Kent
| Ruth Minner | DEM | 27,164 | 57.1 |
| John Burris | REP | 20,073 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Minner +14.9
New Castle
| Ruth Minner | DEM | 127,112 | 60.3 |
| John Burris | REP | 81,311 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Minner +21.7
Sussex
| Ruth Minner | DEM | 37,419 | 57.5 |
| John Burris | REP | 27,219 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Minner +15.7
Adams
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,471 | 51.6 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,864 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +4.8
Allen
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 58,139 | 51.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 53,401 | 46.9 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 2,375 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +4.2
Bartholomew
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 13,526 | 52.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 11,857 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +6.5
Benton
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,019 | 52.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,797 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +5.7
Blackford
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,885 | 59.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,891 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +20.4
Boone
| David McIntosh | REP | 9,776 | 53.6 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,927 | 43.5 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 538 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +10.1
Brown
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,818 | 56.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,780 | 40.8 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 218 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +15.2
Carroll
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,356 | 52.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,771 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +7.1
Cass
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,711 | 51.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,998 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +4.8
Clark
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 24,455 | 66.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 12,258 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +32.9
Clay
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,173 | 61.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,807 | 37.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +23.4
Clinton
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,411 | 49.6 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,289 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +1.1
Crawford
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,714 | 64.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,426 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +30.8
Daviess
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,242 | 54.3 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,319 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +9.6
Dearborn
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,737 | 50.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 8,250 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +2.8
Decatur
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,638 | 50.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,333 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +3.3
De Kalb
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,819 | 50.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,599 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +1.6
Delaware
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 26,896 | 61.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 16,200 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +24.4
Dubois
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,093 | 54.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,790 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +8.7
Elkhart
| David McIntosh | REP | 28,829 | 53.2 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 24,803 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +7.4
Fayette
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,639 | 54.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,783 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +10.0
Floyd
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 19,660 | 65.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 10,140 | 33.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +31.7
Fountain
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,845 | 53.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,295 | 45.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +7.6
Franklin
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,177 | 51.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,876 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +3.7
Fulton
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,533 | 54.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,745 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +9.4
Gibson
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,176 | 59.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,429 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +20.0
Grant
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 13,674 | 52.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 12,132 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +5.9
Greene
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,304 | 59.2 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,885 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +19.6
Hamilton
| David McIntosh | REP | 43,415 | 57.6 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 30,093 | 39.9 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 1,889 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +17.7
Hancock
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 11,096 | 48.6 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 11,066 | 48.5 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 673 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +0.1
Harrison
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 10,168 | 67.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,655 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +36.8
Hendricks
| David McIntosh | REP | 21,828 | 54.4 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 17,303 | 43.1 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 986 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +11.3
Henry
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 10,165 | 55.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 7,830 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +12.8
Howard
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 18,672 | 54.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 14,862 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +11.2
Huntington
| David McIntosh | REP | 7,544 | 52.4 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,610 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +6.5
Jackson
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,221 | 56.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,250 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +13.5
Jasper
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,520 | 50.2 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,364 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +1.4
Jay
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,391 | 54.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,473 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +11.5
Jefferson
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,293 | 62.2 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,301 | 36.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +25.5
Jennings
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,249 | 55.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,086 | 43.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +12.3
Johnson
| David McIntosh | REP | 21,385 | 50.9 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 19,636 | 46.7 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 1,021 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +4.2
Knox
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 9,619 | 64.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,063 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +30.7
Kosciusko
| David McIntosh | REP | 14,748 | 58.6 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 10,035 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +18.7
La Grange
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,195 | 50.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,012 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +2.2
Lake
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 122,784 | 71.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 47,859 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +43.5
La Porte
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 25,816 | 65.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 13,026 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +32.5
Lawrence
| David McIntosh | REP | 8,336 | 52.1 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,436 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +5.6
Madison
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 30,210 | 57.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 21,189 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +17.3
Marion
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 163,077 | 58.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 105,281 | 38.0 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 8,509 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +20.9
Marshall
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,555 | 53.2 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 7,412 | 46.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +7.1
Martin
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,465 | 53.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,040 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +9.3
Miami
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,255 | 49.4 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,209 | 49.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +0.4
Monroe
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 24,033 | 60.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 14,299 | 36.1 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 1,227 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +24.6
Montgomery
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,570 | 50.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,263 | 47.8 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 280 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +2.3
Morgan
| David McIntosh | REP | 11,335 | 51.7 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 10,018 | 45.7 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 559 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +6.0
Newton
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,035 | 55.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,311 | 42.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +13.3
Noble
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 7,081 | 50.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,866 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +1.5
Ohio
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 1,399 | 57.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,026 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +15.2
Orange
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,004 | 54.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,281 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +9.8
Owen
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,474 | 53.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,805 | 43.5 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 172 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +10.4
Parke
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,762 | 58.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,556 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +18.8
Perry
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,902 | 66.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,382 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +34.3
Pike
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,630 | 58.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,504 | 40.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +18.1
Porter
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 36,444 | 62.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 21,575 | 36.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +25.3
Posey
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,614 | 60.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,284 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +21.1
Pulaski
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,748 | 51.7 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,510 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +4.5
Putnam
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,273 | 53.2 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,275 | 44.7 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 254 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +8.5
Randolph
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,346 | 53.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,583 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +7.6
Ripley
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,587 | 52.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,839 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +7.1
Rush
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,744 | 51.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,339 | 45.9 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 187 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +5.6
St Joseph
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 60,608 | 63.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 34,699 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +27.0
Scott
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,445 | 69.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,267 | 29.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +40.8
Shelby
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 8,106 | 53.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,774 | 44.5 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 335 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +8.8
Spencer
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,233 | 58.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,660 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +17.5
Starke
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,171 | 61.8 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,108 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +24.7
Steuben
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,972 | 53.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,069 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +8.0
Sullivan
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,215 | 65.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 2,626 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +32.7
Switzerland
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 1,965 | 61.5 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,174 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +24.8
Tippecanoe
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 25,798 | 56.4 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 18,896 | 41.3 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 1,032 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +15.1
Tipton
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 3,602 | 50.1 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,466 | 48.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +1.9
Union
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,423 | 51.2 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 1,322 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +3.6
Vanderburgh
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 39,533 | 60.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 25,267 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +21.8
Vermillion
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 4,566 | 69.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,912 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +40.3
Vigo
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 24,017 | 66.6 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 11,452 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +34.8
Wabash
| David McIntosh | REP | 6,365 | 49.9 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,215 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +1.2
Warren
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 2,065 | 55.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 1,646 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +11.2
Warrick
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 12,647 | 57.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 9,193 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +15.6
Washington
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,751 | 58.9 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 3,859 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +19.4
Wayne
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 13,061 | 52.3 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 11,617 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +5.8
Wells
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,825 | 51.7 |
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,244 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McIntosh +5.2
White
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 5,385 | 54.6 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 4,328 | 43.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +10.7
Whitley
| Frank L. O'Bannon | DEM | 6,326 | 51.0 |
| David McIntosh | REP | 5,781 | 46.6 |
| Andrew Horning | LIB | 301 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Bannon +4.4
Adair
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,518 | 53.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,473 | 43.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +10.2
Andrew
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,943 | 54.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,142 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +11.1
Atchison
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,610 | 57.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,169 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +15.6
Audrain
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,086 | 51.5 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,576 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +5.2
Barry
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,352 | 59.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,681 | 38.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +21.8
Barton
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,764 | 70.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,535 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +41.5
Bates
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,794 | 49.0 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,783 | 48.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +0.1
Benton
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,944 | 52.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,407 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.2
Bollinger
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,190 | 61.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,910 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +24.8
Boone
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 31,007 | 52.2 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 25,609 | 43.1 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 1,740 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +9.1
Buchanan
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 17,998 | 52.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 15,602 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +6.9
Butler
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,301 | 58.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,657 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +18.6
Caldwell
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,006 | 52.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,701 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.9
Callaway
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 8,129 | 53.4 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 6,641 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +9.8
Camden
| Jim Talent | REP | 9,555 | 56.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 7,059 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +14.7
Cape Girardeau
| Jim Talent | REP | 18,543 | 62.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 10,491 | 35.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +27.1
Carroll
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,643 | 57.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,872 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +16.8
Carter
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,441 | 52.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,153 | 42.2 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 102 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +10.5
Cass
| Jim Talent | REP | 18,777 | 52.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 16,084 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.6
Cedar
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,297 | 58.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,240 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +18.7
Chariton
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,077 | 50.4 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,998 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +1.9
Christian
| Jim Talent | REP | 13,646 | 58.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 9,148 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +19.4
Clark
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,928 | 51.2 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,751 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +4.7
Clay
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 40,747 | 51.3 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 36,983 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +4.7
Clinton
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,313 | 51.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,943 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +4.4
Cole
| Jim Talent | REP | 16,673 | 51.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 15,397 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.9
Cooper
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,641 | 53.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,013 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +9.2
Crawford
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,352 | 52.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,624 | 43.7 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 232 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +8.8
Dade
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,306 | 62.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,337 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +26.2
Dallas
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,429 | 55.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,672 | 43.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +12.2
Daviess
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,768 | 50.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,604 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +4.7
De Kalb
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,129 | 52.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,798 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +8.2
Dent
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,403 | 57.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,401 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +16.9
Douglas
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,317 | 63.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,813 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +28.8
Dunklin
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,875 | 56.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,471 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +13.4
Franklin
| Jim Talent | REP | 21,336 | 54.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 16,216 | 41.6 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 988 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +13.1
Gasconade
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,091 | 61.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,336 | 35.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +26.5
Gentry
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,523 | 49.3 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,522 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +0.0
Greene
| Jim Talent | REP | 54,770 | 53.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 45,612 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +9.0
Grundy
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,029 | 64.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,520 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +32.1
Harrison
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,307 | 60.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,430 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +22.9
Henry
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,072 | 52.4 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,420 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +6.7
Hickory
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,132 | 50.5 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,017 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +2.7
Holt
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,563 | 59.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,031 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +20.1
Howard
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,352 | 52.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,029 | 45.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +7.2
Howell
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,537 | 53.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 6,306 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +8.7
Iron
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,258 | 51.2 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,002 | 45.4 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 92 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +5.8
Jackson
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 165,490 | 61.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 99,064 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +24.5
Jasper
| Jim Talent | REP | 24,335 | 65.3 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 12,203 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +32.6
Jefferson
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 37,808 | 49.3 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 36,060 | 47.0 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 2,071 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +2.3
Johnson
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,219 | 49.3 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 7,964 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +1.5
Knox
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,124 | 55.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 878 | 43.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +12.1
Laclede
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,595 | 58.3 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,115 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +19.0
Lafayette
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,276 | 50.3 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 6,932 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +2.4
Lawrence
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,447 | 58.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,106 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +18.3
Lewis
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,224 | 50.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,154 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +1.6
Lincoln
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,282 | 52.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 7,034 | 44.3 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 417 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.9
Linn
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,003 | 50.3 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,869 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +2.2
Livingston
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,236 | 52.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,873 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +5.8
McDonald
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,216 | 64.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,087 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +32.8
Macon
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,633 | 51.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,355 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.9
Madison
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,210 | 50.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,050 | 46.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.7
Maries
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,897 | 49.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,836 | 47.5 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 92 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +1.6
Marion
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,832 | 50.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,696 | 48.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +1.2
Mercer
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,144 | 64.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 606 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +30.2
Miller
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,343 | 57.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,684 | 39.4 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 246 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +17.7
Mississippi
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,936 | 56.8 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,170 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +14.8
Moniteau
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,217 | 53.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,689 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +8.7
Monroe
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,214 | 54.2 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,801 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +10.1
Montgomery
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,857 | 54.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,198 | 41.7 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 188 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +12.5
Morgan
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,207 | 53.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,424 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +10.0
New Madrid
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,148 | 57.5 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,978 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +16.2
Newton
| Jim Talent | REP | 13,917 | 66.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 6,780 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +33.9
Nodaway
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,425 | 49.5 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,294 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +1.5
Oregon
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,187 | 51.7 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,938 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +5.9
Osage
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,450 | 55.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,646 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +13.0
Ozark
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,502 | 58.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,644 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +20.1
Pemiscot
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,784 | 63.8 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,053 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +29.2
Perry
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,735 | 65.3 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,419 | 33.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +32.0
Pettis
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,536 | 54.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 6,692 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +11.8
Phelps
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,280 | 51.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 7,345 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +5.8
Pike
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,717 | 50.7 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,427 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +4.0
Platte
| Jim Talent | REP | 16,971 | 50.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 16,115 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +2.5
Polk
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,996 | 58.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,068 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +18.9
Pulaski
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,533 | 52.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,738 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.6
Putnam
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,531 | 66.4 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 752 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +33.8
Ralls
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,347 | 51.7 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,145 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +4.4
Randolph
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,897 | 53.6 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,066 | 44.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +9.1
Ray
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,407 | 55.8 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,045 | 41.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +14.1
Reynolds
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,480 | 48.4 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,416 | 46.3 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 130 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +2.1
Ripley
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,651 | 53.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,211 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +8.8
St Charles
| Jim Talent | REP | 74,357 | 58.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 50,415 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +18.8
St Clair
| Jim Talent | REP | 2,405 | 50.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,245 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.4
Ste. Genevieve
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,554 | 48.8 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,525 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +0.4
St Francois
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 9,425 | 50.2 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,712 | 46.4 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 476 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +3.8
St Louis
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 239,341 | 49.3 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 233,031 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +1.3
Saline
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,245 | 56.1 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,945 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +13.9
Schuyler
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,006 | 50.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 946 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.0
Scotland
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,129 | 53.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 962 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.8
Scott
| Jim Talent | REP | 8,159 | 52.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 7,293 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +5.5
Shannon
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,031 | 54.5 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,623 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +11.0
Shelby
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,668 | 51.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,547 | 47.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.7
Stoddard
| Jim Talent | REP | 6,537 | 52.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,689 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +6.9
Stone
| Jim Talent | REP | 7,338 | 60.9 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,484 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +23.7
Sullivan
| Jim Talent | REP | 1,755 | 58.1 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 1,218 | 40.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +17.8
Taney
| Jim Talent | REP | 9,003 | 60.0 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 5,594 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +22.7
Texas
| Jim Talent | REP | 5,030 | 50.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,709 | 47.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +3.2
Vernon
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,370 | 52.5 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 3,763 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +7.3
Warren
| Jim Talent | REP | 6,060 | 56.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,318 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +16.3
Washington
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,110 | 49.9 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,536 | 42.9 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 514 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +7.0
Wayne
| Jim Talent | REP | 3,008 | 51.8 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,684 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +5.6
Webster
| Jim Talent | REP | 6,721 | 56.7 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 4,904 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +15.3
Worth
| Jim Talent | REP | 557 | 49.2 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 552 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +0.4
Wright
| Jim Talent | REP | 4,872 | 62.6 |
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 2,783 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Talent +26.8
St Louis City
| Robert Lee Holden Jr. | DEM | 89,680 | 72.4 |
| Jim Talent | REP | 25,710 | 20.8 |
| Larry Rice | IND | 6,598 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Holden +51.7
Beaverhead
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,889 | 68.8 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,246 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +39.1
Big Horn
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,699 | 64.8 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,402 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +31.1
Blaine
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,610 | 58.5 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,102 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +18.5
Broadwater
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,316 | 63.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 707 | 34.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +29.5
Carbon
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,739 | 56.4 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,019 | 41.6 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 101 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +14.8
Carter
| Judy Martz | REP | 515 | 81.7 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 106 | 16.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +64.9
Cascade
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 18,096 | 54.5 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 14,479 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +10.9
Chouteau
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,722 | 59.7 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,112 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +21.1
Custer
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,582 | 51.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,333 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +5.0
Daniels
| Judy Martz | REP | 691 | 63.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 377 | 34.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +29.0
Dawson
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,433 | 57.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,760 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +15.8
Deer Lodge
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 3,297 | 72.0 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,218 | 26.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +45.4
Fallon
| Judy Martz | REP | 870 | 65.7 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 426 | 32.2 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 29 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +33.5
Fergus
| Judy Martz | REP | 3,829 | 63.7 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,061 | 34.3 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 122 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +29.4
Flathead
| Judy Martz | REP | 20,593 | 61.2 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 12,298 | 36.6 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 749 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +24.7
Gallatin
| Judy Martz | REP | 16,909 | 52.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 14,438 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +7.7
Garfield
| Judy Martz | REP | 597 | 81.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 125 | 17.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +64.7
Glacier
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,700 | 64.4 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,410 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +30.8
Golden Valley
| Judy Martz | REP | 382 | 71.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 137 | 25.8 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 12 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +46.1
Granite
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,010 | 63.7 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 528 | 33.3 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 48 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +30.4
Hill
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 3,858 | 58.9 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,544 | 38.9 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 145 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +20.1
Jefferson
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,967 | 57.6 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,086 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +17.1
Judith Basin
| Judy Martz | REP | 905 | 65.2 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 459 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +32.2
Lake
| Judy Martz | REP | 5,983 | 52.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 5,179 | 45.3 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 268 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +7.0
Lewis and Clark
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 13,704 | 50.2 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 13,185 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +1.9
Liberty
| Judy Martz | REP | 652 | 62.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 374 | 35.7 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 21 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +26.6
Lincoln
| Judy Martz | REP | 4,735 | 60.6 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,833 | 36.3 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 241 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +24.4
McCone
| Judy Martz | REP | 699 | 61.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 429 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +23.7
Madison
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,468 | 67.5 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,115 | 30.5 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 75 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +37.0
Meagher
| Judy Martz | REP | 656 | 70.2 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 258 | 27.6 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 21 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +42.6
Mineral
| Judy Martz | REP | 836 | 51.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 744 | 45.7 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 49 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +5.6
Missoula
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 27,034 | 58.4 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 18,215 | 39.3 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 1,052 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +19.0
Musselshell
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,371 | 62.5 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 766 | 34.9 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 56 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +27.6
Park
| Judy Martz | REP | 4,004 | 54.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 3,243 | 43.8 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 157 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +10.3
Petroleum
| Judy Martz | REP | 235 | 75.8 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 70 | 22.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +53.2
Phillips
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,598 | 72.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 589 | 26.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +45.5
Pondera
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,569 | 53.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,300 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +9.2
Powder River
| Judy Martz | REP | 745 | 75.8 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 229 | 23.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +52.5
Powell
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,688 | 59.5 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,077 | 37.9 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 74 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +21.5
Prairie
| Judy Martz | REP | 498 | 67.2 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 231 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +36.0
Ravalli
| Judy Martz | REP | 9,772 | 57.0 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 6,982 | 40.8 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 375 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +16.3
Richland
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,658 | 66.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,293 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +33.9
Roosevelt
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 2,417 | 63.1 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,369 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +27.3
Rosebud
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,955 | 56.0 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,466 | 42.0 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 71 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +14.0
Sanders
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,633 | 56.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,911 | 40.9 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 132 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +15.4
Sheridan
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,052 | 54.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 868 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +9.5
Silver Bow
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 10,837 | 64.5 |
| Judy Martz | REP | 5,750 | 34.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
O'Keefe +30.3
Stillwater
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,417 | 62.1 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,392 | 35.8 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 83 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +26.3
Sweet Grass
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,382 | 75.4 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 422 | 23.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +52.3
Teton
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,892 | 57.3 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,360 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +16.1
Toole
| Judy Martz | REP | 1,283 | 53.5 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,071 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +8.8
Treasure
| Judy Martz | REP | 306 | 64.4 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 163 | 34.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +30.1
Valley
| Judy Martz | REP | 2,137 | 53.8 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 1,750 | 44.0 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 86 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +9.7
Wheatland
| Judy Martz | REP | 688 | 68.9 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 298 | 29.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +39.1
Wibaux
| Judy Martz | REP | 302 | 59.8 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 187 | 37.0 |
| Stan Jones | LIB | 16 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +22.8
Yellowstone
| Judy Martz | REP | 29,787 | 52.0 |
| Mark O'Keefe | DEM | 26,572 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Martz +5.6
Belknap
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 12,980 | 48.3 |
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 11,994 | 44.7 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 1,664 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Humphrey +3.7
Carroll
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 11,691 | 49.5 |
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 10,363 | 43.9 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 1,260 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Humphrey +5.6
Cheshire
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 17,734 | 53.7 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 12,554 | 38.0 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 2,245 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +15.7
Coos
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 7,011 | 48.2 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 6,470 | 44.5 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 896 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +3.7
Grafton
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 18,425 | 48.3 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 17,030 | 44.7 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 2,066 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +3.7
Hillsborough
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 78,522 | 47.6 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 75,067 | 45.5 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 9,523 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +2.1
Merrimack
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 33,571 | 52.9 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 24,479 | 38.6 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 4,766 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +14.3
Rockingham
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 61,247 | 46.3 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 60,837 | 46.0 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 8,743 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +0.3
Strafford
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 28,044 | 57.0 |
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 17,234 | 35.0 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 3,326 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +22.0
Sullivan
| Gordon Humphrey | REP | 8,610 | 46.8 |
| Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 8,127 | 44.2 |
| Mary Brown | IND | 1,415 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Humphrey +2.6
Alamance
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 24,447 | 51.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 22,180 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +4.8
Alexander
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,218 | 59.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,381 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +20.6
Alleghany
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,293 | 53.2 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,938 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +8.2
Anson
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,473 | 67.9 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,481 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +37.1
Ashe
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,494 | 52.3 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,831 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +6.3
Avery
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,343 | 64.7 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,187 | 32.6 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 151 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +32.1
Beaufort
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,108 | 51.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,438 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +3.8
Bertie
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,568 | 76.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,679 | 23.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +53.3
Bladen
| Mike Easley | DEM | 7,689 | 70.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,112 | 28.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +41.9
Brunswick
| Mike Easley | DEM | 16,685 | 57.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 11,682 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +17.3
Buncombe
| Mike Easley | DEM | 43,436 | 50.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 39,802 | 46.3 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 2,252 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +4.2
Burke
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 15,068 | 52.0 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 13,408 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +5.7
Cabarrus
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 29,641 | 59.1 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 19,540 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +20.2
Caldwell
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 14,958 | 56.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,963 | 41.2 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 580 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +15.0
Camden
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,621 | 57.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,121 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +17.8
Carteret
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 13,536 | 52.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 11,786 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +6.8
Caswell
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,968 | 59.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,349 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +19.2
Catawba
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 30,595 | 59.4 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 20,001 | 38.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +20.6
Chatham
| Mike Easley | DEM | 12,371 | 57.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,746 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +16.8
Cherokee
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,492 | 56.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,050 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +14.9
Chowan
| Mike Easley | DEM | 3,057 | 63.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,636 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +29.5
Clay
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,238 | 56.9 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,597 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +16.3
Cleveland
| Mike Easley | DEM | 17,218 | 51.8 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 15,586 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +4.9
Columbus
| Mike Easley | DEM | 13,689 | 72.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,964 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +46.2
Craven
| Mike Easley | DEM | 15,970 | 50.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 15,531 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +1.4
Cumberland
| Mike Easley | DEM | 46,386 | 59.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 30,952 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +19.7
Currituck
| Mike Easley | DEM | 3,389 | 50.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,074 | 46.0 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 185 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +4.7
Dare
| Mike Easley | DEM | 7,589 | 57.9 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,195 | 39.6 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 270 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +18.3
Davidson
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 28,583 | 55.0 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 22,505 | 43.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +11.7
Davie
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,377 | 60.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,214 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +22.7
Duplin
| Mike Easley | DEM | 8,291 | 56.9 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 6,148 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +14.7
Durham
| Mike Easley | DEM | 59,667 | 69.2 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 25,250 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +39.9
Edgecombe
| Mike Easley | DEM | 13,753 | 73.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,864 | 26.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +47.5
Forsyth
| Mike Easley | DEM | 62,677 | 51.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 56,369 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +5.2
Franklin
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,528 | 58.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 6,515 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +18.5
Gaston
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 35,101 | 58.8 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 23,572 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +19.3
Gates
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,473 | 70.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 974 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +42.6
Graham
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,874 | 55.0 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,471 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +11.8
Granville
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,706 | 63.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,461 | 35.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +27.7
Greene
| Mike Easley | DEM | 3,435 | 59.2 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,329 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +19.1
Guilford
| Mike Easley | DEM | 94,523 | 56.2 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 70,922 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +14.0
Halifax
| Mike Easley | DEM | 12,691 | 71.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,927 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +43.7
Harnett
| Mike Easley | DEM | 13,037 | 52.9 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 11,277 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +7.1
Haywood
| Mike Easley | DEM | 12,698 | 55.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 9,853 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +12.3
Henderson
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 23,043 | 59.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 15,138 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +20.3
Hertford
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,193 | 79.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,587 | 20.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +58.7
Hoke
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,797 | 69.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,469 | 29.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +39.7
Hyde
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,396 | 63.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 774 | 35.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +28.3
Iredell
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 26,496 | 57.7 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 18,620 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +17.2
Jackson
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,695 | 54.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,258 | 42.9 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 250 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +11.7
Johnston
| Mike Easley | DEM | 21,369 | 50.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 20,214 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +2.7
Jones
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,309 | 57.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,658 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +16.3
Lee
| Mike Easley | DEM | 8,856 | 54.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 7,230 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +10.0
Lenoir
| Mike Easley | DEM | 12,802 | 59.8 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,499 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +20.1
Lincoln
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 14,003 | 56.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,465 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +14.2
McDowell
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 7,336 | 52.1 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,458 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +6.2
Macon
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 7,231 | 53.8 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,930 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +9.7
Madison
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,352 | 52.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,748 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +7.3
Martin
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,563 | 68.2 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,005 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +37.0
Mecklenburg
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 133,728 | 50.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 126,480 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +2.7
Mitchell
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,540 | 68.3 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,971 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +38.6
Montgomery
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,194 | 56.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,861 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +14.5
Moore
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 17,738 | 55.4 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 14,032 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +11.6
Nash
| Mike Easley | DEM | 18,261 | 58.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 12,953 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +16.9
New Hanover
| Mike Easley | DEM | 36,971 | 55.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 27,992 | 42.1 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 1,332 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +13.5
Northampton
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,636 | 77.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,850 | 21.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +55.8
Onslow
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 15,804 | 52.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 13,622 | 45.0 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 720 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +7.2
Orange
| Mike Easley | DEM | 33,837 | 67.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 15,528 | 30.7 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 1,042 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +36.3
Pamlico
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,852 | 54.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,325 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +10.0
Pasquotank
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,995 | 65.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 3,576 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +31.8
Pender
| Mike Easley | DEM | 7,993 | 56.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 6,052 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +13.6
Perquimans
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,604 | 61.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,548 | 36.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +24.9
Person
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,800 | 56.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 5,071 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +14.4
Pitt
| Mike Easley | DEM | 25,738 | 59.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 16,969 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +20.3
Polk
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,395 | 53.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 3,559 | 43.4 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 201 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +10.2
Randolph
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 26,235 | 60.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 16,410 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +22.7
Richmond
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,658 | 61.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,567 | 29.0 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 1,454 | 9.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +32.4
Robeson
| Mike Easley | DEM | 23,118 | 74.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 7,517 | 24.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +50.2
Rockingham
| Mike Easley | DEM | 17,525 | 53.5 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 14,681 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +8.7
Rowan
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 24,978 | 56.1 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 18,643 | 41.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +14.2
Rutherford
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 10,736 | 50.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,190 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +2.6
Sampson
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,943 | 56.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,455 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +12.7
Scotland
| Mike Easley | DEM | 6,777 | 70.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 2,759 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +41.7
Stanly
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 13,015 | 57.7 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,197 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +16.9
Stokes
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 9,841 | 55.9 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 7,488 | 42.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +13.4
Surry
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 12,602 | 54.0 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,454 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +9.2
Swain
| Mike Easley | DEM | 2,437 | 55.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,855 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +13.3
Transylvania
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,219 | 57.9 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,557 | 39.1 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 355 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +18.7
Tyrrell
| Mike Easley | DEM | 1,118 | 73.0 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 402 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +46.8
Union
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 28,892 | 61.9 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 16,986 | 36.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +25.5
Vance
| Mike Easley | DEM | 8,875 | 67.7 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,147 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +36.1
Wake
| Mike Easley | DEM | 150,014 | 55.1 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 117,283 | 43.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +12.0
Warren
| Mike Easley | DEM | 5,138 | 73.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,804 | 25.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +47.6
Washington
| Mike Easley | DEM | 3,526 | 68.3 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 1,581 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +37.7
Watauga
| Mike Easley | DEM | 9,177 | 48.4 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 9,015 | 47.6 |
| Barbara Howe | LIB | 624 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +0.9
Wayne
| Mike Easley | DEM | 17,526 | 50.8 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 16,608 | 48.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +2.7
Wilkes
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 14,463 | 57.2 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 10,448 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +15.9
Wilson
| Mike Easley | DEM | 15,463 | 60.9 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 9,706 | 38.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +22.7
Yadkin
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 8,719 | 62.6 |
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,980 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vinroot +26.8
Yancey
| Mike Easley | DEM | 4,513 | 50.6 |
| Richard Vinroot | REP | 4,259 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Easley +2.8
Adams
| John Hoeven | REP | 601 | 50.7 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 585 | 49.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +1.3
Barnes
| John Hoeven | REP | 3,060 | 53.1 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 2,702 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +6.2
Benson
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,332 | 61.1 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 849 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +22.1
Billings
| John Hoeven | REP | 345 | 65.1 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 183 | 34.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +30.6
Bottineau
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,137 | 58.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,550 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +15.9
Bowman
| John Hoeven | REP | 915 | 61.6 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 570 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +23.2
Burke
| John Hoeven | REP | 601 | 57.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 443 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +15.1
Burleigh
| John Hoeven | REP | 21,781 | 63.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 12,771 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +26.1
Cass
| John Hoeven | REP | 31,930 | 54.1 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 27,078 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +8.2
Cavalier
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,350 | 56.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,045 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +12.7
Dickey
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,631 | 58.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,159 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +16.9
Divide
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 420 | 52.0 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 387 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +4.1
Dunn
| John Hoeven | REP | 960 | 55.2 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 779 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +10.4
Eddy
| John Hoeven | REP | 650 | 50.8 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 630 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +1.6
Emmons
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,355 | 67.4 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 654 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +34.9
Foster
| John Hoeven | REP | 991 | 56.9 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 751 | 43.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +13.8
Golden Valley
| John Hoeven | REP | 539 | 66.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 274 | 33.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +32.6
Grand Forks
| John Hoeven | REP | 14,405 | 50.9 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 13,882 | 49.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +1.8
Grant
| John Hoeven | REP | 952 | 66.2 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 486 | 33.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +32.4
Griggs
| John Hoeven | REP | 814 | 54.7 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 675 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +9.3
Hettinger
| John Hoeven | REP | 888 | 58.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 642 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +16.1
Kidder
| John Hoeven | REP | 814 | 63.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 469 | 36.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +26.8
La Moure
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,430 | 57.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,065 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +14.6
Logan
| John Hoeven | REP | 795 | 68.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 366 | 31.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +37.0
McHenry
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,499 | 54.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,263 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +8.5
McIntosh
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,163 | 69.4 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 512 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +38.9
McKenzie
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,281 | 54.4 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,074 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +8.8
McLean
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,700 | 57.6 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,984 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +15.3
Mercer
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,605 | 59.4 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,784 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +18.7
Morton
| John Hoeven | REP | 6,303 | 56.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 4,953 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +12.0
Mountrail
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,684 | 57.7 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,233 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +15.5
Nelson
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,008 | 54.0 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 860 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +7.9
Oliver
| John Hoeven | REP | 639 | 60.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 418 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +20.9
Pembina
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,005 | 52.9 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,788 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +5.7
Pierce
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,192 | 59.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 810 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +19.1
Ramsey
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,649 | 52.7 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 2,374 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +5.5
Ransom
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,684 | 61.6 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,049 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +23.2
Renville
| John Hoeven | REP | 765 | 57.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 577 | 43.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +14.0
Richland
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 4,202 | 52.0 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 3,884 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +3.9
Rolette
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 3,189 | 72.6 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,201 | 27.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +45.3
Sargent
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 1,300 | 58.8 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 910 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +17.6
Sheridan
| John Hoeven | REP | 635 | 68.1 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 297 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +36.3
Sioux
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 861 | 80.8 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 204 | 19.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +61.7
Slope
| John Hoeven | REP | 250 | 55.8 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 198 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +11.6
Stark
| John Hoeven | REP | 5,791 | 59.1 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 4,013 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +18.1
Steele
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 661 | 54.7 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 548 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +9.3
Stutsman
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,810 | 52.4 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 4,365 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +4.9
Towner
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 631 | 52.4 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 573 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +4.8
Traill
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 2,204 | 53.1 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,948 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heitkamp +6.2
Walsh
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,748 | 51.0 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 2,635 | 49.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +2.1
Ward
| John Hoeven | REP | 13,589 | 60.3 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 8,932 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +20.7
Wells
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,448 | 59.9 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 969 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +19.8
Williams
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,593 | 58.5 |
| Heidi Heitkamp | DEM | 3,263 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +16.9
Beaver
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,396 | 62.7 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 798 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +26.8
Box Elder
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 9,910 | 64.8 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 5,107 | 33.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +31.4
Cache
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 23,949 | 73.3 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 8,264 | 25.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +48.0
Carbon
| Bill Orton | DEM | 4,630 | 63.6 |
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,566 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orton +28.3
Daggett
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 246 | 58.2 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 175 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +16.8
Davis
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 54,324 | 62.7 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 30,972 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +27.0
Duchesne
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,597 | 57.3 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,857 | 41.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +16.3
Emery
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,493 | 56.1 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,867 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +14.1
Garfield
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,224 | 64.1 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 629 | 32.9 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 58 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +31.1
Grand
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,771 | 50.6 |
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,630 | 46.5 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 102 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orton +4.0
Iron
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 8,472 | 68.4 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 3,450 | 27.9 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 457 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +40.6
Juab
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,524 | 55.9 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,134 | 41.6 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 70 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +14.3
Kane
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,881 | 68.7 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 760 | 27.7 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 98 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +40.9
Millard
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,862 | 60.5 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,733 | 36.7 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 133 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +23.9
Morgan
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 1,862 | 58.9 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,243 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +19.6
Piute
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 536 | 70.8 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 211 | 27.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +42.9
Rich
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 553 | 61.6 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 341 | 38.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +23.6
Salt Lake
| Bill Orton | DEM | 157,564 | 51.7 |
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 141,698 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orton +5.2
San Juan
| Bill Orton | DEM | 2,424 | 51.2 |
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,213 | 46.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orton +4.5
Sanpete
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 4,498 | 61.2 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 2,596 | 35.3 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 261 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +25.9
Sevier
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 4,858 | 69.7 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 1,971 | 28.3 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 145 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +41.4
Summit
| Bill Orton | DEM | 6,819 | 57.3 |
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 4,914 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orton +16.0
Tooele
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 6,318 | 51.3 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 5,804 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +4.2
Uintah
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 5,026 | 61.1 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 3,018 | 36.7 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 180 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +24.4
Utah
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 79,626 | 67.2 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 36,202 | 30.6 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 2,639 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +36.7
Wasatch
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 2,895 | 51.4 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 2,662 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +4.1
Washington
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 21,693 | 68.1 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 9,059 | 28.5 |
| Jeremy Friedbaum | IND | 1,085 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +39.7
Wayne
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 733 | 62.0 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 450 | 38.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +23.9
Weber
| Michael Leavitt | REP | 32,340 | 52.2 |
| Bill Orton | DEM | 28,468 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leavitt +6.3
Addison
| Howard Dean | DEM | 9,388 | 54.0 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 6,097 | 35.1 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,578 | 9.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +18.9
Bennington
| Howard Dean | DEM | 8,312 | 47.3 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 7,658 | 43.6 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,085 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +3.7
Caledonia
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 6,389 | 46.9 |
| Howard Dean | DEM | 5,399 | 39.6 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,644 | 12.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dwyer +7.3
Chittenden
| Howard Dean | DEM | 41,599 | 58.0 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 22,425 | 31.3 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 6,901 | 9.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +26.8
Essex
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 1,671 | 58.0 |
| Howard Dean | DEM | 891 | 30.9 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 214 | 7.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dwyer +27.1
Franklin
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 8,815 | 45.9 |
| Howard Dean | DEM | 8,318 | 43.3 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,818 | 9.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dwyer +2.6
Grand Isle
| Howard Dean | DEM | 1,659 | 45.5 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 1,596 | 43.8 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 327 | 9.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +1.7
Lamoille
| Howard Dean | DEM | 5,577 | 49.4 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 4,164 | 36.9 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,381 | 12.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +12.5
Orange
| Howard Dean | DEM | 6,905 | 47.0 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 6,514 | 44.3 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,063 | 7.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +2.7
Orleans
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 6,004 | 49.5 |
| Howard Dean | DEM | 4,403 | 36.3 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 1,566 | 12.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dwyer +13.2
Rutland
| Howard Dean | DEM | 13,039 | 44.5 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 12,551 | 42.8 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 2,082 | 7.1 |
| Phil Stannard Sr. | IND | 1,133 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +1.7
Washington
| Howard Dean | DEM | 14,935 | 50.3 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 10,437 | 35.1 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 3,919 | 13.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +15.1
Windham
| Howard Dean | DEM | 11,085 | 51.8 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 7,245 | 33.9 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 2,513 | 11.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +18.0
Windsor
| Howard Dean | DEM | 16,549 | 57.0 |
| Ruth Dwyer | REP | 9,793 | 33.8 |
| Anthony Pollina | PRO | 2,025 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dean +23.3
Adams
| John Carlson | REP | 2,629 | 53.2 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 2,250 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +7.7
Asotin
| Gary Locke | DEM | 4,718 | 59.6 |
| John Carlson | REP | 3,070 | 38.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +20.8
Benton
| John Carlson | REP | 29,245 | 49.3 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 28,892 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +0.6
Chelan
| John Carlson | REP | 14,970 | 56.8 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 10,984 | 41.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +15.1
Clallam
| Gary Locke | DEM | 17,128 | 53.9 |
| John Carlson | REP | 13,795 | 43.4 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 839 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +10.5
Clark
| Gary Locke | DEM | 71,998 | 54.2 |
| John Carlson | REP | 57,464 | 43.3 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 3,382 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +10.9
Columbia
| John Carlson | REP | 1,116 | 53.2 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 950 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +7.9
Cowlitz
| Gary Locke | DEM | 20,919 | 57.3 |
| John Carlson | REP | 14,589 | 40.0 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 1,010 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +17.3
Douglas
| John Carlson | REP | 7,454 | 58.1 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 5,149 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +18.0
Ferry
| John Carlson | REP | 1,624 | 53.9 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 1,254 | 41.6 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 135 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +12.3
Franklin
| John Carlson | REP | 6,832 | 49.1 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 6,757 | 48.5 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 333 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +0.5
Garfield
| John Carlson | REP | 646 | 48.6 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 644 | 48.4 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 40 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +0.2
Grant
| John Carlson | REP | 13,673 | 57.7 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 9,491 | 40.1 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 531 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +17.6
Grays Harbor
| Gary Locke | DEM | 15,817 | 60.9 |
| John Carlson | REP | 9,566 | 36.8 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 578 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +24.1
Island
| Gary Locke | DEM | 17,736 | 54.3 |
| John Carlson | REP | 14,381 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +10.3
Jefferson
| Gary Locke | DEM | 9,712 | 61.7 |
| John Carlson | REP | 5,628 | 35.8 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 398 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +25.9
King
| Gary Locke | DEM | 522,229 | 66.5 |
| John Carlson | REP | 250,103 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +34.6
Kitsap
| Gary Locke | DEM | 58,603 | 56.9 |
| John Carlson | REP | 42,358 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +15.8
Kittitas
| John Carlson | REP | 7,262 | 51.9 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 6,423 | 45.9 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 315 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +6.0
Klickitat
| Gary Locke | DEM | 4,278 | 53.5 |
| John Carlson | REP | 3,468 | 43.4 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 253 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +10.1
Lewis
| John Carlson | REP | 16,422 | 55.2 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 12,545 | 42.2 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 777 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +13.0
Lincoln
| John Carlson | REP | 2,984 | 57.6 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 2,083 | 40.2 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 115 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +17.4
Mason
| Gary Locke | DEM | 12,319 | 55.3 |
| John Carlson | REP | 9,473 | 42.5 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 497 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +12.8
Okanogan
| John Carlson | REP | 8,559 | 58.4 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 5,626 | 38.4 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 481 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +20.0
Pacific
| Gary Locke | DEM | 5,519 | 58.7 |
| John Carlson | REP | 3,643 | 38.7 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 244 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +19.9
Pend Oreille
| Gary Locke | DEM | 2,621 | 48.8 |
| John Carlson | REP | 2,590 | 48.2 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 164 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +0.6
Pierce
| Gary Locke | DEM | 148,450 | 55.6 |
| John Carlson | REP | 113,633 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +13.0
San Juan
| Gary Locke | DEM | 5,385 | 64.8 |
| John Carlson | REP | 2,684 | 32.3 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 237 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +32.5
Skagit
| Gary Locke | DEM | 24,191 | 53.7 |
| John Carlson | REP | 19,990 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +9.3
Skamania
| Gary Locke | DEM | 2,148 | 53.2 |
| John Carlson | REP | 1,656 | 41.1 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 230 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +12.2
Snohomish
| Gary Locke | DEM | 142,196 | 56.9 |
| John Carlson | REP | 102,993 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +15.7
Spokane
| Gary Locke | DEM | 99,492 | 57.8 |
| John Carlson | REP | 69,848 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +17.2
Stevens
| John Carlson | REP | 9,871 | 55.4 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 7,426 | 41.6 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 536 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +13.7
Thurston
| Gary Locke | DEM | 58,915 | 61.1 |
| John Carlson | REP | 35,404 | 36.7 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 2,147 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +24.4
Wahkiakum
| Gary Locke | DEM | 1,112 | 57.0 |
| John Carlson | REP | 770 | 39.5 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 69 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +17.5
Walla Walla
| Gary Locke | DEM | 10,869 | 51.3 |
| John Carlson | REP | 9,936 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +4.4
Whatcom
| Gary Locke | DEM | 42,313 | 58.2 |
| John Carlson | REP | 28,861 | 39.7 |
| Steve LePage | LIB | 1,500 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +18.5
Whitman
| Gary Locke | DEM | 9,113 | 56.8 |
| John Carlson | REP | 6,676 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Locke +15.2
Yakima
| John Carlson | REP | 34,194 | 49.5 |
| Gary Locke | DEM | 33,718 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Carlson +0.7
Barbour
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,052 | 50.3 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,900 | 47.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +2.5
Berkeley
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 12,221 | 53.3 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 10,045 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +9.5
Boone
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,193 | 67.4 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,865 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +36.2
Braxton
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,419 | 64.2 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,848 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +29.5
Brooke
| Bob Wise | DEM | 4,908 | 52.0 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 4,317 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +6.3
Cabell
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 15,661 | 48.6 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 15,190 | 47.1 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 803 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +1.5
Calhoun
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,411 | 53.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,124 | 42.7 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 77 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +10.9
Clay
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,115 | 58.4 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,420 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +19.2
Doddridge
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,878 | 66.0 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 906 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +34.2
Fayette
| Bob Wise | DEM | 8,746 | 59.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 5,520 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +22.0
Gilmer
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,418 | 51.7 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,231 | 44.9 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 68 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +6.8
Grant
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,453 | 77.2 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 957 | 21.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +55.8
Greenbrier
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 6,443 | 50.3 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 5,896 | 46.0 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 311 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +4.3
Hampshire
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,648 | 60.1 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,245 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +23.1
Hancock
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,926 | 54.0 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 5,660 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +9.9
Hardy
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,991 | 67.3 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,377 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +36.3
Harrison
| Bob Wise | DEM | 14,417 | 54.2 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 11,606 | 43.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +10.6
Jackson
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,155 | 53.3 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 5,157 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +8.6
Jefferson
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,772 | 47.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 6,598 | 46.4 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 427 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +1.2
Kanawha
| Bob Wise | DEM | 43,312 | 56.5 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 30,571 | 39.9 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 2,172 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +16.6
Lewis
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,368 | 54.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,686 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +11.1
Lincoln
| Bob Wise | DEM | 4,498 | 60.0 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,841 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +22.1
Logan
| Bob Wise | DEM | 8,692 | 59.0 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 5,889 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +19.0
McDowell
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,723 | 50.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,570 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +2.1
Marion
| Bob Wise | DEM | 13,078 | 57.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 9,207 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +17.0
Marshall
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,832 | 50.4 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 6,406 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +3.1
Mason
| Bob Wise | DEM | 6,569 | 58.2 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 4,512 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +18.2
Mercer
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 9,786 | 51.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 8,728 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +5.6
Mineral
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 5,525 | 56.6 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 4,022 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +15.4
Mingo
| Bob Wise | DEM | 5,737 | 56.7 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 4,286 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +14.3
Monongalia
| Bob Wise | DEM | 13,089 | 48.1 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 12,673 | 46.6 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 916 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +1.5
Monroe
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,721 | 52.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,301 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +8.2
Morgan
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,240 | 57.5 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,219 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +18.1
Nicholas
| Bob Wise | DEM | 5,144 | 59.5 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,366 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +20.6
Ohio
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 9,690 | 53.8 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 7,833 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +10.3
Pendleton
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,834 | 58.0 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,285 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +17.4
Pleasants
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,886 | 58.6 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,286 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +18.7
Pocahontas
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,692 | 48.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,654 | 47.8 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 70 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +1.1
Preston
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 6,231 | 59.7 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,920 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +22.1
Putnam
| Bob Wise | DEM | 9,991 | 48.5 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 9,969 | 48.4 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 467 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +0.1
Raleigh
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 12,072 | 50.1 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 11,435 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +2.6
Randolph
| Bob Wise | DEM | 5,219 | 54.6 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 4,071 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +12.0
Ritchie
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,524 | 65.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,210 | 31.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +34.3
Roane
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,988 | 52.7 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,505 | 44.1 |
| Denise Giardina | MOU | 156 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +8.5
Summers
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,459 | 52.0 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,145 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +6.6
Taylor
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,991 | 51.0 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,690 | 45.9 |
| Bob Myers | LIB | 136 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +5.1
Tucker
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,661 | 49.2 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,630 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +0.9
Tyler
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 2,921 | 73.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 960 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +49.6
Upshur
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 4,333 | 52.9 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 3,669 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +8.1
Wayne
| Bob Wise | DEM | 8,787 | 54.2 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 7,103 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +10.4
Webster
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,204 | 66.1 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,084 | 32.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +33.6
Wetzel
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,292 | 51.8 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 2,962 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +5.2
Wirt
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 1,261 | 52.8 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 1,099 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +6.8
Wood
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 19,474 | 57.6 |
| Bob Wise | DEM | 13,673 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Underwood +17.2
Wyoming
| Bob Wise | DEM | 4,390 | 55.8 |
| Cecil Underwood | REP | 3,385 | 43.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wise +12.8