Alaska
Dan Sullivan | REP | 119,579 | 48.8 |
Mark Begich | DEM | 111,668 | 45.6 |
Mark Fish | LIB | 9,026 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sullivan +3.2
Autauga
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Baldwin
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Barbour
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Bibb
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Blount
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Bullock
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Butler
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Calhoun
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Chambers
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Cherokee
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Chilton
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Choctaw
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Clarke
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Clay
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Cleburne
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Coffee
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Colbert
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Conecuh
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Coosa
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Covington
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Crenshaw
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Cullman
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Dale
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Dallas
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
DeKalb
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Elmore
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Escambia
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Etowah
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Fayette
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Franklin
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Geneva
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Greene
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Hale
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Henry
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Houston
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Jackson
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Jefferson
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Lamar
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Lauderdale
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Lawrence
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Lee
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Limestone
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Lowndes
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Macon
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Madison
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Marengo
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Marion
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Marshall
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Mobile
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Monroe
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Montgomery
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Morgan
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Perry
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Pickens
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Pike
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Randolph
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Russell
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Shelby
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
St. Clair
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Sumter
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Talladega
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Tallapoosa
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Tuscaloosa
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Walker
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Washington
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Wilcox
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Winston
0.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sessions +100.0
Arkansas
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,590 | 50.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,358 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +4.6
Ashley
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,267 | 52.5 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,775 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +7.9
Baxter
Tom Cotton | REP | 9,936 | 66.5 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 4,356 | 29.2 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 344 | 2.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 303 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +37.4
Benton
Tom Cotton | REP | 41,901 | 67.5 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 17,265 | 27.8 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 1,635 | 2.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 1,314 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +39.7
Boone
Tom Cotton | REP | 7,567 | 68.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,884 | 26.3 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 272 | 2.5 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 259 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +42.6
Bradley
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,422 | 50.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,299 | 46.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 63 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +4.4
Calhoun
Tom Cotton | REP | 881 | 55.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 654 | 40.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 37 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +14.2
Carroll
Tom Cotton | REP | 4,690 | 58.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,981 | 37.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 220 | 2.7 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 171 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +21.2
Chicot
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,284 | 65.3 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,149 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +32.4
Clark
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,623 | 52.1 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,120 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +7.2
Clay
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,253 | 56.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,573 | 39.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 103 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +17.0
Cleburne
Tom Cotton | REP | 6,635 | 67.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,686 | 27.2 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 278 | 2.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 269 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +40.0
Cleveland
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,666 | 61.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 941 | 34.5 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 66 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +26.6
Columbia
Tom Cotton | REP | 4,610 | 58.1 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,094 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +19.1
Conway
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,393 | 53.5 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,701 | 42.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 134 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +10.9
Craighead
Tom Cotton | REP | 15,196 | 60.3 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 9,012 | 35.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 559 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +24.5
Crawford
Tom Cotton | REP | 11,122 | 68.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 4,238 | 26.2 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 415 | 2.6 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 404 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +42.5
Crittenden
Mark Pryor | DEM | 5,885 | 55.2 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 4,522 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +12.8
Cross
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,975 | 56.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,120 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +16.3
Dallas
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,164 | 49.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,134 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +1.3
Desha
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,082 | 61.3 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,211 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +25.6
Drew
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,675 | 51.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,378 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +5.7
Faulkner
Tom Cotton | REP | 20,582 | 60.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 11,877 | 35.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 772 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +25.7
Franklin
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,354 | 61.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,851 | 33.9 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 137 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 123 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +27.5
Fulton
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,005 | 59.3 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,234 | 36.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 79 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +22.8
Garland
Tom Cotton | REP | 18,154 | 60.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 10,877 | 36.0 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 613 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +24.1
Grant
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,488 | 65.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,615 | 30.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 129 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +35.1
Greene
Tom Cotton | REP | 6,825 | 62.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,630 | 33.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 278 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 274 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +29.0
Hempstead
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,055 | 57.5 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,107 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +17.8
Hot Spring
Tom Cotton | REP | 5,240 | 56.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,649 | 39.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 260 | 2.8 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 206 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +17.0
Howard
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,082 | 56.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,485 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +16.3
Independence
Tom Cotton | REP | 6,216 | 62.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,200 | 32.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 290 | 2.9 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 252 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +30.3
Izard
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,593 | 59.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,549 | 35.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 109 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 96 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +24.0
Jackson
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,103 | 50.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,808 | 43.7 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 129 | 3.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 101 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +7.1
Jefferson
Mark Pryor | DEM | 13,125 | 65.3 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 6,562 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +32.6
Johnson
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,630 | 55.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,483 | 38.1 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 230 | 3.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 174 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +17.6
Lafayette
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,333 | 56.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 950 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +16.3
Lawrence
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,593 | 56.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,731 | 37.9 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 143 | 3.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 99 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +18.9
Lee
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,759 | 65.0 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 888 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +32.2
Lincoln
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,535 | 49.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,427 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +3.5
Little River
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,294 | 56.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,620 | 39.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 91 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +16.6
Logan
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,928 | 60.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,127 | 33.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 212 | 3.3 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 188 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +27.9
Lonoke
Tom Cotton | REP | 12,517 | 68.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 5,031 | 27.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 429 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +40.9
Madison
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,094 | 60.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,752 | 34.1 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 176 | 3.4 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 114 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +26.1
Marion
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,365 | 65.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,481 | 28.9 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 153 | 3.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 124 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +36.8
Miller
Tom Cotton | REP | 7,581 | 66.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,636 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +34.4
Mississippi
Mark Pryor | DEM | 5,260 | 51.5 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 4,513 | 44.2 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 243 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +7.3
Monroe
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,292 | 53.8 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,025 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +11.1
Montgomery
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,834 | 63.3 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 938 | 32.4 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 67 | 2.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 59 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +30.9
Nevada
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,405 | 51.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,280 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +4.5
Newton
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,923 | 64.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 908 | 30.5 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 76 | 2.6 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 67 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +34.1
Ouachita
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,999 | 50.3 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,748 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +3.2
Perry
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,108 | 58.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,258 | 35.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 127 | 3.5 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 91 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +23.7
Phillips
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,780 | 65.7 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,774 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +34.8
Pike
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,014 | 64.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 971 | 31.3 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 66 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +33.6
Poinsett
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,682 | 58.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 2,331 | 36.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 159 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 158 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +21.3
Polk
Tom Cotton | REP | 4,444 | 70.1 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,510 | 23.8 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 207 | 3.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 177 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +46.3
Pope
Tom Cotton | REP | 11,608 | 68.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 4,684 | 27.4 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 391 | 2.3 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 386 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +40.6
Prairie
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,535 | 57.9 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 997 | 37.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 63 | 2.4 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 54 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +20.3
Pulaski
Mark Pryor | DEM | 71,822 | 56.3 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 52,101 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +15.5
Randolph
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,941 | 58.4 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,837 | 36.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 132 | 2.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 125 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +21.9
Saint Francis
Mark Pryor | DEM | 3,741 | 62.0 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,193 | 36.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +25.7
Saline
Tom Cotton | REP | 25,754 | 65.0 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 12,153 | 30.7 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 866 | 2.2 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 839 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +34.3
Scott
Tom Cotton | REP | 1,964 | 63.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 925 | 30.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 110 | 3.6 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 82 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +33.7
Searcy
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,144 | 70.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 755 | 24.7 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 82 | 2.7 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 73 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +45.5
Sebastian
Tom Cotton | REP | 20,558 | 64.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 9,857 | 31.0 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 728 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +33.7
Sevier
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,243 | 63.3 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,176 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +30.1
Sharp
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,533 | 62.7 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,787 | 31.7 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 175 | 3.1 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 139 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +31.0
Stone
Tom Cotton | REP | 2,805 | 62.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,478 | 32.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 123 | 2.7 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 103 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +29.4
Union
Tom Cotton | REP | 7,253 | 58.6 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 4,818 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +19.7
Van Buren
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,641 | 61.8 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,955 | 33.2 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 166 | 2.8 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 131 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +28.6
Washington
Tom Cotton | REP | 29,433 | 54.1 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 22,267 | 41.0 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 1,384 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 1,282 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +13.2
White
Tom Cotton | REP | 15,290 | 70.1 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 5,504 | 25.2 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 560 | 2.6 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 466 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +44.8
Woodruff
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,299 | 60.4 |
Tom Cotton | REP | 749 | 34.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 54 | 2.5 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 48 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Pryor +25.6
Yell
Tom Cotton | REP | 3,132 | 60.2 |
Mark Pryor | DEM | 1,760 | 33.8 |
Mark Swaney | GRN | 175 | 3.4 |
Nathan LaFrance | LIB | 136 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cotton +26.4
Adams
Mark Udall | DEM | 55,438 | 47.5 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 52,942 | 45.4 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 3,431 | 2.9 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 2,662 | 2.3 |
88.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +2.1
Alamosa
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,422 | 47.5 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,323 | 45.6 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 153 | 3.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 108 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.9
Arapahoe
Mark Udall | DEM | 106,601 | 48.0 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 103,460 | 46.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 5,795 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.4
Archuleta
Cory Gardner | REP | 3,096 | 56.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,029 | 37.3 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 128 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +19.6
Baca
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,373 | 73.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 353 | 19.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 64 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +54.9
Bent
Cory Gardner | REP | 932 | 60.6 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 495 | 32.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 42 | 2.7 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 35 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +28.4
Boulder
Mark Udall | DEM | 93,479 | 68.3 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 37,749 | 27.6 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 3,022 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +40.7
Broomfield
Mark Udall | DEM | 13,242 | 48.2 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 12,781 | 46.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 743 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.7
Chaffee
Cory Gardner | REP | 4,351 | 49.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 3,979 | 45.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 230 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +4.2
Cheyenne
Cory Gardner | REP | 823 | 81.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 120 | 11.9 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 25 | 2.5 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 21 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +69.8
Clear Creek
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,337 | 50.5 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,979 | 42.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 180 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +7.7
Conejos
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,659 | 47.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,617 | 46.7 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 79 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +1.2
Costilla
Mark Udall | DEM | 894 | 65.1 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 389 | 28.3 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 43 | 3.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 33 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +36.8
Crowley
Cory Gardner | REP | 872 | 65.6 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 340 | 25.6 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 41 | 3.1 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 36 | 2.7 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 30 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +40.0
Custer
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,654 | 65.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 740 | 29.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 51 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +36.4
Delta
Cory Gardner | REP | 9,192 | 68.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 3,497 | 26.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 348 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +42.4
Denver
Mark Udall | DEM | 155,371 | 70.7 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 54,050 | 24.6 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 4,897 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +46.1
Dolores
Cory Gardner | REP | 636 | 67.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 239 | 25.4 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 26 | 2.8 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 21 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +42.1
Douglas
Cory Gardner | REP | 86,038 | 62.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 44,751 | 32.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 3,063 | 2.2 |
96.6% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +30.2
Eagle
Mark Udall | DEM | 9,345 | 54.4 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 7,048 | 41.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 441 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +13.4
El Paso
Cory Gardner | REP | 141,185 | 62.0 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 73,023 | 32.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 6,283 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +29.9
Elbert
Cory Gardner | REP | 9,011 | 73.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,521 | 20.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 341 | 2.8 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 247 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +52.9
Fremont
Cory Gardner | REP | 11,057 | 64.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 4,760 | 27.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 621 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +36.7
Garfield
Cory Gardner | REP | 9,853 | 51.3 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 8,342 | 43.4 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 489 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +7.9
Gilpin
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,443 | 50.3 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,168 | 40.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 124 | 4.3 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 68 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +9.6
Grand
Cory Gardner | REP | 3,616 | 53.6 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,765 | 41.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 202 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +12.6
Gunnison
Mark Udall | DEM | 3,780 | 55.3 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,639 | 38.6 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 205 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +16.7
Hinsdale
Cory Gardner | REP | 307 | 58.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 191 | 36.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 11 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +22.2
Huerfano
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,504 | 47.0 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,449 | 45.3 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 88 | 2.8 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 85 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.7
Jackson
Cory Gardner | REP | 531 | 72.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 163 | 22.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 17 | 2.3 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 16 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +50.1
Jefferson
Cory Gardner | REP | 117,324 | 47.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 117,204 | 47.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 6,785 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +0.0
Kiowa
Cory Gardner | REP | 616 | 80.9 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 107 | 14.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 16 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +66.9
Kit Carson
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,444 | 79.0 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 486 | 15.7 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 64 | 2.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 63 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +63.3
La Plata
Mark Udall | DEM | 11,721 | 51.7 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 10,099 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +7.2
Lake
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,292 | 53.7 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 891 | 37.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 103 | 4.3 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 58 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +16.7
Larimer
Cory Gardner | REP | 68,942 | 47.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 68,377 | 47.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 3,751 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +0.4
Las Animas
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,787 | 50.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,363 | 42.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 163 | 2.9 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 122 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +7.7
Lincoln
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,537 | 78.0 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 314 | 15.9 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 45 | 2.3 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 41 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +62.0
Logan
Cory Gardner | REP | 5,652 | 73.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,586 | 20.6 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 201 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +52.8
Mesa
Cory Gardner | REP | 37,607 | 68.6 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 14,639 | 26.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 1,133 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +41.9
Mineral
Cory Gardner | REP | 304 | 50.6 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 254 | 42.3 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 20 | 3.3 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 15 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +8.3
Moffat
Cory Gardner | REP | 3,724 | 76.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 826 | 17.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 176 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +59.5
Montezuma
Cory Gardner | REP | 5,747 | 59.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 3,317 | 34.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 247 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +25.3
Montrose
Cory Gardner | REP | 11,819 | 71.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 4,042 | 24.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 331 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +47.1
Morgan
Cory Gardner | REP | 6,088 | 69.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,152 | 24.5 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 195 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +44.9
Otero
Cory Gardner | REP | 3,794 | 57.5 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,314 | 35.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 211 | 3.2 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 147 | 2.2 |
72.2% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +22.4
Ouray
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,351 | 50.4 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,228 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +4.6
Park
Cory Gardner | REP | 4,644 | 58.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,803 | 35.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 265 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +23.1
Phillips
Cory Gardner | REP | 1,516 | 76.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 357 | 18.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 51 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +58.6
Pitkin
Mark Udall | DEM | 5,133 | 69.8 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,012 | 27.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +42.4
Prowers
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,864 | 72.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 885 | 22.3 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 84 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +49.9
Pueblo
Mark Udall | DEM | 27,000 | 46.7 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 26,738 | 46.3 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 1,462 | 2.5 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 1,215 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +0.5
Rio Blanco
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,207 | 81.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 357 | 13.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 75 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +68.3
Rio Grande
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,511 | 57.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,542 | 35.1 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 139 | 3.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 118 | 2.7 |
87.5% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +22.1
Routt
Mark Udall | DEM | 5,582 | 53.9 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 4,248 | 41.0 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 300 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +12.9
Saguache
Mark Udall | DEM | 1,258 | 54.8 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 837 | 36.4 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 95 | 4.1 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 51 | 2.2 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 46 | 2.0 |
85.7% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +18.3
San Juan
Mark Udall | DEM | 255 | 55.2 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 182 | 39.4 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 10 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +15.8
San Miguel
Mark Udall | DEM | 2,214 | 68.3 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 866 | 26.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 108 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +41.6
Sedgwick
Cory Gardner | REP | 853 | 70.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 262 | 21.7 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 36 | 3.0 |
Raul Acosta | UNA | 27 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +49.0
Summit
Mark Udall | DEM | 6,902 | 60.3 |
Cory Gardner | REP | 4,032 | 35.2 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 310 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +25.1
Teller
Cory Gardner | REP | 7,282 | 65.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 3,136 | 28.1 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 431 | 3.9 |
92.3% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +37.1
Washington
Cory Gardner | REP | 2,029 | 87.2 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 234 | 10.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +77.1
Weld
Cory Gardner | REP | 54,735 | 60.4 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 29,690 | 32.8 |
Gaylon Kent | LIB | 2,609 | 2.9 |
Steve Shogan | UNA | 1,816 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +27.6
Yuma
Cory Gardner | REP | 3,652 | 85.7 |
Mark Udall | DEM | 509 | 11.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gardner +73.7
Kent
Kevin Wade | REP | 19,527 | 49.5 |
Chris Coons | DEM | 19,215 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wade +0.8
New Castle
Chris Coons | DEM | 84,978 | 63.8 |
Kevin Wade | REP | 45,225 | 34.0 |
Andrew Groff | GRN | 2,948 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Coons +29.9
Sussex
Kevin Wade | REP | 34,067 | 55.4 |
Chris Coons | DEM | 26,452 | 43.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wade +12.4
Appling
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,295 | 74.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,058 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +50.4
Atkinson
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,070 | 65.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 500 | 30.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 56 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +35.1
Bacon
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,766 | 79.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 395 | 17.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 60 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +61.7
Baker
David A. Perdue | REP | 484 | 48.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 484 | 48.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 23 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tie
Baldwin
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 5,447 | 51.3 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,995 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +4.3
Banks
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,591 | 83.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 622 | 14.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 110 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +68.7
Barrow
David A. Perdue | REP | 11,983 | 73.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,743 | 23.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 479 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +50.8
Bartow
David A. Perdue | REP | 16,823 | 73.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 5,433 | 23.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 604 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +49.8
Ben Hill
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,042 | 58.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,400 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +18.3
Berrien
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,961 | 75.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 872 | 22.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 113 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +52.9
Bibb
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 24,833 | 57.9 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 17,558 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +17.0
Bleckley
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,334 | 71.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 872 | 26.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 68 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +44.7
Brantley
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,455 | 82.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 465 | 15.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 70 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +66.6
Brooks
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,553 | 55.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,995 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +12.1
Bryan
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,626 | 70.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,216 | 27.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 165 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +42.6
Bulloch
David A. Perdue | REP | 8,303 | 62.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 4,844 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +25.9
Burke
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,054 | 51.4 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,798 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +4.3
Butts
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,138 | 67.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,880 | 30.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 137 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +36.7
Calhoun
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 825 | 56.5 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 617 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +14.2
Camden
David A. Perdue | REP | 6,632 | 67.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,065 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +36.2
Candler
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,458 | 65.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 717 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +33.5
Carroll
David A. Perdue | REP | 17,614 | 67.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 7,838 | 30.0 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 711 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +37.4
Catoosa
David A. Perdue | REP | 10,683 | 76.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,854 | 20.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 398 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +56.2
Charlton
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,396 | 69.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 584 | 28.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 42 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +40.2
Chatham
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 36,202 | 54.3 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 29,337 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +10.3
Chattahoochee
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 349 | 49.5 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 336 | 47.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 20 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +1.8
Chattooga
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,136 | 65.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,466 | 30.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 196 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +34.8
Cherokee
David A. Perdue | REP | 51,088 | 76.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 14,108 | 21.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 1,786 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +55.2
Clarke
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 16,729 | 65.3 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 8,362 | 32.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 529 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +32.7
Clay
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 535 | 56.6 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 399 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +14.4
Clayton
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 52,813 | 84.0 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 9,347 | 14.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +69.1
Clinch
David A. Perdue | REP | 813 | 69.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 339 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +40.4
Cobb
David A. Perdue | REP | 117,950 | 55.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 90,276 | 42.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 4,698 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +13.0
Coffee
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,413 | 65.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,654 | 32.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 193 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +33.4
Colquitt
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,796 | 72.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,081 | 25.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 161 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +46.2
Columbia
David A. Perdue | REP | 28,643 | 71.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 10,757 | 26.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +44.6
Cook
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,320 | 65.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,170 | 32.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 77 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +32.2
Coweta
David A. Perdue | REP | 26,122 | 70.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 10,250 | 27.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 946 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +42.5
Crawford
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,109 | 64.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,118 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +30.2
Crisp
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,125 | 61.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,865 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +24.9
Dade
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,572 | 75.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 724 | 21.2 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 116 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +54.2
Dawson
David A. Perdue | REP | 6,086 | 83.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,081 | 14.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +68.6
Decatur
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,456 | 57.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,516 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +15.5
DeKalb
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 165,803 | 78.3 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 42,927 | 20.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +58.0
Dodge
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,400 | 65.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,657 | 31.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 140 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +33.5
Dooly
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,361 | 50.2 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,323 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +1.4
Dougherty
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 15,911 | 67.2 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,532 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +35.4
Douglas
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 19,537 | 51.8 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 17,396 | 46.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 810 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +5.7
Early
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,646 | 51.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,509 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +4.3
Echols
David A. Perdue | REP | 513 | 82.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 96 | 15.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 14 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +66.9
Effingham
David A. Perdue | REP | 9,332 | 73.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,030 | 24.0 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 273 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +49.9
Elbert
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,971 | 62.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,690 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +27.1
Emanuel
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,216 | 64.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,694 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +30.4
Evans
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,369 | 63.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 758 | 35.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +28.2
Fannin
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,235 | 75.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,542 | 22.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 151 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +53.3
Fayette
David A. Perdue | REP | 26,162 | 61.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 15,342 | 36.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +25.6
Floyd
David A. Perdue | REP | 13,855 | 66.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 6,422 | 30.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 604 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +35.6
Forsyth
David A. Perdue | REP | 46,425 | 79.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 10,648 | 18.2 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 1,347 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +61.2
Franklin
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,784 | 80.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 839 | 17.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 109 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +62.2
Fulton
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 171,504 | 64.7 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 89,844 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +30.8
Gilmer
David A. Perdue | REP | 6,093 | 77.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,587 | 20.2 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 193 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +57.2
Glascock
David A. Perdue | REP | 644 | 80.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 135 | 16.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 21 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +63.6
Glynn
David A. Perdue | REP | 13,487 | 66.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 6,509 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +34.5
Gordon
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,701 | 74.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,223 | 21.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 370 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +53.2
Grady
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,564 | 64.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,874 | 33.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 115 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +30.4
Greene
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,106 | 62.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,344 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +27.0
Gwinnett
David A. Perdue | REP | 107,522 | 54.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 86,369 | 43.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 4,263 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +10.7
Habersham
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,622 | 79.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,763 | 18.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 268 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +60.7
Hall
David A. Perdue | REP | 33,541 | 76.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 9,194 | 21.0 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 1,136 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +55.5
Hancock
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,917 | 79.4 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 481 | 19.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +59.5
Haralson
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,255 | 77.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,315 | 19.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 252 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +57.8
Harris
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,301 | 70.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,878 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +42.7
Hart
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,667 | 69.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,946 | 28.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 151 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +40.2
Heard
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,802 | 72.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 617 | 24.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 69 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +47.6
Henry
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 31,340 | 49.4 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 30,933 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +0.6
Houston
David A. Perdue | REP | 22,846 | 60.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 14,300 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +22.6
Irwin
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,604 | 68.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 688 | 29.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +39.2
Jackson
David A. Perdue | REP | 12,719 | 79.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,898 | 18.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 395 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +61.3
Jasper
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,561 | 66.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,213 | 31.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 82 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +35.0
Jeff Davis
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,189 | 73.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 732 | 24.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 74 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +48.6
Jefferson
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,486 | 54.7 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,014 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +10.4
Jenkins
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,120 | 57.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 786 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +17.2
Johnson
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,539 | 66.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 742 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +34.5
Jones
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,978 | 61.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,014 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +24.1
Lamar
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,194 | 63.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,698 | 33.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 113 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +29.9
Lanier
David A. Perdue | REP | 875 | 61.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 505 | 35.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 38 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +26.1
Laurens
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,902 | 61.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 4,865 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +23.4
Lee
David A. Perdue | REP | 6,631 | 74.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,134 | 23.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +50.5
Liberty
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 5,614 | 62.3 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,257 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +26.2
Lincoln
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,713 | 64.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 888 | 33.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 65 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +30.9
Long
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,257 | 58.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 822 | 38.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 61 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +20.3
Lowndes
David A. Perdue | REP | 12,238 | 58.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 8,395 | 40.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +18.4
Lumpkin
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,812 | 75.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,640 | 21.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 231 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +54.3
Macon
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,983 | 65.1 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,017 | 33.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +31.7
Madison
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,549 | 73.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,809 | 23.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 220 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +49.4
Marion
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,145 | 52.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 995 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +6.9
McDuffie
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,611 | 59.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,347 | 38.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +20.8
McIntosh
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,085 | 54.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,685 | 43.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 86 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +10.4
Meriwether
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,188 | 52.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,802 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +6.3
Miller
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,064 | 74.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 340 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +50.8
Mitchell
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,552 | 51.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,369 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +3.7
Monroe
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,907 | 68.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,590 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +38.4
Montgomery
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,612 | 70.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 636 | 27.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 47 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +42.5
Morgan
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,339 | 68.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,888 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +38.7
Murray
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,621 | 76.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,231 | 20.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 199 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +56.0
Muscogee
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 24,196 | 58.4 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 16,578 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +18.4
Newton
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 14,229 | 50.1 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 13,648 | 48.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +2.0
Oconee
David A. Perdue | REP | 9,482 | 69.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,745 | 27.6 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 335 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +42.3
Oglethorpe
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,722 | 66.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,298 | 31.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 101 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +34.6
Paulding
David A. Perdue | REP | 25,048 | 68.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 10,484 | 28.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 927 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +39.9
Peach
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,723 | 50.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,507 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +2.9
Pickens
David A. Perdue | REP | 7,087 | 79.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,586 | 17.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 217 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +61.9
Pierce
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,345 | 84.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 568 | 14.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +70.1
Pike
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,453 | 79.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,033 | 18.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 141 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +60.8
Polk
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,537 | 68.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,196 | 27.2 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 327 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +41.5
Pulaski
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,548 | 64.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 800 | 33.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +31.3
Putnam
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,342 | 68.8 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,865 | 29.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +39.3
Quitman
David A. Perdue | REP | 302 | 48.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 298 | 48.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 17 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +0.6
Rabun
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,940 | 72.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,381 | 25.3 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 141 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +46.9
Randolph
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,107 | 51.8 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,013 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +4.4
Richmond
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 30,641 | 63.5 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 16,927 | 35.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +28.4
Rockdale
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 15,682 | 58.8 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 10,611 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +19.0
Schley
David A. Perdue | REP | 928 | 73.0 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 319 | 25.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +47.9
Screven
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,022 | 53.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,697 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +8.6
Seminole
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,385 | 62.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 802 | 35.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 45 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +26.1
Spalding
David A. Perdue | REP | 10,231 | 60.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 6,181 | 36.8 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 395 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +24.1
Stephens
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,914 | 75.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,139 | 21.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 139 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +53.4
Stewart
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 736 | 59.7 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 475 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +21.2
Sumter
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 4,248 | 53.0 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,673 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +7.2
Talbot
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,312 | 60.7 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 803 | 37.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 48 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +23.5
Taliaferro
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 348 | 60.6 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 213 | 37.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 13 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +23.5
Tattnall
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,927 | 69.2 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,229 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +40.1
Taylor
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,260 | 57.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 917 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +15.5
Telfair
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,524 | 55.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,168 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +13.0
Terrell
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,801 | 54.7 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,441 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +10.9
Thomas
David A. Perdue | REP | 6,723 | 61.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 4,151 | 37.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +23.4
Tift
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,813 | 68.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,539 | 29.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +38.6
Toombs
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,924 | 70.7 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,537 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +43.0
Towns
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,067 | 72.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,097 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +46.6
Treutlen
David A. Perdue | REP | 941 | 61.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 560 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +24.9
Troup
David A. Perdue | REP | 9,352 | 59.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 6,068 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +20.9
Turner
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,334 | 58.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 906 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +18.8
Twiggs
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,613 | 55.2 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,251 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +12.4
Union
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,873 | 75.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,722 | 22.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 180 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +53.4
Upson
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,580 | 64.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,380 | 33.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 155 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +30.9
Walker
David A. Perdue | REP | 9,330 | 75.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 2,662 | 21.5 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 385 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +53.9
Walton
David A. Perdue | REP | 20,060 | 77.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 5,424 | 20.9 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 528 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +56.3
Ware
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,696 | 70.1 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,911 | 28.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +41.6
Warren
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 823 | 54.8 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 655 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +11.2
Washington
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,182 | 52.2 |
David A. Perdue | REP | 2,836 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Nunn +5.7
Wayne
David A. Perdue | REP | 4,375 | 70.5 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,676 | 27.0 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 155 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +43.5
Webster
David A. Perdue | REP | 429 | 55.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 332 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +12.5
Wheeler
David A. Perdue | REP | 924 | 60.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 572 | 37.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 33 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +23.0
White
David A. Perdue | REP | 5,946 | 77.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,511 | 19.7 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 222 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +57.8
Whitfield
David A. Perdue | REP | 11,531 | 72.9 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 3,807 | 24.1 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 490 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +48.8
Wilcox
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,289 | 67.6 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 594 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +36.5
Wilkes
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,689 | 54.3 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,385 | 44.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +9.8
Wilkinson
David A. Perdue | REP | 1,579 | 49.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,570 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +0.3
Worth
David A. Perdue | REP | 3,720 | 71.4 |
Michelle Nunn | DEM | 1,375 | 26.4 |
Amanda Swafford | LIB | 113 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Perdue +45.0
Hawaii
Brian Schatz | DEM | 35,509 | 73.2 |
Cam Cavasso | REP | 11,093 | 22.9 |
Michael Kokoski | LIB | 1,881 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +50.4
Honolulu
Brian Schatz | DEM | 163,354 | 68.1 |
Cam Cavasso | REP | 71,464 | 29.8 |
Michael Kokoski | LIB | 4,884 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +38.3
Kauai
Brian Schatz | DEM | 16,189 | 73.7 |
Cam Cavasso | REP | 5,250 | 23.9 |
Michael Kokoski | LIB | 537 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +49.8
Maui
Brian Schatz | DEM | 31,668 | 72.9 |
Cam Cavasso | REP | 10,165 | 23.4 |
Michael Kokoski | LIB | 1,634 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +49.5
Adair
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,965 | 62.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 986 | 31.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 104 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +31.3
Adams
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,106 | 65.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 493 | 29.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 48 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +36.5
Allamakee
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,759 | 52.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,173 | 41.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 176 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +11.2
Appanoose
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,522 | 55.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,589 | 35.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 288 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.6
Audubon
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,458 | 60.3 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 850 | 35.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 75 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.2
Benton
Joni Ernst | REP | 5,875 | 57.5 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,927 | 38.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 269 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +19.1
Black Hawk
Bruce Braley | DEM | 24,041 | 51.9 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 20,933 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +6.7
Boone
Joni Ernst | REP | 5,595 | 53.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 4,387 | 42.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 283 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +11.6
Bremer
Joni Ernst | REP | 5,478 | 54.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 4,195 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +12.8
Buchanan
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,941 | 50.1 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,534 | 44.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 227 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +5.2
Buena Vista
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,514 | 60.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,023 | 34.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 183 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.6
Butler
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,625 | 62.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,943 | 33.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 143 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +29.1
Calhoun
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,540 | 63.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,256 | 31.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 125 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +32.2
Carroll
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,725 | 58.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,904 | 36.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 256 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +22.7
Cass
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,287 | 65.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,528 | 30.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 109 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +35.2
Cedar
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,006 | 55.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,968 | 40.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 196 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +14.2
Cerro Gordo
Bruce Braley | DEM | 8,881 | 52.2 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 7,590 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +7.6
Cherokee
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,035 | 62.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,509 | 31.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 200 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +31.6
Chickasaw
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,620 | 53.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,039 | 41.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 174 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +11.8
Clarke
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,861 | 57.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,195 | 36.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 110 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.5
Clay
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,781 | 63.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,889 | 31.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 215 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +31.7
Clayton
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,784 | 54.3 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,878 | 41.3 |
Douglas Butzier | LIB | 180 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +13.0
Clinton
Bruce Braley | DEM | 8,317 | 48.5 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 8,039 | 46.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 454 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +1.6
Crawford
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,881 | 61.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,542 | 32.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 157 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +28.5
Dallas
Joni Ernst | REP | 17,191 | 59.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 10,746 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +22.3
Davis
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,726 | 59.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,025 | 35.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 98 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +24.1
Decatur
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,496 | 57.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 857 | 33.1 |
Ruth Smith | IND | 144 | 5.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 62 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +24.7
Delaware
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,046 | 58.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,610 | 37.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 139 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.8
Des Moines
Bruce Braley | DEM | 6,790 | 50.0 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 6,314 | 46.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 279 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +3.5
Dickinson
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,558 | 62.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,431 | 33.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 170 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +29.4
Dubuque
Bruce Braley | DEM | 18,313 | 50.7 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 16,351 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +5.4
Emmet
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,973 | 56.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,229 | 35.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 166 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +21.3
Fayette
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,046 | 51.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,448 | 44.1 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 206 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +7.7
Floyd
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,011 | 50.2 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,723 | 45.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 176 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +4.8
Franklin
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,467 | 63.3 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,217 | 31.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 157 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +32.1
Fremont
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,510 | 62.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 797 | 32.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 63 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +29.5
Greene
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,063 | 57.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,367 | 37.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 136 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +19.2
Grundy
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,621 | 68.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,514 | 28.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 109 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +39.7
Guthrie
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,735 | 63.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,366 | 31.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 122 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +31.6
Hamilton
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,376 | 59.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,033 | 35.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 188 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +23.6
Hancock
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,643 | 60.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,518 | 34.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 134 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.8
Hardin
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,036 | 60.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,344 | 35.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 228 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.2
Harrison
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,068 | 61.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,648 | 33.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 133 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +28.7
Henry
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,012 | 60.5 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,317 | 34.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 173 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.6
Howard
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,706 | 50.7 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,502 | 44.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 95 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +6.1
Humboldt
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,564 | 66.3 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,135 | 29.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 114 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +37.0
Ida
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,872 | 69.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 709 | 26.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 93 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +43.1
Iowa
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,921 | 58.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,520 | 37.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 193 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.9
Jackson
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,763 | 49.5 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,371 | 44.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 360 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +5.2
Jasper
Joni Ernst | REP | 7,779 | 52.1 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 6,350 | 42.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 514 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +9.6
Jefferson
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,223 | 51.3 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,760 | 44.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 141 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +7.4
Johnson
Bruce Braley | DEM | 33,597 | 64.9 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 16,652 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +32.7
Jones
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,088 | 52.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,319 | 42.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 186 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +10.0
Keokuk
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,371 | 64.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,154 | 31.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 97 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +33.1
Kossuth
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,001 | 60.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,261 | 34.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 191 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +26.5
Lee
Bruce Braley | DEM | 5,248 | 49.5 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,908 | 46.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 223 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +3.2
Linn
Bruce Braley | DEM | 43,690 | 51.0 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 38,908 | 45.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 1,859 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +5.6
Louisa
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,014 | 59.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,205 | 35.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 75 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +24.0
Lucas
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,944 | 61.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,027 | 32.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 103 | 3.2 |
Ruth Smith | IND | 68 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +28.9
Lyon
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,618 | 84.1 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 586 | 13.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +70.5
Madison
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,956 | 60.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,211 | 34.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 185 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +26.8
Mahaska
Joni Ernst | REP | 5,309 | 68.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,079 | 26.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 193 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +41.7
Marion
Joni Ernst | REP | 8,357 | 63.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 4,361 | 32.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 327 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +30.1
Marshall
Joni Ernst | REP | 7,022 | 51.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 5,967 | 44.1 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 355 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +7.8
Mills
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,275 | 66.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,375 | 28.1 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 145 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +38.8
Mitchell
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,112 | 51.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,867 | 45.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 95 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +5.9
Monona
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,169 | 58.3 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,271 | 34.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 205 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +24.1
Monroe
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,746 | 60.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 968 | 33.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 123 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +26.9
Montgomery
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,794 | 73.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 890 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +50.3
Muscatine
Joni Ernst | REP | 6,738 | 52.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 5,605 | 43.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 316 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +8.7
O'Brien
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,146 | 76.5 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,093 | 20.2 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 119 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +56.3
Osceola
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,680 | 77.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 399 | 18.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 64 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +59.3
Page
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,407 | 70.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,266 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +44.5
Palo Alto
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,047 | 56.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,361 | 37.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 125 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +19.0
Plymouth
Joni Ernst | REP | 6,663 | 72.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,178 | 23.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 246 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +48.9
Pocahontas
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,868 | 65.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 823 | 29.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 97 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +36.9
Polk
Bruce Braley | DEM | 82,612 | 50.4 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 75,491 | 46.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 3,339 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +4.3
Pottawattamie
Joni Ernst | REP | 15,103 | 57.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 9,686 | 37.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 647 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.7
Poweshiek
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,677 | 49.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,411 | 46.1 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 199 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +3.6
Ringgold
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,294 | 62.5 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 613 | 29.6 |
Ruth Smith | IND | 81 | 3.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 56 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +32.9
Sac
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,499 | 65.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,102 | 29.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 130 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +36.8
Scott
Joni Ernst | REP | 30,514 | 49.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 29,081 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +2.3
Shelby
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,919 | 68.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,171 | 27.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 92 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +41.1
Sioux
Joni Ernst | REP | 11,550 | 87.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,462 | 11.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +76.0
Story
Bruce Braley | DEM | 16,104 | 49.6 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 15,102 | 46.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 723 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +3.1
Tama
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,492 | 52.7 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 2,844 | 42.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 178 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +9.8
Taylor
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,507 | 69.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 584 | 26.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 56 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +42.4
Union
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,607 | 60.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,492 | 34.6 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 141 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +25.9
Van Buren
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,755 | 61.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 943 | 33.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 89 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +28.6
Wapello
Joni Ernst | REP | 5,310 | 48.9 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 4,978 | 45.8 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 345 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +3.1
Warren
Joni Ernst | REP | 10,851 | 55.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 7,774 | 40.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 478 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +15.8
Washington
Joni Ernst | REP | 4,766 | 58.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,071 | 37.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 206 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +20.7
Wayne
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,340 | 62.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 701 | 32.5 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 68 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +29.7
Webster
Joni Ernst | REP | 6,979 | 53.8 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 5,360 | 41.3 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 416 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +12.5
Winnebago
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,227 | 53.2 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,761 | 42.1 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 114 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +11.1
Winneshiek
Joni Ernst | REP | 3,956 | 48.0 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 3,932 | 47.7 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 228 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +0.3
Woodbury
Joni Ernst | REP | 16,926 | 56.4 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 11,526 | 38.4 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 1,029 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +18.0
Worth
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,555 | 50.5 |
Joni Ernst | REP | 1,381 | 44.9 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 95 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Braley +5.7
Wright
Joni Ernst | REP | 2,846 | 62.6 |
Bruce Braley | DEM | 1,502 | 33.0 |
Rick Stewart | IND | 126 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ernst +29.6
Ada
Jim Risch | REP | 69,404 | 53.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 59,423 | 46.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +7.7
Adams
Jim Risch | REP | 1,022 | 72.6 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 385 | 27.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +45.3
Bannock
Jim Risch | REP | 12,944 | 58.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 9,287 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +16.5
Bear Lake
Jim Risch | REP | 1,599 | 84.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 289 | 15.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +69.4
Benewah
Jim Risch | REP | 1,924 | 72.8 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 719 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +45.6
Bingham
Jim Risch | REP | 8,013 | 75.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 2,578 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +51.3
Blaine
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 4,184 | 59.4 |
Jim Risch | REP | 2,854 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Mitchell +18.9
Boise
Jim Risch | REP | 1,902 | 70.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 780 | 29.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +41.8
Bonner
Jim Risch | REP | 8,462 | 66.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 4,219 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +33.5
Bonneville
Jim Risch | REP | 19,234 | 71.8 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 7,563 | 28.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +43.6
Boundary
Jim Risch | REP | 2,517 | 76.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 785 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +52.5
Butte
Jim Risch | REP | 895 | 78.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 240 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +57.7
Camas
Jim Risch | REP | 329 | 76.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 100 | 23.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +53.4
Canyon
Jim Risch | REP | 32,063 | 72.4 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 12,244 | 27.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +44.7
Caribou
Jim Risch | REP | 1,618 | 83.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 327 | 16.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +66.4
Cassia
Jim Risch | REP | 4,616 | 84.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 824 | 15.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +69.7
Clark
Jim Risch | REP | 195 | 84.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 37 | 15.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +68.1
Clearwater
Jim Risch | REP | 1,876 | 71.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 761 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +42.3
Custer
Jim Risch | REP | 1,361 | 76.4 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 420 | 23.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +52.8
Elmore
Jim Risch | REP | 3,690 | 70.5 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,543 | 29.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +41.0
Franklin
Jim Risch | REP | 2,527 | 89.0 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 312 | 11.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +78.0
Fremont
Jim Risch | REP | 3,256 | 81.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 720 | 18.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +63.8
Gem
Jim Risch | REP | 3,961 | 76.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,236 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +52.4
Gooding
Jim Risch | REP | 2,912 | 74.0 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,021 | 26.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +48.1
Idaho County
Jim Risch | REP | 4,386 | 77.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,244 | 22.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +55.8
Jefferson
Jim Risch | REP | 5,958 | 82.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,290 | 17.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +64.4
Jerome
Jim Risch | REP | 3,294 | 75.3 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,080 | 24.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +50.6
Kootenai
Jim Risch | REP | 25,645 | 69.5 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 11,246 | 30.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +39.0
Latah
Jim Risch | REP | 5,826 | 50.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 5,813 | 49.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +0.1
Lemhi
Jim Risch | REP | 2,273 | 77.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 654 | 22.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +55.3
Lewis
Jim Risch | REP | 893 | 74.4 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 307 | 25.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +48.8
Lincoln
Jim Risch | REP | 871 | 70.6 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 363 | 29.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +41.2
Madison
Jim Risch | REP | 5,902 | 86.9 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 886 | 13.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +73.9
Minidoka
Jim Risch | REP | 3,622 | 78.7 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 981 | 21.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +57.4
Nez Perce
Jim Risch | REP | 6,974 | 62.5 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 4,186 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +25.0
Oneida
Jim Risch | REP | 918 | 84.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 174 | 15.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +68.1
Owyhee
Jim Risch | REP | 2,117 | 82.2 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 459 | 17.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +64.4
Payette
Jim Risch | REP | 4,366 | 76.8 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,321 | 23.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +53.5
Power
Jim Risch | REP | 1,441 | 69.4 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 635 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +38.8
Shoshone
Jim Risch | REP | 1,874 | 57.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,407 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +14.2
Teton
Jim Risch | REP | 1,991 | 51.1 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,909 | 48.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +2.1
Twin Falls
Jim Risch | REP | 13,309 | 70.8 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 5,489 | 29.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +41.6
Valley
Jim Risch | REP | 2,067 | 58.4 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 1,475 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +16.7
Washington
Jim Risch | REP | 2,421 | 75.6 |
Nels Mitchell | DEM | 781 | 24.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Risch +51.2
Adams
Jim Oberweis | REP | 15,219 | 68.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 6,277 | 28.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 806 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +40.1
Alexander
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,361 | 58.7 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 846 | 36.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 111 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +22.2
Bond
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,686 | 54.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,001 | 40.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 229 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +13.9
Boone
Jim Oberweis | REP | 8,693 | 57.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,730 | 37.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 767 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +19.5
Brown
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,029 | 65.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 476 | 30.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 71 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +35.1
Bureau
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,772 | 53.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,315 | 42.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 532 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +11.5
Calhoun
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 998 | 50.9 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 898 | 45.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 65 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +5.1
Carroll
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,122 | 56.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,157 | 38.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 260 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +17.4
Cass
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,001 | 53.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,586 | 42.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 187 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +11.0
Champaign
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 26,176 | 48.5 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 25,816 | 47.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 2,032 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +0.7
Christian
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,892 | 59.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,187 | 36.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 524 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +23.3
Clark
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,434 | 66.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,507 | 29.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 262 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +37.0
Clay
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,565 | 66.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,128 | 29.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 193 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +37.0
Clinton
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,386 | 58.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,627 | 36.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 572 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +21.9
Coles
Jim Oberweis | REP | 8,473 | 57.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,623 | 38.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 662 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +19.3
Cook
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 893,790 | 70.5 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 333,381 | 26.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 39,750 | 3.1 |
98.7% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +44.2
Crawford
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,906 | 62.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,024 | 32.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 348 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +30.0
Cumberland
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,375 | 60.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,332 | 34.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 215 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +26.6
DeKalb
Jim Oberweis | REP | 14,077 | 50.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 12,524 | 44.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,466 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +5.5
DeWitt
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,433 | 62.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,765 | 32.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 272 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +30.5
Douglas
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,850 | 64.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,895 | 31.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 237 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +32.7
DuPage
Jim Oberweis | REP | 134,968 | 50.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 121,499 | 45.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 10,441 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +5.0
Edgar
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,547 | 56.9 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,392 | 38.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 290 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +18.5
Edwards
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,608 | 71.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 558 | 24.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 92 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +46.5
Effingham
Jim Oberweis | REP | 8,260 | 68.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,465 | 28.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 398 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +39.6
Fayette
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,085 | 62.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,177 | 33.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 265 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +29.2
Ford
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,033 | 67.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,255 | 28.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 187 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +39.7
Franklin
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,364 | 50.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,696 | 45.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 579 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +5.3
Fulton
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,877 | 53.1 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,650 | 42.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 535 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +11.1
Gallatin
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 902 | 49.5 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 828 | 45.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 91 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +4.1
Greene
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,293 | 53.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,798 | 41.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 202 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +11.5
Grundy
Jim Oberweis | REP | 8,556 | 52.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 6,895 | 42.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 843 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +10.2
Hamilton
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,671 | 53.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,287 | 41.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 150 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +12.4
Hancock
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,530 | 64.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,710 | 31.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 224 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +33.3
Hardin
Jim Oberweis | REP | 811 | 56.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 580 | 40.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 55 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +16.0
Henderson
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,256 | 48.4 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,217 | 46.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 121 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +1.5
Henry
Jim Oberweis | REP | 9,456 | 53.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 7,553 | 42.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 654 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +10.8
Iroquois
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,523 | 69.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,469 | 26.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 404 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +43.1
Jackson
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 7,336 | 52.0 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,146 | 43.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 620 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +8.4
Jasper
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,374 | 58.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,475 | 36.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 207 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +22.2
Jefferson
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,700 | 54.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,975 | 40.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 556 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +14.1
Jersey
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,432 | 55.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,168 | 39.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 359 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +15.9
JoDaviess
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,124 | 53.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,215 | 41.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 361 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +11.8
Johnson
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,922 | 64.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,414 | 31.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 205 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +33.2
Kane
Jim Oberweis | REP | 62,953 | 51.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 53,123 | 43.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 5,389 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +8.1
Kankakee
Jim Oberweis | REP | 17,291 | 51.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 14,587 | 43.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,598 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +8.1
Kendall
Jim Oberweis | REP | 16,660 | 54.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 12,535 | 40.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,669 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +13.4
Knox
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 8,189 | 51.2 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,158 | 44.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 635 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +6.5
Lake
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 93,572 | 49.3 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 89,700 | 47.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 6,452 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +2.0
LaSalle
Jim Oberweis | REP | 18,414 | 52.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 14,882 | 42.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,911 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +10.0
Lawrence
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,390 | 58.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,449 | 35.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 238 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +23.1
Lee
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,340 | 56.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,334 | 38.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 563 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +17.9
Livingston
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,202 | 64.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,429 | 30.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 486 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +33.9
Logan
Jim Oberweis | REP | 5,395 | 65.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,555 | 30.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 343 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +34.2
Macon
Jim Oberweis | REP | 19,012 | 57.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 13,049 | 39.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,299 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +17.9
Macoupin
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,774 | 49.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 7,133 | 45.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 790 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +4.1
Madison
Jim Oberweis | REP | 39,945 | 50.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 35,387 | 44.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 3,518 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +5.8
Marion
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,407 | 54.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,727 | 40.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 549 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +14.4
Marshall
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,547 | 60.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,522 | 35.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 173 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +24.2
Mason
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,528 | 47.9 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,473 | 46.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 278 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +1.0
Massac
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,541 | 59.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,570 | 36.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 140 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +22.8
McDonough
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,771 | 56.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,346 | 39.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 327 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +16.9
McHenry
Jim Oberweis | REP | 53,256 | 57.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 35,231 | 37.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 4,500 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +19.4
McLean
Jim Oberweis | REP | 29,591 | 59.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 18,657 | 37.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,597 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +21.9
Menard
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,139 | 64.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,595 | 32.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 151 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +31.6
Mercer
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,165 | 48.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,032 | 46.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 311 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +2.0
Monroe
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,659 | 61.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,433 | 35.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 434 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +25.8
Montgomery
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,889 | 56.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,406 | 39.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 422 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +17.0
Morgan
Jim Oberweis | REP | 6,149 | 55.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 4,485 | 40.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 413 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +15.1
Moultrie
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,854 | 63.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,468 | 32.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 193 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +30.7
Ogle
Jim Oberweis | REP | 10,597 | 62.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,604 | 33.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 789 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +29.4
Peoria
Jim Oberweis | REP | 26,608 | 51.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 23,454 | 45.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,441 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +6.1
Perry
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,589 | 49.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,400 | 47.0 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 249 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +2.6
Piatt
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,256 | 60.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,494 | 35.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 313 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +24.9
Pike
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,507 | 61.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,018 | 35.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 226 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +25.9
Pope
Jim Oberweis | REP | 948 | 60.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 537 | 34.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 73 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +26.4
Pulaski
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,317 | 51.9 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,126 | 44.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 97 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +7.5
Putnam
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,231 | 48.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,163 | 46.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 131 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +2.7
Randolph
Jim Oberweis | REP | 5,534 | 49.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,215 | 46.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 425 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +2.9
Richland
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,225 | 65.8 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,456 | 29.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 223 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +36.1
Rock Island
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 24,118 | 53.6 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 19,391 | 43.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,461 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +10.5
Saline
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,027 | 52.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,330 | 43.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 347 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +9.0
Sangamon
Jim Oberweis | REP | 37,967 | 53.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 30,930 | 43.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 2,612 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +9.8
Schuyler
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,720 | 52.9 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,373 | 42.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 157 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +10.7
Scott
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,242 | 57.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 827 | 38.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 104 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +19.1
Shelby
Jim Oberweis | REP | 5,135 | 63.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,533 | 31.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 416 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +32.2
St. Clair
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 36,539 | 50.4 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 33,161 | 45.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 2,813 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +4.7
Stark
Jim Oberweis | REP | 1,135 | 59.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 682 | 35.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 92 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +23.7
Stephenson
Jim Oberweis | REP | 7,971 | 55.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 5,662 | 39.6 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 667 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +16.1
Tazewell
Jim Oberweis | REP | 26,353 | 61.1 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 15,330 | 35.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 1,475 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +25.5
Union
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,711 | 52.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,307 | 44.3 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 192 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +7.8
Vermilion
Jim Oberweis | REP | 11,265 | 54.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 8,728 | 41.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 871 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +12.2
Wabash
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,832 | 62.7 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,475 | 32.7 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 208 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +30.1
Warren
Jim Oberweis | REP | 2,844 | 52.3 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,403 | 44.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 188 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +8.1
Washington
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,530 | 62.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,882 | 33.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 249 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +29.1
Wayne
Jim Oberweis | REP | 4,183 | 73.0 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 1,286 | 22.4 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 260 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +50.6
White
Jim Oberweis | REP | 3,516 | 59.4 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 2,136 | 36.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 268 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +23.3
Whiteside
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 8,479 | 48.4 |
Jim Oberweis | REP | 8,324 | 47.5 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 723 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Durbin +0.9
Will
Jim Oberweis | REP | 91,150 | 48.6 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 88,458 | 47.2 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 7,805 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +1.4
Williamson
Jim Oberweis | REP | 11,770 | 58.5 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 7,616 | 37.8 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 737 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +20.6
Winnebago
Jim Oberweis | REP | 38,629 | 51.9 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 32,761 | 44.1 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 2,977 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +7.9
Woodford
Jim Oberweis | REP | 9,783 | 70.2 |
Richard J. Durbin | DEM | 3,749 | 26.9 |
Sharon Hansen | LIB | 394 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Oberweis +43.3
Allen
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,491 | 57.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,536 | 35.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 324 | 7.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +21.9
Anderson
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,527 | 61.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 817 | 32.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 153 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +28.4
Atchison
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,458 | 52.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,927 | 41.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 275 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +11.4
Barber
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,183 | 70.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 443 | 26.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 61 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +43.9
Barton
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,316 | 66.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,279 | 28.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 346 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +38.2
Bourbon
Pat Roberts | REP | 3,120 | 64.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,427 | 29.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 306 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.9
Brown
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,043 | 65.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 946 | 30.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 143 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +35.0
Butler
Pat Roberts | REP | 12,175 | 59.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 7,292 | 35.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 916 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +24.0
Chase
Pat Roberts | REP | 633 | 59.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 371 | 35.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 56 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +24.7
Chautauqua
Pat Roberts | REP | 831 | 75.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 218 | 19.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 49 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +55.8
Cherokee
Pat Roberts | REP | 3,609 | 61.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,772 | 30.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 451 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +31.5
Cheyenne
Pat Roberts | REP | 823 | 78.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 196 | 18.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 30 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +59.8
Clark
Pat Roberts | REP | 593 | 74.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 174 | 21.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 34 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +52.3
Clay
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,119 | 68.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 861 | 27.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 126 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +40.5
Cloud
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,093 | 66.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 889 | 28.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 166 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +38.2
Coffey
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,001 | 64.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 934 | 30.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 161 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.5
Comanche
Pat Roberts | REP | 479 | 71.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 159 | 23.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 37 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +47.4
Cowley
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,214 | 54.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 3,871 | 40.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 555 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +13.9
Crawford
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,003 | 49.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 4,383 | 43.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 763 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +6.1
Decatur
Pat Roberts | REP | 941 | 77.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 230 | 18.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 48 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +58.3
Dickinson
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,069 | 64.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,899 | 30.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 323 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.5
Doniphan
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,554 | 69.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 550 | 24.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 134 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +44.9
Douglas
Greg Orman | IND | 24,391 | 66.8 |
Pat Roberts | REP | 10,857 | 29.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 1,251 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orman +37.1
Edwards
Pat Roberts | REP | 791 | 70.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 293 | 25.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 46 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +44.1
Elk
Pat Roberts | REP | 670 | 62.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 311 | 29.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 84 | 7.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +33.7
Ellis
Pat Roberts | REP | 6,070 | 59.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 3,628 | 35.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 431 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +24.1
Ellsworth
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,396 | 62.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 738 | 32.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 113 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +29.3
Finney
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,317 | 65.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,948 | 29.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 290 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +36.1
Ford
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,020 | 66.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,771 | 29.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 230 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +37.4
Franklin
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,319 | 55.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,964 | 38.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 452 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +17.5
Geary
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,711 | 55.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,923 | 39.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 222 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +16.2
Gove
Pat Roberts | REP | 850 | 75.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 228 | 20.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 45 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +55.4
Graham
Pat Roberts | REP | 793 | 69.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 297 | 26.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 46 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +43.7
Grant
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,252 | 72.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 399 | 23.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 81 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +49.2
Gray
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,184 | 74.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 345 | 21.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 66 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +52.6
Greeley
Pat Roberts | REP | 424 | 75.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 113 | 20.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 26 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +55.2
Greenwood
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,391 | 63.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 636 | 29.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 151 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.7
Hamilton
Pat Roberts | REP | 529 | 75.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 147 | 21.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 21 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +54.8
Harper
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,330 | 67.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 531 | 26.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 120 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +40.3
Harvey
Pat Roberts | REP | 6,007 | 53.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 4,906 | 43.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 412 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +9.7
Haskell
Pat Roberts | REP | 797 | 79.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 181 | 18.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 30 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +61.1
Hodgeman
Pat Roberts | REP | 570 | 75.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 165 | 21.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 20 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +53.6
Jackson
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,513 | 53.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,988 | 42.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 229 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +11.1
Jefferson
Pat Roberts | REP | 3,367 | 52.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,832 | 43.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 259 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +8.3
Jewell
Pat Roberts | REP | 844 | 76.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 218 | 19.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 49 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +56.3
Johnson
Pat Roberts | REP | 93,497 | 49.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 91,067 | 48.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 4,856 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +1.3
Kearny
Pat Roberts | REP | 752 | 75.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 212 | 21.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 30 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +54.3
Kingman
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,841 | 64.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 868 | 30.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 129 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.3
Kiowa
Pat Roberts | REP | 677 | 77.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 177 | 20.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 24 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +56.9
Labette
Pat Roberts | REP | 3,152 | 56.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,059 | 36.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 366 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +19.6
Lane
Pat Roberts | REP | 563 | 76.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 152 | 20.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 19 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +56.0
Leavenworth
Pat Roberts | REP | 10,303 | 52.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 8,468 | 43.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 890 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +9.3
Lincoln
Pat Roberts | REP | 913 | 72.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 295 | 23.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 51 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +49.1
Linn
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,992 | 63.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 959 | 30.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 181 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +33.0
Logan
Pat Roberts | REP | 794 | 76.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 199 | 19.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 49 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +57.1
Lyon
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,176 | 48.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 4,133 | 47.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 386 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +0.5
Marion
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,807 | 64.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,346 | 30.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 215 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +33.4
Marshall
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,215 | 60.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,287 | 35.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 154 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +25.4
McPherson
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,933 | 59.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 3,540 | 35.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 490 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +24.0
Meade
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,042 | 74.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 308 | 22.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 50 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +52.4
Miami
Pat Roberts | REP | 6,019 | 58.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 3,959 | 38.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 396 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +19.9
Mitchell
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,610 | 73.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 491 | 22.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 92 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +51.0
Montgomery
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,914 | 69.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,173 | 25.6 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 389 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +44.1
Morris
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,164 | 58.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 717 | 35.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 115 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +22.4
Morton
Pat Roberts | REP | 670 | 76.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 168 | 19.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 34 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +57.6
Nemaha
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,848 | 68.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,126 | 27.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 185 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +41.4
Neosho
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,864 | 60.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,540 | 32.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 332 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +28.0
Ness
Pat Roberts | REP | 899 | 77.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 219 | 18.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 40 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +58.7
Norton
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,328 | 73.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 385 | 21.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 87 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +52.4
Osage
Pat Roberts | REP | 3,160 | 55.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,240 | 39.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 309 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +16.1
Osborne
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,026 | 71.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 328 | 23.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 72 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +48.9
Ottawa
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,664 | 72.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 501 | 21.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 134 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +50.6
Pawnee
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,357 | 63.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 688 | 32.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 87 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +31.4
Phillips
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,889 | 75.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 492 | 19.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 113 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +56.0
Pottawatomie
Pat Roberts | REP | 5,342 | 66.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,303 | 28.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 338 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +38.1
Pratt
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,955 | 62.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 1,003 | 32.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 151 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +30.6
Rawlins
Pat Roberts | REP | 908 | 80.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 171 | 15.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 45 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +65.6
Reno
Pat Roberts | REP | 10,298 | 55.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 7,261 | 39.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 926 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +16.4
Republic
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,386 | 70.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 477 | 24.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 92 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +46.5
Rice
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,868 | 63.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 924 | 31.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 151 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +32.1
Riley
Pat Roberts | REP | 7,587 | 50.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 6,922 | 46.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 465 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +4.4
Rooks
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,479 | 74.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 387 | 19.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 114 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +55.2
Rush
Pat Roberts | REP | 878 | 67.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 362 | 27.7 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 65 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +39.5
Russell
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,724 | 67.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 697 | 27.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 129 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +40.3
Saline
Pat Roberts | REP | 6,529 | 54.8 |
Greg Orman | IND | 4,769 | 40.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 625 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +14.8
Scott
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,346 | 78.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 292 | 17.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 80 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +61.4
Sedgwick
Pat Roberts | REP | 71,018 | 51.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 60,902 | 43.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 7,035 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +7.3
Seward
Pat Roberts | REP | 2,346 | 73.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 708 | 22.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 146 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +51.2
Shawnee
Greg Orman | IND | 32,081 | 53.0 |
Pat Roberts | REP | 26,163 | 43.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 2,320 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orman +9.8
Sheridan
Pat Roberts | REP | 809 | 77.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 200 | 19.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 36 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +58.3
Sherman
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,490 | 75.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 425 | 21.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 70 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +53.7
Smith
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,257 | 73.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 363 | 21.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 88 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +52.3
Stafford
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,019 | 67.6 |
Greg Orman | IND | 419 | 27.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 70 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +39.8
Stanton
Pat Roberts | REP | 538 | 78.7 |
Greg Orman | IND | 119 | 17.4 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 27 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +61.3
Stevens
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,082 | 78.5 |
Greg Orman | IND | 232 | 16.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 64 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +61.7
Sumner
Pat Roberts | REP | 4,217 | 57.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 2,614 | 35.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 447 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +22.0
Thomas
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,879 | 72.4 |
Greg Orman | IND | 610 | 23.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 106 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +48.9
Trego
Pat Roberts | REP | 795 | 68.1 |
Greg Orman | IND | 307 | 26.3 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 66 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +41.8
Wabaunsee
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,728 | 61.9 |
Greg Orman | IND | 896 | 32.1 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 168 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +29.8
Wallace
Pat Roberts | REP | 530 | 86.3 |
Greg Orman | IND | 67 | 10.9 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 17 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +75.4
Washington
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,652 | 73.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 492 | 21.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 112 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +51.4
Wichita
Pat Roberts | REP | 623 | 81.0 |
Greg Orman | IND | 115 | 15.0 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 31 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +66.1
Wilson
Pat Roberts | REP | 1,795 | 69.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 653 | 25.2 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 146 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +44.0
Woodson
Pat Roberts | REP | 668 | 63.2 |
Greg Orman | IND | 304 | 28.8 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 85 | 8.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Roberts +34.4
Wyandotte
Greg Orman | IND | 17,599 | 63.5 |
Pat Roberts | REP | 8,719 | 31.5 |
Randall Batson | LIB | 1,381 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Orman +32.1
Adair
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,900 | 68.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,023 | 28.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 239 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +40.2
Allen
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,410 | 67.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,875 | 28.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 279 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +38.6
Anderson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,164 | 58.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,158 | 35.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 481 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +22.8
Ballard
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,249 | 62.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,223 | 34.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 119 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +28.6
Barren
Mitch McConnell | REP | 8,268 | 59.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,091 | 36.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 601 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +22.8
Bath
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,890 | 49.3 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,777 | 46.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 168 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +2.9
Bell
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,757 | 69.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,206 | 26.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 288 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +43.0
Boone
Mitch McConnell | REP | 23,191 | 67.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 9,779 | 28.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,225 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +39.2
Bourbon
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,494 | 52.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,907 | 43.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 243 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +8.8
Boyd
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,264 | 49.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 6,841 | 46.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 533 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +2.9
Boyle
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,437 | 56.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,892 | 40.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 288 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +16.1
Bracken
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,575 | 61.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 898 | 34.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 99 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +26.3
Breathitt
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,430 | 52.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,062 | 44.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 163 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +7.9
Breckinridge
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,120 | 57.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,830 | 39.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 261 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +17.9
Bullitt
Mitch McConnell | REP | 14,717 | 60.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 8,847 | 36.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 761 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +24.1
Butler
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,873 | 70.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,085 | 26.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 119 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +43.9
Caldwell
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,089 | 61.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,743 | 34.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 198 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +26.8
Calloway
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,263 | 58.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,676 | 37.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 450 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +20.9
Campbell
Mitch McConnell | REP | 17,607 | 59.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 10,971 | 36.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,117 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +22.3
Carlisle
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,386 | 62.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 777 | 35.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 49 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +27.5
Carroll
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,683 | 48.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,649 | 47.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 120 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +1.0
Carter
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,479 | 52.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,748 | 43.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 363 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +8.5
Casey
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,699 | 73.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,174 | 23.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 168 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +50.1
Christian
Mitch McConnell | REP | 9,316 | 61.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,516 | 36.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 445 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +24.9
Clark
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,131 | 57.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,882 | 39.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 433 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.1
Clay
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,597 | 75.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,325 | 21.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 205 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +53.4
Clinton
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,156 | 76.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 838 | 20.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 134 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +56.2
Crittenden
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,283 | 67.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 953 | 28.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 127 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +39.5
Cumberland
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,079 | 69.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 778 | 26.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 124 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +43.6
Daviess
Mitch McConnell | REP | 18,228 | 55.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 13,433 | 41.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,002 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +14.7
Edmonson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,731 | 64.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,370 | 32.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 130 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +32.2
Elliott
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,153 | 54.1 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 898 | 42.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 82 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +12.0
Estill
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,881 | 61.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,588 | 34.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 192 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +27.7
Fayette
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 50,332 | 51.9 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 44,073 | 45.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 2,482 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +6.5
Fleming
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,863 | 58.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,920 | 38.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 148 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +19.1
Floyd
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,914 | 52.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,734 | 43.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 430 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +9.0
Franklin
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 10,534 | 53.5 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 8,329 | 42.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 842 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +11.2
Fulton
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,087 | 55.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 804 | 41.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 62 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +14.5
Gallatin
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,530 | 57.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,028 | 38.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 92 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.9
Garrard
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,764 | 68.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,562 | 28.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 177 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +40.0
Grant
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,126 | 65.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,938 | 30.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 274 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +34.5
Graves
Mitch McConnell | REP | 8,365 | 63.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,359 | 33.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 389 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +30.5
Grayson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,048 | 64.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,553 | 32.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 287 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +31.6
Green
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,198 | 66.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,454 | 30.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 155 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +36.3
Greenup
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,077 | 51.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,378 | 45.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 365 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +5.9
Hancock
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,882 | 50.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,707 | 45.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 134 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +4.7
Hardin
Mitch McConnell | REP | 17,551 | 57.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 11,975 | 39.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,011 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.3
Harlan
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,461 | 72.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,199 | 24.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 316 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +47.5
Harrison
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,228 | 55.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,243 | 38.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 326 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +17.0
Hart
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,296 | 57.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,248 | 39.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 227 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.2
Henderson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,119 | 51.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 6,479 | 46.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 355 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +4.6
Henry
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,281 | 55.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,382 | 40.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 211 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +15.3
Hickman
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,156 | 60.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 707 | 36.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 63 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +23.3
Hopkins
Mitch McConnell | REP | 10,405 | 65.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,087 | 31.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 473 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +33.3
Jackson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,555 | 77.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 856 | 18.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 154 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +59.1
Jefferson
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 144,761 | 56.0 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 108,786 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +13.9
Jessamine
Mitch McConnell | REP | 10,822 | 63.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,567 | 32.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 699 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +30.8
Johnson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,608 | 69.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,152 | 26.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 326 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +42.7
Kenton
Mitch McConnell | REP | 28,297 | 60.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 16,660 | 35.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,575 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +25.0
Knott
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,578 | 59.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,661 | 38.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 103 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +21.1
Knox
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,977 | 68.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,951 | 28.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 283 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +39.4
LaRue
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,966 | 62.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,608 | 33.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 167 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +28.6
Laurel
Mitch McConnell | REP | 12,613 | 73.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,997 | 23.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 470 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +50.4
Lawrence
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,128 | 60.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,842 | 35.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 198 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +24.9
Lee
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,729 | 65.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 799 | 30.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 97 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +35.4
Leslie
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,513 | 81.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 684 | 15.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 96 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +65.9
Letcher
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,787 | 63.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,495 | 33.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 261 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +30.4
Lewis
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,383 | 69.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 951 | 27.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 95 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +41.8
Lincoln
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,565 | 61.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,590 | 34.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 276 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +26.6
Livingston
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,374 | 60.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,389 | 35.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 132 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +25.3
Logan
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,719 | 61.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,706 | 35.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 239 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +26.3
Lyon
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,096 | 57.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,425 | 39.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 117 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.4
Madison
Mitch McConnell | REP | 15,472 | 57.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 10,407 | 38.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 961 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.9
Magoffin
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,662 | 57.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,523 | 39.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 155 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.0
Marion
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,267 | 55.3 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,498 | 42.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 140 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +13.0
Marshall
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,886 | 59.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,977 | 37.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 443 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +21.9
Martin
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,077 | 74.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 925 | 22.3 |
David Patterson | LIB | 138 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +52.0
Mason
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,279 | 58.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,192 | 39.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 149 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +19.3
McCracken
Mitch McConnell | REP | 15,043 | 63.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 8,262 | 34.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 558 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +28.4
McCreary
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,508 | 70.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,275 | 25.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 218 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +44.7
McLean
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,217 | 58.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,457 | 38.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 115 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +20.1
Meade
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,123 | 55.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,793 | 41.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 313 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +14.4
Menifee
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,291 | 50.1 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,183 | 45.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 103 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +4.2
Mercer
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,901 | 61.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,602 | 32.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 414 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +29.0
Metcalfe
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,294 | 56.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,550 | 38.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 188 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.5
Monroe
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,472 | 74.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,021 | 21.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 189 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +52.3
Montgomery
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,711 | 53.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,837 | 43.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 336 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +9.8
Morgan
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,230 | 52.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,817 | 43.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 177 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +9.8
Muhlenberg
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,192 | 53.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,249 | 43.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 253 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +9.7
Nelson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 7,663 | 51.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 6,883 | 46.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 417 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +5.2
Nicholas
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,147 | 51.1 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,005 | 44.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 93 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +6.3
Ohio
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,460 | 60.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,236 | 36.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 289 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +24.8
Oldham
Mitch McConnell | REP | 15,049 | 64.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 7,746 | 33.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 578 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +31.2
Owen
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,495 | 61.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,383 | 34.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 180 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +27.4
Owsley
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,458 | 68.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 574 | 27.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 83 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +41.8
Pendleton
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,715 | 63.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,304 | 30.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 231 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +33.2
Perry
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,179 | 64.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,098 | 32.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 337 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +32.0
Pike
Mitch McConnell | REP | 11,840 | 62.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 6,531 | 34.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 508 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +28.1
Powell
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,156 | 49.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,022 | 46.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 218 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +3.0
Pulaski
Mitch McConnell | REP | 15,610 | 72.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,263 | 24.4 |
David Patterson | LIB | 719 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +47.9
Robertson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 459 | 57.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 314 | 39.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 21 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +18.3
Rockcastle
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,803 | 74.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,122 | 22.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 172 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +52.6
Rowan
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,667 | 49.6 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,453 | 46.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 271 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +2.9
Russell
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,779 | 70.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,685 | 25.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 279 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +45.9
Scott
Mitch McConnell | REP | 9,371 | 55.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 6,767 | 40.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 706 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +15.5
Shelby
Mitch McConnell | REP | 9,220 | 60.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 5,525 | 36.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 405 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +24.4
Simpson
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,738 | 57.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,887 | 39.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 151 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +17.8
Spencer
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,766 | 63.9 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,445 | 32.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 253 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +31.1
Taylor
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,119 | 63.3 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 3,271 | 33.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 281 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +29.4
Todd
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,367 | 64.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,179 | 31.9 |
David Patterson | LIB | 148 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +32.2
Trigg
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,328 | 63.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,765 | 33.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 173 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +29.7
Trimble
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,678 | 55.1 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,282 | 42.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 85 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +13.0
Union
Mitch McConnell | REP | 3,171 | 61.8 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,824 | 35.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 135 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +26.3
Warren
Mitch McConnell | REP | 19,460 | 58.7 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 12,671 | 38.2 |
David Patterson | LIB | 1,039 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +20.5
Washington
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,655 | 58.0 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,775 | 38.8 |
David Patterson | LIB | 145 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +19.2
Wayne
Mitch McConnell | REP | 4,229 | 61.5 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,343 | 34.1 |
David Patterson | LIB | 308 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +27.4
Webster
Mitch McConnell | REP | 2,854 | 63.4 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,512 | 33.6 |
David Patterson | LIB | 134 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +29.8
Whitley
Mitch McConnell | REP | 6,879 | 71.2 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 2,485 | 25.7 |
David Patterson | LIB | 293 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +45.5
Wolfe
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 1,180 | 49.4 |
Mitch McConnell | REP | 1,134 | 47.5 |
David Patterson | LIB | 74 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grimes +1.9
Woodford
Mitch McConnell | REP | 5,573 | 53.6 |
Alison Lundergan Grimes | DEM | 4,470 | 43.0 |
David Patterson | LIB | 364 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McConnell +10.6
Acadia
Bill Cassidy | REP | 13,290 | 73.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,751 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +47.3
Allen
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,646 | 69.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,640 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +37.9
Ascension
Bill Cassidy | REP | 20,531 | 64.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 11,572 | 36.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +27.9
Assumption
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,380 | 50.7 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,292 | 49.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +1.3
Avoyelles
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,406 | 62.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,411 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +25.3
Beauregard
Bill Cassidy | REP | 6,878 | 79.1 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,817 | 20.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +58.2
Bienville
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,487 | 51.3 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,357 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +2.7
Bossier
Bill Cassidy | REP | 20,691 | 73.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 7,637 | 27.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +46.1
Caddo
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 37,807 | 54.2 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 31,948 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +8.4
Calcasieu
Bill Cassidy | REP | 30,510 | 63.1 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 17,868 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +26.1
Caldwell
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,291 | 74.8 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 772 | 25.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +49.6
Cameron
Bill Cassidy | REP | 1,545 | 79.4 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 402 | 20.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +58.7
Catahoula
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,158 | 65.9 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,119 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +31.7
Claiborne
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,503 | 53.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,157 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +7.4
Concordia
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,083 | 57.5 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,278 | 42.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +15.0
DeSoto
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,592 | 54.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,917 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +7.9
East Baton Rouge
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 69,245 | 52.7 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 62,115 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +5.4
East Carroll
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,876 | 67.3 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 913 | 32.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +34.5
East Feliciana
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,653 | 50.2 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,630 | 49.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +0.3
Evangeline
Bill Cassidy | REP | 6,336 | 60.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,101 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +21.4
Franklin
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,509 | 69.1 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,014 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +38.2
Grant
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,396 | 82.6 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 927 | 17.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +65.2
Iberia
Bill Cassidy | REP | 12,738 | 62.5 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 7,652 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +24.9
Iberville
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 7,537 | 58.4 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 5,378 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +16.7
Jackson
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,264 | 62.3 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,977 | 37.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +24.6
Jeff Davis
Bill Cassidy | REP | 5,781 | 71.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,359 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +42.0
Jefferson
Bill Cassidy | REP | 58,160 | 53.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 51,512 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +6.1
Lafayette
Bill Cassidy | REP | 42,537 | 67.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 20,297 | 32.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +35.4
Lafourche
Bill Cassidy | REP | 14,876 | 64.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 8,360 | 36.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +28.0
LaSalle
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,763 | 87.9 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 520 | 12.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +75.7
Lincoln
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,187 | 59.6 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,874 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +19.2
Livingston
Bill Cassidy | REP | 27,206 | 83.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 5,585 | 17.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +65.9
Madison
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,872 | 60.1 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 1,244 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +20.2
Morehouse
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,338 | 52.6 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,914 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +5.1
Natchitoches
Bill Cassidy | REP | 5,674 | 55.1 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,617 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +10.3
Orleans
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 87,398 | 84.9 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 15,585 | 15.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +69.7
Ouachita
Bill Cassidy | REP | 26,797 | 62.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 16,419 | 38.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +24.0
Plaquemines
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,342 | 56.6 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,331 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +13.2
Pointe Coupee
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,143 | 52.0 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 3,824 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +4.0
Rapides
Bill Cassidy | REP | 25,123 | 65.4 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 13,266 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +30.9
Red River
Bill Cassidy | REP | 1,423 | 50.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,381 | 49.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +1.5
Richland
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,442 | 62.5 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,667 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +25.0
Sabine
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,837 | 78.5 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,327 | 21.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +56.9
St. Bernard
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,758 | 50.6 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,636 | 49.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +1.3
St. Charles
Bill Cassidy | REP | 9,059 | 57.2 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 6,785 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +14.4
St. Helena
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 2,676 | 62.4 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 1,610 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +24.9
St. James
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 5,281 | 64.4 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,919 | 35.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +28.8
St. John the Baptist
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 8,954 | 69.0 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,031 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +37.9
St. Landry
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 13,990 | 50.7 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 13,616 | 49.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +1.4
St. Martin
Bill Cassidy | REP | 9,817 | 60.4 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 6,431 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +20.8
St. Mary
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,773 | 57.2 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 5,812 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +14.4
St. Tammany
Bill Cassidy | REP | 54,914 | 71.8 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 21,595 | 28.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +43.5
Tangipahoa
Bill Cassidy | REP | 19,148 | 60.8 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 12,323 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +21.7
Tensas
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 971 | 55.0 |
Bill Cassidy | REP | 796 | 45.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Landrieu +9.9
Terrebonne
Bill Cassidy | REP | 16,731 | 63.8 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 9,490 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +27.6
Union
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,965 | 71.4 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,988 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +42.8
Vermilion
Bill Cassidy | REP | 11,201 | 75.9 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 3,559 | 24.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +51.8
Vernon
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,854 | 80.3 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,923 | 19.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +60.7
Washington
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,144 | 59.3 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,903 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +18.6
Webster
Bill Cassidy | REP | 7,126 | 59.3 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,885 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +18.7
West Baton Rouge
Bill Cassidy | REP | 4,313 | 51.0 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 4,148 | 49.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +2.0
West Carroll
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,422 | 80.6 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 582 | 19.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +61.3
West Feliciana
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,231 | 53.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,927 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +7.3
Winn
Bill Cassidy | REP | 2,862 | 68.7 |
Mary Landrieu | DEM | 1,302 | 31.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cassidy +37.5
Barnstable
Ed Markey | DEM | 51,217 | 53.5 |
Brian Herr | REP | 44,443 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +7.1
Berkshire
Ed Markey | DEM | 28,389 | 74.8 |
Brian Herr | REP | 9,582 | 25.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +49.5
Bristol
Ed Markey | DEM | 84,022 | 59.4 |
Brian Herr | REP | 57,388 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +18.8
Dukes
Ed Markey | DEM | 5,161 | 72.0 |
Brian Herr | REP | 2,010 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +43.9
Essex
Ed Markey | DEM | 146,622 | 59.5 |
Brian Herr | REP | 99,805 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +19.0
Franklin
Ed Markey | DEM | 18,779 | 73.1 |
Brian Herr | REP | 6,896 | 26.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +46.3
Hampden
Ed Markey | DEM | 76,703 | 59.8 |
Brian Herr | REP | 51,611 | 40.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +19.6
Hampshire
Ed Markey | DEM | 38,379 | 71.9 |
Brian Herr | REP | 15,016 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +43.8
Middlesex
Ed Markey | DEM | 336,391 | 66.0 |
Brian Herr | REP | 173,097 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +32.1
Nantucket
Ed Markey | DEM | 2,233 | 61.7 |
Brian Herr | REP | 1,386 | 38.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +23.4
Norfolk
Ed Markey | DEM | 143,898 | 59.5 |
Brian Herr | REP | 97,873 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +19.0
Plymouth
Ed Markey | DEM | 91,339 | 52.9 |
Brian Herr | REP | 81,432 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +5.7
Suffolk
Ed Markey | DEM | 134,414 | 79.7 |
Brian Herr | REP | 34,137 | 20.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +59.5
Worcester
Ed Markey | DEM | 128,189 | 52.8 |
Brian Herr | REP | 114,702 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Markey +5.6
Androscoggin
Susan Collins | REP | 32,605 | 71.9 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 12,747 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +43.8
Aroostook
Susan Collins | REP | 22,063 | 78.1 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 6,178 | 21.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +56.2
Cumberland
Susan Collins | REP | 86,485 | 62.0 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 53,027 | 38.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +24.0
Franklin
Susan Collins | REP | 9,821 | 70.0 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 4,203 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +40.1
Hancock
Susan Collins | REP | 16,090 | 62.6 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 9,611 | 37.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +25.2
Kennebec
Susan Collins | REP | 38,744 | 69.2 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 17,272 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +38.3
Knox
Susan Collins | REP | 11,622 | 62.7 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 6,906 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +25.5
Lincoln
Susan Collins | REP | 12,321 | 68.6 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 5,646 | 31.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +37.2
Oxford
Susan Collins | REP | 18,457 | 71.0 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 7,532 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +42.0
Penobscot
Susan Collins | REP | 46,393 | 73.7 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 16,553 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +47.4
Piscataquis
Susan Collins | REP | 6,173 | 76.8 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 1,862 | 23.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +53.7
Sagadahoc
Susan Collins | REP | 12,715 | 69.2 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 5,666 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +38.3
Somerset
Susan Collins | REP | 15,820 | 72.3 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 6,068 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +44.6
Waldo
Susan Collins | REP | 11,831 | 65.0 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 6,367 | 35.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +30.0
Washington
Susan Collins | REP | 9,765 | 71.1 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 3,971 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +42.2
York
Susan Collins | REP | 61,306 | 70.2 |
Shenna Bellows | DEM | 26,044 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Collins +40.4
Alcona
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,330 | 52.5 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,983 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +7.8
Alger
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,618 | 49.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,520 | 46.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +3.0
Allegan
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 19,739 | 56.1 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 13,667 | 38.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 895 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +17.2
Alpena
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,782 | 50.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,497 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +3.0
Antrim
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,133 | 54.3 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,939 | 41.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +12.6
Arenac
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,827 | 53.5 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,153 | 40.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 142 | 2.7 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 111 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +12.8
Baraga
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,227 | 49.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,176 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +2.1
Barry
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 10,499 | 52.8 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 8,258 | 41.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 555 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +11.3
Bay
Gary Peters | DEM | 15,540 | 57.0 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 10,462 | 38.4 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 563 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +18.6
Benzie
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,557 | 49.5 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,342 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +3.0
Berrien
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 24,746 | 57.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 16,968 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +18.1
Branch
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 6,095 | 54.6 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,471 | 40.0 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 292 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +14.5
Calhoun
Gary Peters | DEM | 19,034 | 50.7 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 16,581 | 44.2 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 955 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +6.5
Cass
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 8,025 | 60.2 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,828 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +24.0
Charlevoix
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,470 | 52.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,568 | 43.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.6
Cheboygan
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,682 | 49.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,401 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +3.0
Chippewa
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,340 | 48.7 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,190 | 47.3 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 222 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +1.4
Clare
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,475 | 48.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,090 | 44.6 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 262 | 2.9 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 238 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +4.2
Clinton
Gary Peters | DEM | 14,836 | 50.3 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 13,706 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +3.8
Crawford
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,323 | 49.5 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,132 | 45.4 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 114 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +4.1
Delta
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 6,860 | 51.6 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 6,113 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +5.6
Dickinson
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,913 | 57.9 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,368 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +18.2
Eaton
Gary Peters | DEM | 21,858 | 54.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 17,032 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +12.0
Emmet
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 6,933 | 53.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,498 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +11.1
Genesee
Gary Peters | DEM | 86,100 | 65.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 39,896 | 30.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +35.3
Gladwin
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,272 | 49.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,813 | 44.6 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 215 | 2.5 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 177 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +5.4
Gogebic
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,566 | 51.6 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,269 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +6.0
Grand Traverse
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 16,575 | 50.3 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 15,029 | 45.6 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 668 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +4.7
Gratiot
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,519 | 51.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,812 | 44.6 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 220 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +6.6
Hillsdale
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 7,622 | 58.0 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,891 | 37.2 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 264 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +20.8
Houghton
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,390 | 52.3 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,620 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +7.5
Huron
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,961 | 51.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,187 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +6.7
Ingham
Gary Peters | DEM | 56,022 | 64.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 27,585 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +32.9
Ionia
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 8,580 | 48.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 8,183 | 46.1 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 525 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +2.2
Iosco
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,709 | 51.5 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,968 | 43.4 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 234 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +8.1
Iron
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,166 | 51.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,877 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +6.9
Isabella
Gary Peters | DEM | 8,869 | 54.5 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 6,582 | 40.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 344 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +14.1
Jackson
Gary Peters | DEM | 21,437 | 48.4 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 20,961 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +1.1
Kalamazoo
Gary Peters | DEM | 43,452 | 54.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 32,662 | 40.7 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 2,351 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +13.4
Kalkaska
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,905 | 50.8 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,448 | 42.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 155 | 2.7 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 134 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.0
Kent
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 97,317 | 52.1 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 81,909 | 43.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 4,032 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.2
Keweenaw
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 620 | 56.5 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 447 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +15.8
Lake
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,780 | 51.0 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,492 | 42.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 93 | 2.7 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 73 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +8.3
Lapeer
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 14,420 | 49.2 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 13,183 | 45.0 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 770 | 2.6 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 602 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +4.2
Leelanau
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,340 | 48.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,243 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +0.9
Lenawee
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 14,911 | 52.1 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 12,584 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.1
Livingston
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 37,630 | 54.6 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 27,872 | 40.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 1,906 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +14.2
Luce
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 992 | 52.1 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 835 | 43.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.2
Mackinac
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,220 | 49.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,082 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +3.1
Macomb
Gary Peters | DEM | 140,592 | 53.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 108,142 | 41.4 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 6,115 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +12.4
Manistee
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,865 | 53.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,919 | 42.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 187 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +10.3
Marquette
Gary Peters | DEM | 12,623 | 57.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 8,868 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +17.0
Mason
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,849 | 48.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,720 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +1.3
Mecosta
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,763 | 49.7 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,224 | 45.0 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 280 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +4.6
Menominee
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,661 | 57.0 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,606 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +16.4
Midland
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 14,891 | 51.9 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 12,690 | 44.2 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 595 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +7.7
Missaukee
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,044 | 62.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,605 | 32.9 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 109 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +29.5
Monroe
Gary Peters | DEM | 22,957 | 49.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 20,842 | 45.3 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 1,095 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +4.6
Montcalm
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 8,198 | 48.1 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 7,744 | 45.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 499 | 2.9 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 393 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +2.7
Montmorency
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,771 | 50.4 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,557 | 44.3 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 95 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +6.1
Muskegon
Gary Peters | DEM | 27,781 | 57.1 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 18,307 | 37.7 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 1,158 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +19.5
Newaygo
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 7,769 | 53.8 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,815 | 40.2 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 378 | 2.6 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 331 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +13.5
Oakland
Gary Peters | DEM | 246,204 | 55.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 179,463 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +15.1
Oceana
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,190 | 51.3 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,514 | 43.0 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 192 | 2.4 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 189 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +8.3
Ogemaw
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,511 | 50.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,979 | 43.2 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 176 | 2.6 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 170 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +7.7
Ontonagon
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,263 | 50.2 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,174 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +3.5
Osceola
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 3,930 | 54.8 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,823 | 39.4 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 198 | 2.8 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 144 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +15.4
Oscoda
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,367 | 49.8 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,194 | 43.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 91 | 3.3 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 76 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +6.3
Otsego
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,564 | 53.9 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 3,523 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +12.3
Ottawa
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 59,337 | 65.0 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 28,589 | 31.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +33.7
Presque Isle
Gary Peters | DEM | 2,596 | 49.7 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 2,427 | 46.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +3.2
Roscommon
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,371 | 48.3 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 4,152 | 45.9 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 261 | 2.9 |
Richard Matkin | UST | 196 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +2.4
Saginaw
Gary Peters | DEM | 39,436 | 59.3 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 24,745 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +22.1
Sanilac
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 6,771 | 54.0 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 5,143 | 41.0 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 281 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +13.0
Schoolcraft
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 1,478 | 51.6 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 1,313 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +5.8
Shiawassee
Gary Peters | DEM | 12,683 | 52.9 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 10,135 | 42.3 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 561 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +10.6
St. Clair
Gary Peters | DEM | 24,551 | 48.6 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 23,160 | 45.8 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 1,366 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +2.8
St. Joseph
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 7,894 | 53.2 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 6,104 | 41.2 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 418 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +12.1
Tuscola
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 8,153 | 48.0 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 8,083 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +0.4
Van Buren
Gary Peters | DEM | 10,663 | 48.5 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 10,046 | 45.7 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 558 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +2.8
Washtenaw
Gary Peters | DEM | 80,604 | 67.3 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 35,155 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +37.9
Wayne
Gary Peters | DEM | 356,253 | 71.8 |
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 123,286 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Peters +47.0
Wexford
Terri Lynn Land | REP | 5,191 | 52.3 |
Gary Peters | DEM | 4,220 | 42.5 |
Jim Fulner | LIB | 271 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Land +9.8
Aitkin
Al Franken | DEM | 3,788 | 52.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,200 | 44.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 187 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +8.1
Anoka
Mike McFadden | REP | 57,905 | 49.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 55,409 | 47.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 2,649 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +2.1
Becker
Mike McFadden | REP | 5,941 | 49.4 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,395 | 44.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 478 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +4.5
Beltrami
Al Franken | DEM | 8,252 | 53.5 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,455 | 41.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 469 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +11.6
Benton
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,565 | 49.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,877 | 44.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 482 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +5.2
Big Stone
Al Franken | DEM | 1,166 | 54.9 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 851 | 40.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 72 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +14.8
Blue Earth
Al Franken | DEM | 10,866 | 54.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 8,194 | 40.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 626 | 3.1 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 414 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +13.3
Brown
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,657 | 49.8 |
Al Franken | DEM | 4,270 | 45.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 284 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +4.1
Carlton
Al Franken | DEM | 8,633 | 61.8 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,666 | 33.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 432 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +28.4
Carver
Mike McFadden | REP | 21,327 | 57.7 |
Al Franken | DEM | 14,428 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +18.7
Cass
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,245 | 50.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,445 | 44.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 402 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.5
Chippewa
Al Franken | DEM | 2,460 | 52.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,001 | 42.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 134 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +9.8
Chisago
Mike McFadden | REP | 10,456 | 51.6 |
Al Franken | DEM | 8,979 | 44.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 547 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +7.3
Clay
Al Franken | DEM | 10,229 | 57.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,909 | 38.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 465 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +18.6
Clearwater
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,536 | 53.1 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,196 | 41.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 123 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +11.7
Cook
Al Franken | DEM | 1,851 | 63.5 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 945 | 32.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 62 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +31.1
Cottonwood
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,079 | 48.3 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,980 | 46.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 158 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +2.3
Crow Wing
Mike McFadden | REP | 13,715 | 51.0 |
Al Franken | DEM | 12,049 | 44.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 737 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.2
Dakota
Al Franken | DEM | 75,860 | 49.8 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 71,509 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.9
Dodge
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,590 | 49.8 |
Al Franken | DEM | 3,140 | 43.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 342 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.2
Douglas
Mike McFadden | REP | 7,853 | 51.1 |
Al Franken | DEM | 6,879 | 44.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 435 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.3
Faribault
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,615 | 48.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,502 | 46.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 211 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +2.1
Fillmore
Al Franken | DEM | 4,366 | 52.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,429 | 41.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 407 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +11.2
Freeborn
Al Franken | DEM | 6,719 | 54.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 5,125 | 41.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 404 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +12.8
Goodhue
Mike McFadden | REP | 8,315 | 48.1 |
Al Franken | DEM | 8,176 | 47.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 523 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +0.8
Grant
Al Franken | DEM | 1,554 | 54.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,165 | 40.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 89 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +13.6
Hennepin
Al Franken | DEM | 278,243 | 61.9 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 158,271 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +26.7
Houston
Al Franken | DEM | 3,697 | 47.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,523 | 44.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 447 | 5.7 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 172 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.2
Hubbard
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,462 | 51.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 3,879 | 44.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 272 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.7
Isanti
Mike McFadden | REP | 7,269 | 52.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 6,022 | 43.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 399 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +8.9
Itasca
Al Franken | DEM | 10,781 | 56.8 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 7,447 | 39.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 506 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +17.6
Jackson
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,892 | 48.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,741 | 45.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 166 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +3.9
Kanabec
Al Franken | DEM | 2,984 | 48.0 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,912 | 46.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 209 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +1.2
Kandiyohi
Al Franken | DEM | 8,190 | 49.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 7,877 | 47.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 422 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +1.9
Kittson
Al Franken | DEM | 1,136 | 58.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 725 | 37.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 55 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +21.1
Koochiching
Al Franken | DEM | 3,108 | 58.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,935 | 36.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 199 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +21.9
Lac Qui Parle
Al Franken | DEM | 1,620 | 54.3 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,236 | 41.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 90 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +12.9
Lake
Al Franken | DEM | 3,170 | 61.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,752 | 34.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 158 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +27.6
Lake of the Woods
Mike McFadden | REP | 969 | 51.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 806 | 42.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 91 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +8.6
Le Sueur
Al Franken | DEM | 4,754 | 48.8 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,568 | 46.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 276 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +1.9
Lincoln
Al Franken | DEM | 1,100 | 47.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,041 | 44.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 146 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.5
Lyon
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,178 | 49.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 3,799 | 45.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 275 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +4.5
Mahnomen
Al Franken | DEM | 999 | 58.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 598 | 34.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 92 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +23.4
Marshall
Al Franken | DEM | 2,054 | 50.3 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,796 | 44.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 158 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +6.3
Martin
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,188 | 53.3 |
Al Franken | DEM | 3,200 | 40.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 314 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +12.6
McLeod
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,549 | 52.8 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,186 | 41.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 403 | 3.2 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 273 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +11.0
Meeker
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,481 | 49.0 |
Al Franken | DEM | 4,128 | 45.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 377 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +3.9
Mille Lacs
Al Franken | DEM | 4,303 | 48.0 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,211 | 47.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 284 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +1.0
Morrison
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,594 | 50.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,676 | 43.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 442 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +7.1
Mower
Al Franken | DEM | 6,672 | 56.3 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,571 | 38.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 438 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +17.7
Murray
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,626 | 46.0 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,606 | 45.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 233 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +0.6
Nicollet
Al Franken | DEM | 6,514 | 55.3 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,698 | 39.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 380 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +15.4
Nobles
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,973 | 49.4 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,596 | 43.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 353 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.3
Norman
Al Franken | DEM | 1,471 | 59.8 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 855 | 34.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 94 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +25.0
Olmsted
Al Franken | DEM | 24,757 | 49.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 23,375 | 46.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 1,514 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.7
Otter Tail
Mike McFadden | REP | 11,909 | 53.7 |
Al Franken | DEM | 9,243 | 41.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 718 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +12.0
Pennington
Al Franken | DEM | 2,515 | 49.0 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,290 | 44.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 221 | 4.3 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 105 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +4.4
Pine
Al Franken | DEM | 5,360 | 51.4 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,531 | 43.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 350 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +8.0
Pipestone
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,119 | 55.6 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,384 | 36.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 239 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +19.3
Polk
Al Franken | DEM | 4,778 | 48.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,522 | 46.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 363 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.6
Pope
Al Franken | DEM | 2,595 | 52.5 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,143 | 43.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 144 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +9.1
Ramsey
Al Franken | DEM | 118,769 | 65.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 56,009 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +34.7
Red Lake
Al Franken | DEM | 779 | 53.0 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 605 | 41.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 63 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +11.8
Redwood
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,848 | 51.6 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,342 | 42.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 212 | 3.8 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 113 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +9.2
Renville
Al Franken | DEM | 2,911 | 50.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,556 | 44.5 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 198 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +6.2
Rice
Al Franken | DEM | 12,045 | 56.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 8,603 | 40.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 493 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +16.0
Rock
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,793 | 56.8 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,141 | 36.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 171 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +20.7
Roseau
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,043 | 56.3 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,083 | 38.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 195 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +17.8
Scott
Mike McFadden | REP | 24,963 | 55.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 18,596 | 41.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 922 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +14.1
Sherburne
Mike McFadden | REP | 17,390 | 57.1 |
Al Franken | DEM | 11,745 | 38.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 786 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +18.5
Sibley
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,995 | 49.8 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,632 | 43.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 259 | 4.3 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 126 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +6.0
St. Louis
Al Franken | DEM | 52,147 | 64.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 26,020 | 32.0 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 1,830 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +32.1
Stearns
Mike McFadden | REP | 25,329 | 49.4 |
Al Franken | DEM | 23,608 | 46.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 1,498 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +3.4
Steele
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,177 | 48.9 |
Al Franken | DEM | 5,819 | 46.1 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 429 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +2.8
Stevens
Al Franken | DEM | 2,215 | 52.1 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,878 | 44.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 95 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +7.9
Swift
Al Franken | DEM | 2,345 | 56.9 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,591 | 38.6 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 109 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +18.3
Todd
Mike McFadden | REP | 4,398 | 49.7 |
Al Franken | DEM | 3,958 | 44.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 349 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +5.0
Traverse
Al Franken | DEM | 882 | 57.6 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 572 | 37.3 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 59 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +20.2
Wabasha
Al Franken | DEM | 4,043 | 48.2 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,836 | 45.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 351 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.5
Wadena
Mike McFadden | REP | 2,841 | 55.5 |
Al Franken | DEM | 2,041 | 39.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 162 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +15.6
Waseca
Al Franken | DEM | 3,205 | 48.7 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 3,017 | 45.9 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 228 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +2.9
Washington
Al Franken | DEM | 47,332 | 49.4 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 45,466 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +1.9
Watonwan
Al Franken | DEM | 1,943 | 52.5 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,563 | 42.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 134 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +10.3
Wilkin
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,147 | 49.2 |
Al Franken | DEM | 1,045 | 44.8 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 87 | 3.7 |
Heather Johnson | LIB | 54 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +4.4
Winona
Al Franken | DEM | 8,252 | 52.0 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 6,690 | 42.2 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 624 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +9.8
Wright
Mike McFadden | REP | 25,496 | 57.0 |
Al Franken | DEM | 17,325 | 38.7 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 1,170 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McFadden +18.3
Yellow Medicine
Al Franken | DEM | 2,055 | 51.5 |
Mike McFadden | REP | 1,772 | 44.4 |
Steve Carlson | INP | 104 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Franken +7.1
Adams
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,085 | 50.7 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,871 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +2.7
Alcorn
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,276 | 70.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,679 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +43.0
Amite
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,144 | 58.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,452 | 39.3 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 102 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +18.7
Attala
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,253 | 60.4 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,409 | 37.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +22.6
Benton
Travis Childers | DEM | 950 | 50.2 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 913 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +2.0
Bolivar
Travis Childers | DEM | 4,166 | 51.7 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,787 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +4.7
Calhoun
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,124 | 62.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,211 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +27.0
Carroll
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,120 | 68.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 898 | 29.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +39.7
Chickasaw
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,140 | 52.7 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,896 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +6.0
Choctaw
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,444 | 66.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 676 | 31.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +35.6
Claiborne
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,574 | 73.7 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 545 | 25.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +48.2
Clarke
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,748 | 66.7 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,272 | 30.9 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 98 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +35.8
Clay
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,501 | 55.2 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,794 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +11.1
Coahoma
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,589 | 54.9 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,058 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +11.3
Copiah
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,213 | 52.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,830 | 45.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 130 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +6.2
Covington
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,935 | 57.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,992 | 39.1 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 174 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +18.5
DeSoto
Thad Cochran | REP | 16,820 | 67.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 7,442 | 29.6 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 851 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +37.3
Forrest
Thad Cochran | REP | 8,826 | 64.1 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 4,575 | 33.2 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 368 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +30.9
Franklin
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,443 | 63.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 791 | 34.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +28.7
George
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,189 | 76.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 699 | 16.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 279 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +59.8
Greene
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,706 | 71.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 516 | 21.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 150 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +50.2
Grenada
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,108 | 55.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,377 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +13.1
Hancock
Thad Cochran | REP | 6,680 | 73.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,999 | 21.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 473 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +51.1
Harrison
Thad Cochran | REP | 21,970 | 65.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 10,149 | 30.4 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 1,214 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +35.5
Hinds
Travis Childers | DEM | 28,792 | 57.8 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 20,480 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +16.7
Holmes
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,714 | 69.5 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,151 | 29.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +40.0
Humphreys
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,241 | 56.4 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 944 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +13.5
Issaquena
Thad Cochran | REP | 195 | 51.6 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 181 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +3.7
Itawamba
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,167 | 67.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,421 | 30.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +37.4
Jackson
Thad Cochran | REP | 20,613 | 70.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 7,792 | 26.5 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 950 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +43.7
Jasper
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,492 | 53.3 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,071 | 44.3 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 114 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +9.0
Jeff Davis
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,251 | 56.7 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,644 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +15.3
Jefferson
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,342 | 76.9 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 390 | 22.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +54.5
Jones
Thad Cochran | REP | 9,026 | 56.3 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 6,294 | 39.2 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 719 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +17.0
Kemper
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,244 | 53.7 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,043 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +8.7
Lafayette
Thad Cochran | REP | 6,311 | 64.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,277 | 33.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +31.2
Lamar
Thad Cochran | REP | 10,347 | 76.6 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,752 | 20.4 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 410 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +56.2
Lauderdale
Thad Cochran | REP | 10,312 | 70.7 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 4,033 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +43.1
Lawrence
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,127 | 63.4 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,163 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +28.7
Leake
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,661 | 56.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,920 | 41.1 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 96 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +15.8
Lee
Thad Cochran | REP | 11,598 | 62.7 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 6,619 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +26.9
Leflore
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,996 | 56.8 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,246 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +14.2
Lincoln
Thad Cochran | REP | 5,274 | 71.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,987 | 26.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 149 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +44.4
Lowndes
Thad Cochran | REP | 8,203 | 56.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 6,159 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +14.1
Madison
Thad Cochran | REP | 15,741 | 67.1 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 7,451 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +35.3
Marion
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,028 | 65.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,963 | 32.1 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 130 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +33.7
Marshall
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,989 | 55.0 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,123 | 43.0 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 146 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +11.9
Monroe
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,404 | 58.4 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,068 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +17.7
Montgomery
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,378 | 55.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,065 | 42.7 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 52 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +12.5
Neshoba
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,487 | 73.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,465 | 24.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +49.8
Newton
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,584 | 71.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,294 | 26.0 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 105 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +46.0
Noxubee
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,943 | 68.9 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 856 | 30.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +38.5
Oktibbeha
Thad Cochran | REP | 5,024 | 58.6 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,490 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +17.9
Panola
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,513 | 52.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,128 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +5.7
Pearl River
Thad Cochran | REP | 7,911 | 73.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,090 | 19.5 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 716 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +54.3
Perry
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,755 | 66.4 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 767 | 29.0 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 122 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +37.4
Pike
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,155 | 54.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,404 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +9.8
Pontotoc
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,505 | 69.7 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,820 | 28.1 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 141 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +41.5
Prentiss
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,630 | 49.9 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,585 | 49.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +0.9
Quitman
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,464 | 58.3 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 998 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +18.6
Rankin
Thad Cochran | REP | 24,409 | 87.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,766 | 9.9 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 724 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +77.6
Scott
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,022 | 62.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,762 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +25.9
Sharkey
Travis Childers | DEM | 541 | 49.8 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 534 | 49.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +0.6
Simpson
Thad Cochran | REP | 4,138 | 62.0 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,428 | 36.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +25.6
Smith
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,890 | 67.3 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,276 | 29.7 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 126 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +37.6
Stone
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,734 | 71.6 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 929 | 24.3 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 157 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +47.3
Sunflower
Travis Childers | DEM | 3,012 | 59.6 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,989 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +20.2
Tallahatchie
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,509 | 52.2 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,340 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +5.8
Tate
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,042 | 63.4 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,628 | 33.9 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 130 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +29.5
Tippah
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,213 | 67.1 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,491 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +36.0
Tishomingo
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,077 | 66.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,421 | 30.8 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 110 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +35.9
Tunica
Travis Childers | DEM | 970 | 60.0 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 620 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +21.7
Union
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,982 | 69.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,650 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +40.9
Walthall
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,130 | 57.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,507 | 40.4 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 90 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +16.7
Warren
Thad Cochran | REP | 6,135 | 58.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 4,214 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +18.2
Washington
Travis Childers | DEM | 4,322 | 52.8 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 3,758 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +6.9
Wayne
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,247 | 54.8 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,694 | 41.3 |
Shawn O'Hara | RP | 158 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +13.5
Webster
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,104 | 75.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 657 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +51.7
Wilkinson
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,170 | 59.2 |
Thad Cochran | REP | 784 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Childers +19.5
Winston
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,775 | 55.9 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 2,130 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +13.0
Yalobusha
Thad Cochran | REP | 1,707 | 53.2 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,453 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +7.9
Yazoo
Thad Cochran | REP | 2,651 | 56.5 |
Travis Childers | DEM | 1,985 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cochran +14.2
Beaverhead
Steve Daines | REP | 2,749 | 69.5 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,120 | 28.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 89 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +41.2
Big Horn
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,856 | 50.2 |
Steve Daines | REP | 1,784 | 48.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +1.9
Blaine
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 930 | 50.0 |
Steve Daines | REP | 916 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +0.8
Broadwater
Steve Daines | REP | 1,889 | 74.3 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 598 | 23.5 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 57 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +50.7
Carbon
Steve Daines | REP | 2,885 | 62.3 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,661 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +26.4
Carter
Steve Daines | REP | 551 | 88.6 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 59 | 9.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +79.1
Cascade
Steve Daines | REP | 14,607 | 56.1 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 10,977 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +13.9
Chouteau
Steve Daines | REP | 1,435 | 67.4 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 662 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +36.3
Custer
Steve Daines | REP | 2,585 | 63.4 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,406 | 34.5 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 89 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +28.9
Daniels
Steve Daines | REP | 602 | 73.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 179 | 21.9 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 36 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +51.8
Dawson
Steve Daines | REP | 2,288 | 70.5 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 876 | 27.0 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 80 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +43.5
Deer Lodge
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 2,114 | 63.8 |
Steve Daines | REP | 1,119 | 33.8 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 78 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +30.1
Fallon
Steve Daines | REP | 908 | 79.9 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 162 | 14.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 66 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +65.7
Fergus
Steve Daines | REP | 3,437 | 69.5 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,412 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +41.0
Flathead
Steve Daines | REP | 21,152 | 67.0 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 9,855 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +35.8
Gallatin
Steve Daines | REP | 18,492 | 52.9 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 15,643 | 44.8 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 796 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +8.2
Garfield
Steve Daines | REP | 513 | 86.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 68 | 11.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +75.2
Glacier
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,790 | 56.6 |
Steve Daines | REP | 1,309 | 41.4 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 66 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +15.2
Golden Valley
Steve Daines | REP | 334 | 75.2 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 90 | 20.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 20 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +55.0
Granite
Steve Daines | REP | 993 | 65.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 467 | 30.9 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 49 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +34.9
Hill
Steve Daines | REP | 2,657 | 53.1 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 2,252 | 45.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +8.1
Jefferson
Steve Daines | REP | 3,316 | 63.5 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,785 | 34.2 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 117 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +29.3
Judith Basin
Steve Daines | REP | 719 | 71.3 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 274 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +44.1
Lake
Steve Daines | REP | 5,258 | 57.6 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 3,674 | 40.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 193 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +17.4
Lewis and Clark
Steve Daines | REP | 13,323 | 51.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 11,934 | 46.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 523 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +5.4
Liberty
Steve Daines | REP | 615 | 70.9 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 236 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +43.7
Lincoln
Steve Daines | REP | 5,194 | 70.9 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,901 | 25.9 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 233 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +44.9
Madison
Steve Daines | REP | 2,540 | 70.1 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,010 | 27.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +42.2
McCone
Steve Daines | REP | 652 | 75.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 189 | 22.0 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 20 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +53.8
Meagher
Steve Daines | REP | 587 | 75.2 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 181 | 23.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +52.0
Mineral
Steve Daines | REP | 978 | 63.9 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 501 | 32.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 51 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +31.2
Missoula
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 23,043 | 56.1 |
Steve Daines | REP | 17,121 | 41.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 877 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +14.4
Musselshell
Steve Daines | REP | 1,541 | 76.1 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 439 | 21.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 44 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +54.4
Park
Steve Daines | REP | 3,886 | 56.5 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 2,799 | 40.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 197 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +15.8
Petroleum
Steve Daines | REP | 200 | 83.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 36 | 15.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +68.6
Phillips
Steve Daines | REP | 1,379 | 78.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 337 | 19.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +59.5
Pondera
Steve Daines | REP | 1,470 | 67.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 666 | 30.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +37.1
Powder River
Steve Daines | REP | 705 | 80.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 157 | 18.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +62.8
Powell
Steve Daines | REP | 1,544 | 66.6 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 703 | 30.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 72 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +36.3
Prairie
Steve Daines | REP | 457 | 75.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 134 | 22.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +53.6
Ravalli
Steve Daines | REP | 10,939 | 65.4 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 5,458 | 32.6 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 340 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +32.7
Richland
Steve Daines | REP | 2,541 | 76.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 684 | 20.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 86 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +56.1
Roosevelt
Steve Daines | REP | 1,331 | 50.4 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,255 | 47.5 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 56 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +2.9
Rosebud
Steve Daines | REP | 1,653 | 63.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 890 | 34.3 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 52 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +29.4
Sanders
Steve Daines | REP | 3,189 | 69.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,241 | 27.1 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 141 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +42.6
Sheridan
Steve Daines | REP | 906 | 65.3 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 447 | 32.2 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 34 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +33.1
Silver Bow
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 8,369 | 66.3 |
Steve Daines | REP | 4,029 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Curtis +34.4
Stillwater
Steve Daines | REP | 2,676 | 71.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 985 | 26.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +45.4
Sweet Grass
Steve Daines | REP | 1,256 | 76.6 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 352 | 21.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +55.1
Teton
Steve Daines | REP | 1,808 | 66.6 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 856 | 31.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +35.1
Toole
Steve Daines | REP | 1,193 | 71.7 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 433 | 26.0 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 37 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +45.7
Treasure
Steve Daines | REP | 266 | 70.0 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 104 | 27.4 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 10 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +42.6
Valley
Steve Daines | REP | 2,192 | 65.8 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 1,055 | 31.7 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 85 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +34.1
Wheatland
Steve Daines | REP | 434 | 68.3 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 185 | 29.1 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 16 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +39.2
Wibaux
Steve Daines | REP | 364 | 78.1 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 94 | 20.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +57.9
Yellowstone
Steve Daines | REP | 31,396 | 61.0 |
Amanda Curtis | DEM | 19,017 | 37.0 |
Roger Roots | LIB | 1,041 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Daines +24.1
Alamance
Thom Tillis | REP | 24,132 | 55.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 17,889 | 40.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,712 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +14.3
Alexander
Thom Tillis | REP | 7,902 | 66.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,079 | 26.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 831 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +40.8
Alleghany
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,484 | 59.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,352 | 32.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 326 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +27.2
Anson
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,124 | 61.6 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,342 | 35.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 232 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +26.6
Ashe
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,636 | 59.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,212 | 34.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 592 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +25.7
Avery
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,699 | 73.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,127 | 22.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 222 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +51.0
Beaufort
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,718 | 55.1 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 7,057 | 40.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 877 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +15.1
Bertie
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,043 | 63.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,217 | 34.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 162 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +28.4
Bladen
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,622 | 49.8 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,029 | 44.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 642 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +5.3
Brunswick
Thom Tillis | REP | 22,728 | 56.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 15,600 | 38.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,139 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +17.6
Buncombe
Kay Hagan | DEM | 49,192 | 57.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 33,733 | 39.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,421 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +17.9
Burke
Thom Tillis | REP | 13,968 | 57.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,621 | 35.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,530 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +22.2
Cabarrus
Thom Tillis | REP | 29,158 | 56.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 19,900 | 38.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,195 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +18.1
Caldwell
Thom Tillis | REP | 13,294 | 63.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,241 | 29.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,380 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +33.7
Camden
Thom Tillis | REP | 1,913 | 60.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,132 | 35.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 106 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +24.8
Carteret
Thom Tillis | REP | 16,431 | 65.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 7,474 | 30.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,018 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +35.9
Caswell
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,454 | 49.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,381 | 48.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 209 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +1.0
Catawba
Thom Tillis | REP | 27,351 | 62.5 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 14,236 | 32.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,209 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +29.9
Chatham
Kay Hagan | DEM | 14,933 | 54.1 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 11,876 | 43.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 811 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +11.1
Cherokee
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,316 | 67.4 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,678 | 28.6 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 377 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +38.8
Chowan
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,803 | 54.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,238 | 43.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 130 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +10.9
Clay
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,003 | 66.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,316 | 29.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 167 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +37.6
Cleveland
Thom Tillis | REP | 15,484 | 55.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 10,944 | 39.4 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,318 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +16.4
Columbus
Thom Tillis | REP | 7,040 | 47.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,871 | 46.2 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 964 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +1.1
Craven
Thom Tillis | REP | 17,490 | 57.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 11,905 | 39.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,117 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +18.3
Cumberland
Kay Hagan | DEM | 42,493 | 56.1 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 30,809 | 40.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,437 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +15.4
Currituck
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,016 | 66.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,234 | 29.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 255 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +37.1
Dare
Thom Tillis | REP | 7,175 | 56.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,099 | 40.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 393 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +16.4
Davidson
Thom Tillis | REP | 28,039 | 68.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 11,068 | 27.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,727 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +41.6
Davie
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,433 | 68.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,709 | 27.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 588 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +41.7
Duplin
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,815 | 53.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,418 | 42.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 466 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +11.0
Durham
Kay Hagan | DEM | 70,601 | 76.7 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 19,628 | 21.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,855 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +55.4
Edgecombe
Kay Hagan | DEM | 11,421 | 67.3 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,149 | 30.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 411 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +36.9
Forsyth
Kay Hagan | DEM | 55,505 | 51.3 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 49,567 | 45.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,031 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +5.5
Franklin
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,743 | 49.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 9,114 | 46.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 923 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +3.2
Gaston
Thom Tillis | REP | 32,944 | 60.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 18,937 | 34.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,406 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +25.8
Gates
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,640 | 49.1 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 1,618 | 48.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 79 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +0.7
Graham
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,039 | 61.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 995 | 30.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 278 | 8.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +31.5
Granville
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,479 | 51.8 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 7,339 | 44.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 550 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +7.0
Greene
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,906 | 50.1 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,676 | 46.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 220 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +4.0
Guilford
Kay Hagan | DEM | 90,796 | 55.7 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 68,383 | 41.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,896 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +13.7
Halifax
Kay Hagan | DEM | 10,822 | 62.2 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,088 | 35.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 497 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +27.2
Harnett
Thom Tillis | REP | 15,306 | 56.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 10,487 | 39.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,095 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +17.9
Haywood
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,756 | 52.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,051 | 42.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 958 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +9.1
Henderson
Thom Tillis | REP | 21,651 | 59.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 13,132 | 36.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,359 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +23.6
Hertford
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,377 | 69.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 1,861 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +39.6
Hoke
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,944 | 57.6 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,995 | 38.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 380 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +18.9
Hyde
Kay Hagan | DEM | 886 | 49.9 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 793 | 44.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 97 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +5.2
Iredell
Thom Tillis | REP | 31,115 | 62.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 16,244 | 32.4 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,793 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +29.7
Jackson
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,179 | 48.1 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,032 | 46.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 552 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +1.4
Johnston
Thom Tillis | REP | 30,458 | 61.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 17,199 | 34.6 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,050 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +26.7
Jones
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,019 | 51.4 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,719 | 43.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 193 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +7.6
Lee
Thom Tillis | REP | 7,935 | 50.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,953 | 44.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 737 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +6.3
Lenoir
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,138 | 49.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,889 | 47.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 627 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +1.3
Lincoln
Thom Tillis | REP | 15,833 | 66.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,683 | 28.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,232 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +38.5
Macon
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,720 | 57.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,310 | 36.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 640 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +20.7
Madison
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,632 | 48.1 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,448 | 45.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 465 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +2.4
Martin
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,296 | 51.9 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,667 | 44.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 311 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +7.6
McDowell
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,894 | 62.7 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,386 | 30.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 708 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +31.9
Mecklenburg
Kay Hagan | DEM | 156,533 | 59.3 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 100,683 | 38.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 6,857 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +21.1
Mitchell
Thom Tillis | REP | 3,694 | 71.4 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,263 | 24.4 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 220 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +47.0
Montgomery
Thom Tillis | REP | 4,293 | 53.4 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,312 | 41.2 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 435 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +12.2
Moore
Thom Tillis | REP | 20,360 | 62.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 11,273 | 34.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,060 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +27.8
Nash
Thom Tillis | REP | 16,768 | 49.4 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 16,232 | 47.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 974 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +1.6
New Hanover
Thom Tillis | REP | 31,280 | 47.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 31,220 | 47.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,283 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +0.1
Northampton
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,362 | 65.9 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,106 | 31.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 149 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +34.1
Onslow
Thom Tillis | REP | 19,578 | 63.1 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 9,982 | 32.2 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,454 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +30.9
Orange
Kay Hagan | DEM | 38,470 | 73.3 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 12,721 | 24.2 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,288 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +49.1
Pamlico
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,997 | 55.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,184 | 40.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 205 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +15.1
Pasquotank
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,447 | 53.9 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 4,473 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +9.6
Pender
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,038 | 55.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,271 | 38.6 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 942 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +17.0
Perquimans
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,492 | 60.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,528 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +23.5
Person
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,650 | 52.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,443 | 43.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 544 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +9.6
Pitt
Kay Hagan | DEM | 22,291 | 50.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 20,933 | 46.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,362 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +3.0
Polk
Thom Tillis | REP | 4,151 | 55.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,076 | 41.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 281 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +14.3
Randolph
Thom Tillis | REP | 26,842 | 73.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,179 | 22.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,598 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +51.0
Richmond
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,439 | 50.4 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,626 | 44.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 702 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +6.4
Robeson
Kay Hagan | DEM | 12,964 | 53.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 10,668 | 43.6 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 848 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +9.4
Rockingham
Thom Tillis | REP | 15,846 | 57.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 10,491 | 37.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,479 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +19.3
Rowan
Thom Tillis | REP | 23,104 | 59.6 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 13,478 | 34.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,184 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +24.8
Rutherford
Thom Tillis | REP | 11,676 | 60.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 6,611 | 34.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,085 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +26.1
Sampson
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,262 | 53.5 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 7,392 | 42.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 657 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +10.8
Scotland
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,619 | 55.7 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 4,148 | 41.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 319 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +14.6
Stanly
Thom Tillis | REP | 12,408 | 65.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,390 | 28.3 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,240 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +36.9
Stokes
Thom Tillis | REP | 9,461 | 67.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,737 | 26.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 891 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +40.6
Surry
Thom Tillis | REP | 12,235 | 63.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,873 | 30.7 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,031 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +33.2
Swain
Thom Tillis | REP | 2,043 | 46.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 1,956 | 44.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 354 | 8.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +2.0
Transylvania
Thom Tillis | REP | 6,930 | 53.1 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 5,468 | 41.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 665 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +11.2
Tyrrell
Thom Tillis | REP | 590 | 48.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 567 | 46.2 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 71 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +1.9
Union
Thom Tillis | REP | 37,417 | 64.0 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 19,000 | 32.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,025 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +31.5
Vance
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,510 | 61.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 5,025 | 36.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 424 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +25.0
Wake
Kay Hagan | DEM | 177,207 | 55.3 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 134,132 | 41.8 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 9,360 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +13.4
Warren
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,023 | 75.0 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 622 | 23.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +52.0
Washington
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,646 | 57.6 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 1,767 | 38.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 181 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +19.1
Watauga
Thom Tillis | REP | 8,640 | 49.2 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 8,002 | 45.6 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 921 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +3.6
Wayne
Thom Tillis | REP | 17,821 | 54.3 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 13,956 | 42.5 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,040 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +11.8
Wilkes
Thom Tillis | REP | 12,541 | 67.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 4,891 | 26.4 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,060 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +41.4
Wilson
Kay Hagan | DEM | 13,323 | 51.4 |
Thom Tillis | REP | 11,941 | 46.0 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 679 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hagan +5.3
Yadkin
Thom Tillis | REP | 8,294 | 73.9 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 2,351 | 20.9 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 581 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +52.9
Yancey
Thom Tillis | REP | 4,316 | 52.8 |
Kay Hagan | DEM | 3,441 | 42.1 |
Sean Haugh | LIB | 411 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Tillis +10.7
Adams
Ben Sasse | REP | 5,879 | 68.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,301 | 26.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 219 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +41.8
Antelope
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,834 | 72.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 630 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +47.6
Arthur
Ben Sasse | REP | 144 | 80.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 29 | 16.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 5 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +63.9
Banner
Ben Sasse | REP | 249 | 86.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 31 | 10.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +75.7
Blaine
Ben Sasse | REP | 147 | 72.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 31 | 15.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 24 | 11.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.1
Boone
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,643 | 74.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 466 | 21.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 80 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +53.4
Box Butte
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,037 | 67.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 830 | 27.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 86 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +40.3
Boyd
Ben Sasse | REP | 707 | 75.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 206 | 21.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +53.1
Brown
Ben Sasse | REP | 880 | 78.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 176 | 15.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 49 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +62.7
Buffalo
Ben Sasse | REP | 9,889 | 74.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,148 | 16.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 1,054 | 8.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +58.4
Burt
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,812 | 64.1 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 930 | 32.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 58 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +31.2
Butler
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,369 | 76.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 600 | 19.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 77 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.1
Cass
Ben Sasse | REP | 6,029 | 70.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,197 | 25.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 201 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +44.9
Cedar
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,916 | 62.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,060 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +28.0
Chase
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,201 | 86.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 125 | 9.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 46 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +77.1
Cherry
Ben Sasse | REP | 3,046 | 78.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 614 | 15.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 189 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +62.3
Cheyenne
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,225 | 78.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 492 | 17.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 70 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +61.3
Clay
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,663 | 77.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 375 | 17.6 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 58 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +60.3
Colfax
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,403 | 71.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 505 | 25.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +45.6
Cuming
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,128 | 74.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 662 | 23.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +51.2
Custer
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,501 | 59.5 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 1,236 | 29.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 410 | 9.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +30.1
Dakota
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,182 | 59.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,333 | 36.3 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 98 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +23.1
Dawes
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,889 | 70.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 653 | 24.5 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 74 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +46.3
Dawson
Ben Sasse | REP | 4,191 | 76.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 932 | 16.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 314 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +59.1
Deuel
Ben Sasse | REP | 555 | 80.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 90 | 13.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 30 | 4.3 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 15 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +67.4
Dixon
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,280 | 66.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 597 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +35.4
Dodge
Ben Sasse | REP | 7,297 | 69.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,826 | 27.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 214 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +42.8
Douglas
Ben Sasse | REP | 73,982 | 57.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 52,609 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +16.5
Dundy
Ben Sasse | REP | 591 | 85.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 69 | 10.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 18 | 2.6 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 14 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +75.4
Fillmore
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,630 | 70.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 588 | 25.5 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 53 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +45.3
Franklin
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,078 | 79.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 187 | 13.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 69 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +65.9
Frontier
Ben Sasse | REP | 803 | 83.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 116 | 12.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 31 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +71.2
Furnas
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,341 | 80.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 213 | 12.8 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 63 | 3.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 43 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +68.0
Gage
Ben Sasse | REP | 4,685 | 64.1 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,323 | 31.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 217 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +32.3
Garden
Ben Sasse | REP | 508 | 80.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 84 | 13.3 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 33 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +67.0
Garfield
Ben Sasse | REP | 557 | 76.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 125 | 17.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 32 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +59.3
Gosper
Ben Sasse | REP | 542 | 73.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 110 | 14.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 67 | 9.0 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 23 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +58.2
Grant
Ben Sasse | REP | 199 | 72.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 53 | 19.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 18 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +53.5
Greeley
Ben Sasse | REP | 556 | 67.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 230 | 28.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 28 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +39.8
Hall
Ben Sasse | REP | 9,127 | 66.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 4,023 | 29.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 429 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +37.0
Hamilton
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,841 | 78.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 622 | 17.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 111 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +61.1
Harlan
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,072 | 80.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 197 | 14.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 41 | 3.1 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 30 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +65.3
Hayes
Ben Sasse | REP | 399 | 87.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 33 | 7.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 21 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +80.1
Hitchcock
Ben Sasse | REP | 972 | 83.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 141 | 12.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 34 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +71.4
Holt
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,663 | 72.1 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 916 | 24.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +47.3
Hooker
Ben Sasse | REP | 212 | 72.1 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 44 | 15.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 33 | 11.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.1
Howard
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,452 | 69.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 546 | 26.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 51 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +43.4
Jefferson
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,818 | 70.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 665 | 25.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 63 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +44.8
Johnson
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,079 | 64.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 531 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +32.9
Kearney
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,035 | 78.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 359 | 13.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 162 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +64.9
Keith
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,075 | 79.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 357 | 13.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 133 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +66.0
Keya Paha
Ben Sasse | REP | 313 | 82.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 53 | 14.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +68.8
Kimball
Ben Sasse | REP | 965 | 80.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 168 | 14.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 35 | 2.9 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 28 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +66.6
Knox
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,097 | 66.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 922 | 29.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 99 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +37.1
Lancaster
Ben Sasse | REP | 43,906 | 51.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 36,538 | 43.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 2,835 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +8.7
Lincoln
Ben Sasse | REP | 7,694 | 72.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,443 | 23.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 366 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +49.5
Logan
Ben Sasse | REP | 290 | 81.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 40 | 11.3 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 21 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +70.6
Loup
Ben Sasse | REP | 230 | 72.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 52 | 16.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 33 | 10.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +56.2
Madison
Ben Sasse | REP | 6,438 | 69.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,607 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +41.2
McPherson
Ben Sasse | REP | 190 | 76.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 40 | 16.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 11 | 4.4 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 7 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +60.5
Merrick
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,197 | 76.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 540 | 18.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 93 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.7
Morrill
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,241 | 81.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 235 | 15.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 35 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +65.9
Nance
Ben Sasse | REP | 816 | 69.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 317 | 27.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 28 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +42.5
Nemaha
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,699 | 71.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 548 | 23.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 74 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +48.7
Nuckolls
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,175 | 76.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 278 | 18.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 48 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +58.7
Otoe
Ben Sasse | REP | 3,811 | 70.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,368 | 25.4 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 136 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +45.4
Pawnee
Ben Sasse | REP | 785 | 72.1 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 275 | 25.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +46.8
Perkins
Ben Sasse | REP | 862 | 82.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 128 | 12.3 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 45 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +70.5
Phelps
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,716 | 80.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 472 | 14.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 146 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +66.5
Pierce
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,843 | 78.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 445 | 18.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +59.3
Platte
Ben Sasse | REP | 7,251 | 78.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,713 | 18.5 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 198 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +59.9
Polk
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,382 | 78.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 318 | 18.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 52 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +60.2
Red Willow
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,922 | 83.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 437 | 12.5 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 97 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +71.0
Richardson
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,884 | 73.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 589 | 23.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +50.7
Rock
Ben Sasse | REP | 496 | 78.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 101 | 16.1 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 23 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +62.8
Saline
Ben Sasse | REP | 2,125 | 59.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,312 | 36.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 93 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +22.8
Sarpy
Ben Sasse | REP | 30,081 | 67.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 13,055 | 29.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +38.4
Saunders
Ben Sasse | REP | 5,148 | 70.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,864 | 25.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 164 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +45.2
Scotts Bluff
Ben Sasse | REP | 7,045 | 73.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 2,187 | 22.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 278 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +50.5
Seward
Ben Sasse | REP | 3,861 | 70.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,368 | 24.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 194 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +45.4
Sheridan
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,451 | 84.0 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 206 | 11.9 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 47 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +72.1
Sherman
Ben Sasse | REP | 891 | 68.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 293 | 22.6 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 97 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +46.1
Sioux
Ben Sasse | REP | 433 | 83.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 72 | 13.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +69.6
Stanton
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,253 | 72.3 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 424 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +47.9
Thayer
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,476 | 74.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 421 | 21.3 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 53 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +53.4
Thomas
Ben Sasse | REP | 246 | 78.6 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 46 | 14.7 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 16 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +63.9
Thurston
Ben Sasse | REP | 710 | 50.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 657 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +3.8
Valley
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,209 | 74.2 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 345 | 21.2 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 60 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +53.0
Washington
Ben Sasse | REP | 5,089 | 73.9 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 1,610 | 23.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +50.5
Wayne
Ben Sasse | REP | 1,729 | 64.5 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 863 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +32.3
Webster
Ben Sasse | REP | 948 | 73.7 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 299 | 23.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +50.4
Wheeler
Ben Sasse | REP | 307 | 75.8 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 76 | 18.8 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 16 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.0
York
Ben Sasse | REP | 3,350 | 74.4 |
Dave Domina | DEM | 766 | 17.0 |
Jim Jenkins | PEC | 258 | 5.7 |
Todd Watson | PEC | 127 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sasse +57.4
Belknap
Scott Brown | REP | 12,568 | 53.1 |
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 11,097 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Brown +6.2
Carroll
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 10,478 | 51.0 |
Scott Brown | REP | 10,058 | 49.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +2.0
Cheshire
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 16,468 | 60.8 |
Scott Brown | REP | 10,598 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +21.7
Coos
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 6,409 | 62.7 |
Scott Brown | REP | 3,819 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +25.3
Grafton
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 20,499 | 61.8 |
Scott Brown | REP | 12,650 | 38.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +23.7
Hillsborough
Scott Brown | REP | 70,364 | 51.2 |
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 67,023 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Brown +2.4
Merrimack
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 32,369 | 56.8 |
Scott Brown | REP | 24,582 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +13.7
Rockingham
Scott Brown | REP | 65,010 | 54.7 |
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 53,907 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Brown +9.3
Strafford
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 23,710 | 56.1 |
Scott Brown | REP | 18,539 | 43.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +12.2
Sullivan
Jeanne Shaheen | DEM | 8,762 | 56.8 |
Scott Brown | REP | 6,658 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shaheen +13.6
Atlantic
Cory Booker | DEM | 29,047 | 50.8 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 27,005 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +3.6
Bergen
Cory Booker | DEM | 117,010 | 57.2 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 84,324 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +16.0
Burlington
Cory Booker | DEM | 58,938 | 54.0 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 48,647 | 44.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +9.4
Camden
Cory Booker | DEM | 72,577 | 65.2 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 37,075 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +31.9
Cape May
Jeff Bell | REP | 16,093 | 57.4 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 11,530 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +16.3
Cumberland
Cory Booker | DEM | 14,531 | 53.0 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 12,353 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +7.9
Essex
Cory Booker | DEM | 104,364 | 77.1 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 29,109 | 21.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +55.6
Gloucester
Cory Booker | DEM | 36,868 | 52.8 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 31,540 | 45.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +7.6
Hudson
Cory Booker | DEM | 67,317 | 78.3 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 16,575 | 19.3 |
98.4% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +59.0
Hunterdon
Jeff Bell | REP | 21,625 | 59.0 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 14,168 | 38.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +20.3
Mercer
Cory Booker | DEM | 52,098 | 65.7 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 25,644 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +33.4
Middlesex
Cory Booker | DEM | 83,050 | 59.9 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 53,422 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +21.4
Monmouth
Jeff Bell | REP | 76,127 | 53.2 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 64,173 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +8.4
Morris
Jeff Bell | REP | 64,488 | 55.6 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 49,749 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +12.7
Ocean
Jeff Bell | REP | 78,911 | 57.5 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 55,365 | 40.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +17.1
Passaic
Cory Booker | DEM | 51,915 | 60.5 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 32,456 | 37.8 |
99.3% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +22.7
Salem
Jeff Bell | REP | 9,265 | 51.5 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 7,992 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +7.1
Somerset
Jeff Bell | REP | 37,428 | 49.6 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 36,655 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +1.0
Sussex
Jeff Bell | REP | 22,247 | 61.8 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 12,697 | 35.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +26.5
Union
Cory Booker | DEM | 67,646 | 65.0 |
Jeff Bell | REP | 34,624 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Booker +31.7
Warren
Jeff Bell | REP | 14,033 | 59.9 |
Cory Booker | DEM | 8,514 | 36.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bell +23.6
Bernalillo
Tom Udall | DEM | 94,756 | 56.9 |
Allen Weh | REP | 71,671 | 43.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +13.9
Catron
Allen Weh | REP | 1,151 | 68.0 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 542 | 32.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +36.0
Chaves
Allen Weh | REP | 8,779 | 67.8 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 4,173 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +35.6
Cibola
Tom Udall | DEM | 3,604 | 64.0 |
Allen Weh | REP | 2,030 | 36.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +27.9
Colfax
Tom Udall | DEM | 2,338 | 56.0 |
Allen Weh | REP | 1,835 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +12.1
Curry
Allen Weh | REP | 5,576 | 70.0 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 2,392 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +40.0
DeBaca
Allen Weh | REP | 462 | 59.0 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 321 | 41.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +18.0
Dona Ana
Tom Udall | DEM | 22,705 | 55.9 |
Allen Weh | REP | 17,877 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +11.9
Eddy
Allen Weh | REP | 7,523 | 65.1 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 4,027 | 34.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +30.3
Grant
Tom Udall | DEM | 5,288 | 57.9 |
Allen Weh | REP | 3,843 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +15.8
Guadalupe
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,365 | 75.1 |
Allen Weh | REP | 453 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +50.2
Harding
Tom Udall | DEM | 257 | 50.2 |
Allen Weh | REP | 255 | 49.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +0.4
Hidalgo
Tom Udall | DEM | 780 | 54.1 |
Allen Weh | REP | 662 | 45.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +8.2
Lea
Allen Weh | REP | 6,702 | 74.1 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 2,346 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +48.1
Lincoln
Allen Weh | REP | 4,028 | 65.4 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 2,131 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +30.8
Los Alamos
Tom Udall | DEM | 4,430 | 55.6 |
Allen Weh | REP | 3,540 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +11.2
Luna
Tom Udall | DEM | 2,467 | 50.8 |
Allen Weh | REP | 2,388 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.6
McKinley
Tom Udall | DEM | 10,978 | 76.5 |
Allen Weh | REP | 3,377 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +53.0
Mora
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,528 | 72.3 |
Allen Weh | REP | 586 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +44.6
Otero
Allen Weh | REP | 8,099 | 63.9 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 4,578 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +27.8
Quay
Allen Weh | REP | 1,557 | 58.1 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,125 | 41.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +16.1
Rio Arriba
Tom Udall | DEM | 6,381 | 75.4 |
Allen Weh | REP | 2,080 | 24.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +50.8
Roosevelt
Allen Weh | REP | 2,516 | 66.8 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,252 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +33.5
San Juan
Allen Weh | REP | 18,122 | 60.4 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 11,886 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +20.8
San Miguel
Tom Udall | DEM | 6,170 | 77.1 |
Allen Weh | REP | 1,833 | 22.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +54.2
Sandoval
Tom Udall | DEM | 19,993 | 51.9 |
Allen Weh | REP | 18,494 | 48.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +3.9
Santa Fe
Tom Udall | DEM | 36,930 | 76.5 |
Allen Weh | REP | 11,326 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +53.1
Sierra
Allen Weh | REP | 2,120 | 57.4 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,575 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +14.7
Socorro
Tom Udall | DEM | 3,116 | 59.2 |
Allen Weh | REP | 2,144 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +18.5
Taos
Tom Udall | DEM | 8,644 | 81.0 |
Allen Weh | REP | 2,027 | 19.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +62.0
Torrance
Allen Weh | REP | 2,599 | 56.6 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 1,989 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +13.3
Union
Allen Weh | REP | 872 | 63.4 |
Tom Udall | DEM | 504 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weh +26.7
Valencia
Tom Udall | DEM | 9,503 | 50.9 |
Allen Weh | REP | 9,179 | 49.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Udall +1.7
Adair
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,938 | 71.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,060 | 25.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +45.5
Alfalfa
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,306 | 84.7 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 180 | 11.7 |
Ray Woods | IND | 32 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +73.0
Atoka
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,433 | 70.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 912 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +43.9
Beaver
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,308 | 86.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 127 | 8.4 |
Ray Woods | IND | 34 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +78.2
Beckham
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,670 | 79.9 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 789 | 17.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +62.7
Blaine
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,104 | 80.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 429 | 16.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +63.8
Bryan
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,105 | 70.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,306 | 26.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +43.6
Caddo
Jim Inhofe | REP | 4,012 | 69.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,607 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +41.6
Canadian
Jim Inhofe | REP | 21,662 | 77.7 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 5,272 | 18.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +58.8
Carter
Jim Inhofe | REP | 7,799 | 73.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,492 | 23.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +49.7
Cherokee
Jim Inhofe | REP | 5,251 | 58.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 3,488 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +19.5
Choctaw
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,198 | 70.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 821 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +44.1
Cimarron
Jim Inhofe | REP | 693 | 90.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 43 | 5.6 |
Ray Woods | IND | 21 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +85.0
Cleveland
Jim Inhofe | REP | 37,753 | 63.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 19,810 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +30.0
Coal
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,117 | 65.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 515 | 30.0 |
Ray Woods | IND | 42 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +35.0
Comanche
Jim Inhofe | REP | 13,168 | 66.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 5,923 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +36.4
Cotton
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,266 | 75.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 364 | 21.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +53.7
Craig
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,377 | 67.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,040 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +37.7
Creek
Jim Inhofe | REP | 11,150 | 73.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 3,650 | 23.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +49.1
Custer
Jim Inhofe | REP | 5,182 | 79.7 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,120 | 17.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +62.5
Delaware
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,441 | 72.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,199 | 24.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +47.5
Dewey
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,255 | 84.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 187 | 12.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +71.8
Ellis
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,085 | 87.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 117 | 9.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +78.1
Garfield
Jim Inhofe | REP | 9,882 | 78.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,302 | 18.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +59.8
Garvin
Jim Inhofe | REP | 4,437 | 74.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,373 | 22.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +51.1
Grady
Jim Inhofe | REP | 9,664 | 75.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,731 | 21.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +54.1
Grant
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,302 | 82.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 226 | 14.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +68.0
Greer
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,084 | 73.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 342 | 23.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +50.1
Harmon
Jim Inhofe | REP | 538 | 79.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 127 | 18.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +60.5
Harper
Jim Inhofe | REP | 941 | 87.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 98 | 9.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +78.1
Haskell
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,679 | 68.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 719 | 29.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +38.9
Hughes
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,987 | 68.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 790 | 27.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +41.3
Jackson
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,455 | 82.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 640 | 15.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +67.1
Jefferson
Jim Inhofe | REP | 884 | 72.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 282 | 23.0 |
Joan Farr | IND | 27 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +49.2
Johnston
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,628 | 69.5 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 611 | 26.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +43.4
Kay
Jim Inhofe | REP | 7,220 | 74.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,072 | 21.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +53.3
Kingfisher
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,220 | 87.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 392 | 10.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +76.5
Kiowa
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,853 | 75.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 536 | 21.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +53.9
Latimer
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,489 | 63.5 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 775 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +30.5
LeFlore
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,499 | 66.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,757 | 28.3 |
Joan Farr | IND | 219 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +38.5
Lincoln
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,590 | 76.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,756 | 20.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +55.9
Logan
Jim Inhofe | REP | 8,024 | 75.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,250 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +54.3
Love
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,534 | 71.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 520 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +47.5
Major
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,806 | 81.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 203 | 9.2 |
Ray Woods | IND | 170 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +72.6
Marshall
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,521 | 74.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 758 | 22.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +51.9
Mayes
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,355 | 67.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,733 | 28.9 |
Aaron DeLozier | IND | 211 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +38.3
McClain
Jim Inhofe | REP | 6,975 | 77.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,735 | 19.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +58.2
McCurtain
Jim Inhofe | REP | 4,744 | 71.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,618 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +46.9
McIntosh
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,913 | 63.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,547 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +29.7
Murray
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,109 | 72.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 717 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +47.5
Muskogee
Jim Inhofe | REP | 8,611 | 60.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 5,147 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +24.3
Noble
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,311 | 79.7 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 515 | 17.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +61.9
Nowata
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,961 | 72.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 642 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +48.9
Okfuskee
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,728 | 66.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 795 | 30.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +35.8
Oklahoma
Jim Inhofe | REP | 93,339 | 60.5 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 55,650 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +24.4
Okmulgee
Jim Inhofe | REP | 4,976 | 61.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,940 | 36.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +25.0
Osage
Jim Inhofe | REP | 7,073 | 63.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 3,751 | 33.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +29.7
Ottawa
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,409 | 65.6 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,541 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +36.0
Pawnee
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,602 | 71.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 937 | 25.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +45.5
Payne
Jim Inhofe | REP | 9,913 | 64.5 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 4,897 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +32.6
Pittsburg
Jim Inhofe | REP | 7,021 | 69.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,807 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +41.6
Pontotoc
Jim Inhofe | REP | 5,578 | 70.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,069 | 26.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +44.3
Pottawatomie
Jim Inhofe | REP | 10,553 | 72.7 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 3,416 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +49.2
Pushmataha
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,825 | 71.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 648 | 25.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +45.9
Roger Mills
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,030 | 85.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 147 | 12.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +73.0
Rogers
Jim Inhofe | REP | 16,167 | 73.9 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 4,872 | 22.3 |
Aaron DeLozier | IND | 442 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +51.6
Seminole
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,327 | 70.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 1,262 | 26.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +43.6
Sequoyah
Jim Inhofe | REP | 5,496 | 64.2 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,673 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +33.0
Stephens
Jim Inhofe | REP | 8,604 | 76.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,269 | 20.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +56.0
Texas
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,774 | 86.0 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 326 | 10.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +75.9
Tillman
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,271 | 75.5 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 366 | 21.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +53.8
Tulsa
Jim Inhofe | REP | 84,327 | 64.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 42,842 | 32.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +31.7
Wagoner
Jim Inhofe | REP | 12,135 | 72.8 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 4,031 | 24.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +48.6
Washington
Jim Inhofe | REP | 9,816 | 74.3 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 2,934 | 22.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +52.1
Washita
Jim Inhofe | REP | 2,498 | 82.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 473 | 15.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +66.6
Woods
Jim Inhofe | REP | 1,961 | 80.4 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 400 | 16.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +64.0
Woodward
Jim Inhofe | REP | 3,625 | 85.1 |
Matt Silverstein | DEM | 521 | 12.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Inhofe +72.9
Adair
James Lankford | REP | 2,750 | 67.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,183 | 28.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 164 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +38.2
Alfalfa
James Lankford | REP | 1,324 | 85.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 176 | 11.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 48 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +74.2
Atoka
James Lankford | REP | 2,234 | 65.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,021 | 29.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 157 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +35.6
Beaver
James Lankford | REP | 1,310 | 87.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 123 | 8.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 73 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +78.8
Beckham
James Lankford | REP | 3,676 | 79.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 841 | 18.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 101 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +61.4
Blaine
James Lankford | REP | 2,032 | 77.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 500 | 19.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 95 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +58.3
Bryan
James Lankford | REP | 5,683 | 66.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,536 | 29.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 390 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +36.6
Caddo
James Lankford | REP | 4,066 | 70.2 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,588 | 27.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 135 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +42.8
Canadian
James Lankford | REP | 21,904 | 78.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 5,319 | 19.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 768 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +59.3
Carter
James Lankford | REP | 7,258 | 68.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,899 | 27.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 470 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +41.0
Cherokee
James Lankford | REP | 5,231 | 58.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,438 | 38.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 355 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +19.9
Choctaw
James Lankford | REP | 2,102 | 67.8 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 880 | 28.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 120 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.4
Cimarron
James Lankford | REP | 658 | 87.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 64 | 8.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 32 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +78.8
Cleveland
James Lankford | REP | 38,008 | 63.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 20,112 | 33.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 1,893 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +29.8
Coal
James Lankford | REP | 945 | 56.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 646 | 38.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 97 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +17.7
Comanche
James Lankford | REP | 12,214 | 61.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 6,864 | 34.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 748 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +27.0
Cotton
James Lankford | REP | 1,240 | 74.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 379 | 22.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 55 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.4
Craig
James Lankford | REP | 2,341 | 66.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,082 | 30.7 |
Mark Beard | IND | 103 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +35.7
Creek
James Lankford | REP | 11,203 | 73.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,528 | 23.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 536 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +50.3
Custer
James Lankford | REP | 5,189 | 79.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,171 | 18.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 151 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +61.7
Delaware
James Lankford | REP | 6,336 | 71.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,224 | 25.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 324 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +46.3
Dewey
James Lankford | REP | 1,252 | 84.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 184 | 12.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 42 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +72.3
Ellis
James Lankford | REP | 1,090 | 87.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 129 | 10.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 27 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +77.1
Garfield
James Lankford | REP | 9,940 | 78.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,403 | 18.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 349 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +59.4
Garvin
James Lankford | REP | 4,382 | 72.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,450 | 24.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 180 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.8
Grady
James Lankford | REP | 9,646 | 75.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,720 | 21.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 499 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +53.8
Grant
James Lankford | REP | 1,276 | 80.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 264 | 16.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 50 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.6
Greer
James Lankford | REP | 1,055 | 72.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 360 | 24.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 50 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +47.4
Harmon
James Lankford | REP | 521 | 76.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 142 | 20.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 19 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.6
Harper
James Lankford | REP | 923 | 85.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 107 | 10.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 45 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +75.9
Haskell
James Lankford | REP | 1,656 | 67.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 723 | 29.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 77 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +38.0
Hughes
James Lankford | REP | 1,974 | 68.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 835 | 28.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 90 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.3
Jackson
James Lankford | REP | 3,429 | 81.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 668 | 15.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 103 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +65.7
Jefferson
James Lankford | REP | 834 | 68.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 325 | 26.7 |
Mark Beard | IND | 56 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +41.9
Johnston
James Lankford | REP | 1,493 | 64.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 698 | 30.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 122 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +34.4
Kay
James Lankford | REP | 7,187 | 74.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,155 | 22.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 334 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +52.0
Kingfisher
James Lankford | REP | 3,182 | 86.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 439 | 11.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 81 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +74.1
Kiowa
James Lankford | REP | 1,811 | 74.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 572 | 23.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 55 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +50.8
Latimer
James Lankford | REP | 1,396 | 59.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 848 | 36.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 106 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +23.3
LeFlore
James Lankford | REP | 6,174 | 63.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,982 | 30.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 503 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +33.0
Lincoln
James Lankford | REP | 6,631 | 76.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,759 | 20.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 282 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +56.2
Logan
James Lankford | REP | 8,050 | 75.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,282 | 21.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 314 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +54.2
Love
James Lankford | REP | 1,355 | 64.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 645 | 30.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 96 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +33.9
Major
James Lankford | REP | 1,904 | 86.4 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 240 | 10.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 60 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +75.5
Marshall
James Lankford | REP | 2,318 | 69.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 901 | 26.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 142 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +42.2
Mayes
James Lankford | REP | 6,390 | 67.8 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,713 | 28.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 327 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.0
McClain
James Lankford | REP | 7,026 | 77.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,761 | 19.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 255 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +58.2
McCurtain
James Lankford | REP | 4,418 | 67.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,820 | 27.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 349 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.4
McIntosh
James Lankford | REP | 2,867 | 62.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,570 | 34.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 147 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +28.3
Murray
James Lankford | REP | 2,130 | 72.8 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 717 | 24.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 78 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.3
Muskogee
James Lankford | REP | 8,498 | 59.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 5,182 | 36.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 514 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +23.4
Noble
James Lankford | REP | 2,322 | 80.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 492 | 17.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 85 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.1
Nowata
James Lankford | REP | 1,877 | 69.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 684 | 25.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 126 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +44.4
Okfuskee
James Lankford | REP | 1,711 | 65.8 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 814 | 31.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 77 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +34.5
Oklahoma
James Lankford | REP | 94,176 | 60.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 57,237 | 36.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 3,871 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +23.8
Okmulgee
James Lankford | REP | 4,919 | 60.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,969 | 36.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 270 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +23.9
Osage
James Lankford | REP | 6,994 | 62.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,783 | 33.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 404 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +28.7
Ottawa
James Lankford | REP | 3,334 | 64.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,588 | 30.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 260 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +33.7
Pawnee
James Lankford | REP | 2,587 | 70.8 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 930 | 25.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 139 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +45.3
Payne
James Lankford | REP | 10,033 | 65.2 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 4,905 | 31.9 |
Mark Beard | IND | 452 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +33.3
Pittsburg
James Lankford | REP | 6,481 | 64.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,191 | 31.7 |
Mark Beard | IND | 406 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +32.6
Pontotoc
James Lankford | REP | 5,437 | 68.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,175 | 27.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 307 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +41.2
Pottawatomie
James Lankford | REP | 10,824 | 74.2 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,357 | 23.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 412 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.2
Pushmataha
James Lankford | REP | 1,687 | 66.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 729 | 28.7 |
Mark Beard | IND | 120 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +37.8
Roger Mills
James Lankford | REP | 1,006 | 82.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 194 | 15.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +66.4
Rogers
James Lankford | REP | 16,655 | 76.2 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 4,502 | 20.6 |
Mark Beard | IND | 705 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.6
Seminole
James Lankford | REP | 3,384 | 71.2 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 1,248 | 26.3 |
Mark Beard | IND | 119 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +45.0
Sequoyah
James Lankford | REP | 5,327 | 62.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,758 | 32.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 409 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +30.2
Stephens
James Lankford | REP | 8,382 | 74.3 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,523 | 22.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 382 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.9
Texas
James Lankford | REP | 2,737 | 85.0 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 348 | 10.8 |
Mark Beard | IND | 134 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +74.2
Tillman
James Lankford | REP | 1,219 | 72.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 422 | 25.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 36 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +47.5
Tulsa
James Lankford | REP | 86,458 | 66.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 40,465 | 31.0 |
Mark Beard | IND | 3,778 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +35.2
Wagoner
James Lankford | REP | 12,282 | 73.7 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 3,846 | 23.1 |
Mark Beard | IND | 531 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +50.6
Washington
James Lankford | REP | 10,012 | 75.9 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 2,705 | 20.5 |
Mark Beard | IND | 472 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.4
Washita
James Lankford | REP | 2,474 | 81.1 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 509 | 16.7 |
Mark Beard | IND | 67 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +64.4
Woods
James Lankford | REP | 1,945 | 79.6 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 425 | 17.4 |
Mark Beard | IND | 72 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +62.2
Woodward
James Lankford | REP | 3,607 | 84.5 |
Connie Johnson | DEM | 564 | 13.2 |
Mark Beard | IND | 96 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +71.3
Baker
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,229 | 60.2 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 2,331 | 33.2 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 223 | 3.2 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 147 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +27.0
Benton
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 22,784 | 62.7 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 11,285 | 31.1 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 962 | 2.6 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 935 | 2.6 |
91.7% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +31.6
Clackamas
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 65,530 | 52.1 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 52,699 | 41.9 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 3,869 | 3.1 |
79.8% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +10.2
Clatsop
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 6,902 | 57.0 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,348 | 35.9 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 353 | 2.9 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 284 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +21.1
Columbia
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 9,864 | 50.5 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 7,814 | 40.0 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 807 | 4.1 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 638 | 3.3 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 424 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +10.5
Coos
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 11,363 | 48.8 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 10,143 | 43.5 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 808 | 3.5 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 511 | 2.2 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 480 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +5.2
Crook
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,864 | 55.5 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 3,222 | 36.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 334 | 3.8 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 217 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +18.7
Curry
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,176 | 46.8 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 4,071 | 45.6 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 318 | 3.6 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 188 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +1.2
Deschutes
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 33,238 | 50.8 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 28,069 | 42.9 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 2,046 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +7.9
Douglas
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 20,701 | 51.8 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 16,121 | 40.3 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 1,341 | 3.4 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 1,106 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +11.5
Gilliam
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 440 | 50.7 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 366 | 42.2 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 31 | 3.6 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 19 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +8.5
Grant
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 1,943 | 60.9 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 1,046 | 32.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 98 | 3.1 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 79 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +28.1
Harney
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 1,782 | 61.3 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 911 | 31.4 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 105 | 3.6 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 68 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +30.0
Hood River
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 5,056 | 62.8 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 2,522 | 31.3 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 207 | 2.6 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 171 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +31.5
Jackson
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 39,189 | 50.2 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 33,375 | 42.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 2,504 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +7.5
Jefferson
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 3,415 | 51.3 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 2,769 | 41.6 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 220 | 3.3 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 163 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +9.7
Josephine
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 15,462 | 47.5 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 13,922 | 42.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 1,312 | 4.0 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 1,178 | 3.6 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 685 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +4.7
Klamath
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 12,351 | 55.9 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 8,017 | 36.3 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 780 | 3.5 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 590 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +19.6
Lake
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 1,927 | 61.8 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 963 | 30.9 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 101 | 3.2 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 87 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +30.9
Lane
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 82,464 | 62.4 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 41,543 | 31.5 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 3,391 | 2.6 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 2,978 | 2.3 |
92.6% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +31.0
Lincoln
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 11,398 | 59.4 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 6,324 | 33.0 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 597 | 3.1 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 534 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +26.5
Linn
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 20,357 | 48.9 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 17,701 | 42.5 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 1,588 | 3.8 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 1,041 | 2.5 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 935 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +6.4
Malheur
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,727 | 64.3 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 2,030 | 27.6 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 273 | 3.7 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 224 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +36.7
Marion
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 46,771 | 48.7 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 42,590 | 44.3 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 2,942 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +4.4
Morrow
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 1,713 | 55.6 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 1,113 | 36.1 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 117 | 3.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 96 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +19.5
Multnomah
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 198,671 | 74.8 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 49,393 | 18.6 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 8,478 | 3.2 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 6,546 | 2.5 |
85.9% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +56.2
Polk
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 13,873 | 48.7 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 12,727 | 44.7 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 887 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +4.0
Sherman
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 521 | 61.7 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 279 | 33.0 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 22 | 2.6 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 17 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +28.6
Tillamook
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 5,433 | 52.4 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 4,160 | 40.1 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 313 | 3.0 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 239 | 2.3 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 225 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +12.3
Umatilla
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 10,623 | 57.4 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 6,598 | 35.6 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 633 | 3.4 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 405 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +21.7
Union
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 5,465 | 54.9 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 3,799 | 38.2 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 328 | 3.3 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 237 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +16.7
Wallowa
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 2,137 | 60.6 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 1,208 | 34.3 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 83 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +26.3
Wasco
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 4,457 | 50.5 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 3,689 | 41.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 318 | 3.6 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 200 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +8.7
Washington
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 84,543 | 56.7 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 54,780 | 36.8 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 4,867 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +20.0
Wheeler
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 342 | 51.9 |
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 259 | 39.3 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 23 | 3.5 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 21 | 3.2 |
Christina Lugo | PAG | 14 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wehby +12.6
Yamhill
Jeff Merkley | DEM | 16,254 | 46.9 |
Monica C. Wehby | REP | 15,555 | 44.9 |
Mike Montchalin | LIB | 1,428 | 4.1 |
James Leuenberger | CST | 775 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Merkley +2.0
Bristol
Jack Reed | DEM | 12,827 | 72.2 |
Mark Zaccaria | REP | 4,927 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Reed +44.5
Kent
Jack Reed | DEM | 38,219 | 66.1 |
Mark Zaccaria | REP | 19,598 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Reed +32.2
Newport
Jack Reed | DEM | 20,417 | 70.8 |
Mark Zaccaria | REP | 8,421 | 29.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Reed +41.6
Providence
Jack Reed | DEM | 120,552 | 73.4 |
Mark Zaccaria | REP | 43,742 | 26.6 |
99.6% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Reed +46.8
Washington
Jack Reed | DEM | 30,761 | 66.2 |
Mark Zaccaria | REP | 15,701 | 33.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Reed +32.4
Abbeville
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,733 | 58.3 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 2,215 | 34.6 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 306 | 4.8 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 144 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +23.7
Aiken
Lindsey Graham | REP | 28,301 | 62.5 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 14,228 | 31.4 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,425 | 3.1 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,305 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +31.1
Allendale
Brad Hutto | DEM | 1,726 | 74.9 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 533 | 23.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +51.8
Anderson
Lindsey Graham | REP | 29,977 | 67.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 10,597 | 23.7 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 2,697 | 6.0 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,381 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +43.4
Bamberg
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,328 | 67.8 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 1,473 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +37.8
Barnwell
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,157 | 51.2 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,845 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +5.1
Beaufort
Lindsey Graham | REP | 25,764 | 63.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 12,879 | 31.8 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 925 | 2.3 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 871 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +31.9
Berkeley
Lindsey Graham | REP | 23,081 | 53.9 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 16,464 | 38.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,849 | 4.3 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,400 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +15.5
Calhoun
Brad Hutto | DEM | 2,841 | 54.4 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,193 | 42.0 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 111 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +12.4
Charleston
Lindsey Graham | REP | 48,082 | 48.8 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 43,956 | 44.6 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 3,420 | 3.5 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 3,065 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +4.2
Cherokee
Lindsey Graham | REP | 7,800 | 63.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,351 | 27.4 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 749 | 6.1 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 342 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +36.3
Chester
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,796 | 49.2 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,511 | 45.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 282 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +3.7
Chesterfield
Lindsey Graham | REP | 5,443 | 53.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 4,371 | 42.6 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 298 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +10.5
Clarendon
Brad Hutto | DEM | 5,408 | 54.7 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 4,165 | 42.1 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 226 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +12.6
Colleton
Lindsey Graham | REP | 5,303 | 49.6 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 4,824 | 45.1 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 407 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +4.5
Darlington
Brad Hutto | DEM | 9,202 | 49.5 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 8,637 | 46.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 493 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +3.0
Dillon
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,162 | 49.7 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,948 | 46.3 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 196 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +3.4
Dorchester
Lindsey Graham | REP | 18,411 | 54.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 12,918 | 38.0 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,457 | 4.3 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,232 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +16.1
Edgefield
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,812 | 54.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 2,773 | 39.8 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 196 | 2.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 193 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +14.9
Fairfield
Brad Hutto | DEM | 4,835 | 59.5 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,942 | 36.2 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 231 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +23.3
Florence
Lindsey Graham | REP | 17,679 | 48.8 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 16,767 | 46.3 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,167 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +2.5
Georgetown
Lindsey Graham | REP | 11,169 | 54.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 8,320 | 40.7 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 595 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +13.9
Greenville
Lindsey Graham | REP | 74,173 | 61.2 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 33,737 | 27.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 7,389 | 6.1 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 5,924 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +33.4
Greenwood
Lindsey Graham | REP | 10,541 | 59.9 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 6,119 | 34.7 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 587 | 3.3 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 363 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +25.1
Hampton
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,732 | 63.8 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 1,951 | 33.4 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 122 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +30.4
Horry
Lindsey Graham | REP | 44,800 | 65.8 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 19,382 | 28.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 2,362 | 3.5 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,515 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +37.3
Jasper
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,495 | 52.8 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,887 | 43.6 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 143 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +9.2
Kershaw
Lindsey Graham | REP | 10,486 | 57.3 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 6,853 | 37.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 587 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +19.9
Lancaster
Lindsey Graham | REP | 12,251 | 61.0 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 6,905 | 34.4 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 472 | 2.4 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 456 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +26.6
Laurens
Lindsey Graham | REP | 8,667 | 58.0 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 4,776 | 32.0 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,063 | 7.1 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 442 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +26.0
Lee
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,881 | 67.1 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 1,750 | 30.3 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 121 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +36.9
Lexington
Lindsey Graham | REP | 50,341 | 66.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 20,003 | 26.3 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 3,278 | 4.3 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 2,501 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +39.9
Marion
Brad Hutto | DEM | 5,441 | 62.3 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,051 | 34.9 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 185 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +27.3
Marlboro
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,671 | 58.9 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 2,353 | 37.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 150 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +21.2
McCormick
Lindsey Graham | REP | 1,874 | 52.3 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 1,608 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +7.4
Newberry
Lindsey Graham | REP | 6,578 | 60.0 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,785 | 34.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 408 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +25.5
Oconee
Lindsey Graham | REP | 14,879 | 73.4 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,896 | 19.2 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,051 | 5.2 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 458 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +54.1
Orangeburg
Brad Hutto | DEM | 20,433 | 73.3 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 7,027 | 25.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +48.1
Pickens
Lindsey Graham | REP | 19,149 | 71.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 5,066 | 18.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,683 | 6.2 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 1,040 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +52.3
Richland
Brad Hutto | DEM | 66,218 | 60.2 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 39,068 | 35.5 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 2,754 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +24.7
Saluda
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,493 | 61.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 1,902 | 33.6 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 176 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +28.1
Spartanburg
Lindsey Graham | REP | 37,923 | 59.7 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 18,930 | 29.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 4,161 | 6.6 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 2,488 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +29.9
Sumter
Brad Hutto | DEM | 16,285 | 54.5 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 12,479 | 41.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 710 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +12.7
Union
Lindsey Graham | REP | 4,079 | 52.1 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 3,039 | 38.8 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 565 | 7.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +13.3
Williamsburg
Brad Hutto | DEM | 7,115 | 66.4 |
Lindsey Graham | REP | 3,342 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hutto +35.2
York
Lindsey Graham | REP | 34,376 | 60.4 |
Brad Hutto | DEM | 18,427 | 32.4 |
Victor Kocher | LIB | 2,383 | 4.2 |
Thomas Ravenel | PEC | 1,731 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Graham +28.0
Abbeville
Tim Scott | REP | 4,122 | 64.5 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 2,178 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +30.4
Aiken
Tim Scott | REP | 31,010 | 68.5 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 13,538 | 29.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +38.6
Allendale
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 1,646 | 72.6 |
Tim Scott | REP | 596 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +46.3
Anderson
Tim Scott | REP | 34,075 | 76.0 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 9,911 | 22.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +53.9
Bamberg
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,136 | 64.6 |
Tim Scott | REP | 1,668 | 34.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +30.2
Barnwell
Tim Scott | REP | 3,163 | 51.6 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 2,870 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +4.8
Beaufort
Tim Scott | REP | 27,109 | 66.9 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 12,704 | 31.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +35.6
Berkeley
Tim Scott | REP | 27,505 | 63.9 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 14,938 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +29.2
Calhoun
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 2,628 | 50.6 |
Tim Scott | REP | 2,500 | 48.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +2.5
Charleston
Tim Scott | REP | 55,528 | 56.2 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 41,529 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +14.2
Cherokee
Tim Scott | REP | 8,852 | 72.0 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,181 | 25.9 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 257 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +46.1
Chester
Tim Scott | REP | 3,896 | 50.8 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,563 | 46.5 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 207 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +4.3
Chesterfield
Tim Scott | REP | 5,695 | 55.9 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 4,342 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +13.3
Clarendon
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 5,260 | 53.3 |
Tim Scott | REP | 4,504 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +7.7
Colleton
Tim Scott | REP | 5,947 | 55.7 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 4,575 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +12.9
Darlington
Tim Scott | REP | 9,353 | 50.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 9,015 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +1.8
Dillon
Tim Scott | REP | 3,160 | 49.9 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,097 | 48.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +1.0
Dorchester
Tim Scott | REP | 22,197 | 64.8 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 11,566 | 33.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +31.0
Edgefield
Tim Scott | REP | 4,261 | 60.9 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 2,643 | 37.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +23.1
Fairfield
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 4,775 | 59.1 |
Tim Scott | REP | 3,149 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +20.1
Florence
Tim Scott | REP | 19,605 | 54.1 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 16,224 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +9.3
Georgetown
Tim Scott | REP | 12,209 | 59.7 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 7,962 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +20.8
Greenville
Tim Scott | REP | 89,689 | 72.6 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 31,621 | 25.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +47.0
Greenwood
Tim Scott | REP | 11,440 | 65.0 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 5,914 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +31.4
Hampton
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,605 | 62.5 |
Tim Scott | REP | 2,077 | 36.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +26.5
Horry
Tim Scott | REP | 49,197 | 72.3 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 17,667 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +46.3
Jasper
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,439 | 52.0 |
Tim Scott | REP | 3,078 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +5.5
Kershaw
Tim Scott | REP | 11,343 | 62.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 6,450 | 35.5 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 392 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +26.9
Lancaster
Tim Scott | REP | 12,646 | 63.3 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 6,914 | 34.6 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 403 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +28.7
Laurens
Tim Scott | REP | 10,318 | 68.3 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 4,511 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +38.4
Lee
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,841 | 66.7 |
Tim Scott | REP | 1,863 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +34.4
Lexington
Tim Scott | REP | 55,974 | 73.7 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 18,122 | 23.9 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 1,872 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +49.8
Marion
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 5,332 | 61.2 |
Tim Scott | REP | 3,298 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +23.3
Marlboro
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,635 | 58.7 |
Tim Scott | REP | 2,473 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +18.8
McCormick
Tim Scott | REP | 1,953 | 54.6 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 1,574 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +10.6
Newberry
Tim Scott | REP | 6,903 | 63.3 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,771 | 34.6 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 234 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +28.7
Oconee
Tim Scott | REP | 15,885 | 78.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,923 | 19.4 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 458 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +59.0
Orangeburg
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 19,532 | 70.3 |
Tim Scott | REP | 8,034 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +41.4
Pickens
Tim Scott | REP | 22,186 | 81.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 4,535 | 16.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +64.8
Richland
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 64,876 | 59.1 |
Tim Scott | REP | 42,773 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +20.1
Saluda
Tim Scott | REP | 3,748 | 66.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 1,804 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +34.4
Spartanburg
Tim Scott | REP | 45,872 | 71.0 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 17,510 | 27.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +43.9
Sumter
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 15,870 | 53.2 |
Tim Scott | REP | 13,564 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +7.7
Union
Tim Scott | REP | 4,589 | 58.4 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 3,069 | 39.1 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 195 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +19.4
Williamsburg
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 7,117 | 66.3 |
Tim Scott | REP | 3,534 | 32.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dickerson +33.4
York
Tim Scott | REP | 36,725 | 64.8 |
Joyce Dickerson | DEM | 18,366 | 32.4 |
Jill Bossi | AMR | 1,610 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +32.4
Aurora
Mike Rounds | REP | 480 | 41.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 355 | 30.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 259 | 22.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 60 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +10.8
Beadle
Mike Rounds | REP | 3,018 | 53.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,622 | 28.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 810 | 14.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 203 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +24.7
Bennett
Mike Rounds | REP | 444 | 47.9 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 339 | 36.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 110 | 11.9 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 34 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +11.3
Bon Homme
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,157 | 47.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 785 | 32.3 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 408 | 16.8 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 82 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +15.3
Brookings
Mike Rounds | REP | 4,226 | 45.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 3,195 | 34.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,662 | 17.9 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 213 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +11.1
Brown
Mike Rounds | REP | 5,382 | 44.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 4,023 | 33.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 2,417 | 20.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +11.3
Brule
Mike Rounds | REP | 889 | 50.3 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 451 | 25.5 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 346 | 19.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 81 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +24.8
Buffalo
Rick Weiland | DEM | 292 | 62.8 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 105 | 22.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 56 | 12.0 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 12 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +40.2
Butte
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,908 | 59.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 570 | 17.8 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 536 | 16.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 190 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +41.8
Campbell
Mike Rounds | REP | 414 | 65.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 115 | 18.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 79 | 12.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 23 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +47.4
Charles Mix
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,511 | 47.2 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,109 | 34.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 498 | 15.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 84 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +12.6
Clark
Mike Rounds | REP | 737 | 47.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 394 | 25.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 361 | 23.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 58 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +22.1
Clay
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,688 | 44.5 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,433 | 37.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 615 | 16.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +6.7
Codington
Mike Rounds | REP | 4,605 | 50.2 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 2,572 | 28.1 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,771 | 19.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 219 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +22.2
Corson
Mike Rounds | REP | 399 | 43.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 368 | 39.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 109 | 11.8 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 50 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +3.3
Custer
Mike Rounds | REP | 2,107 | 56.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 859 | 23.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 616 | 16.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 151 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +33.4
Davison
Mike Rounds | REP | 3,097 | 50.9 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,582 | 26.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,227 | 20.2 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 174 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +24.9
Day
Rick Weiland | DEM | 989 | 41.0 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 868 | 36.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 493 | 20.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 64 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +5.0
Deuel
Mike Rounds | REP | 847 | 47.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 530 | 29.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 341 | 19.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 70 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +17.7
Dewey
Rick Weiland | DEM | 788 | 53.0 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 457 | 30.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 208 | 14.0 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 33 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +22.3
Douglas
Mike Rounds | REP | 877 | 66.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 205 | 15.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 187 | 14.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 60 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +50.6
Edmunds
Mike Rounds | REP | 947 | 54.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 422 | 24.3 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 326 | 18.8 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 43 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +30.2
Fall River
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,585 | 54.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 672 | 22.9 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 510 | 17.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 167 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +31.1
Faulk
Mike Rounds | REP | 508 | 57.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 180 | 20.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 175 | 19.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 29 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +36.8
Grant
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,404 | 48.2 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 885 | 30.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 534 | 18.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 87 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +17.8
Gregory
Mike Rounds | REP | 996 | 54.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 483 | 26.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 284 | 15.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 65 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +28.1
Haakon
Mike Rounds | REP | 563 | 65.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 151 | 17.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 96 | 11.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 53 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +47.7
Hamlin
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,191 | 53.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 551 | 24.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 391 | 17.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 111 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +28.5
Hand
Mike Rounds | REP | 864 | 57.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 341 | 22.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 240 | 16.0 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 54 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +34.9
Hanson
Mike Rounds | REP | 752 | 55.7 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 365 | 27.1 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 165 | 12.2 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 67 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +28.7
Harding
Mike Rounds | REP | 371 | 62.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 121 | 20.2 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 60 | 10.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 46 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +41.8
Hughes
Mike Rounds | REP | 4,197 | 60.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,573 | 22.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,058 | 15.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +37.8
Hutchinson
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,640 | 58.9 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 575 | 20.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 494 | 17.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 75 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +38.3
Hyde
Mike Rounds | REP | 384 | 63.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 128 | 21.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 72 | 11.9 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 21 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +42.3
Jackson
Mike Rounds | REP | 472 | 51.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 269 | 29.3 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 133 | 14.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 45 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +22.1
Jerauld
Mike Rounds | REP | 361 | 42.7 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 292 | 34.5 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 167 | 19.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 26 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +8.2
Jones
Mike Rounds | REP | 292 | 63.1 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 72 | 15.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 66 | 14.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 33 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +47.5
Kingsbury
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,026 | 48.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 669 | 31.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 376 | 17.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 61 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +16.7
Lake
Mike Rounds | REP | 2,283 | 46.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,862 | 38.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 637 | 13.0 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 117 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +8.6
Lawrence
Mike Rounds | REP | 4,793 | 53.5 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 2,262 | 25.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,582 | 17.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 322 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +28.3
Lincoln
Mike Rounds | REP | 9,353 | 55.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 4,218 | 24.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 3,005 | 17.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 409 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +30.2
Lyman
Mike Rounds | REP | 630 | 50.8 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 361 | 29.1 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 194 | 15.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 56 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +21.7
Marshall
Rick Weiland | DEM | 693 | 39.5 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 684 | 39.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 360 | 20.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +0.5
McCook
Mike Rounds | REP | 997 | 48.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 561 | 27.2 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 418 | 20.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 86 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +21.1
McPherson
Mike Rounds | REP | 677 | 65.7 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 173 | 16.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 154 | 14.9 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 27 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +48.9
Meade
Mike Rounds | REP | 4,910 | 58.6 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,565 | 18.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,456 | 17.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 445 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +39.9
Mellette
Rick Weiland | DEM | 305 | 44.5 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 251 | 36.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 98 | 14.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 31 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +7.9
Miner
Mike Rounds | REP | 405 | 45.8 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 296 | 33.5 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 151 | 17.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 32 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +12.3
Minnehaha
Mike Rounds | REP | 25,766 | 47.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 17,735 | 32.5 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 9,882 | 18.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 1,266 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +14.7
Moody
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,062 | 44.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 832 | 34.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 447 | 18.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 75 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +9.5
Pennington
Mike Rounds | REP | 18,810 | 55.8 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 8,244 | 24.5 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 5,439 | 16.1 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 1,221 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +31.3
Perkins
Mike Rounds | REP | 792 | 59.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 242 | 18.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 208 | 15.5 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 101 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +41.0
Potter
Mike Rounds | REP | 758 | 65.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 211 | 18.1 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 174 | 14.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +47.0
Roberts
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,377 | 42.5 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,326 | 40.9 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 464 | 14.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 74 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +1.6
Sanborn
Mike Rounds | REP | 407 | 46.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 213 | 24.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 211 | 24.2 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 41 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +22.2
Shannon
Rick Weiland | DEM | 2,248 | 81.6 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 245 | 8.9 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 222 | 8.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +72.7
Spink
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,151 | 45.3 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 833 | 32.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 491 | 19.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 68 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +12.5
Stanley
Mike Rounds | REP | 803 | 62.0 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 289 | 22.3 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 177 | 13.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 26 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +39.7
Sully
Mike Rounds | REP | 446 | 65.1 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 115 | 16.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 102 | 14.9 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 22 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +48.3
Todd
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,529 | 69.0 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 407 | 18.4 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 238 | 10.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +50.6
Tripp
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,327 | 60.3 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 505 | 23.0 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 300 | 13.6 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 67 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +37.4
Turner
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,701 | 51.4 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 854 | 25.8 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 617 | 18.7 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 135 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +25.6
Union
Mike Rounds | REP | 3,150 | 61.3 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 1,268 | 24.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 584 | 11.4 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 133 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +36.7
Walworth
Mike Rounds | REP | 1,213 | 62.8 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 420 | 21.7 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 251 | 13.0 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 49 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +41.0
Yankton
Mike Rounds | REP | 3,663 | 47.3 |
Rick Weiland | DEM | 2,497 | 32.3 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 1,339 | 17.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 239 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rounds +15.1
Ziebach
Rick Weiland | DEM | 292 | 46.3 |
Mike Rounds | REP | 220 | 34.9 |
Larry Pressler | IND | 90 | 14.3 |
Gordon Howie | IND | 29 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Weiland +11.4
Anderson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 11,593 | 64.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 5,241 | 29.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 398 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +35.4
Bedford
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,039 | 66.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,993 | 26.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 237 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +40.3
Benton
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,202 | 58.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,293 | 34.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 117 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +24.3
Bledsoe
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,810 | 69.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 635 | 24.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 75 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +45.1
Blount
Lamar Alexander | REP | 20,546 | 68.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 7,159 | 24.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 875 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +44.8
Bradley
Lamar Alexander | REP | 16,131 | 78.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,275 | 16.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 420 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +62.9
Campbell
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,522 | 70.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,549 | 24.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +46.3
Cannon
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,770 | 62.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 826 | 29.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 113 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +33.3
Carroll
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,091 | 65.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,677 | 26.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 262 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +38.7
Carter
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,983 | 73.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,051 | 18.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 321 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +54.7
Cheatham
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,536 | 64.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,366 | 27.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 324 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +36.8
Chester
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,406 | 70.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 645 | 19.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 181 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +51.8
Claiborne
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,694 | 69.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,326 | 24.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 128 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +44.4
Clay
Lamar Alexander | REP | 905 | 61.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 468 | 31.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 37 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +29.7
Cocke
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,712 | 61.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,499 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +29.0
Coffee
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,413 | 65.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,037 | 26.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 354 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +38.7
Crockett
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,980 | 68.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 737 | 25.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 97 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +42.7
Cumberland
Lamar Alexander | REP | 11,439 | 69.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,736 | 22.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 509 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +47.0
Davidson
Gordon Ball | DEM | 69,248 | 50.8 |
Lamar Alexander | REP | 59,773 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ball +6.9
Decatur
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,449 | 63.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 693 | 30.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 57 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +33.0
DeKalb
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,165 | 59.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,190 | 32.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 120 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +26.9
Dickson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 6,282 | 61.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,175 | 31.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 313 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +30.3
Dyer
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,093 | 69.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,574 | 21.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 374 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +48.0
Fayette
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,399 | 70.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,516 | 23.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 329 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +46.4
Fentress
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,248 | 69.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 744 | 22.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 112 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +46.2
Franklin
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,889 | 62.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,995 | 31.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 259 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +30.5
Gibson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,234 | 64.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,825 | 25.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 760 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +39.4
Giles
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,472 | 62.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,710 | 30.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 176 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +31.5
Grainger
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,970 | 70.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 987 | 23.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 89 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +47.2
Greene
Lamar Alexander | REP | 9,682 | 71.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,772 | 20.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 432 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +51.0
Grundy
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,371 | 57.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 817 | 34.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 84 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +23.3
Hamblen
Lamar Alexander | REP | 8,154 | 72.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,484 | 22.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 263 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +50.3
Hamilton
Lamar Alexander | REP | 51,335 | 64.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 25,363 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +32.5
Hancock
Lamar Alexander | REP | 650 | 69.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 231 | 24.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 32 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +44.7
Hardeman
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,621 | 54.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,986 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +13.1
Hardin
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,802 | 74.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,057 | 20.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +53.5
Hawkins
Lamar Alexander | REP | 8,032 | 72.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,288 | 20.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 295 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +52.0
Haywood
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,727 | 50.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,544 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +5.4
Henderson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,575 | 71.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 962 | 19.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 228 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +52.2
Henry
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,816 | 66.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,968 | 27.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 186 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +39.5
Hickman
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,584 | 59.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,387 | 31.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 200 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +27.4
Houston
Lamar Alexander | REP | 946 | 52.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 735 | 41.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 48 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +11.8
Humphreys
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,225 | 53.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,561 | 37.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 260 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +15.9
Jackson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,322 | 54.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 837 | 34.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 154 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +20.0
Jefferson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,428 | 70.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,446 | 23.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 265 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +47.1
Johnson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,400 | 74.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 595 | 18.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 103 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +55.6
Knox
Lamar Alexander | REP | 66,080 | 63.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 30,792 | 29.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 2,434 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +34.1
Lake
Lamar Alexander | REP | 619 | 53.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 417 | 35.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 46 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +17.4
Lauderdale
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,411 | 59.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,393 | 34.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 92 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +25.2
Lawrence
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,888 | 67.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,306 | 26.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 223 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +41.1
Lewis
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,654 | 61.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 736 | 27.5 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 121 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +34.3
Lincoln
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,566 | 72.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,239 | 19.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 208 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +52.8
Loudon
Lamar Alexander | REP | 10,751 | 73.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,031 | 20.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 317 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +52.8
Macon
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,312 | 70.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 725 | 22.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 104 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +48.4
Madison
Lamar Alexander | REP | 13,375 | 58.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 7,870 | 34.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,053 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +24.1
Marion
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,963 | 63.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,968 | 31.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +32.0
Marshall
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,645 | 61.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,897 | 31.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 187 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +29.4
Maury
Lamar Alexander | REP | 11,487 | 61.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 5,831 | 31.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 727 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +30.1
McMinn
Lamar Alexander | REP | 7,711 | 73.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,175 | 20.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 256 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +52.6
McNairy
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,696 | 69.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,343 | 25.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 159 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +44.0
Meigs
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,579 | 69.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 550 | 24.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 50 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +45.4
Monroe
Lamar Alexander | REP | 6,834 | 69.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,515 | 25.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 243 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +43.6
Montgomery
Lamar Alexander | REP | 17,556 | 60.2 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 9,717 | 33.3 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 729 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +26.9
Moore
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,152 | 67.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 445 | 26.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 48 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +41.6
Morgan
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,426 | 66.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 982 | 26.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 115 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +39.6
Obion
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,631 | 68.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,499 | 22.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 373 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +46.3
Overton
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,333 | 58.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,321 | 33.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 214 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +25.3
Perry
Lamar Alexander | REP | 838 | 59.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 447 | 31.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 59 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +27.9
Pickett
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,105 | 67.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 426 | 26.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 55 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +41.6
Polk
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,411 | 67.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 958 | 26.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 85 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +40.8
Putnam
Lamar Alexander | REP | 9,124 | 61.3 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,892 | 26.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,346 | 9.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +35.2
Rhea
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,601 | 77.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,071 | 17.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 121 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +59.2
Roane
Lamar Alexander | REP | 9,193 | 68.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,474 | 25.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 303 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +42.4
Robertson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 9,028 | 64.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,751 | 26.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 490 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +37.8
Rutherford
Lamar Alexander | REP | 33,602 | 61.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 16,754 | 30.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,672 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +30.9
Scott
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,143 | 70.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 755 | 24.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +45.3
Sequatchie
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,254 | 72.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 652 | 21.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 64 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +51.8
Sevier
Lamar Alexander | REP | 13,867 | 74.5 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 3,570 | 19.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 470 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +55.3
Shelby
Lamar Alexander | REP | 90,355 | 48.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 88,838 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +0.8
Smith
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,557 | 59.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,426 | 33.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 147 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +26.4
Stewart
Lamar Alexander | REP | 1,815 | 60.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 968 | 32.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 73 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +28.3
Sullivan
Lamar Alexander | REP | 24,422 | 73.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 6,242 | 18.9 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,032 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +55.0
Sumner
Lamar Alexander | REP | 25,608 | 68.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 9,289 | 24.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,068 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +43.6
Tipton
Lamar Alexander | REP | 8,548 | 69.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,824 | 23.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 366 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +46.8
Trousdale
Lamar Alexander | REP | 856 | 55.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 553 | 36.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 53 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +19.7
Unicoi
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,876 | 72.8 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 759 | 19.2 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 114 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +53.6
Union
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,016 | 67.1 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 794 | 26.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 84 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +40.7
Van Buren
Lamar Alexander | REP | 888 | 57.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 531 | 34.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 41 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +23.3
Warren
Lamar Alexander | REP | 4,759 | 62.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 2,352 | 30.8 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 205 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +31.6
Washington
Lamar Alexander | REP | 18,260 | 68.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 6,285 | 23.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 823 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +45.1
Wayne
Lamar Alexander | REP | 2,017 | 73.9 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 535 | 19.6 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 73 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +54.3
Weakley
Lamar Alexander | REP | 5,066 | 67.6 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,852 | 24.7 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 295 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +42.9
White
Lamar Alexander | REP | 3,721 | 62.4 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 1,674 | 28.1 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 309 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +34.3
Williamson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 42,486 | 72.0 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 12,653 | 21.4 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 1,814 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +50.6
Wilson
Lamar Alexander | REP | 20,247 | 66.7 |
Gordon Ball | DEM | 7,895 | 26.0 |
Joe Wilmoth | CST | 909 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alexander +40.7
Anderson
John Cornyn | REP | 7,781 | 76.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,015 | 19.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 250 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.0
Andrews
John Cornyn | REP | 1,938 | 88.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 178 | 8.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 50 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.4
Angelina
John Cornyn | REP | 12,866 | 77.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,414 | 20.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +56.8
Aransas
John Cornyn | REP | 4,506 | 76.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,164 | 19.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 164 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +56.8
Archer
John Cornyn | REP | 2,185 | 87.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 250 | 10.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 56 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.3
Armstrong
John Cornyn | REP | 497 | 88.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 44 | 7.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 17 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.6
Atascosa
John Cornyn | REP | 4,805 | 66.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,100 | 29.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 183 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +37.5
Austin
John Cornyn | REP | 5,919 | 83.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 995 | 14.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 186 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.1
Bailey
John Cornyn | REP | 851 | 86.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 115 | 11.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.7
Bandera
John Cornyn | REP | 4,992 | 79.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 920 | 14.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 283 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +64.9
Bastrop
John Cornyn | REP | 10,016 | 59.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 5,567 | 33.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 901 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +26.6
Baylor
John Cornyn | REP | 688 | 84.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 107 | 13.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.0
Bee
John Cornyn | REP | 2,980 | 59.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,826 | 36.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 106 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +23.1
Bell
John Cornyn | REP | 28,794 | 66.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 13,097 | 30.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,230 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +36.1
Bexar
John Cornyn | REP | 160,513 | 54.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 123,984 | 41.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 8,274 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +12.3
Blanco
John Cornyn | REP | 2,671 | 74.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 699 | 19.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 170 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.1
Borden
John Cornyn | REP | 236 | 93.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 12 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +88.5
Bosque
John Cornyn | REP | 3,902 | 80.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 733 | 15.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 160 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.7
Bowie
John Cornyn | REP | 15,678 | 73.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,800 | 22.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 579 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.3
Brazoria
John Cornyn | REP | 41,665 | 68.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 16,796 | 27.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,981 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +40.7
Brazos
John Cornyn | REP | 22,160 | 71.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 7,433 | 23.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,062 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +47.4
Brewster
John Cornyn | REP | 1,448 | 51.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,150 | 40.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 120 | 4.2 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 108 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +10.5
Briscoe
John Cornyn | REP | 432 | 86.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 59 | 11.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.5
Brooks
David Alameel | DEM | 1,319 | 66.6 |
John Cornyn | REP | 455 | 23.0 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 138 | 7.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 67 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +43.7
Brown
John Cornyn | REP | 7,070 | 87.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 788 | 9.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 215 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.5
Burleson
John Cornyn | REP | 3,121 | 76.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 858 | 21.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 87 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.3
Burnet
John Cornyn | REP | 9,242 | 79.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,975 | 16.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 391 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +62.1
Caldwell
John Cornyn | REP | 5,166 | 59.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,073 | 35.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 379 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +23.9
Calhoun
John Cornyn | REP | 2,750 | 67.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,130 | 27.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 114 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +39.9
Callahan
John Cornyn | REP | 2,576 | 88.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 244 | 8.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 78 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.0
Cameron
David Alameel | DEM | 19,177 | 49.9 |
John Cornyn | REP | 16,742 | 43.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,385 | 3.6 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 1,121 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +6.3
Camp
John Cornyn | REP | 1,818 | 70.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 692 | 26.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 56 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +43.5
Carson
John Cornyn | REP | 1,627 | 88.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 163 | 8.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.8
Cass
John Cornyn | REP | 5,064 | 74.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,536 | 22.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 138 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +52.0
Castro
John Cornyn | REP | 607 | 80.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 123 | 16.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 18 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.9
Chambers
John Cornyn | REP | 6,808 | 81.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,226 | 14.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 238 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.0
Cherokee
John Cornyn | REP | 7,432 | 79.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,721 | 18.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 212 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.7
Childress
John Cornyn | REP | 959 | 88.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 107 | 9.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.5
Clay
John Cornyn | REP | 2,375 | 85.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 319 | 11.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 80 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +73.6
Cochran
John Cornyn | REP | 411 | 84.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 57 | 11.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 10 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +73.0
Coke
John Cornyn | REP | 674 | 89.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 53 | 7.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 22 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +82.7
Coleman
John Cornyn | REP | 1,934 | 87.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 200 | 9.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 60 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.5
Collin
John Cornyn | REP | 119,450 | 68.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 48,876 | 28.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 5,014 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +40.4
Collingsworth
John Cornyn | REP | 649 | 83.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 101 | 12.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +70.3
Colorado
John Cornyn | REP | 3,975 | 78.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 950 | 18.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 109 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +59.7
Comal
John Cornyn | REP | 27,194 | 78.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 5,936 | 17.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,132 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +61.6
Comanche
John Cornyn | REP | 2,408 | 81.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 423 | 14.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 90 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.4
Concho
John Cornyn | REP | 500 | 85.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 65 | 11.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 14 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.0
Cooke
John Cornyn | REP | 7,449 | 85.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 987 | 11.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 238 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.0
Coryell
John Cornyn | REP | 6,439 | 75.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,778 | 20.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 247 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +54.5
Cottle
John Cornyn | REP | 295 | 83.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 45 | 12.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 9 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.0
Crane
John Cornyn | REP | 664 | 81.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 120 | 14.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.3
Crockett
John Cornyn | REP | 600 | 73.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 167 | 20.5 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 32 | 3.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 17 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.1
Crosby
John Cornyn | REP | 802 | 76.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 198 | 18.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 27 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.8
Culberson
John Cornyn | REP | 158 | 54.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 114 | 39.2 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 11 | 3.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 8 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +15.1
Dallam
John Cornyn | REP | 717 | 86.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 77 | 9.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 24 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +76.9
Dallas
David Alameel | DEM | 198,747 | 49.7 |
John Cornyn | REP | 187,648 | 46.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 9,753 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +2.8
Dawson
John Cornyn | REP | 1,626 | 81.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 290 | 14.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.3
De Witt
John Cornyn | REP | 3,265 | 83.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 517 | 13.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 101 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +70.4
Deaf Smith
John Cornyn | REP | 2,161 | 80.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 412 | 15.4 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 61 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.2
Delta
John Cornyn | REP | 1,030 | 77.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 248 | 18.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 38 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +58.8
Denton
John Cornyn | REP | 96,380 | 67.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 39,393 | 27.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 4,894 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +40.0
Dickens
John Cornyn | REP | 434 | 87.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 49 | 9.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.2
Dimmit
David Alameel | DEM | 1,120 | 62.3 |
John Cornyn | REP | 595 | 33.1 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 44 | 2.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 38 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +29.2
Donley
John Cornyn | REP | 800 | 86.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 94 | 10.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 23 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +76.3
Duval
David Alameel | DEM | 2,182 | 74.7 |
John Cornyn | REP | 578 | 19.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 90 | 3.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 70 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +54.9
Eastland
John Cornyn | REP | 3,402 | 88.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 338 | 8.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 97 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.4
Ector
John Cornyn | REP | 11,897 | 81.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,222 | 15.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 381 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.1
Edwards
John Cornyn | REP | 523 | 71.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 154 | 21.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 32 | 4.4 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 21 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +50.5
El Paso
David Alameel | DEM | 42,959 | 54.0 |
John Cornyn | REP | 31,701 | 39.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 2,800 | 3.5 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 2,042 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +14.2
Ellis
John Cornyn | REP | 24,086 | 75.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 6,698 | 21.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 856 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +54.6
Erath
John Cornyn | REP | 6,051 | 83.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 961 | 13.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 187 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +70.2
Falls
John Cornyn | REP | 1,446 | 73.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 477 | 24.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 43 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +49.0
Fannin
John Cornyn | REP | 4,982 | 78.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,127 | 17.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 170 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.8
Fayette
John Cornyn | REP | 6,013 | 81.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,182 | 15.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 176 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.1
Fisher
John Cornyn | REP | 808 | 67.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 359 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +37.3
Floyd
John Cornyn | REP | 939 | 87.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 110 | 10.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.3
Foard
John Cornyn | REP | 196 | 66.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 90 | 30.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 9 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +35.9
Fort Bend
John Cornyn | REP | 76,005 | 58.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 51,140 | 39.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 2,935 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +19.0
Franklin
John Cornyn | REP | 2,188 | 85.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 295 | 11.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 55 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.1
Freestone
John Cornyn | REP | 3,517 | 80.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 775 | 17.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +62.5
Frio
David Alameel | DEM | 883 | 48.6 |
John Cornyn | REP | 880 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +0.2
Gaines
John Cornyn | REP | 2,137 | 87.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 224 | 9.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 54 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.4
Galveston
John Cornyn | REP | 41,222 | 64.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 19,777 | 31.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 2,018 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +33.6
Garza
John Cornyn | REP | 742 | 89.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 66 | 8.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +81.8
Gillespie
John Cornyn | REP | 7,216 | 82.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,153 | 13.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 350 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.1
Glasscock
John Cornyn | REP | 372 | 94.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 12 | 3.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 10 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +91.4
Goliad
John Cornyn | REP | 1,679 | 66.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 741 | 29.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 60 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +37.4
Gonzales
John Cornyn | REP | 2,840 | 77.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 688 | 18.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 88 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +58.9
Gray
John Cornyn | REP | 3,313 | 90.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 243 | 6.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 75 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +84.1
Grayson
John Cornyn | REP | 18,051 | 77.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,499 | 19.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 532 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +58.4
Gregg
John Cornyn | REP | 16,893 | 74.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 5,264 | 23.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.3
Grimes
John Cornyn | REP | 3,698 | 76.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 958 | 19.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 146 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +56.5
Guadalupe
John Cornyn | REP | 21,847 | 72.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 7,248 | 23.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 926 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +48.2
Hale
John Cornyn | REP | 3,658 | 85.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 491 | 11.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.4
Hall
John Cornyn | REP | 486 | 86.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 70 | 12.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +73.6
Hamilton
John Cornyn | REP | 1,930 | 81.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 356 | 15.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 75 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.3
Hansford
John Cornyn | REP | 1,124 | 93.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 42 | 3.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 27 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +90.1
Hardeman
John Cornyn | REP | 536 | 80.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 112 | 16.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 15 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.9
Hardin
John Cornyn | REP | 9,610 | 85.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,304 | 11.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 256 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.1
Harris
John Cornyn | REP | 362,241 | 54.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 280,669 | 42.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 16,111 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +12.2
Harrison
John Cornyn | REP | 10,404 | 72.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,678 | 25.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +46.6
Hartley
John Cornyn | REP | 1,004 | 90.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 75 | 6.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 24 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +84.1
Haskell
John Cornyn | REP | 787 | 75.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 234 | 22.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.0
Hays
John Cornyn | REP | 21,509 | 55.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 14,474 | 37.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,833 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +18.3
Hemphill
John Cornyn | REP | 716 | 87.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 69 | 8.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 24 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.9
Henderson
John Cornyn | REP | 13,252 | 79.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,025 | 18.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 402 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +61.0
Hidalgo
David Alameel | DEM | 46,101 | 59.2 |
John Cornyn | REP | 27,296 | 35.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 2,334 | 3.0 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 2,111 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +24.2
Hill
John Cornyn | REP | 7,007 | 79.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,529 | 17.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 233 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +62.2
Hockley
John Cornyn | REP | 3,192 | 87.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 370 | 10.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 79 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +76.9
Hood
John Cornyn | REP | 11,084 | 81.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,006 | 14.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 373 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.1
Hopkins
John Cornyn | REP | 5,726 | 78.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,384 | 19.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +59.5
Houston
John Cornyn | REP | 3,576 | 79.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 835 | 18.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 94 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.6
Howard
John Cornyn | REP | 3,433 | 81.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 644 | 15.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 117 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.9
Hudspeth
John Cornyn | REP | 260 | 64.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 104 | 25.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 5.2 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 18 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +38.7
Hunt
John Cornyn | REP | 12,623 | 78.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,877 | 17.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 464 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.6
Hutchinson
John Cornyn | REP | 3,966 | 88.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 374 | 8.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 104 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.5
Irion
John Cornyn | REP | 375 | 87.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 37 | 8.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 12 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.2
Jack
John Cornyn | REP | 1,492 | 87.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 170 | 10.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.7
Jackson
John Cornyn | REP | 2,411 | 83.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 407 | 14.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.4
Jasper
John Cornyn | REP | 5,518 | 78.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,349 | 19.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 144 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +59.3
Jeff Davis
John Cornyn | REP | 570 | 58.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 327 | 33.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 62 | 6.3 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 24 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +24.7
Jefferson
John Cornyn | REP | 26,675 | 51.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 24,539 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +4.1
Jim Hogg
David Alameel | DEM | 514 | 73.6 |
John Cornyn | REP | 160 | 22.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +50.7
Jim Wells
David Alameel | DEM | 2,759 | 50.6 |
John Cornyn | REP | 2,479 | 45.4 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 120 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +5.1
Johnson
John Cornyn | REP | 23,150 | 79.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,784 | 16.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 912 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.2
Jones
John Cornyn | REP | 2,638 | 80.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 489 | 15.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 112 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.9
Karnes
John Cornyn | REP | 1,830 | 74.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 557 | 22.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.7
Kaufman
John Cornyn | REP | 14,918 | 74.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,619 | 22.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 473 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.1
Kendall
John Cornyn | REP | 9,839 | 83.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,477 | 12.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 355 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.2
Kenedy
John Cornyn | REP | 59 | 50.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 52 | 44.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 3 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +6.0
Kent
John Cornyn | REP | 242 | 82.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 41 | 13.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 8 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +68.4
Kerr
John Cornyn | REP | 11,836 | 80.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,239 | 15.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 558 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.0
Kimble
John Cornyn | REP | 1,069 | 90.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 87 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +82.8
King
John Cornyn | REP | 87 | 96.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 2 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +94.4
Kinney
John Cornyn | REP | 738 | 66.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 299 | 26.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 53 | 4.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 23 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +39.4
Kleberg
John Cornyn | REP | 2,804 | 50.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,461 | 44.0 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 183 | 3.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 151 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +6.1
Knox
John Cornyn | REP | 703 | 81.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 141 | 16.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 19 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +64.8
La Salle
John Cornyn | REP | 400 | 49.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 369 | 45.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 25 | 3.1 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 19 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +3.8
La Vaca
John Cornyn | REP | 4,235 | 85.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 595 | 12.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 99 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +73.6
Lamar
John Cornyn | REP | 8,051 | 75.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,271 | 21.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 283 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +54.2
Lamb
John Cornyn | REP | 1,781 | 85.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 244 | 11.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.0
Lampasas
John Cornyn | REP | 3,693 | 81.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 684 | 15.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 118 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.6
Lee
John Cornyn | REP | 3,210 | 76.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 795 | 19.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 151 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.6
Leon
John Cornyn | REP | 3,688 | 87.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 432 | 10.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.4
Liberty
John Cornyn | REP | 9,487 | 78.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,160 | 17.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 350 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.7
Limestone
John Cornyn | REP | 3,257 | 76.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 903 | 21.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.3
Lipscomb
John Cornyn | REP | 743 | 88.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 73 | 8.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 20 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.6
Live Oak
John Cornyn | REP | 1,564 | 84.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 235 | 12.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 43 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.6
Llano
John Cornyn | REP | 5,639 | 81.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,054 | 15.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 203 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.1
Loving
John Cornyn | REP | 34 | 89.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3 | 7.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +81.6
Lubbock
John Cornyn | REP | 35,887 | 76.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 8,936 | 19.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,353 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.8
Lynn
John Cornyn | REP | 979 | 83.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 164 | 13.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 27 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.1
Madison
John Cornyn | REP | 1,923 | 81.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 402 | 16.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +64.1
Marion
John Cornyn | REP | 1,452 | 67.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 655 | 30.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +36.9
Martin
John Cornyn | REP | 958 | 85.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 111 | 9.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 29 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +75.7
Mason
John Cornyn | REP | 1,099 | 80.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 201 | 14.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 50 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.1
Matagorda
John Cornyn | REP | 4,801 | 69.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,791 | 26.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 200 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +43.8
Maverick
David Alameel | DEM | 3,479 | 67.3 |
John Cornyn | REP | 1,284 | 24.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 219 | 4.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 188 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +42.5
McCulloch
John Cornyn | REP | 1,446 | 83.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 206 | 11.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 61 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.9
McLennan
John Cornyn | REP | 31,116 | 71.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 11,275 | 25.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,056 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +45.3
McMullen
John Cornyn | REP | 216 | 87.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 17 | 6.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 10 | 4.0 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 5 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.2
Medina
John Cornyn | REP | 7,382 | 75.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,013 | 20.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 235 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.2
Menard
John Cornyn | REP | 408 | 87.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 43 | 9.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 10 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.5
Midland
John Cornyn | REP | 19,933 | 85.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,624 | 11.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 714 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.0
Milam
John Cornyn | REP | 3,582 | 73.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,098 | 22.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 135 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.2
Mills
John Cornyn | REP | 1,186 | 89.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 105 | 7.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 31 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +81.7
Mitchell
John Cornyn | REP | 964 | 81.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 166 | 14.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 30 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.7
Montague
John Cornyn | REP | 5,700 | 85.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 716 | 10.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 196 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +75.0
Montgomery
John Cornyn | REP | 84,449 | 81.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 15,326 | 14.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 3,064 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.8
Moore
John Cornyn | REP | 2,414 | 87.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 249 | 9.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 67 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +78.8
Morris
John Cornyn | REP | 1,988 | 65.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 978 | 32.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 67 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +33.2
Motley
John Cornyn | REP | 346 | 95.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 12 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +92.0
Nacogdoches
John Cornyn | REP | 8,867 | 75.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,497 | 21.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 295 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +54.3
Navarro
John Cornyn | REP | 7,128 | 76.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,960 | 20.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 214 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.1
Newton
John Cornyn | REP | 1,448 | 71.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 493 | 24.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 65 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +47.3
Nolan
John Cornyn | REP | 2,046 | 79.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 417 | 16.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 78 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.5
Nueces
John Cornyn | REP | 31,799 | 57.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 21,207 | 38.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,565 | 2.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 1,122 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +19.0
Ochiltree
John Cornyn | REP | 1,483 | 93.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 53 | 3.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 37 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +90.5
Oldham
John Cornyn | REP | 518 | 93.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 24 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +88.7
Orange
John Cornyn | REP | 13,190 | 77.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,377 | 19.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 417 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.5
Palo Pinto
John Cornyn | REP | 4,529 | 80.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 900 | 16.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 144 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +64.7
Panola
John Cornyn | REP | 4,615 | 80.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 986 | 17.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.4
Parker
John Cornyn | REP | 25,856 | 82.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,211 | 13.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 948 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.3
Parmer
John Cornyn | REP | 1,234 | 89.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 120 | 8.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +80.4
Pecos
John Cornyn | REP | 1,856 | 63.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 855 | 29.3 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 119 | 4.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 93 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +34.2
Polk
John Cornyn | REP | 7,997 | 77.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,928 | 18.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 300 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +59.0
Potter
John Cornyn | REP | 10,583 | 77.6 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,495 | 18.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 435 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +59.3
Presidio
David Alameel | DEM | 533 | 57.9 |
John Cornyn | REP | 318 | 34.5 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 37 | 4.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 33 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +23.3
Rains
John Cornyn | REP | 1,958 | 82.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 345 | 14.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 62 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.9
Randall
John Cornyn | REP | 23,914 | 86.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,880 | 10.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 781 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +75.8
Reagan
John Cornyn | REP | 421 | 85.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 51 | 10.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 14 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +74.9
Real
John Cornyn | REP | 868 | 84.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 127 | 12.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 22 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +71.8
Red River
John Cornyn | REP | 1,953 | 74.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 597 | 22.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 54 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +51.9
Reeves
John Cornyn | REP | 598 | 50.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 519 | 43.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 48 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +6.7
Refugio
John Cornyn | REP | 1,228 | 62.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 653 | 33.2 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 43 | 2.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 41 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +29.3
Roberts
John Cornyn | REP | 318 | 94.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 12 | 3.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 7 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +90.5
Robertson
John Cornyn | REP | 3,162 | 63.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,639 | 33.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 105 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +30.8
Rockwall
John Cornyn | REP | 16,441 | 79.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,772 | 18.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 481 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.9
Runnels
John Cornyn | REP | 1,985 | 88.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 197 | 8.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 53 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.6
Rusk
John Cornyn | REP | 8,436 | 80.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,759 | 16.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +64.1
Sabine
John Cornyn | REP | 2,303 | 84.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 347 | 12.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +72.1
San Augustine
John Cornyn | REP | 1,804 | 68.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 738 | 28.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 61 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +40.7
San Jacinto
John Cornyn | REP | 4,668 | 74.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,342 | 21.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 218 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.0
San Patricio
John Cornyn | REP | 7,144 | 64.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,470 | 31.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 305 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +33.1
San Saba
John Cornyn | REP | 1,262 | 88.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 125 | 8.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 35 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +79.5
Schleicher
John Cornyn | REP | 609 | 72.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 181 | 21.5 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 31 | 3.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 21 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +50.8
Scurry
John Cornyn | REP | 2,471 | 87.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 278 | 9.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +77.7
Shackelford
John Cornyn | REP | 734 | 92.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 44 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +86.7
Shelby
John Cornyn | REP | 4,293 | 79.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 997 | 18.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +60.9
Sherman
John Cornyn | REP | 545 | 91.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 30 | 5.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 13 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +86.7
Smith
John Cornyn | REP | 36,898 | 76.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 10,093 | 20.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,117 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.5
Somervell
John Cornyn | REP | 1,841 | 83.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 300 | 13.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 52 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.7
Starr
David Alameel | DEM | 3,795 | 76.5 |
John Cornyn | REP | 961 | 19.4 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 110 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +57.1
Stephens
John Cornyn | REP | 1,725 | 90.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 159 | 8.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +81.8
Sterling
John Cornyn | REP | 433 | 93.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 20 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +88.8
Stonewall
John Cornyn | REP | 284 | 77.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 72 | 19.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 8 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.6
Sutton
John Cornyn | REP | 626 | 85.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 91 | 12.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +73.1
Swisher
John Cornyn | REP | 1,033 | 75.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 288 | 20.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 39 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +54.1
Tarrant
John Cornyn | REP | 220,309 | 60.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 132,611 | 36.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 10,349 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +23.9
Taylor
John Cornyn | REP | 18,891 | 81.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,373 | 14.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 681 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +67.1
Terrell
John Cornyn | REP | 239 | 62.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 117 | 30.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 13 | 3.4 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 12 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +32.0
Terry
John Cornyn | REP | 1,814 | 81.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 306 | 13.8 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 51 | 2.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 47 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +68.0
Throckmorton
John Cornyn | REP | 445 | 86.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 53 | 10.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 12 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +76.0
Titus
John Cornyn | REP | 3,805 | 74.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,145 | 22.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +52.4
Tom Green
John Cornyn | REP | 14,586 | 80.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,950 | 16.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 507 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +63.8
Travis
David Alameel | DEM | 147,495 | 56.0 |
John Cornyn | REP | 97,834 | 37.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 12,326 | 4.7 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 5,911 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +18.8
Trinity
John Cornyn | REP | 2,878 | 75.3 |
David Alameel | DEM | 827 | 21.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 90 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.6
Tyler
John Cornyn | REP | 3,649 | 78.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 812 | 17.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 139 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +61.2
Upshur
John Cornyn | REP | 6,977 | 81.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,271 | 14.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 268 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +66.7
Upton
John Cornyn | REP | 501 | 80.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 91 | 14.6 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 17 | 2.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 13 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +65.9
Uvalde
John Cornyn | REP | 2,978 | 59.4 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,853 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +22.4
Val Verde
John Cornyn | REP | 3,930 | 49.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,624 | 45.2 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 241 | 3.0 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 222 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +3.8
Van Zandt
John Cornyn | REP | 9,861 | 83.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,546 | 13.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 304 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +70.6
Victoria
John Cornyn | REP | 12,718 | 74.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 3,716 | 21.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 386 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.0
Walker
John Cornyn | REP | 7,912 | 70.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,778 | 24.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 386 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +45.9
Waller
John Cornyn | REP | 6,106 | 70.8 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,226 | 25.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 208 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +45.0
Ward
John Cornyn | REP | 1,447 | 74.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 416 | 21.3 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 56 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +52.9
Washington
John Cornyn | REP | 7,048 | 79.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,582 | 17.7 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 235 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +61.3
Webb
David Alameel | DEM | 15,221 | 59.2 |
John Cornyn | REP | 7,487 | 29.1 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 1,765 | 6.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 1,238 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +30.1
Wharton
John Cornyn | REP | 6,315 | 76.2 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,749 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +55.1
Wheeler
John Cornyn | REP | 1,136 | 89.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 97 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +82.2
Wichita
John Cornyn | REP | 16,011 | 76.9 |
David Alameel | DEM | 4,128 | 19.8 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 539 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +57.1
Wilbarger
John Cornyn | REP | 2,098 | 79.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 481 | 18.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 54 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +61.0
Willacy
David Alameel | DEM | 1,091 | 53.5 |
John Cornyn | REP | 803 | 39.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 76 | 3.7 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 69 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +14.1
Williamson
John Cornyn | REP | 63,307 | 61.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 33,805 | 32.9 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 4,660 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +28.7
Wilson
John Cornyn | REP | 7,751 | 75.0 |
David Alameel | DEM | 2,181 | 21.1 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 295 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +53.9
Winkler
John Cornyn | REP | 787 | 82.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 129 | 13.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 33 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +68.6
Wise
John Cornyn | REP | 10,318 | 82.7 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,670 | 13.4 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 393 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +69.3
Wood
John Cornyn | REP | 9,550 | 86.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 1,247 | 11.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +75.2
Yoakum
John Cornyn | REP | 1,017 | 90.5 |
David Alameel | DEM | 75 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +83.8
Young
John Cornyn | REP | 4,420 | 86.1 |
David Alameel | DEM | 522 | 10.2 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 138 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cornyn +75.9
Zapata
David Alameel | DEM | 744 | 66.4 |
John Cornyn | REP | 312 | 27.9 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 40 | 3.6 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 24 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +38.6
Zavala
David Alameel | DEM | 1,037 | 72.9 |
John Cornyn | REP | 322 | 22.6 |
Emily Sanchez | GRN | 35 | 2.5 |
Rebecca Paddock | LIB | 29 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Alameel +50.2
Accomack
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,259 | 54.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,133 | 42.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 256 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +11.7
Albemarle
Mark Warner | DEM | 17,485 | 54.1 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 13,727 | 42.4 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,128 | 3.5 |
96.6% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +11.6
Alexandria
Mark Warner | DEM | 29,008 | 70.2 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 11,456 | 27.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 859 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +42.5
Alleghany
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,211 | 53.3 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,836 | 44.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 105 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +9.0
Amelia
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,588 | 63.8 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,374 | 33.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 93 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +29.9
Amherst
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,367 | 61.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,248 | 36.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 183 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +24.1
Appomattox
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,233 | 68.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,401 | 29.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 98 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +38.7
Arlington
Mark Warner | DEM | 47,643 | 70.7 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 18,121 | 26.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,657 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +43.8
Augusta
Ed Gillespie | REP | 14,008 | 71.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 5,151 | 26.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 544 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +45.0
Bath
Ed Gillespie | REP | 638 | 54.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 489 | 41.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 44 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +12.7
Bedford
Ed Gillespie | REP | 17,239 | 69.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,842 | 27.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 567 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +42.2
Bland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,266 | 69.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 514 | 28.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 38 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +41.4
Botetourt
Ed Gillespie | REP | 7,172 | 65.8 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,439 | 31.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 282 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +34.3
Bristol
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,444 | 64.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,292 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +30.3
Brunswick
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,571 | 60.2 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,652 | 38.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +21.5
Buchanan
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,792 | 60.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,794 | 38.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +21.6
Buckingham
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,014 | 51.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,782 | 45.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 105 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +5.9
Buena Vista
Ed Gillespie | REP | 692 | 57.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 475 | 39.4 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 38 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +18.0
Campbell
Ed Gillespie | REP | 10,758 | 69.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,428 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +40.9
Caroline
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,005 | 52.1 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,509 | 45.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 178 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +6.4
Carroll
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,587 | 65.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,264 | 32.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 194 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +33.0
Charles City
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,528 | 64.8 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 784 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +31.6
Charlotte
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,062 | 57.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,462 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +16.8
Charlottesville
Mark Warner | DEM | 8,234 | 77.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,051 | 19.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 412 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +57.8
Chesapeake
Ed Gillespie | REP | 29,887 | 49.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 29,554 | 48.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,214 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +0.5
Chesterfield
Ed Gillespie | REP | 53,271 | 52.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 44,460 | 44.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 3,292 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +8.7
Clarke
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,892 | 58.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,953 | 39.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 143 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +18.8
Colonial Heights
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,351 | 71.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,187 | 25.4 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 139 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +46.3
Covington
Mark Warner | DEM | 731 | 60.3 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 457 | 37.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +22.6
Craig
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,010 | 62.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 559 | 34.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 49 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +27.9
Culpeper
Ed Gillespie | REP | 7,484 | 64.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,823 | 32.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 303 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +31.5
Cumberland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,451 | 52.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,225 | 44.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 93 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +8.2
Danville
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,257 | 57.9 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,432 | 41.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +16.9
Dickenson
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,837 | 56.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,397 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +13.4
Dinwiddie
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,483 | 55.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,467 | 42.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +12.5
Emporia
Mark Warner | DEM | 855 | 62.3 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 501 | 36.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +25.8
Essex
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,545 | 51.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,417 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +4.2
Fairfax
Mark Warner | DEM | 176,364 | 57.7 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 122,782 | 40.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 6,642 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +17.5
Fairfax City
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,808 | 54.5 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,017 | 43.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 160 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +11.3
Falls Church
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,597 | 71.6 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,307 | 26.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 123 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +45.6
Fauquier
Ed Gillespie | REP | 13,199 | 64.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,970 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +30.3
Floyd
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,558 | 55.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,888 | 41.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 163 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +14.5
Fluvanna
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,477 | 53.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,559 | 42.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 274 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +11.0
Franklin
Ed Gillespie | REP | 9,654 | 61.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 5,639 | 35.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 408 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +25.6
Franklin City
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,331 | 61.1 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 818 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +23.6
Frederick
Ed Gillespie | REP | 14,690 | 67.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,658 | 30.4 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 557 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +36.7
Fredericksburg
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,335 | 58.5 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,206 | 38.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 163 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +19.8
Galax
Ed Gillespie | REP | 743 | 55.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 564 | 42.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 29 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +13.4
Giles
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,855 | 60.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,758 | 37.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 140 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +23.1
Gloucester
Ed Gillespie | REP | 6,987 | 63.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,726 | 33.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 277 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +29.7
Goochland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,729 | 61.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,377 | 36.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 235 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +25.2
Grayson
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,585 | 62.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,439 | 34.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 109 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +27.7
Greene
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,223 | 63.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,653 | 32.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 190 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +31.0
Greensville
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,737 | 63.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 984 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +27.3
Halifax
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,002 | 52.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,433 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +5.9
Hampton
Mark Warner | DEM | 23,445 | 68.4 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 10,135 | 29.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +38.9
Hanover
Ed Gillespie | REP | 24,985 | 64.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 12,421 | 32.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,239 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +32.5
Harrisonburg
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,858 | 51.3 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,325 | 44.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 338 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +7.1
Henrico
Mark Warner | DEM | 54,898 | 55.6 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 41,086 | 41.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 2,792 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +14.0
Henry
Ed Gillespie | REP | 7,540 | 56.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 5,673 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +13.9
Highland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 564 | 61.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 318 | 34.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 37 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +26.8
Hopewell
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,416 | 50.9 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,197 | 46.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 134 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +4.6
Isle of Wight
Ed Gillespie | REP | 6,712 | 56.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,975 | 41.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +14.6
James City
Ed Gillespie | REP | 14,394 | 54.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 11,566 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +10.7
King and Queen
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,067 | 49.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,011 | 47.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 59 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +2.6
King George
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,140 | 61.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,455 | 36.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 171 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +24.9
King William
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,177 | 61.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,795 | 34.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 181 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +26.8
Lancaster
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,573 | 56.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,922 | 41.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +14.2
Lee
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,688 | 63.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,030 | 34.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +28.5
Lexington
Mark Warner | DEM | 979 | 64.7 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 500 | 33.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 33 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +31.7
Loudoun
Ed Gillespie | REP | 45,483 | 49.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 45,027 | 48.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 2,080 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +0.5
Louisa
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,802 | 57.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,934 | 39.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 333 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +18.6
Lunenburg
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,736 | 52.8 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,481 | 45.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 69 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +7.8
Lynchburg
Ed Gillespie | REP | 10,624 | 54.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 8,282 | 42.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 461 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +12.1
Madison
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,560 | 62.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,418 | 34.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 102 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +28.0
Manassas
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,003 | 49.2 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,889 | 47.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 240 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +1.4
Manassas Park
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,109 | 52.9 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 923 | 44.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 64 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +8.9
Martinsville
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,146 | 60.6 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,320 | 37.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 75 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +23.3
Mathews
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,139 | 63.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,206 | 35.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +27.5
Mecklenburg
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,371 | 56.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,264 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +14.3
Middlesex
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,302 | 60.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,424 | 37.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 91 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +23.0
Montgomery
Mark Warner | DEM | 11,102 | 51.1 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 9,768 | 44.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 871 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +6.1
Nelson
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,532 | 49.6 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,287 | 44.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 288 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +4.8
New Kent
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,667 | 65.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,301 | 32.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 188 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +33.1
Newport News
Mark Warner | DEM | 23,394 | 60.4 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 14,544 | 37.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 790 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +22.9
Norfolk
Mark Warner | DEM | 29,195 | 68.8 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 12,249 | 28.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,010 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +39.9
Northampton
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,889 | 53.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,551 | 43.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 127 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +9.5
Northumberland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,937 | 57.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,085 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +16.6
Norton
Ed Gillespie | REP | 462 | 59.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 293 | 37.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 26 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +21.6
Nottoway
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,942 | 50.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,795 | 47.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 79 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +3.9
Orange
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,809 | 60.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,626 | 37.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 247 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +22.5
Page
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,682 | 68.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,564 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +39.6
Patrick
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,228 | 66.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,538 | 31.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 117 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +34.6
Petersburg
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,793 | 87.8 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 843 | 10.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +76.9
Pittsylvania
Ed Gillespie | REP | 11,277 | 62.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 6,575 | 36.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +26.0
Poquoson
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,127 | 72.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,077 | 25.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 99 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +47.6
Portsmouth
Mark Warner | DEM | 17,095 | 70.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 6,756 | 27.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 574 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +42.3
Powhatan
Ed Gillespie | REP | 6,784 | 70.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,524 | 26.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 375 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +44.0
Prince Edward
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,549 | 52.4 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,192 | 45.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 122 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +7.3
Prince George
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,131 | 56.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,694 | 40.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 242 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +15.8
Prince William
Mark Warner | DEM | 48,099 | 50.4 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 45,377 | 47.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,955 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +2.9
Pulaski
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,796 | 57.8 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,297 | 39.8 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 198 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +18.1
Radford
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,446 | 51.9 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,256 | 45.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 82 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +6.8
Rappahannock
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,530 | 54.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,213 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +11.3
Richmond
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,194 | 57.6 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 843 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +16.9
Richmond City
Mark Warner | DEM | 37,875 | 75.4 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 10,683 | 21.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 1,669 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +54.1
Roanoke
Ed Gillespie | REP | 18,092 | 59.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 11,560 | 37.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 814 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +21.4
Roanoke City
Mark Warner | DEM | 11,728 | 59.1 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 7,408 | 37.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 702 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +21.8
Rockbridge
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,847 | 56.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,834 | 41.4 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 163 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +14.8
Rockingham
Ed Gillespie | REP | 14,739 | 71.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 5,331 | 25.9 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 540 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +45.6
Russell
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,848 | 60.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,366 | 37.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +23.5
Salem
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,916 | 57.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,750 | 40.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 203 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +17.0
Scott
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,699 | 71.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,406 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +44.3
Shenandoah
Ed Gillespie | REP | 7,517 | 66.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,291 | 29.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 423 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +37.6
Smyth
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,294 | 62.7 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,405 | 35.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 148 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +27.6
Southampton
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,594 | 51.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,377 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +4.3
Spotsylvania
Ed Gillespie | REP | 19,352 | 59.8 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 12,307 | 38.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 727 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +21.8
Stafford
Ed Gillespie | REP | 19,737 | 58.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 13,402 | 39.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 723 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +18.7
Staunton
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,045 | 48.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,010 | 48.3 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 175 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +0.6
Suffolk
Mark Warner | DEM | 13,518 | 56.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 10,200 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +13.7
Surry
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,545 | 60.2 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 962 | 37.5 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 61 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +22.7
Sussex
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,708 | 57.2 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,241 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +15.6
Tazewell
Ed Gillespie | REP | 6,970 | 72.1 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,573 | 26.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +45.5
Virginia Beach
Ed Gillespie | REP | 54,057 | 51.2 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 48,780 | 46.2 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 2,837 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +5.0
Warren
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,923 | 64.4 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 3,043 | 33.1 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 231 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +31.3
Washington
Ed Gillespie | REP | 9,392 | 67.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 4,398 | 31.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +35.6
Waynesboro
Ed Gillespie | REP | 3,138 | 59.5 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 1,950 | 37.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 184 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +22.5
Westmoreland
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,336 | 50.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,214 | 47.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 93 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +2.6
Williamsburg
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,466 | 63.0 |
Ed Gillespie | REP | 1,360 | 34.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 88 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Warner +28.3
Winchester
Ed Gillespie | REP | 2,985 | 48.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,930 | 48.0 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 195 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +0.9
Wise
Ed Gillespie | REP | 5,247 | 70.3 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,098 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +42.2
Wythe
Ed Gillespie | REP | 4,561 | 64.0 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 2,393 | 33.6 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 177 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +30.4
York
Ed Gillespie | REP | 12,120 | 58.9 |
Mark Warner | DEM | 7,956 | 38.7 |
Robert Sarvis | LIB | 490 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gillespie +20.2
Barbour
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,758 | 65.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,261 | 30.1 |
John Buckley | LIB | 90 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +35.7
Berkeley
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 14,405 | 67.2 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 6,358 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +37.6
Boone
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,464 | 53.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,791 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +10.5
Braxton
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,039 | 55.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,501 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +14.7
Brooke
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,583 | 56.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,438 | 38.6 |
John Buckley | LIB | 140 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +18.1
Cabell
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 12,597 | 59.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 7,899 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +22.3
Calhoun
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,089 | 61.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 599 | 34.0 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 47 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +27.8
Clay
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,452 | 64.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 746 | 32.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +31.1
Doddridge
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,257 | 75.1 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 337 | 20.1 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 46 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +55.0
Fayette
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 5,413 | 53.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 4,308 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +10.9
Gilmer
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 957 | 58.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 550 | 33.8 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 76 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +25.0
Grant
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,259 | 83.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 352 | 13.0 |
John Buckley | LIB | 70 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +70.5
Greenbrier
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 5,484 | 57.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 3,635 | 38.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +19.5
Hampshire
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,784 | 72.1 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,256 | 23.9 |
John Buckley | LIB | 159 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +48.2
Hancock
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,739 | 61.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,537 | 33.1 |
John Buckley | LIB | 189 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +28.7
Hardy
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,328 | 69.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 890 | 26.4 |
John Buckley | LIB | 138 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +42.6
Harrison
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 10,310 | 57.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 6,856 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +19.4
Jackson
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 5,445 | 65.2 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,687 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +33.0
Jefferson
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 7,924 | 57.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 5,337 | 38.9 |
John Buckley | LIB | 288 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +18.9
Kanawha
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 30,522 | 57.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 20,869 | 39.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +18.3
Lewis
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,045 | 65.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,409 | 30.4 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 101 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +35.3
Lincoln
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,688 | 60.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,585 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +25.0
Logan
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,661 | 61.4 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,775 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +24.8
Marion
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 7,318 | 50.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 6,573 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +5.2
Marshall
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 5,553 | 66.3 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,592 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +35.3
Mason
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,405 | 63.4 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,358 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +29.4
McDowell
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,896 | 52.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,598 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +8.3
Mercer
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 9,628 | 66.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 4,335 | 30.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +36.7
Mineral
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,679 | 71.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,526 | 23.4 |
John Buckley | LIB | 249 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +48.4
Mingo
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,770 | 62.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,172 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +26.3
Monongalia
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 10,424 | 54.3 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 7,982 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +12.7
Monroe
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,222 | 62.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,204 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +28.7
Morgan
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,441 | 68.3 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,393 | 27.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +40.7
Nicholas
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,252 | 63.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,163 | 32.1 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 177 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +31.0
Ohio
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 7,625 | 64.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 3,869 | 32.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +31.8
Pendleton
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,554 | 73.7 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 514 | 24.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +49.3
Pleasants
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,139 | 66.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 503 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +37.1
Pocahontas
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,416 | 56.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 890 | 35.7 |
Phil Hudok | CST | 67 | 2.7 |
John Buckley | LIB | 62 | 2.5 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 59 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +21.1
Preston
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,846 | 67.4 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,019 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +39.3
Putnam
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 11,036 | 69.2 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 4,519 | 28.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +40.9
Raleigh
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 13,492 | 66.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 6,359 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +34.9
Randolph
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,484 | 64.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 2,113 | 30.4 |
Phil Hudok | CST | 205 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +34.1
Ritchie
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,097 | 75.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 548 | 19.7 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 74 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +55.8
Roane
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,405 | 60.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,408 | 35.6 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 80 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +25.2
Summers
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,795 | 55.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,280 | 39.8 |
John Buckley | LIB | 66 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +16.0
Taylor
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,644 | 61.6 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,512 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +26.4
Tucker
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,740 | 64.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 815 | 30.2 |
Phil Hudok | CST | 58 | 2.2 |
John Buckley | LIB | 54 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +34.3
Tyler
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,512 | 71.6 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 497 | 23.5 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 47 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +48.1
Upshur
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 4,325 | 70.8 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,569 | 25.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +45.1
Wayne
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 5,984 | 60.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 3,623 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +23.9
Webster
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 1,096 | 55.3 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 792 | 39.9 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 47 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +15.3
Wetzel
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 2,401 | 59.5 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,479 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +22.8
Wirt
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 996 | 69.0 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 382 | 26.5 |
Bob Baber | MNT | 34 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +42.6
Wood
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 14,600 | 67.9 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 6,188 | 28.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +39.1
Wyoming
Shelley Moore Capito | REP | 3,145 | 63.1 |
Natalie Tennant | DEM | 1,705 | 34.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Capito +28.9
Albany
Mike Enzi | REP | 5,514 | 55.1 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 3,242 | 32.4 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 1,022 | 10.2 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 230 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +22.7
Big Horn
Mike Enzi | REP | 3,398 | 82.0 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 351 | 8.5 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 248 | 6.0 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 146 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +73.5
Campbell
Mike Enzi | REP | 8,900 | 83.9 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 715 | 6.7 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 703 | 6.6 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 287 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +77.2
Carbon
Mike Enzi | REP | 3,356 | 73.6 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 819 | 18.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 283 | 6.2 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 100 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +55.7
Converse
Mike Enzi | REP | 3,255 | 76.9 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 497 | 11.7 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 384 | 9.1 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 95 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +65.2
Crook
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,368 | 85.1 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 196 | 7.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 144 | 5.2 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 74 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +78.1
Fremont
Mike Enzi | REP | 8,629 | 70.2 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 2,331 | 19.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 1,123 | 9.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +51.2
Goshen
Mike Enzi | REP | 3,302 | 76.7 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 511 | 11.9 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 416 | 9.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +64.9
Hot Springs
Mike Enzi | REP | 1,529 | 75.3 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 248 | 12.2 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 190 | 9.4 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 64 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +63.1
Johnson
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,735 | 83.4 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 320 | 9.8 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 160 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +73.7
Laramie
Mike Enzi | REP | 17,645 | 68.4 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 5,559 | 21.6 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 2,042 | 7.9 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 541 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +46.9
Lincoln
Mike Enzi | REP | 4,758 | 82.1 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 580 | 10.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 304 | 5.2 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 150 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +72.1
Natrona
Mike Enzi | REP | 14,361 | 68.4 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 3,387 | 16.1 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 2,855 | 13.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +52.3
Niobrara
Mike Enzi | REP | 875 | 83.4 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 84 | 8.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 70 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +75.4
Park
Mike Enzi | REP | 5,749 | 81.5 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 757 | 10.7 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 397 | 5.6 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 152 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +70.8
Platte
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,625 | 74.0 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 552 | 15.6 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 284 | 8.0 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 84 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +58.5
Sheridan
Mike Enzi | REP | 7,307 | 76.8 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 1,474 | 15.5 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 557 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +61.3
Sublette
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,546 | 80.2 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 416 | 13.1 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 138 | 4.3 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 75 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +67.1
Sweetwater
Mike Enzi | REP | 7,746 | 68.2 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 2,723 | 24.0 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 647 | 5.7 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 243 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +44.2
Teton
Mike Enzi | REP | 4,261 | 54.5 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 3,103 | 39.7 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 261 | 3.3 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 189 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +14.8
Uinta
Mike Enzi | REP | 4,368 | 76.5 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 892 | 15.6 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 322 | 5.6 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 127 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +60.9
Washakie
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,279 | 80.1 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 263 | 9.2 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 253 | 8.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +70.9
Weston
Mike Enzi | REP | 2,028 | 81.7 |
Curt Gottshall | IND | 201 | 8.1 |
Charlie Hardy | DEM | 194 | 7.8 |
Joseph Porambo | LIB | 60 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Enzi +73.6