Alaska
| Lisa Murkowski | REP | 138,149 | 44.5 |
| Joe Miller | LIB | 90,825 | 29.2 |
| Margaret Stock | NO- | 41,194 | 13.3 |
| Ray Metcalfe | DEM | 36,200 | 11.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murkowski +15.2
Limestone
| Richard Shelby | REP | 29,203 | 74.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 10,233 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +48.1
Cleburne
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,554 | 86.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 847 | 13.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +73.5
Barbour
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,436 | 53.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,777 | 46.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +6.5
Macon
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 7,442 | 82.7 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,553 | 17.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +65.5
Perry
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,656 | 71.0 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,496 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +41.9
Wilcox
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,857 | 68.0 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,819 | 32.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +35.9
Elmore
| Richard Shelby | REP | 27,591 | 75.7 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 8,833 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +51.5
Chambers
| Richard Shelby | REP | 7,865 | 57.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,845 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +14.7
Shelby
| Richard Shelby | REP | 75,344 | 75.5 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 24,483 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +50.9
Talladega
| Richard Shelby | REP | 20,446 | 61.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 12,632 | 38.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +23.6
Etowah
| Richard Shelby | REP | 31,441 | 72.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 11,981 | 27.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +44.8
Washington
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,830 | 70.3 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,463 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +40.6
Montgomery
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 57,972 | 61.4 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 36,477 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +22.8
Baldwin
| Richard Shelby | REP | 74,021 | 79.5 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 19,145 | 20.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +58.9
Cherokee
| Richard Shelby | REP | 8,636 | 81.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,915 | 18.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +63.7
Fayette
| Richard Shelby | REP | 6,555 | 81.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,497 | 18.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +62.8
Choctaw
| Richard Shelby | REP | 4,035 | 57.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,992 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +14.8
Jackson
| Richard Shelby | REP | 15,742 | 77.6 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,538 | 22.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +55.2
Marion
| Richard Shelby | REP | 10,753 | 84.6 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,961 | 15.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +69.2
Blount
| Richard Shelby | REP | 22,169 | 88.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,980 | 11.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +76.3
Clarke
| Richard Shelby | REP | 7,158 | 56.3 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,558 | 43.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +12.6
Sumter
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,611 | 73.6 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,656 | 26.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +47.2
Escambia
| Richard Shelby | REP | 9,555 | 67.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,625 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +34.8
Bibb
| Richard Shelby | REP | 6,612 | 76.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,082 | 23.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +52.1
Lawrence
| Richard Shelby | REP | 10,254 | 71.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,171 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +42.2
Coffee
| Richard Shelby | REP | 15,745 | 77.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,498 | 22.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +55.6
Dallas
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 12,388 | 67.2 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 6,060 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +34.3
Monroe
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,854 | 57.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,255 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +15.8
Walker
| Richard Shelby | REP | 23,419 | 80.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,558 | 19.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +61.6
Lowndes
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,580 | 71.4 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,839 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +42.7
Pike
| Richard Shelby | REP | 7,835 | 60.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,037 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +21.7
Conecuh
| Richard Shelby | REP | 3,298 | 52.3 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,006 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +4.6
Franklin
| Richard Shelby | REP | 8,670 | 75.3 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,850 | 24.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +50.5
Russell
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 9,487 | 50.2 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 9,408 | 49.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +0.4
Calhoun
| Richard Shelby | REP | 32,976 | 70.0 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 14,152 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +39.9
Geneva
| Richard Shelby | REP | 9,606 | 84.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,803 | 15.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +68.4
Autauga
| Richard Shelby | REP | 18,220 | 74.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 6,331 | 25.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +48.4
Covington
| Richard Shelby | REP | 12,690 | 82.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,740 | 17.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +64.5
Henry
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,506 | 69.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,366 | 30.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +39.9
Clay
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,147 | 78.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,377 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +57.8
St. Clair
| Richard Shelby | REP | 31,279 | 82.5 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 6,635 | 17.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +65.0
Chilton
| Richard Shelby | REP | 14,582 | 81.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,327 | 18.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +62.8
Hale
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,650 | 59.2 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 3,208 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +18.4
Cullman
| Richard Shelby | REP | 32,001 | 86.0 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,207 | 14.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +72.0
Lauderdale
| Richard Shelby | REP | 27,092 | 69.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 11,652 | 30.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +39.9
Tallapoosa
| Richard Shelby | REP | 13,401 | 69.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,804 | 30.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +39.6
Colbert
| Richard Shelby | REP | 15,866 | 65.3 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 8,443 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +30.5
DeKalb
| Richard Shelby | REP | 20,347 | 81.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,749 | 18.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +62.2
Crenshaw
| Richard Shelby | REP | 4,392 | 71.7 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,734 | 28.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +43.4
Butler
| Richard Shelby | REP | 4,840 | 56.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,663 | 43.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +13.8
Madison
| Richard Shelby | REP | 97,796 | 60.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 62,870 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +21.7
Coosa
| Richard Shelby | REP | 3,378 | 65.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,788 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +30.8
Marengo
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,419 | 50.6 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,294 | 49.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +1.2
Bullock
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,364 | 74.2 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 1,167 | 25.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +48.5
Randolph
| Richard Shelby | REP | 7,454 | 75.5 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 2,424 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +50.9
Marshall
| Richard Shelby | REP | 28,532 | 82.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 5,898 | 17.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +65.7
Winston
| Richard Shelby | REP | 8,817 | 87.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,269 | 12.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +74.8
Jefferson
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 156,574 | 52.1 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 144,136 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +4.1
Dale
| Richard Shelby | REP | 13,652 | 74.7 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 4,625 | 25.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +49.4
Tuscaloosa
| Richard Shelby | REP | 49,923 | 61.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 31,602 | 38.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +22.5
Houston
| Richard Shelby | REP | 30,494 | 73.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 11,219 | 26.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +46.2
Lee
| Richard Shelby | REP | 36,684 | 63.1 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 21,475 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +26.2
Morgan
| Richard Shelby | REP | 37,448 | 75.2 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 12,325 | 24.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +50.5
Mobile
| Richard Shelby | REP | 97,911 | 57.8 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 71,602 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +15.5
Greene
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,834 | 80.7 |
| Richard Shelby | REP | 918 | 19.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crumpton +61.4
Lamar
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,634 | 83.4 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 1,125 | 16.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +66.7
Pickens
| Richard Shelby | REP | 5,384 | 57.9 |
| Ron Crumpton | DEM | 3,908 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Shelby +15.9
Fulton
| John Boozman | REP | 3,254 | 71.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,059 | 23.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 232 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +48.3
Scott
| John Boozman | REP | 2,461 | 71.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 867 | 25.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 115 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +46.3
Lawrence
| John Boozman | REP | 3,912 | 70.9 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,380 | 25.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 229 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +45.9
Yell
| John Boozman | REP | 4,221 | 66.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,881 | 29.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 246 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +36.9
Faulkner
| John Boozman | REP | 27,632 | 59.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 16,770 | 35.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 2,266 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +23.3
Craighead
| John Boozman | REP | 23,218 | 66.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 10,241 | 29.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 1,432 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +37.2
Woodruff
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,521 | 61.2 |
| John Boozman | REP | 917 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +24.3
Drew
| John Boozman | REP | 3,701 | 58.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,413 | 38.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 208 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +20.4
Union
| John Boozman | REP | 10,168 | 64.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,902 | 31.1 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 683 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +33.4
Logan
| John Boozman | REP | 5,209 | 66.4 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,342 | 29.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 293 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +36.6
Poinsett
| John Boozman | REP | 5,357 | 70.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,026 | 26.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 241 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +43.7
Mississippi
| John Boozman | REP | 6,835 | 55.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 5,023 | 40.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 435 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +14.7
Clay
| John Boozman | REP | 3,286 | 65.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,527 | 30.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 235 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +34.8
Madison
| John Boozman | REP | 4,520 | 66.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,045 | 30.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 261 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +36.3
Phillips
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,777 | 59.3 |
| John Boozman | REP | 2,400 | 37.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 191 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +21.6
Randolph
| John Boozman | REP | 4,266 | 68.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,659 | 26.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 321 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +41.7
Lonoke
| John Boozman | REP | 17,483 | 66.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 7,666 | 29.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 1,276 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +37.2
Sharp
| John Boozman | REP | 5,127 | 72.8 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,609 | 22.8 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 311 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +49.9
Jackson
| John Boozman | REP | 2,958 | 58.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,951 | 38.5 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 162 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +19.9
Ouachita
| John Boozman | REP | 5,277 | 55.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,052 | 42.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 234 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +12.8
Franklin
| John Boozman | REP | 4,749 | 70.7 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,690 | 25.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 275 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +45.6
Benton
| John Boozman | REP | 63,503 | 66.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 27,434 | 28.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 4,487 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +37.8
Pulaski
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 88,892 | 56.2 |
| John Boozman | REP | 64,378 | 40.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 4,918 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +15.5
Searcy
| John Boozman | REP | 2,704 | 74.7 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 725 | 20.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 193 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +54.6
Lincoln
| John Boozman | REP | 2,190 | 58.9 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,440 | 38.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 90 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +20.2
Hot Spring
| John Boozman | REP | 7,259 | 62.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,006 | 34.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 381 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +27.9
Boone
| John Boozman | REP | 12,490 | 79.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,620 | 16.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 703 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +62.4
Crawford
| John Boozman | REP | 16,008 | 72.8 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 5,042 | 22.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 933 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +49.9
Van Buren
| John Boozman | REP | 4,670 | 65.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,145 | 30.1 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 315 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +35.4
Lafayette
| John Boozman | REP | 1,713 | 62.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 954 | 34.8 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 72 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +27.7
White
| John Boozman | REP | 19,413 | 69.8 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 7,341 | 26.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 1,057 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +43.4
Saint Francis
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,643 | 52.3 |
| John Boozman | REP | 3,153 | 45.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 165 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +7.0
Miller
| John Boozman | REP | 10,974 | 70.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,099 | 26.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 481 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +44.2
Cleveland
| John Boozman | REP | 2,164 | 65.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,034 | 31.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 102 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +34.2
Johnson
| John Boozman | REP | 5,680 | 64.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,882 | 32.5 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 309 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +31.5
Montgomery
| John Boozman | REP | 2,366 | 68.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 985 | 28.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 122 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +39.8
Grant
| John Boozman | REP | 5,015 | 69.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,877 | 25.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 361 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +43.3
Chicot
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,288 | 54.5 |
| John Boozman | REP | 1,824 | 43.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 86 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +11.1
Ashley
| John Boozman | REP | 5,106 | 66.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,346 | 30.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 275 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +35.7
Jefferson
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 15,342 | 61.6 |
| John Boozman | REP | 8,805 | 35.4 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 756 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +26.2
Hempstead
| John Boozman | REP | 4,168 | 62.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,352 | 35.1 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 186 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +27.1
Sevier
| John Boozman | REP | 3,036 | 70.4 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,076 | 24.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 201 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +45.4
Little River
| John Boozman | REP | 3,368 | 67.4 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,443 | 28.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 184 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +38.5
Desha
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,256 | 55.3 |
| John Boozman | REP | 1,727 | 42.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 95 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +13.0
Saline
| John Boozman | REP | 33,125 | 64.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 16,140 | 31.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 2,333 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +32.9
Pope
| John Boozman | REP | 15,344 | 69.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 5,819 | 26.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 1,055 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +42.9
Dallas
| John Boozman | REP | 1,429 | 53.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,171 | 43.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 88 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +9.6
Nevada
| John Boozman | REP | 1,881 | 60.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,115 | 35.8 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 122 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +24.6
Baxter
| John Boozman | REP | 14,074 | 73.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,231 | 22.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 933 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +51.2
Carroll
| John Boozman | REP | 6,771 | 64.5 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,318 | 31.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 411 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +32.9
Independence
| John Boozman | REP | 9,020 | 68.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,747 | 28.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 493 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +39.8
Izard
| John Boozman | REP | 3,593 | 68.8 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,404 | 26.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 222 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +41.9
Conway
| John Boozman | REP | 4,403 | 57.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,023 | 39.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 292 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +17.9
Crittenden
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 7,412 | 50.3 |
| John Boozman | REP | 6,779 | 46.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 553 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +4.3
Howard
| John Boozman | REP | 2,969 | 66.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,377 | 30.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 133 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +35.5
Prairie
| John Boozman | REP | 2,130 | 64.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,093 | 33.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 91 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +31.3
Greene
| John Boozman | REP | 9,842 | 70.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 3,405 | 24.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 789 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +45.9
Washington
| John Boozman | REP | 43,137 | 53.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 34,475 | 42.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 3,408 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +10.7
Columbia
| John Boozman | REP | 5,440 | 64.3 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,757 | 32.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 259 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +31.7
Newton
| John Boozman | REP | 2,833 | 76.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 754 | 20.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 134 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +55.9
Cleburne
| John Boozman | REP | 8,382 | 71.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,902 | 24.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 490 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +46.5
Cross
| John Boozman | REP | 4,456 | 66.9 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,997 | 30.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 208 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +36.9
Garland
| John Boozman | REP | 24,262 | 60.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 14,385 | 35.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 1,655 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +24.5
Polk
| John Boozman | REP | 6,062 | 75.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,654 | 20.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 304 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +55.0
Calhoun
| John Boozman | REP | 1,336 | 61.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 773 | 35.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 82 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +25.7
Bradley
| John Boozman | REP | 2,019 | 58.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,343 | 38.6 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 119 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +19.4
Clark
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 4,087 | 49.4 |
| John Boozman | REP | 3,947 | 47.7 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 238 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +1.7
Monroe
| John Boozman | REP | 1,363 | 49.0 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,361 | 48.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 57 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +0.1
Stone
| John Boozman | REP | 3,690 | 67.4 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,530 | 27.9 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 258 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +39.4
Arkansas
| John Boozman | REP | 3,684 | 59.9 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 2,341 | 38.1 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 125 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +21.8
Marion
| John Boozman | REP | 5,265 | 75.6 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,320 | 19.0 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 380 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +56.6
Perry
| John Boozman | REP | 2,588 | 61.7 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,394 | 33.2 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 214 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +28.5
Sebastian
| John Boozman | REP | 29,405 | 66.1 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 13,060 | 29.3 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 2,038 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +36.7
Pike
| John Boozman | REP | 2,819 | 72.2 |
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 955 | 24.5 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 131 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Boozman +47.7
Lee
| Conner Eldridge | DEM | 1,636 | 54.7 |
| John Boozman | REP | 1,271 | 42.5 |
| Frank Gilbert | LIB | 84 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Eldridge +12.2
Yuma
| John McCain | REP | 27,290 | 55.2 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 19,451 | 39.3 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 2,739 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +15.8
Apache
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 18,446 | 66.6 |
| John McCain | REP | 7,944 | 28.7 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 1,312 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirkpatrick +37.9
Greenlee
| John McCain | REP | 1,784 | 55.0 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 1,189 | 36.7 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 268 | 8.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +18.4
Yavapai
| John McCain | REP | 68,032 | 61.7 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 34,527 | 31.3 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 7,619 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +30.4
Navajo
| John McCain | REP | 18,760 | 47.9 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 17,645 | 45.1 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 2,727 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +2.8
Maricopa
| John McCain | REP | 842,425 | 55.2 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 602,635 | 39.5 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 79,724 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +15.7
Gila
| John McCain | REP | 13,157 | 61.3 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 6,701 | 31.2 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 1,620 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +30.1
Mohave
| John McCain | REP | 50,486 | 66.3 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 19,045 | 25.0 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 6,615 | 8.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +41.3
Santa Cruz
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 9,745 | 61.0 |
| John McCain | REP | 5,635 | 35.3 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 589 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirkpatrick +25.7
Cochise
| John McCain | REP | 27,636 | 57.1 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 17,642 | 36.4 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 3,163 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +20.6
La Paz
| John McCain | REP | 3,662 | 63.8 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 1,629 | 28.4 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 450 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +35.4
Pima
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 202,213 | 49.4 |
| John McCain | REP | 187,910 | 45.9 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 19,403 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirkpatrick +3.5
Graham
| John McCain | REP | 7,728 | 65.1 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 3,280 | 27.6 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 871 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +37.4
Pinal
| John McCain | REP | 72,787 | 57.5 |
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 45,402 | 35.9 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 8,405 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McCain +21.6
Coconino
| Ann Kirkpatrick | DEM | 31,695 | 53.9 |
| John McCain | REP | 24,031 | 40.8 |
| Gary Swing | GRE | 3,129 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirkpatrick +13.0
Lassen
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 4,151 | 56.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 3,226 | 43.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +12.5
Humboldt
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 32,729 | 66.8 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 16,277 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +33.6
Riverside
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 339,497 | 54.7 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 281,437 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +9.4
Siskiyou
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 8,744 | 57.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 6,457 | 42.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +15.0
Calaveras
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 11,259 | 64.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 6,302 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +28.2
San Mateo
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 199,956 | 71.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 81,090 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +42.3
Fresno
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 118,148 | 50.0 |
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 117,956 | 50.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sanchez +0.1
Santa Clara
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 411,765 | 66.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 207,380 | 33.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +33.0
Alameda
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 443,536 | 75.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 144,134 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +50.9
Sutter
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 15,191 | 56.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 11,700 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +13.0
Contra Costa
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 282,587 | 69.4 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 124,731 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +38.8
Sierra
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 826 | 65.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 442 | 34.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +30.3
Del Norte
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 4,603 | 61.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 2,939 | 39.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +22.1
Ventura
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 181,785 | 61.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 115,964 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +22.1
Sacramento
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 312,038 | 65.9 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 161,673 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +31.7
Mariposa
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 4,134 | 62.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 2,519 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +24.3
Yolo
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 48,901 | 67.6 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 23,429 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +35.2
Alpine
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 342 | 72.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 133 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +44.0
Yuba
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 9,999 | 56.2 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 7,789 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +12.4
Placer
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 89,687 | 63.2 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 52,192 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +26.4
Nevada
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 29,639 | 69.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 13,329 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +38.0
Imperial
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 28,872 | 67.4 |
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 13,975 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sanchez +34.8
Marin
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 98,196 | 78.4 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 27,101 | 21.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +56.7
Inyo
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 3,863 | 63.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 2,258 | 36.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +26.2
Lake
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 13,188 | 65.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 7,003 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +30.6
Trinity
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 2,696 | 60.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 1,795 | 40.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +20.1
Kings
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 14,655 | 52.7 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 13,158 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +5.4
Stanislaus
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 80,502 | 56.8 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 61,219 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +13.6
El Dorado
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 45,671 | 63.4 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 26,408 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +26.7
Mono
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 2,611 | 62.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 1,591 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +24.3
San Diego
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 625,843 | 58.4 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 446,063 | 41.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +16.8
Merced
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 30,172 | 50.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 29,835 | 49.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +0.6
Tulare
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 47,145 | 51.7 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 44,044 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +3.4
Mendocino
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 22,335 | 70.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 9,564 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +40.0
Santa Barbara
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 88,861 | 59.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 60,995 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +18.6
Los Angeles
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 1,895,675 | 60.9 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 1,218,236 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +21.8
Sonoma
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 147,532 | 73.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 54,600 | 27.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +46.0
San Benito
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 11,151 | 59.6 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 7,568 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +19.1
Tehama
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 9,456 | 54.2 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 7,991 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +8.4
Santa Cruz
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 81,443 | 71.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 32,720 | 28.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +42.7
Tuolumne
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 12,239 | 65.9 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 6,345 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +31.7
Amador
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 8,690 | 64.1 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 4,872 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +28.2
Modoc
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 1,531 | 59.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 1,044 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +18.9
Kern
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 98,526 | 50.2 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 97,689 | 49.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +0.4
San Bernardino
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 300,738 | 54.5 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 251,246 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +9.0
San Luis Obispo
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 69,190 | 64.9 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 37,455 | 35.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +29.8
Solano
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 97,410 | 66.4 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 49,229 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +32.9
San Francisco
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 286,723 | 78.0 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 80,985 | 22.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +56.0
Napa
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 35,925 | 66.9 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 17,778 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +33.8
Madera
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 17,562 | 51.2 |
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 16,769 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sanchez +2.3
San Joaquin
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 111,563 | 57.8 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 81,295 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +15.7
Monterey
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 77,659 | 64.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 43,060 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +28.7
Shasta
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 31,877 | 56.7 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 24,369 | 43.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +13.3
Butte
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 43,491 | 58.6 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 30,680 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +17.3
Plumas
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 4,606 | 65.6 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 2,418 | 34.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +31.2
Glenn
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 3,793 | 52.6 |
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 3,423 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sanchez +5.1
Orange
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 555,459 | 53.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 486,783 | 46.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +6.6
Colusa
| Kamala Harris | DEM | 2,639 | 51.3 |
| Loretta Sanchez | DEM | 2,502 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Harris +2.7
Garfield
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 12,596 | 48.1 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 12,039 | 45.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 903 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +2.1
Rio Blanco
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,641 | 78.3 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 600 | 17.8 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 100 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +60.5
Baca
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,469 | 68.7 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 577 | 27.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 62 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +41.7
Clear Creek
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,883 | 49.1 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,541 | 43.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 282 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +5.8
Custer
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,984 | 64.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 944 | 30.8 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 100 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +34.0
Jackson
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 583 | 68.3 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 235 | 27.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 22 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +40.7
Boulder
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 126,334 | 68.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 45,755 | 24.6 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 6,768 | 3.6 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 6,089 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +43.4
Mesa
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 48,559 | 62.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 24,109 | 31.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 3,062 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +31.6
Lincoln
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,742 | 72.2 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 588 | 24.4 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 54 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +47.8
Archuleta
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 4,072 | 56.2 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,750 | 37.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 262 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +18.2
Hinsdale
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 316 | 53.9 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 246 | 42.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 17 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +11.9
Morgan
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 7,516 | 63.3 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,910 | 32.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 276 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +30.4
Adams
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 97,402 | 52.7 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 76,285 | 41.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 7,435 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +11.4
Saguache
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,570 | 55.1 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,042 | 36.6 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 110 | 3.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 96 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +18.5
Grand
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 4,402 | 51.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,623 | 42.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 352 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +9.1
Montrose
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 13,946 | 66.5 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 6,055 | 28.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 679 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +37.6
Douglas
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 107,920 | 57.9 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 70,005 | 37.6 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 6,479 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +20.3
Prowers
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 3,110 | 62.9 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,648 | 33.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 123 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +29.6
Phillips
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,570 | 67.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 695 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +37.8
Montezuma
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 7,484 | 59.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 4,305 | 34.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 455 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +25.2
Kit Carson
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,607 | 71.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 894 | 24.6 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 76 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +47.2
Moffat
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 4,786 | 74.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,338 | 20.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 169 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +53.9
Rio Grande
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,974 | 53.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,372 | 42.6 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 121 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +10.8
Conejos
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,073 | 51.1 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,878 | 46.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +4.8
Lake
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,704 | 54.2 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,174 | 37.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 150 | 4.8 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 86 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +16.9
Yuma
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 3,386 | 71.1 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,252 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +44.8
Delta
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 10,970 | 65.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 4,916 | 29.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 515 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +36.1
La Plata
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 15,903 | 51.9 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 12,678 | 41.4 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 1,186 | 3.9 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 621 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +10.5
Teller
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 9,547 | 66.6 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 4,064 | 28.4 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 493 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +38.3
Crowley
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 936 | 61.7 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 504 | 33.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 55 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +28.5
Pueblo
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 40,475 | 52.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 33,051 | 42.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 2,632 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +9.5
Pitkin
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 6,847 | 68.3 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,656 | 26.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 284 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +41.8
Weld
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 74,843 | 55.7 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 52,263 | 38.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 4,924 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +16.8
Mineral
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 326 | 49.5 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 301 | 45.7 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 19 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +3.8
Elbert
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 11,558 | 72.6 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,684 | 23.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 521 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +49.5
Denver
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 238,774 | 73.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 71,078 | 21.7 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 9,828 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +51.2
Routt
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 7,793 | 56.6 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 5,265 | 38.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 461 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +18.3
Eagle
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 13,707 | 55.2 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 8,772 | 35.3 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 1,255 | 5.1 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 892 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +19.9
Jefferson
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 163,172 | 50.8 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 139,237 | 43.3 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 12,847 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +7.4
Chaffee
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 5,384 | 47.8 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 5,259 | 46.7 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 345 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +1.1
Dolores
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 808 | 67.1 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 338 | 28.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 40 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +39.0
Alamosa
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,695 | 53.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,894 | 41.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 238 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +11.5
Ouray
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,735 | 52.4 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,397 | 42.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 97 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +10.2
Arapahoe
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 162,747 | 54.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 123,509 | 41.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 10,228 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +13.0
Las Animas
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,305 | 48.8 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 3,174 | 46.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 183 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +1.9
Gunnison
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 5,517 | 58.7 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 3,216 | 34.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 370 | 3.9 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 219 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +24.5
Washington
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 2,092 | 77.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 527 | 19.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +57.9
San Juan
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 279 | 56.0 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 193 | 38.8 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 18 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +17.3
Logan
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 6,534 | 67.6 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,768 | 28.6 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 242 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +39.0
Gilpin
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,729 | 48.3 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,503 | 42.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 170 | 4.7 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 133 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +6.3
Otero
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 4,561 | 53.5 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,651 | 42.8 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 183 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +10.7
Costilla
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,186 | 65.1 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 547 | 30.0 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 53 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +35.1
Broomfield
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 19,431 | 53.1 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 15,077 | 41.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 1,434 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +11.9
Summit
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 9,536 | 59.9 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 5,178 | 32.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 721 | 4.5 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 363 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +27.4
Larimer
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 95,789 | 49.4 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 86,101 | 44.4 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 7,640 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +5.0
Park
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 5,937 | 57.2 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 3,722 | 35.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 480 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +21.3
Sedgwick
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 863 | 64.4 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 426 | 31.8 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 32 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +32.6
Fremont
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 14,154 | 64.5 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 6,671 | 30.4 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 715 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +34.1
San Miguel
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 2,951 | 68.5 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,055 | 24.5 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 161 | 3.7 |
| Arn Menconi | GRE | 123 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +44.0
Cheyenne
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 828 | 76.0 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 220 | 20.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 30 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +55.8
El Paso
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 183,709 | 58.0 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 113,726 | 35.9 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 13,507 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +22.1
Huerfano
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 1,942 | 51.3 |
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,694 | 44.7 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 84 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bennet +6.5
Bent
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 1,034 | 53.9 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 810 | 42.2 |
| Lily Williams | LIB | 43 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +11.7
Kiowa
| Darryl Glenn | REP | 621 | 74.1 |
| Michael Bennet | DEM | 196 | 23.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glenn +50.7
New London
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 75,188 | 63.3 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 40,238 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +29.4
New Haven
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 239,991 | 65.4 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 119,774 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +32.8
Fairfield
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 249,887 | 61.4 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 148,935 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +24.8
Hartford
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 265,018 | 66.9 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 122,624 | 31.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +36.0
Windham
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 28,849 | 58.8 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 18,546 | 37.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +21.0
Tolland
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 45,949 | 60.4 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 27,989 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +23.6
Middlesex
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 53,960 | 62.1 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 30,996 | 35.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +26.4
Litchfield
| Richard Blumenthal | DEM | 49,872 | 52.2 |
| Dan Carter | REP | 43,519 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blumenthal +6.7
Alachua
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 69,399 | 54.5 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 54,203 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +11.9
Baker
| Marco Rubio | REP | 9,901 | 79.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,135 | 17.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +62.3
Bay
| Marco Rubio | REP | 62,906 | 72.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 19,971 | 23.0 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,484 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +49.5
Bradford
| Marco Rubio | REP | 8,720 | 73.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,694 | 22.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +50.8
Brevard
| Marco Rubio | REP | 181,496 | 58.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 112,914 | 36.3 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 9,709 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +22.0
Broward
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 522,932 | 63.8 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 278,766 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +29.8
Calhoun
| Marco Rubio | REP | 4,331 | 72.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,275 | 21.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 154 | 2.6 |
| Bruce Nathan | NO- | 148 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +50.9
Charlotte
| Marco Rubio | REP | 60,194 | 63.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 30,207 | 31.8 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,765 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +31.5
Citrus
| Marco Rubio | REP | 48,798 | 62.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 24,038 | 30.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,845 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +31.6
Clay
| Marco Rubio | REP | 77,965 | 74.0 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 23,251 | 22.1 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,339 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +52.0
Collier
| Marco Rubio | REP | 115,719 | 68.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 49,470 | 29.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +39.1
Columbia
| Marco Rubio | REP | 19,924 | 70.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 7,361 | 26.0 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 601 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +44.4
DeSoto
| Marco Rubio | REP | 6,844 | 64.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 3,346 | 31.5 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 230 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +32.9
Dixie
| Marco Rubio | REP | 5,040 | 72.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,582 | 22.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 185 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +49.5
Duval
| Marco Rubio | REP | 241,000 | 56.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 171,598 | 40.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +16.2
Escambia
| Marco Rubio | REP | 94,200 | 62.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 51,316 | 33.9 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 3,542 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +28.3
Flagler
| Marco Rubio | REP | 32,914 | 58.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 21,260 | 37.5 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 1,481 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +20.6
Franklin
| Marco Rubio | REP | 3,861 | 65.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,826 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +34.4
Gadsden
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 14,573 | 66.4 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 6,887 | 31.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +35.0
Gilchrist
| Marco Rubio | REP | 6,303 | 75.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,675 | 20.1 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 182 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +55.6
Glades
| Marco Rubio | REP | 2,927 | 68.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,196 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +40.3
Gulf
| Marco Rubio | REP | 5,191 | 72.0 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,750 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +47.8
Hamilton
| Marco Rubio | REP | 3,050 | 56.9 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,106 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +17.6
Hardee
| Marco Rubio | REP | 5,151 | 68.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,025 | 27.0 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 169 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +41.7
Hendry
| Marco Rubio | REP | 6,683 | 61.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 3,892 | 35.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +25.5
Hernando
| Marco Rubio | REP | 53,708 | 58.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 32,766 | 35.5 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 3,402 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +22.7
Highlands
| Marco Rubio | REP | 28,123 | 62.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 14,498 | 32.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 1,281 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +30.3
Hillsborough
| Marco Rubio | REP | 283,871 | 48.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 281,122 | 47.6 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 15,615 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +0.5
Holmes
| Marco Rubio | REP | 7,039 | 83.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 976 | 11.6 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 191 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +72.1
Indian River
| Marco Rubio | REP | 48,181 | 61.0 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 28,288 | 35.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +25.2
Jackson
| Marco Rubio | REP | 13,820 | 66.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 6,362 | 30.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +35.7
Jefferson
| Marco Rubio | REP | 3,751 | 49.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 3,623 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +1.7
Lafayette
| Marco Rubio | REP | 2,572 | 76.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 669 | 19.9 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 71 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +56.6
Lake
| Marco Rubio | REP | 100,664 | 59.9 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 59,151 | 35.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 4,592 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +24.7
Lee
| Marco Rubio | REP | 204,778 | 63.6 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 104,591 | 32.5 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 6,993 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +31.1
Leon
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 86,641 | 57.4 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 59,958 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +17.7
Levy
| Marco Rubio | REP | 12,914 | 67.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 5,294 | 27.8 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 478 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +40.0
Liberty
| Marco Rubio | REP | 2,290 | 71.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 748 | 23.3 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 82 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +48.1
Madison
| Marco Rubio | REP | 4,584 | 54.6 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 3,564 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +12.1
Manatee
| Marco Rubio | REP | 102,717 | 58.0 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 66,545 | 37.6 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 4,840 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +20.4
Marion
| Marco Rubio | REP | 104,400 | 60.6 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 59,537 | 34.6 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 4,825 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +26.0
Martin
| Marco Rubio | REP | 49,806 | 58.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 33,685 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +18.9
Miami-Dade
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 529,445 | 54.6 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 420,063 | 43.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +11.3
Monroe
| Marco Rubio | REP | 21,629 | 51.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 18,738 | 44.8 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 901 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +6.9
Nassau
| Marco Rubio | REP | 34,974 | 75.8 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 9,544 | 20.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 987 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +55.2
Okaloosa
| Marco Rubio | REP | 74,749 | 74.8 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 20,813 | 20.8 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,799 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +53.9
Okeechobee
| Marco Rubio | REP | 8,647 | 64.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 4,287 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +32.3
Orange
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 293,696 | 54.4 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 224,853 | 41.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 12,214 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +12.8
Osceola
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 75,646 | 54.6 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 57,103 | 41.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 3,060 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +13.4
Palm Beach
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 350,625 | 53.7 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 287,899 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +9.6
Pasco
| Marco Rubio | REP | 134,779 | 56.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 88,665 | 37.3 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 8,515 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +19.4
Pinellas
| Marco Rubio | REP | 236,421 | 48.8 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 222,928 | 46.0 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 15,628 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +2.8
Polk
| Marco Rubio | REP | 156,196 | 55.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 110,363 | 39.4 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 8,194 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +16.4
Putnam
| Marco Rubio | REP | 21,474 | 65.7 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 9,910 | 30.3 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 751 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +35.4
St. Johns
| Marco Rubio | REP | 95,753 | 70.6 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 35,580 | 26.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +44.4
St. Lucie
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 69,590 | 49.9 |
| Marco Rubio | REP | 66,222 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murphy +2.4
Santa Rosa
| Marco Rubio | REP | 66,921 | 76.9 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 16,284 | 18.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 2,450 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +58.2
Sarasota
| Marco Rubio | REP | 124,163 | 55.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 92,332 | 40.9 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 5,616 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +14.1
Seminole
| Marco Rubio | REP | 117,734 | 53.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 94,449 | 42.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 5,624 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +10.5
Sumter
| Marco Rubio | REP | 51,846 | 68.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 21,187 | 27.9 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 1,634 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +40.4
Suwannee
| Marco Rubio | REP | 13,335 | 72.1 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 4,483 | 24.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 401 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +47.8
Taylor
| Marco Rubio | REP | 6,216 | 67.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,658 | 28.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +38.5
Union
| Marco Rubio | REP | 4,313 | 77.4 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 1,064 | 19.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +58.3
Volusia
| Marco Rubio | REP | 139,933 | 54.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 104,531 | 40.7 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 7,395 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +13.8
Wakulla
| Marco Rubio | REP | 9,773 | 64.3 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 4,852 | 31.9 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 330 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +32.4
Walton
| Marco Rubio | REP | 25,722 | 77.2 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 6,334 | 19.0 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 699 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +58.2
Washington
| Marco Rubio | REP | 8,323 | 75.5 |
| Patrick Murphy | DEM | 2,232 | 20.2 |
| Paul Stanton | LIB | 238 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Rubio +55.2
Appling
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,170 | 79.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,187 | 18.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 154 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +61.2
Atkinson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,678 | 71.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 596 | 25.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 65 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +46.3
Bacon
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,046 | 84.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 474 | 13.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 95 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +71.1
Baker
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 763 | 57.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 531 | 40.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 29 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +17.5
Baldwin
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 7,796 | 51.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 6,787 | 45.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 464 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +6.7
Banks
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,705 | 85.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 673 | 10.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 304 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +75.3
Barrow
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 20,281 | 73.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 5,691 | 20.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,608 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +52.9
Bartow
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 28,073 | 75.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 7,291 | 19.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,008 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +55.6
Ben Hill
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,589 | 65.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,739 | 31.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 135 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +33.9
Berrien
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,061 | 81.9 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 895 | 14.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 226 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +67.4
Bibb
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 31,533 | 53.6 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 25,601 | 43.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,677 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +10.1
Bleckley
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,698 | 77.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 923 | 19.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 147 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +58.2
Brantley
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,844 | 85.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 611 | 10.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 244 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +74.3
Brooks
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,465 | 60.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,092 | 36.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 188 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +23.9
Bryan
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 10,488 | 73.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,216 | 22.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 655 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +50.6
Bulloch
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 15,530 | 64.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 7,738 | 31.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,016 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +32.1
Burke
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,448 | 51.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,068 | 46.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 200 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +4.4
Butts
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,320 | 71.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,167 | 24.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 346 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +47.0
Calhoun
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,007 | 53.0 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 862 | 45.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +7.6
Camden
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 11,454 | 65.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 5,097 | 29.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,006 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +36.2
Candler
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,588 | 72.9 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 855 | 24.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 105 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +48.8
Carroll
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 29,043 | 69.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 10,867 | 25.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,997 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +43.4
Catoosa
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 18,888 | 77.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,121 | 17.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,281 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +60.8
Charlton
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,489 | 71.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 873 | 24.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 141 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +46.1
Chatham
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 52,146 | 49.2 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 49,740 | 46.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 4,078 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +2.3
Chattahoochee
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 700 | 55.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 508 | 40.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 62 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +15.1
Chattooga
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,827 | 75.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,622 | 20.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 295 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +54.3
Cherokee
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 80,166 | 74.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 20,717 | 19.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 6,438 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +55.4
Clarke
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 25,474 | 59.0 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 15,529 | 35.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,203 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +23.0
Clay
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 574 | 49.6 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 560 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +1.2
Clayton
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 69,400 | 80.0 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 14,918 | 17.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,428 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +62.8
Clinch
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,549 | 73.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 493 | 23.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 76 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +49.9
Cobb
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 169,269 | 52.9 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 133,871 | 41.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 16,955 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +11.1
Coffee
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,883 | 69.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,494 | 27.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 361 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +42.3
Colquitt
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,618 | 75.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,726 | 21.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 337 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +54.3
Columbia
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 42,891 | 70.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 15,800 | 25.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,443 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +44.3
Cook
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,045 | 71.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,462 | 25.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 187 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +45.4
Coweta
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 41,972 | 71.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 14,088 | 23.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,815 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +47.4
Crawford
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,494 | 72.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,193 | 24.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 162 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +47.5
Crisp
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,546 | 65.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,245 | 32.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 171 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +33.1
Dade
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,448 | 78.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 880 | 15.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 347 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +62.9
Dawson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,314 | 83.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,233 | 11.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 659 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +72.1
Decatur
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,593 | 59.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,529 | 37.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 289 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +21.9
DeKalb
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 218,383 | 72.5 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 70,994 | 23.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 11,761 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +48.9
Dodge
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,766 | 74.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,441 | 22.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 172 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +52.1
Dooly
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,022 | 57.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,441 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +16.4
Dougherty
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 20,354 | 63.7 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 11,048 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +29.1
Douglas
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 28,166 | 50.9 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 25,102 | 45.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,068 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +5.5
Early
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,515 | 55.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,877 | 41.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 112 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +14.2
Echols
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 874 | 82.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 146 | 13.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 45 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +68.4
Effingham
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 17,389 | 78.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,049 | 18.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 863 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +59.8
Elbert
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,960 | 67.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,154 | 29.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 231 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +38.2
Emanuel
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,062 | 70.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,974 | 27.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 186 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +42.8
Evans
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,395 | 72.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 852 | 25.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 80 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +46.4
Fannin
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,841 | 79.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,778 | 16.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 462 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +63.7
Fayette
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 36,356 | 62.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 19,602 | 33.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,549 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +28.6
Floyd
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 23,480 | 72.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 7,812 | 24.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,323 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +48.0
Forsyth
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 70,833 | 75.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 18,169 | 19.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 5,258 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +55.9
Franklin
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,488 | 81.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,113 | 14.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 327 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +67.8
Fulton
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 246,397 | 59.3 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 151,689 | 36.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 17,421 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +22.8
Gilmer
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,508 | 79.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,795 | 15.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 614 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +64.7
Glascock
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,101 | 86.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 142 | 11.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 37 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +74.9
Glynn
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 20,887 | 66.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 9,439 | 30.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,169 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +36.3
Gordon
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 14,092 | 79.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,854 | 16.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 816 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +63.3
Grady
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,534 | 65.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,671 | 31.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 261 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +33.8
Greene
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,735 | 67.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,625 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +36.5
Gwinnett
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 154,572 | 49.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 141,141 | 45.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 15,360 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +4.3
Habersham
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 12,493 | 81.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,173 | 14.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 736 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +67.0
Hall
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 50,124 | 74.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 13,602 | 20.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 3,547 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +54.3
Hancock
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,295 | 69.6 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 946 | 28.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +40.9
Haralson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,833 | 82.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,444 | 13.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 481 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +68.7
Harris
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 11,608 | 74.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,395 | 21.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 582 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +52.7
Hart
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,703 | 72.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,180 | 23.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 345 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +49.0
Heard
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,099 | 78.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 679 | 17.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 172 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +61.3
Henry
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 45,234 | 48.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 44,108 | 47.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 3,468 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +1.2
Houston
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 35,289 | 62.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 19,191 | 33.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,063 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +28.5
Irwin
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,581 | 75.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 762 | 22.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 88 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +53.0
Jackson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 20,965 | 80.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,906 | 15.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,217 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +65.4
Jasper
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,180 | 72.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,362 | 23.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 230 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +48.8
Jeff Davis
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,716 | 80.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 775 | 16.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 144 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +63.5
Jefferson
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,091 | 49.5 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,040 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +0.8
Jenkins
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,826 | 64.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 934 | 33.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 61 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +31.6
Johnson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,373 | 71.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 888 | 26.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 76 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +44.5
Jones
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,125 | 68.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,482 | 29.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 344 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +38.9
Lamar
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,929 | 68.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,003 | 27.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 250 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +40.7
Lanier
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,792 | 69.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 661 | 25.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 121 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +43.9
Laurens
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 12,449 | 67.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 5,563 | 30.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 430 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +37.3
Lee
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 10,305 | 76.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,876 | 21.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 329 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +55.0
Liberty
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 8,147 | 53.5 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,497 | 42.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 574 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +10.8
Lincoln
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,671 | 69.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,098 | 28.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 95 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +40.7
Long
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,524 | 65.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,152 | 30.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 169 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +35.7
Lowndes
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 20,802 | 59.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 13,087 | 37.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,337 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +21.9
Lumpkin
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,197 | 77.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,955 | 16.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 772 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +60.7
McDuffie
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,253 | 61.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,045 | 35.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 211 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +25.9
McIntosh
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,420 | 62.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,905 | 34.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 189 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +27.5
Macon
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,129 | 54.8 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,678 | 43.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 78 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +11.6
Madison
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,828 | 77.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,164 | 18.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 441 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +58.3
Marion
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,845 | 62.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,033 | 35.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 77 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +27.5
Meriwether
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,158 | 59.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,194 | 37.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 272 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +22.8
Miller
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,709 | 75.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 503 | 22.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 60 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +53.1
Mitchell
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,243 | 57.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,977 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +17.2
Monroe
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,719 | 72.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,965 | 24.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 385 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +47.7
Montgomery
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,532 | 76.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 676 | 20.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 93 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +56.2
Morgan
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,533 | 72.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,216 | 24.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 319 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +47.6
Murray
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 8,922 | 80.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,741 | 15.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 453 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +64.6
Muscogee
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 33,620 | 52.7 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 27,940 | 43.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,254 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +8.9
Newton
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 20,584 | 49.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 19,851 | 47.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,401 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +1.8
Oconee
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 14,344 | 73.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,423 | 22.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 874 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +50.5
Oglethorpe
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,502 | 70.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,629 | 25.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 258 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +45.0
Paulding
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 42,974 | 69.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 15,732 | 25.5 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 3,102 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +44.1
Peach
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,419 | 53.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,454 | 43.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 323 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +9.5
Pickens
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 11,001 | 82.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,739 | 13.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 673 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +69.1
Pierce
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,817 | 86.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 751 | 11.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 183 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +75.0
Pike
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,913 | 83.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,101 | 13.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 313 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +69.8
Polk
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 10,219 | 76.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,613 | 19.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 519 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +57.0
Pulaski
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,415 | 71.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 871 | 25.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 88 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +45.8
Putnam
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,435 | 71.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,334 | 25.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 277 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +45.3
Quitman
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 501 | 54.9 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 382 | 41.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 29 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +13.0
Rabun
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,977 | 79.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,256 | 16.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 330 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +62.4
Randolph
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,293 | 49.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,275 | 48.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +0.7
Richmond
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 42,229 | 60.0 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 25,908 | 36.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 2,196 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +23.2
Rockdale
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 21,223 | 58.5 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 13,893 | 38.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,150 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +20.2
Schley
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,445 | 79.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 345 | 18.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 38 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +60.2
Screven
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 3,289 | 61.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,942 | 36.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 109 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +25.2
Seminole
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,070 | 65.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,012 | 31.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 90 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +33.4
Spalding
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 15,172 | 63.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 7,879 | 32.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 914 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +30.4
Stephens
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 7,284 | 79.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,548 | 16.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 346 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +62.5
Stewart
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 900 | 51.4 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 807 | 46.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 43 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +5.3
Sumter
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,418 | 51.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 4,876 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +5.2
Talbot
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,639 | 55.3 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,228 | 41.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 97 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +13.9
Taliaferro
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 443 | 55.5 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 341 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +12.8
Tattnall
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,960 | 76.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,354 | 21.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 147 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +55.8
Taylor
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,974 | 62.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,091 | 34.7 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 81 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +28.1
Telfair
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,327 | 66.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,120 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +34.4
Terrell
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,997 | 50.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,857 | 47.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +3.6
Thomas
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 10,823 | 62.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 6,002 | 34.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 526 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +27.8
Tift
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,510 | 71.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,432 | 25.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 358 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +45.7
Toombs
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 6,367 | 74.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,953 | 22.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 248 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +51.5
Towns
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,964 | 78.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,164 | 18.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 226 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +59.8
Treutlen
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,700 | 71.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 626 | 26.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 64 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +44.9
Troup
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 15,293 | 62.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 8,312 | 34.0 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 830 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +28.6
Turner
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,039 | 64.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,031 | 32.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 75 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +32.1
Twiggs
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,975 | 53.0 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,655 | 44.4 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 95 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +8.6
Union
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,181 | 80.3 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,820 | 15.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 432 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +64.4
Upson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 7,063 | 68.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,911 | 28.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 308 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +40.4
Walker
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 17,086 | 77.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,750 | 17.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,116 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +60.8
Walton
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 29,723 | 77.1 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 7,183 | 18.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,622 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +58.5
Ware
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 7,872 | 70.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 2,871 | 25.8 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 397 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +44.9
Warren
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,110 | 51.7 |
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 993 | 46.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 45 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Barksdale +5.4
Washington
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 4,092 | 52.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 3,608 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +6.2
Wayne
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 7,686 | 79.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,705 | 17.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 287 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +61.8
Webster
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 649 | 61.8 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 387 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +24.9
Wheeler
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 1,304 | 68.5 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 545 | 28.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 55 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +39.9
White
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 9,212 | 81.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,541 | 13.6 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 586 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +67.7
Whitfield
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 19,808 | 70.9 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 6,763 | 24.2 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 1,381 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +46.7
Wilcox
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,036 | 73.4 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 669 | 24.1 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 70 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +49.3
Wilkes
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,507 | 60.7 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,525 | 36.9 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 99 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +23.8
Wilkinson
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 2,266 | 57.2 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,616 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +16.4
Worth
| Johnny Isakson | REP | 5,884 | 74.6 |
| Jim Barksdale | DEM | 1,839 | 23.3 |
| Allen Buckley | LIB | 160 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Isakson +51.3
Hawaii
| Brian Schatz | DEM | 47,003 | 74.6 |
| John Carroll | REP | 12,766 | 20.3 |
| Joy Allison | CON | 1,695 | 2.7 |
| Michael Kokoski | LIB | 1,276 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +54.3
Honolulu
| Brian Schatz | DEM | 203,372 | 73.0 |
| John Carroll | REP | 64,939 | 23.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +49.7
Kauai
| Brian Schatz | DEM | 19,015 | 76.1 |
| John Carroll | REP | 4,745 | 19.0 |
| Joy Allison | CON | 704 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +57.1
Maui
| Brian Schatz | DEM | 37,214 | 74.6 |
| John Carroll | REP | 10,203 | 20.4 |
| Joy Allison | CON | 1,302 | 2.6 |
| Michael Kokoski | LIB | 1,008 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schatz +54.1
Adair
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,708 | 71.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 894 | 23.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 111 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +48.1
Adams
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 1,515 | 73.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 454 | 22.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 58 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +51.5
Allamakee
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,473 | 65.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,099 | 30.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 168 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +34.8
Appanoose
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,122 | 68.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,690 | 28.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 121 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +40.5
Audubon
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,323 | 70.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 847 | 25.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 70 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +45.0
Benton
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 9,351 | 68.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,811 | 27.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 355 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +40.5
Black Hawk
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 33,884 | 53.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 27,245 | 42.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,643 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +10.5
Boone
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 8,593 | 61.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 4,820 | 34.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 455 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +26.9
Bremer
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 8,583 | 64.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 4,357 | 32.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 334 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +31.5
Buchanan
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,382 | 62.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,313 | 32.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 298 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +30.3
Buena Vista
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,369 | 66.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,382 | 29.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 210 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +37.1
Butler
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,433 | 72.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,782 | 23.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +49.0
Calhoun
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,798 | 74.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,154 | 22.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 119 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +51.7
Carroll
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 7,259 | 70.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,714 | 26.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 244 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +44.0
Cass
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,081 | 73.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,558 | 22.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 161 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +50.9
Cedar
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,103 | 64.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,908 | 30.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 268 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +34.0
Cerro Gordo
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 13,417 | 59.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 8,173 | 36.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 588 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +23.2
Cherokee
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,670 | 75.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,331 | 21.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 128 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +54.0
Chickasaw
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,177 | 65.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,956 | 30.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 153 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +34.8
Clarke
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,903 | 66.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,273 | 29.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 118 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +37.2
Clay
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,260 | 73.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,894 | 22.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 227 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +51.6
Clayton
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,851 | 64.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,779 | 30.8 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 190 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +34.1
Clinton
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 12,821 | 56.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 8,852 | 38.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 584 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +17.5
Crawford
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,674 | 69.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,771 | 26.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 182 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +43.2
Dallas
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 24,374 | 64.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 11,876 | 31.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,072 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +33.1
Davis
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,750 | 71.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 972 | 25.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 82 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +46.3
Decatur
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,488 | 67.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,037 | 28.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 91 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +39.5
Delaware
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,445 | 70.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,369 | 25.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 191 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +44.4
Des Moines
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 10,353 | 55.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 7,589 | 40.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 475 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +14.8
Dickinson
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 7,489 | 73.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,421 | 23.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +49.5
Dubuque
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 27,348 | 56.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 19,291 | 39.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,266 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +16.6
Emmet
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,341 | 70.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,171 | 24.9 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 108 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +46.1
Fayette
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,412 | 64.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,069 | 30.9 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 220 | 2.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 216 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +33.7
Floyd
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,947 | 62.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,725 | 34.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 183 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +27.9
Franklin
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,550 | 71.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,172 | 23.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 150 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +48.2
Fremont
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,582 | 73.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 735 | 21.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 120 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +52.7
Greene
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,197 | 67.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,344 | 28.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 123 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +39.1
Grundy
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,261 | 76.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,370 | 20.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +56.7
Guthrie
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,004 | 70.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,413 | 24.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 225 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +45.3
Hamilton
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,142 | 67.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,170 | 28.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 187 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +39.0
Hancock
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,232 | 72.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,324 | 22.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 170 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +50.0
Hardin
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,841 | 69.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,284 | 27.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 234 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +42.0
Harrison
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,108 | 70.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,788 | 24.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 248 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +45.5
Henry
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,294 | 68.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,535 | 27.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 248 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +40.8
Howard
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,859 | 63.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,459 | 32.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 129 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +31.1
Humboldt
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,860 | 76.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 999 | 19.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 110 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +56.8
Ida
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,868 | 80.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 590 | 16.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 78 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +63.9
Iowa
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,062 | 68.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,443 | 27.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 209 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +41.0
Jackson
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,283 | 62.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,450 | 34.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 212 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +28.2
Jasper
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 11,688 | 62.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 6,170 | 32.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 525 | 2.8 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 421 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +29.3
Jefferson
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,094 | 51.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,447 | 43.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 271 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +8.2
Johnson
| Patty Judge | DEM | 42,699 | 57.2 |
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 28,914 | 38.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,891 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Judge +18.5
Jones
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,551 | 65.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,063 | 30.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 261 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +34.7
Keokuk
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,697 | 75.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,045 | 21.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 111 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +54.0
Kossuth
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,027 | 70.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,247 | 26.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +44.1
Lee
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 8,441 | 53.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 6,382 | 40.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 504 | 3.2 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 474 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +13.0
Linn
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 62,737 | 54.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 47,635 | 41.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 3,818 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +13.1
Louisa
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,303 | 67.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,429 | 29.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 146 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +38.0
Lucas
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,064 | 71.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,068 | 25.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 99 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +46.7
Lyon
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,328 | 85.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 761 | 12.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +73.1
Madison
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,921 | 69.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,205 | 25.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 279 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +43.7
Mahaska
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 7,812 | 74.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,302 | 22.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 248 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +52.6
Marion
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 12,407 | 70.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 4,562 | 25.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 429 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +44.6
Marshall
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 10,432 | 58.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 6,585 | 37.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 481 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +21.7
Mills
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,290 | 71.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,740 | 23.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 259 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +47.9
Mitchell
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,680 | 68.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,536 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +39.9
Monona
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,315 | 73.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,049 | 23.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 107 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +50.1
Monroe
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,458 | 64.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,280 | 33.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +30.7
Montgomery
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,646 | 73.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,067 | 21.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 148 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +52.2
Muscatine
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 11,157 | 58.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 6,963 | 36.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 543 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +22.0
O'Brien
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,076 | 83.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,060 | 14.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +68.7
Osceola
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,601 | 82.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 455 | 14.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +68.3
Page
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,208 | 75.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,461 | 21.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 176 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +54.2
Palo Alto
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,377 | 72.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,109 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +48.8
Plymouth
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 10,338 | 79.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,300 | 17.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +62.0
Pocahontas
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,891 | 75.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 784 | 20.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 96 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +55.1
Polk
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 118,164 | 51.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 100,317 | 44.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 6,594 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +7.8
Pottawattamie
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 25,721 | 62.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 12,943 | 31.3 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 1,333 | 3.2 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,264 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +30.9
Poweshiek
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,617 | 57.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,748 | 38.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 244 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +19.2
Ringgold
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 1,989 | 74.1 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 617 | 23.0 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 54 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +51.1
Sac
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,965 | 77.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,015 | 19.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +57.6
Scott
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 46,415 | 54.9 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 34,503 | 40.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 2,717 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +14.1
Shelby
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,480 | 73.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,409 | 23.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 153 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +50.3
Sioux
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 15,902 | 88.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,709 | 9.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +79.2
Story
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 25,475 | 51.7 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 21,472 | 43.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,658 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +8.1
Tama
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 5,536 | 63.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 2,769 | 31.8 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 204 | 2.3 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 191 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +31.8
Taylor
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,220 | 75.5 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 613 | 20.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 70 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +54.7
Union
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,913 | 67.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,625 | 28.1 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 140 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +39.6
Van Buren
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,618 | 74.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 764 | 21.7 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 76 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +52.6
Wapello
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 8,692 | 58.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 5,365 | 36.3 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 352 | 2.4 |
| Jim Hennager | OTH | 337 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +22.5
Warren
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 17,081 | 63.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 8,700 | 32.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 762 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +31.2
Washington
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 7,251 | 67.3 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 3,062 | 28.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 343 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +38.9
Wayne
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,195 | 75.0 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 645 | 22.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +52.9
Webster
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 11,045 | 64.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 5,396 | 31.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 415 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +33.0
Winnebago
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 3,938 | 68.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,590 | 27.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 153 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +40.8
Winneshiek
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 6,349 | 56.6 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 4,436 | 39.6 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 296 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +17.1
Woodbury
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 27,166 | 63.2 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 13,909 | 32.4 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 1,015 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +30.8
Worth
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 2,774 | 65.8 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,246 | 29.5 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 120 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +36.2
Wright
| Charles E. Grassley | REP | 4,208 | 70.4 |
| Patty Judge | DEM | 1,550 | 25.9 |
| Charles Aldrich | LIB | 168 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Grassley +44.5
Ada
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 104,650 | 55.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 72,847 | 38.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 9,646 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +17.0
Adams
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,463 | 68.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 459 | 21.6 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 202 | 9.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +47.3
Bannock
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 19,883 | 59.1 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 11,585 | 34.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 2,181 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +24.7
Bear Lake
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,415 | 82.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 291 | 10.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 208 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +72.9
Benewah
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,103 | 74.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 746 | 18.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 293 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +56.9
Bingham
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 12,114 | 73.4 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 2,997 | 18.2 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 1,401 | 8.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +55.2
Blaine
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 5,961 | 55.5 |
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 4,562 | 42.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 226 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Sturgill +13.0
Boise
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,497 | 66.6 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 860 | 22.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 391 | 10.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +43.7
Bonner
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 13,908 | 67.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 5,767 | 27.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 1,029 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +39.3
Bonneville
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 31,093 | 71.5 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 9,158 | 21.1 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 3,229 | 7.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +50.4
Boundary
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,961 | 76.8 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 920 | 17.8 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 274 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +59.0
Butte
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 948 | 76.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 185 | 15.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 100 | 8.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +61.9
Camas
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 414 | 71.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 126 | 21.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 36 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +50.0
Canyon
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 50,006 | 69.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 17,007 | 23.5 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 5,242 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +45.7
Caribou
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,450 | 80.8 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 350 | 11.5 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 234 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +69.2
Cassia
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 6,418 | 78.7 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,011 | 12.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 721 | 8.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +66.3
Clark
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 225 | 80.4 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 32 | 11.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 23 | 8.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +68.9
Clearwater
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,865 | 76.7 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 711 | 19.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 158 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +57.7
Custer
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,693 | 71.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 429 | 18.1 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 253 | 10.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +53.2
Elmore
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 6,059 | 72.0 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,752 | 20.8 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 610 | 7.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +51.1
Franklin
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 4,682 | 85.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 441 | 8.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 365 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +77.3
Fremont
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 4,521 | 79.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 692 | 12.1 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 498 | 8.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +67.0
Gem
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 5,779 | 73.6 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,378 | 17.6 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 694 | 8.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +56.1
Gooding
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,834 | 73.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 958 | 18.5 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 399 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +55.4
Idaho County
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 6,272 | 77.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,247 | 15.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 594 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +61.9
Jefferson
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 9,120 | 80.1 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,196 | 10.5 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 1,067 | 9.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +69.6
Jerome
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 4,931 | 73.0 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,253 | 18.5 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 574 | 8.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +54.4
Kootenai
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 47,636 | 72.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 15,365 | 23.3 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 2,945 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +48.9
Latah
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 9,626 | 52.5 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 8,050 | 43.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 645 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +8.6
Lemhi
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,013 | 74.5 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 723 | 17.9 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 309 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +56.6
Lewis
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,239 | 77.5 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 257 | 16.1 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 102 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +61.5
Lincoln
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,263 | 72.6 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 354 | 20.3 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 123 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +52.2
Madison
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 12,826 | 83.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,473 | 9.6 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 1,117 | 7.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +73.6
Minidoka
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 5,067 | 74.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,108 | 16.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 591 | 8.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +58.5
Nez Perce
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 12,188 | 70.2 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 4,621 | 26.6 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 560 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +43.6
Oneida
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,719 | 83.5 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 206 | 10.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 133 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +73.5
Owyhee
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,909 | 75.9 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 581 | 15.2 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 344 | 9.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +60.7
Payette
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 6,480 | 75.1 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,549 | 18.0 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 600 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +57.1
Power
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 1,942 | 69.6 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 686 | 24.6 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 162 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +45.0
Shoshone
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,463 | 67.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,477 | 28.7 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 205 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +38.6
Teton
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 2,659 | 53.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 2,156 | 43.2 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 170 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +10.1
Twin Falls
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 20,701 | 69.7 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 6,559 | 22.1 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 2,452 | 8.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +47.6
Valley
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,202 | 60.1 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 1,883 | 35.4 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 240 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +24.8
Washington
| Michael D. Crapo | REP | 3,218 | 73.3 |
| Jerry Sturgill | DEM | 842 | 19.2 |
| Ray Writz | CON | 331 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Crapo +54.1
Adams
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 18,094 | 57.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 12,391 | 39.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 822 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +18.0
Alexander
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,511 | 55.5 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,121 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +14.3
Bond
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,841 | 51.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,203 | 43.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 291 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +8.6
Boone
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 12,520 | 55.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 8,509 | 37.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 972 | 4.3 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 578 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +17.8
Brown
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,380 | 60.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 794 | 34.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 65 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +25.8
Bureau
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,434 | 52.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,842 | 42.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 585 | 3.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 363 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +9.8
Calhoun
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,272 | 51.4 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,131 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +5.7
Carroll
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,354 | 59.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,577 | 35.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 262 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +24.3
Cass
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 2,917 | 58.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,799 | 35.8 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 174 | 3.5 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 129 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +22.3
Champaign
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 45,760 | 51.0 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 38,731 | 43.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,969 | 3.3 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 2,232 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +7.8
Christian
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 9,316 | 61.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,876 | 32.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 645 | 4.2 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 344 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +29.2
Clark
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,953 | 64.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,394 | 30.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 258 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +33.1
Clay
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,905 | 64.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,917 | 31.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 198 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +32.6
Clinton
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 10,049 | 58.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,419 | 37.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 502 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +21.2
Coles
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 12,555 | 58.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 7,516 | 35.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 808 | 3.8 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 563 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +23.5
Cook
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,499,900 | 70.4 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 529,781 | 24.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 53,827 | 2.5 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 46,988 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +45.5
Crawford
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,455 | 63.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,648 | 31.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 301 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +32.9
Cumberland
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,797 | 69.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,329 | 24.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 240 | 4.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 133 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +44.9
DeKalb
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 20,025 | 46.8 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 19,355 | 45.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,187 | 5.1 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,216 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +1.6
DeWitt
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,009 | 67.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,943 | 26.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 352 | 4.7 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 162 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +41.1
Douglas
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,599 | 69.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,972 | 24.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 328 | 4.1 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 170 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +44.9
DuPage
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 208,669 | 49.1 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 193,069 | 45.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 14,291 | 3.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 8,819 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +3.7
Edgar
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,290 | 68.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,027 | 26.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 261 | 3.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 161 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +42.2
Edwards
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 2,322 | 72.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 727 | 22.8 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 86 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +50.1
Effingham
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 12,520 | 72.5 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,810 | 22.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 596 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +50.4
Fayette
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,751 | 61.3 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,201 | 34.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 312 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +27.2
Ford
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,507 | 71.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,421 | 22.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 279 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +48.8
Franklin
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,894 | 48.5 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 8,537 | 46.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 452 | 2.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 441 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +1.9
Fulton
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 7,702 | 49.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,726 | 43.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 792 | 5.1 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 375 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +6.3
Gallatin
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,263 | 49.4 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,209 | 47.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +2.1
Greene
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,064 | 56.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,023 | 37.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 182 | 3.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 138 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +19.3
Grundy
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 11,624 | 50.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 9,475 | 41.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 1,172 | 5.1 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 549 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +9.4
Hamilton
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 2,171 | 54.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,628 | 41.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 105 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +13.7
Hancock
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,127 | 57.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,394 | 38.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 289 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +19.4
Hardin
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,137 | 55.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 865 | 41.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +13.1
Henderson
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,820 | 53.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,407 | 41.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 137 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +12.1
Henry
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 13,214 | 55.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 9,488 | 39.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 869 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +15.5
Iroquois
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 9,379 | 72.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,755 | 21.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 470 | 3.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 285 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +51.4
Jackson
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 13,739 | 56.9 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,938 | 37.0 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 743 | 3.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 715 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +19.9
Jasper
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,312 | 67.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,420 | 28.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 140 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +38.3
Jefferson
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,790 | 53.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,903 | 41.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 501 | 3.0 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 388 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +11.4
Jersey
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,840 | 54.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,233 | 39.8 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 370 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +15.1
JoDaviess
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,988 | 53.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,525 | 40.8 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 382 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +13.2
Johnson
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,572 | 60.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,056 | 34.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 187 | 3.1 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 122 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +25.5
Kane
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 97,088 | 49.1 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 87,886 | 44.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 8,303 | 4.2 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 4,323 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +4.7
Kankakee
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 22,850 | 49.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 20,901 | 44.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 1,811 | 3.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 961 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +4.2
Kendall
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 25,202 | 47.5 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 24,035 | 45.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,493 | 4.7 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,329 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +2.2
Knox
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 10,651 | 48.0 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 10,350 | 46.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 746 | 3.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 454 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +1.4
Lake
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 150,351 | 50.1 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 135,334 | 45.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 9,446 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +5.0
LaSalle
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 23,471 | 48.3 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 22,073 | 45.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 1,909 | 3.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,104 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +2.9
Lawrence
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,701 | 62.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,938 | 32.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 174 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +30.0
Lee
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,640 | 56.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 5,587 | 36.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 646 | 4.2 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 381 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +20.0
Livingston
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 10,169 | 67.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,019 | 26.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 634 | 4.2 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 318 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +40.6
Logan
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 8,236 | 67.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,272 | 26.8 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 444 | 3.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 276 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +40.6
McDonough
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,254 | 48.5 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,917 | 45.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 524 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +2.6
McHenry
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 72,296 | 51.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 58,815 | 41.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 6,929 | 4.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 3,526 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +9.5
McLean
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 41,579 | 51.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 33,204 | 41.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 3,446 | 4.3 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,901 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +10.5
Macon
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 26,114 | 55.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 18,600 | 39.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 1,607 | 3.4 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,026 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +15.9
Macoupin
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 10,550 | 48.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 10,264 | 46.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 695 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +1.3
Madison
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 64,240 | 50.4 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 56,665 | 44.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 4,159 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +5.9
Marion
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 9,162 | 54.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,827 | 40.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 482 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +14.0
Marshall
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,588 | 60.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,921 | 32.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 225 | 3.8 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 159 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +28.3
Mason
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,708 | 58.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,301 | 36.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 246 | 3.8 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 135 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +22.0
Massac
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,739 | 57.3 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,461 | 37.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 217 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +19.6
Menard
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,278 | 66.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,773 | 27.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 252 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +39.1
Mercer
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,465 | 53.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,391 | 40.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 350 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +12.9
Monroe
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 10,885 | 57.1 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 7,458 | 39.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 467 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +18.0
Montgomery
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 6,662 | 52.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 5,367 | 42.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 415 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +10.2
Morgan
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 9,112 | 62.3 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,733 | 32.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 504 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +29.9
Moultrie
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,264 | 68.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,574 | 25.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 235 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +43.4
Ogle
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 14,768 | 61.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 7,645 | 32.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 940 | 3.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 536 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +29.8
Peoria
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 38,169 | 48.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 36,548 | 46.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,891 | 3.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,655 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +2.0
Perry
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,925 | 51.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,279 | 44.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 243 | 2.5 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 203 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +6.7
Piatt
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,954 | 66.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,563 | 28.5 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 313 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +37.7
Pike
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,377 | 59.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,654 | 36.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 229 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +23.4
Pope
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,279 | 61.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 703 | 34.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 49 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +27.9
Pulaski
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,394 | 52.1 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,206 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +7.0
Putnam
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,587 | 52.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,255 | 41.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 106 | 3.5 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 63 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +11.0
Randolph
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 7,364 | 52.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 6,119 | 43.7 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 308 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +8.9
Richland
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,900 | 65.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,208 | 29.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 239 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +36.1
Rock Island
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 32,952 | 52.4 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 26,767 | 42.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,100 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +9.8
St. Clair
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 68,709 | 57.2 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 45,998 | 38.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 3,024 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +18.9
Saline
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,612 | 51.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 4,797 | 44.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 278 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +7.5
Sangamon
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 51,849 | 53.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 39,928 | 41.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 3,417 | 3.5 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,982 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +12.3
Schuyler
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,943 | 51.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,612 | 43.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 128 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +8.8
Scott
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,606 | 62.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 848 | 33.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 70 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +29.6
Shelby
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 7,418 | 68.3 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,733 | 25.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 466 | 4.3 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 238 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +43.2
Stark
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 1,760 | 65.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 782 | 29.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 99 | 3.7 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 60 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +36.2
Stephenson
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 11,453 | 57.0 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 7,411 | 36.9 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 794 | 3.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 445 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +20.1
Tazewell
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 38,386 | 59.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 21,215 | 33.1 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 2,745 | 4.3 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 1,722 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +26.8
Union
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,231 | 50.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,843 | 45.6 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 186 | 2.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 175 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +4.6
Vermilion
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 18,076 | 59.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 10,511 | 34.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 1,161 | 3.8 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 664 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +24.9
Wabash
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 3,500 | 66.4 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,541 | 29.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 149 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +37.2
Warren
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,184 | 54.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 3,025 | 39.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 373 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +15.0
Washington
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,417 | 60.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,553 | 35.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 187 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +25.7
Wayne
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 5,616 | 70.7 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 1,924 | 24.2 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 271 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +46.5
White
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 4,356 | 61.5 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 2,408 | 34.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 230 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +27.5
Whiteside
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 12,149 | 48.2 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 11,672 | 46.3 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 897 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +1.9
Will
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 152,790 | 51.1 |
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 127,473 | 42.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 11,977 | 4.0 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 6,844 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Duckworth +8.5
Williamson
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 16,075 | 51.6 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 13,518 | 43.4 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 835 | 2.7 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 702 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +8.2
Winnebago
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 57,643 | 48.8 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 52,730 | 44.6 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 4,623 | 3.9 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 3,168 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +4.2
Woodford
| Mark S. Kirk | REP | 13,291 | 67.9 |
| Tammy Duckworth | DEM | 5,083 | 26.0 |
| Kenton McMillen | LIB | 732 | 3.7 |
| Scott Summers | GRE | 470 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kirk +41.9
Adams
| Todd Young | REP | 8,430 | 64.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,840 | 29.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 866 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.9
Allen
| Todd Young | REP | 79,370 | 53.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 59,868 | 40.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 8,503 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +13.2
Bartholomew
| Todd Young | REP | 19,050 | 59.1 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 11,355 | 35.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,839 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.9
Benton
| Todd Young | REP | 2,316 | 62.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,132 | 30.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 246 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +32.1
Blackford
| Todd Young | REP | 2,748 | 57.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,707 | 35.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 365 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +21.6
Boone
| Todd Young | REP | 19,966 | 61.9 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 10,583 | 32.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,715 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +29.1
Brown
| Todd Young | REP | 4,616 | 57.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,907 | 36.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 462 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +21.4
Carroll
| Todd Young | REP | 5,512 | 63.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,522 | 29.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 648 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.4
Cass
| Todd Young | REP | 8,306 | 58.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,927 | 34.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,013 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.7
Clark
| Todd Young | REP | 27,684 | 54.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 21,414 | 41.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,995 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +12.3
Clay
| Todd Young | REP | 6,439 | 57.9 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,979 | 35.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 697 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +22.1
Clinton
| Todd Young | REP | 7,291 | 62.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,693 | 31.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 740 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +30.7
Crawford
| Todd Young | REP | 2,500 | 54.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,890 | 41.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 169 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +13.4
Daviess
| Todd Young | REP | 7,096 | 66.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,131 | 29.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 450 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +37.1
Dearborn
| Todd Young | REP | 17,288 | 73.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,251 | 22.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 953 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +51.2
Decatur
| Todd Young | REP | 7,301 | 66.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,022 | 27.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 603 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +39.2
DeKalb
| Todd Young | REP | 10,229 | 61.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,029 | 30.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,413 | 8.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.2
Delaware
| Todd Young | REP | 21,557 | 48.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 20,578 | 45.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,744 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +2.2
Dubois
| Todd Young | REP | 11,029 | 56.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 7,692 | 39.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 962 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +17.0
Elkhart
| Todd Young | REP | 39,291 | 59.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 23,416 | 35.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,398 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +24.0
Fayette
| Todd Young | REP | 5,602 | 59.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,170 | 33.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 609 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +25.9
Floyd
| Todd Young | REP | 20,735 | 55.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 15,504 | 41.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,349 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +13.9
Fountain
| Todd Young | REP | 4,982 | 66.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,071 | 27.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 449 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +38.8
Franklin
| Todd Young | REP | 7,926 | 72.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,625 | 24.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 359 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +48.6
Fulton
| Todd Young | REP | 5,076 | 60.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,793 | 33.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 552 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +27.1
Gibson
| Todd Young | REP | 9,220 | 59.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,519 | 35.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 776 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.9
Grant
| Todd Young | REP | 15,280 | 60.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 8,345 | 33.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,640 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +27.4
Greene
| Todd Young | REP | 7,866 | 57.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,062 | 37.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 699 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +20.6
Hamilton
| Todd Young | REP | 92,773 | 59.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 55,708 | 35.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 6,801 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.9
Hancock
| Todd Young | REP | 23,196 | 63.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 10,775 | 29.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,402 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.1
Harrison
| Todd Young | REP | 11,442 | 61.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 6,580 | 35.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 580 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +26.1
Hendricks
| Todd Young | REP | 46,722 | 62.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 24,427 | 32.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,888 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +29.7
Henry
| Todd Young | REP | 11,664 | 57.9 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 6,915 | 34.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,557 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.6
Howard
| Todd Young | REP | 20,402 | 55.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 14,311 | 38.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,377 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +16.4
Huntington
| Todd Young | REP | 9,941 | 63.1 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,545 | 28.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,280 | 8.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.2
Jackson
| Todd Young | REP | 11,269 | 64.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,626 | 31.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 721 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +32.0
Jasper
| Todd Young | REP | 8,556 | 64.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,106 | 31.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 574 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +33.6
Jay
| Todd Young | REP | 4,529 | 57.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,721 | 34.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 596 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.0
Jefferson
| Todd Young | REP | 7,541 | 56.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,424 | 40.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 463 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +15.8
Jennings
| Todd Young | REP | 6,949 | 62.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,702 | 33.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 515 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +29.1
Johnson
| Todd Young | REP | 43,317 | 64.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 19,897 | 29.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,719 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +35.0
Knox
| Todd Young | REP | 7,816 | 51.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 6,503 | 43.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 810 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +8.7
Kosciusko
| Todd Young | REP | 22,188 | 68.9 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 8,025 | 24.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,981 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +44.0
LaGrange
| Todd Young | REP | 6,222 | 64.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,782 | 28.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 618 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +35.8
Lake
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 122,036 | 61.9 |
| Todd Young | REP | 67,657 | 34.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 7,538 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +27.6
LaPorte
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 22,401 | 49.9 |
| Todd Young | REP | 19,733 | 43.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,766 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +5.9
Lawrence
| Todd Young | REP | 12,327 | 65.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,493 | 29.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,007 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +36.3
Madison
| Todd Young | REP | 28,057 | 52.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 22,188 | 41.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,689 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +10.9
Marion
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 213,483 | 58.5 |
| Todd Young | REP | 131,576 | 36.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 20,141 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +22.4
Marshall
| Todd Young | REP | 10,659 | 59.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 6,223 | 34.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,059 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +24.7
Martin
| Todd Young | REP | 2,934 | 61.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,595 | 33.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 261 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +28.0
Miami
| Todd Young | REP | 8,453 | 63.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,836 | 28.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,007 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.7
Monroe
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 34,241 | 58.3 |
| Todd Young | REP | 21,049 | 35.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,478 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +22.4
Montgomery
| Todd Young | REP | 9,808 | 64.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,393 | 28.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 976 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +35.7
Morgan
| Todd Young | REP | 21,193 | 68.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 7,821 | 25.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,011 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +43.1
Newton
| Todd Young | REP | 3,670 | 63.6 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,788 | 31.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 313 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +32.6
Noble
| Todd Young | REP | 10,509 | 62.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,996 | 29.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,217 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +33.0
Ohio
| Todd Young | REP | 1,948 | 67.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 853 | 29.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 95 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +37.8
Orange
| Todd Young | REP | 5,134 | 62.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,795 | 34.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 291 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +28.5
Owen
| Todd Young | REP | 5,333 | 62.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,642 | 31.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 557 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.5
Parke
| Todd Young | REP | 3,859 | 58.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,339 | 35.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 435 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +22.9
Perry
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,990 | 49.9 |
| Todd Young | REP | 3,612 | 45.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 388 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +4.7
Pike
| Todd Young | REP | 3,404 | 57.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,228 | 37.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 314 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +19.8
Porter
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 36,828 | 48.0 |
| Todd Young | REP | 35,629 | 46.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 4,266 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +1.6
Posey
| Todd Young | REP | 7,058 | 56.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,857 | 38.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 597 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +17.6
Pulaski
| Todd Young | REP | 3,109 | 58.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,859 | 34.8 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 372 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +23.4
Putnam
| Todd Young | REP | 9,510 | 64.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,319 | 29.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 861 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +35.3
Randolph
| Todd Young | REP | 6,411 | 62.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,230 | 31.5 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 614 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.0
Ripley
| Todd Young | REP | 9,227 | 71.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,182 | 24.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 464 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +47.0
Rush
| Todd Young | REP | 4,472 | 62.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,238 | 31.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 441 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.2
St. Joseph
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 56,749 | 51.2 |
| Todd Young | REP | 47,353 | 42.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 6,782 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +8.5
Scott
| Todd Young | REP | 5,046 | 55.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,763 | 41.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 288 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +14.1
Shelby
| Todd Young | REP | 11,267 | 62.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 5,549 | 30.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,113 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.9
Spencer
| Todd Young | REP | 5,465 | 55.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,960 | 40.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 458 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +15.2
Starke
| Todd Young | REP | 4,895 | 54.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,443 | 38.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 699 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +16.1
Steuben
| Todd Young | REP | 9,078 | 62.0 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,546 | 31.0 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,017 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +31.0
Sullivan
| Todd Young | REP | 4,164 | 49.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,856 | 45.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 429 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +3.6
Switzerland
| Todd Young | REP | 2,260 | 62.1 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,242 | 34.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 139 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +28.0
Tippecanoe
| Todd Young | REP | 30,081 | 47.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 28,921 | 45.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 4,013 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +1.8
Tipton
| Todd Young | REP | 4,760 | 63.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 2,260 | 30.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 496 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +33.3
Union
| Todd Young | REP | 2,252 | 68.5 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 901 | 27.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 136 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +41.1
Vanderburgh
| Todd Young | REP | 36,835 | 50.7 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 32,077 | 44.1 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 3,787 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +6.5
Vermillion
| Todd Young | REP | 3,247 | 47.1 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,197 | 46.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 455 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +0.7
Vigo
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 21,028 | 52.8 |
| Todd Young | REP | 16,581 | 41.6 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 2,227 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Bayh +11.2
Wabash
| Todd Young | REP | 8,595 | 64.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,925 | 29.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 848 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.9
Warren
| Todd Young | REP | 2,589 | 65.4 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 1,159 | 29.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 211 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +36.1
Warrick
| Todd Young | REP | 17,255 | 58.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 11,092 | 37.4 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,302 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +20.8
Washington
| Todd Young | REP | 7,197 | 63.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,773 | 33.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 405 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +30.1
Wayne
| Todd Young | REP | 14,703 | 57.2 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 9,309 | 36.2 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,678 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +21.0
Wells
| Todd Young | REP | 8,811 | 66.9 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,516 | 26.7 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 836 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +40.2
White
| Todd Young | REP | 6,128 | 60.8 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 3,255 | 32.3 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 700 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +28.5
Whitley
| Todd Young | REP | 9,865 | 63.3 |
| Evan Bayh | DEM | 4,500 | 28.9 |
| Lucy Brenton | LIB | 1,208 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Young +34.5
Allen
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,889 | 72.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,192 | 22.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 321 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +49.9
Anderson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,426 | 73.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 717 | 21.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 161 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +51.7
Atchison
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,295 | 65.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,917 | 29.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 301 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +36.5
Barber
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,836 | 82.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 275 | 12.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 114 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +70.2
Barton
| Jerry Moran | REP | 8,321 | 81.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,308 | 12.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 543 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +68.9
Bourbon
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,427 | 72.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,308 | 21.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 347 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +51.3
Brown
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,105 | 76.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 751 | 18.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 191 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +58.2
Butler
| Jerry Moran | REP | 19,705 | 71.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 5,915 | 21.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 1,908 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +50.1
Chase
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,021 | 74.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 271 | 19.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 83 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +54.5
Chautauqua
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,186 | 81.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 198 | 13.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 79 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +67.5
Cherokee
| Jerry Moran | REP | 5,938 | 69.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,165 | 25.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 449 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +44.1
Cheyenne
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,227 | 87.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 125 | 8.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 48 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +78.7
Clark
| Jerry Moran | REP | 840 | 84.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 103 | 10.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 51 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.1
Clay
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,250 | 84.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 419 | 10.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 162 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.9
Cloud
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,089 | 79.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 597 | 15.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 219 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.8
Coffey
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,146 | 78.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 604 | 15.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 275 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.2
Comanche
| Jerry Moran | REP | 732 | 84.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 98 | 11.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 36 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.2
Cowley
| Jerry Moran | REP | 8,530 | 67.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 3,286 | 26.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 755 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +41.7
Crawford
| Jerry Moran | REP | 8,957 | 60.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 5,065 | 34.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 780 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +26.3
Decatur
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,237 | 87.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 127 | 9.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 54 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +78.3
Dickinson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 6,368 | 77.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,273 | 15.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 532 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +62.3
Doniphan
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,538 | 77.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 602 | 18.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 156 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +58.7
Douglas
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 30,436 | 60.5 |
| Jerry Moran | REP | 17,563 | 34.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 2,330 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wiesner +25.6
Edwards
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,078 | 81.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 166 | 12.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 78 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +69.0
Elk
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,012 | 81.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 154 | 12.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 83 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +68.7
Ellis
| Jerry Moran | REP | 9,319 | 77.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,211 | 18.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 458 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +59.3
Ellsworth
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,199 | 81.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 384 | 14.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 112 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +67.3
Finney
| Jerry Moran | REP | 7,165 | 71.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,348 | 23.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 540 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +47.9
Ford
| Jerry Moran | REP | 5,530 | 72.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,655 | 21.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 405 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +51.1
Franklin
| Jerry Moran | REP | 7,394 | 68.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,735 | 25.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 733 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +42.9
Geary
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,918 | 66.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,187 | 29.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 338 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +36.7
Gove
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,200 | 88.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 117 | 8.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 39 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +79.9
Graham
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,095 | 85.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 135 | 10.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 54 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.8
Grant
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,897 | 80.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 316 | 13.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 131 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +67.4
Gray
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,756 | 85.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 222 | 10.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 82 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.5
Greeley
| Jerry Moran | REP | 570 | 88.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 48 | 7.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 23 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +81.4
Greenwood
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,164 | 77.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 460 | 16.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 178 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +60.8
Hamilton
| Jerry Moran | REP | 729 | 84.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 87 | 10.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 47 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.4
Harper
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,021 | 80.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 371 | 14.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 126 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +65.5
Harvey
| Jerry Moran | REP | 9,815 | 66.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 4,237 | 28.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 825 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +37.5
Haskell
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,137 | 84.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 158 | 11.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 49 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +72.8
Hodgeman
| Jerry Moran | REP | 889 | 87.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 83 | 8.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 40 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +79.6
Jackson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,115 | 70.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,425 | 24.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 291 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +46.1
Jefferson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 5,456 | 65.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,504 | 29.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 404 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +35.3
Jewell
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,263 | 86.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 127 | 8.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 77 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +77.4
Johnson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 160,074 | 55.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 112,283 | 38.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 16,345 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +16.6
Kearny
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,132 | 84.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 161 | 12.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 51 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +72.2
Kingman
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,661 | 79.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 490 | 14.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 186 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +65.1
Kiowa
| Jerry Moran | REP | 950 | 88.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 83 | 7.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 47 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +80.3
Labette
| Jerry Moran | REP | 5,212 | 64.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,319 | 28.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 508 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +36.0
Lane
| Jerry Moran | REP | 763 | 86.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 79 | 9.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 39 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +77.6
Leavenworth
| Jerry Moran | REP | 18,287 | 60.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 10,171 | 33.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 1,767 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +26.9
Lincoln
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,234 | 83.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 167 | 11.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 69 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +72.6
Linn
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,261 | 75.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 796 | 18.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 282 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +56.8
Logan
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,197 | 88.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 106 | 7.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 43 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +81.1
Lyon
| Jerry Moran | REP | 7,925 | 64.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 3,760 | 30.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 618 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +33.9
McPherson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 9,637 | 75.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,527 | 19.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 613 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +55.6
Marion
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,490 | 79.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 913 | 16.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 249 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.3
Marshall
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,591 | 77.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 867 | 18.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 191 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +58.6
Meade
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,491 | 87.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 158 | 9.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 63 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +77.9
Miami
| Jerry Moran | REP | 10,448 | 70.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 3,773 | 25.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 715 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +44.7
Mitchell
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,463 | 84.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 336 | 11.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 114 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.0
Montgomery
| Jerry Moran | REP | 8,232 | 69.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,702 | 22.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 919 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +46.7
Morris
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,087 | 79.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 420 | 15.9 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 129 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.2
Morton
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,010 | 85.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 108 | 9.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 68 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +76.1
Nemaha
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,294 | 83.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 667 | 13.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 165 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +70.8
Neosho
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,378 | 70.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,427 | 22.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 446 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +47.2
Ness
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,290 | 89.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 109 | 7.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 43 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +81.9
Norton
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,895 | 84.5 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 238 | 10.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 110 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.9
Osage
| Jerry Moran | REP | 4,977 | 70.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,636 | 23.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 494 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +47.0
Osborne
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,521 | 84.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 188 | 10.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 85 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.3
Ottawa
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,316 | 80.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 354 | 12.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 217 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +68.0
Pawnee
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,108 | 78.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 432 | 16.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 137 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +62.6
Phillips
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,316 | 87.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 211 | 8.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 114 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +79.7
Pottawatomie
| Jerry Moran | REP | 8,407 | 78.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,829 | 17.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 490 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +61.3
Pratt
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,019 | 78.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 602 | 15.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 216 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.0
Rawlins
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,263 | 85.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 126 | 8.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 81 | 5.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +77.3
Reno
| Jerry Moran | REP | 17,218 | 70.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 5,532 | 22.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 1,547 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +48.1
Republic
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,117 | 84.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 274 | 11.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 110 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.7
Rice
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,979 | 78.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 611 | 16.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 230 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +62.0
Riley
| Jerry Moran | REP | 13,438 | 62.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 7,170 | 33.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 1,027 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +29.0
Rooks
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,104 | 87.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 192 | 8.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 114 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +79.3
Rush
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,281 | 84.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 169 | 11.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 59 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +73.7
Russell
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,635 | 83.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 380 | 12.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 159 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +71.0
Saline
| Jerry Moran | REP | 15,123 | 69.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 5,117 | 23.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 1,675 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +45.7
Scott
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,902 | 87.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 187 | 8.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 94 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +78.6
Sedgwick
| Jerry Moran | REP | 112,455 | 60.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 62,816 | 33.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 11,539 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +26.6
Seward
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,168 | 67.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 1,213 | 25.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 335 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +41.5
Shawnee
| Jerry Moran | REP | 41,689 | 54.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 30,925 | 40.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 3,422 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +14.2
Sheridan
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,201 | 88.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 119 | 8.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 38 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +79.7
Sherman
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,158 | 83.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 296 | 11.5 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 123 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +72.3
Smith
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,744 | 85.1 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 219 | 10.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 86 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +74.4
Stafford
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,563 | 83.4 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 230 | 12.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 80 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +71.2
Stanton
| Jerry Moran | REP | 506 | 81.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 78 | 12.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 36 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +69.0
Stevens
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,600 | 86.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 169 | 9.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 75 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +77.6
Sumner
| Jerry Moran | REP | 6,825 | 71.0 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 2,124 | 22.1 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 670 | 7.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +48.9
Thomas
| Jerry Moran | REP | 3,012 | 84.2 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 417 | 11.7 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 147 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +72.6
Trego
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,202 | 81.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 203 | 13.8 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 62 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +68.1
Wabaunsee
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,580 | 75.9 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 619 | 18.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 199 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +57.7
Wallace
| Jerry Moran | REP | 733 | 92.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 35 | 4.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 26 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +87.9
Washington
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,341 | 85.6 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 285 | 10.4 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 110 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +75.1
Wichita
| Jerry Moran | REP | 793 | 83.7 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 114 | 12.0 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 40 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +71.7
Wilson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 2,806 | 78.8 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 544 | 15.3 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 212 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +63.5
Woodson
| Jerry Moran | REP | 1,063 | 75.3 |
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 257 | 18.2 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 92 | 6.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Moran +57.1
Wyandotte
| Patrick Wiesner | DEM | 28,525 | 60.4 |
| Jerry Moran | REP | 15,863 | 33.6 |
| Robert Garrard | LIB | 2,831 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wiesner +26.8
Adair
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,897 | 74.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,072 | 26.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +48.0
Allen
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,979 | 75.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,940 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +51.0
Anderson
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,910 | 60.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,475 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.4
Ballard
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,725 | 66.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,367 | 33.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +33.2
Barren
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,876 | 59.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,460 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +18.6
Bath
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,324 | 51.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,154 | 48.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +3.8
Bell
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,637 | 71.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,638 | 28.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +43.1
Boone
| Rand Paul | REP | 42,032 | 73.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 15,303 | 26.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +46.6
Bourbon
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,411 | 50.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,350 | 49.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +0.7
Boyd
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,730 | 52.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 9,536 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +5.9
Boyle
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,982 | 54.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 5,937 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +8.1
Bracken
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,488 | 72.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 964 | 27.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +44.1
Breathitt
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,854 | 51.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,673 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +3.3
Breckinridge
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,413 | 62.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,233 | 37.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +25.2
Bullitt
| Rand Paul | REP | 23,022 | 64.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 12,619 | 35.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +29.2
Butler
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,055 | 73.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,444 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +47.5
Caldwell
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,887 | 65.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,037 | 34.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +31.2
Calloway
| Rand Paul | REP | 9,848 | 61.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 6,154 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +23.1
Campbell
| Rand Paul | REP | 27,418 | 64.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 14,926 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +29.5
Carlisle
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,813 | 70.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 769 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +40.4
Carroll
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,193 | 57.4 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,625 | 42.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +14.9
Carter
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,640 | 56.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,428 | 44.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +12.0
Casey
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,789 | 75.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,518 | 24.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +51.9
Christian
| Rand Paul | REP | 14,074 | 64.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,675 | 35.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +29.4
Clark
| Rand Paul | REP | 9,023 | 55.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,120 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +11.8
Clay
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,917 | 76.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,506 | 23.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +53.1
Clinton
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,513 | 83.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 679 | 16.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +67.6
Crittenden
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,877 | 72.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,090 | 27.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +45.0
Cumberland
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,261 | 78.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 631 | 21.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +56.4
Daviess
| Rand Paul | REP | 26,652 | 58.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 18,768 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +17.4
Edmonson
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,553 | 68.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,648 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +36.6
Elliott
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,477 | 56.1 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,157 | 43.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +12.1
Estill
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,528 | 64.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,920 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +29.5
Fayette
| Jim Gray | DEM | 82,403 | 60.4 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 54,068 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +20.8
Fleming
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,597 | 58.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,555 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +16.9
Floyd
| Rand Paul | REP | 8,082 | 51.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,615 | 48.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +3.0
Franklin
| Jim Gray | DEM | 13,860 | 58.1 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,000 | 41.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +16.2
Fulton
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,322 | 56.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,029 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +12.5
Gallatin
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,358 | 71.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 939 | 28.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +43.0
Garrard
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,034 | 66.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,515 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +33.4
Grant
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,125 | 75.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,334 | 24.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +50.7
Graves
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,996 | 67.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 5,394 | 32.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +34.2
Grayson
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,097 | 68.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,307 | 31.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +36.4
Green
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,688 | 71.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,459 | 28.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +43.3
Greenup
| Rand Paul | REP | 8,946 | 55.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,128 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +11.3
Hancock
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,383 | 56.4 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,842 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +12.8
Hardin
| Rand Paul | REP | 24,892 | 58.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 18,046 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +15.9
Harlan
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,455 | 73.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,655 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +47.5
Harrison
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,225 | 54.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,472 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +9.8
Hart
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,504 | 63.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,647 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +26.0
Henderson
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,659 | 54.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 8,882 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +9.1
Henry
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,300 | 60.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,794 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.2
Hickman
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,409 | 66.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 722 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +32.2
Hopkins
| Rand Paul | REP | 13,625 | 67.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 6,457 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +35.7
Jackson
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,264 | 81.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 969 | 18.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +63.0
Jefferson
| Jim Gray | DEM | 207,610 | 58.9 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 144,628 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +17.9
Jessamine
| Rand Paul | REP | 13,821 | 59.4 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 9,462 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +18.7
Johnson
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,187 | 67.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,968 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +35.2
Kenton
| Rand Paul | REP | 47,376 | 66.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 24,370 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +32.1
Knott
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,085 | 56.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,369 | 43.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +13.1
Knox
| Rand Paul | REP | 8,162 | 71.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,322 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +42.1
LaRue
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,111 | 65.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,185 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.6
Laurel
| Rand Paul | REP | 18,216 | 75.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 6,065 | 25.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +50.0
Lawrence
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,652 | 62.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,218 | 37.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +24.4
Lee
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,688 | 65.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 898 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.5
Leslie
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,575 | 84.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 679 | 16.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +68.1
Letcher
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,364 | 62.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,175 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +25.6
Lewis
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,569 | 71.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,434 | 28.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +42.7
Lincoln
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,144 | 65.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,264 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.6
Livingston
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,063 | 66.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,514 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +33.8
Logan
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,555 | 70.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,214 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +40.3
Lyon
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,431 | 61.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,508 | 38.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +23.4
McCracken
| Rand Paul | REP | 19,699 | 63.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 11,552 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +26.1
McCreary
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,303 | 77.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,238 | 22.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +55.3
McLean
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,820 | 62.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,681 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +25.3
Madison
| Rand Paul | REP | 20,817 | 55.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 16,439 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +11.8
Magoffin
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,756 | 55.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,171 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +11.9
Marion
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,086 | 51.2 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,887 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +2.5
Marshall
| Rand Paul | REP | 10,635 | 63.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 6,031 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +27.6
Martin
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,814 | 75.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 909 | 24.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +51.2
Mason
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,452 | 62.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,640 | 37.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +25.5
Meade
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,043 | 58.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 5,069 | 41.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +16.3
Menifee
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,514 | 55.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,201 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +11.5
Mercer
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,365 | 60.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,113 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.5
Metcalfe
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,845 | 63.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,660 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +26.3
Monroe
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,842 | 81.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 881 | 18.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +62.7
Montgomery
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,220 | 54.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 5,112 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +9.8
Morgan
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,602 | 56.4 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,010 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +12.8
Muhlenberg
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,354 | 57.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 5,489 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +14.5
Nelson
| Rand Paul | REP | 11,747 | 57.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 8,832 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +14.2
Nicholas
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,434 | 51.2 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,365 | 48.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +2.5
Ohio
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,742 | 65.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,505 | 34.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +31.6
Oldham
| Rand Paul | REP | 21,250 | 64.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 11,718 | 35.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +28.9
Owen
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,388 | 68.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,527 | 31.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +37.9
Owsley
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,160 | 70.7 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 481 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +41.4
Pendleton
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,376 | 74.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,493 | 25.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +49.1
Perry
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,310 | 61.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,880 | 38.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +23.8
Pike
| Rand Paul | REP | 14,427 | 60.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 9,299 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.6
Powell
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,664 | 54.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,225 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +9.0
Pulaski
| Rand Paul | REP | 19,972 | 72.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 7,648 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +44.6
Robertson
| Rand Paul | REP | 650 | 65.4 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 344 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.8
Rockcastle
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,889 | 75.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,614 | 24.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +50.4
Rowan
| Jim Gray | DEM | 4,625 | 52.9 |
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,123 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Gray +5.7
Russell
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,904 | 74.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,061 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +48.2
Scott
| Rand Paul | REP | 13,340 | 55.2 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 10,835 | 44.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +10.4
Shelby
| Rand Paul | REP | 12,477 | 60.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 8,011 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.8
Simpson
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,819 | 64.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,618 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +29.6
Spencer
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,447 | 68.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,989 | 31.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +36.6
Taylor
| Rand Paul | REP | 7,276 | 65.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,861 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.7
Todd
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,514 | 75.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,170 | 25.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +50.0
Trigg
| Rand Paul | REP | 4,752 | 71.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,912 | 28.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +42.6
Trimble
| Rand Paul | REP | 2,326 | 61.9 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,434 | 38.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +23.7
Union
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,840 | 62.5 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,302 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +25.0
Warren
| Rand Paul | REP | 29,188 | 60.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 19,191 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +20.7
Washington
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,365 | 60.6 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,191 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +21.1
Wayne
| Rand Paul | REP | 5,159 | 67.1 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 2,534 | 32.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +34.1
Webster
| Rand Paul | REP | 3,712 | 65.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,996 | 35.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +30.1
Whitley
| Rand Paul | REP | 9,748 | 72.0 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 3,795 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +44.0
Wolfe
| Rand Paul | REP | 1,307 | 50.8 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 1,268 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +1.5
Woodford
| Rand Paul | REP | 6,838 | 50.3 |
| Jim Gray | DEM | 6,756 | 49.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Paul +0.6
Acadia
| John Kennedy | REP | 9,887 | 78.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,753 | 21.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +56.4
Allen
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,424 | 72.3 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 931 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +44.5
Ascension
| John Kennedy | REP | 13,950 | 67.3 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 6,786 | 32.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +34.5
Assumption
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,616 | 61.9 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,608 | 38.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +23.9
Avoyelles
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,529 | 64.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,463 | 35.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +29.5
Beauregard
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,339 | 79.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,114 | 20.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +59.1
Bienville
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,856 | 52.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,684 | 47.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +4.9
Bossier
| John Kennedy | REP | 16,634 | 74.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 5,711 | 25.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +48.9
Caddo
| John Kennedy | REP | 24,731 | 50.1 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 24,674 | 49.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +0.1
Calcasieu
| John Kennedy | REP | 19,364 | 65.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 10,261 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +30.7
Caldwell
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,723 | 80.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 415 | 19.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +61.2
Cameron
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,169 | 81.1 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 273 | 18.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +62.1
Catahoula
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,404 | 71.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 573 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +42.0
Claiborne
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,807 | 60.9 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,159 | 39.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +21.8
Concordia
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,045 | 60.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,318 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +21.6
DeSoto
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,913 | 60.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,566 | 39.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +20.8
East Baton Rouge
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 59,624 | 52.0 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 55,037 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +4.0
East Carroll
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 717 | 59.1 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 496 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +18.2
East Feliciana
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,052 | 56.5 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,354 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +12.9
Evangeline
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,460 | 70.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,485 | 30.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +39.9
Franklin
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,155 | 76.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 995 | 24.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +52.0
Grant
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,823 | 85.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 490 | 14.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +70.4
Iberia
| John Kennedy | REP | 10,247 | 74.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,593 | 26.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +48.1
Iberville
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,579 | 52.2 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,272 | 47.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +4.5
Jackson
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,157 | 67.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,033 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +35.2
Jefferson
| John Kennedy | REP | 49,806 | 63.9 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 28,171 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +27.7
Jeff Davis
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,338 | 75.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,433 | 24.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +50.3
Lafayette
| John Kennedy | REP | 31,784 | 70.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 13,102 | 29.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +41.6
Lafourche
| John Kennedy | REP | 13,670 | 81.5 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,098 | 18.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +63.0
LaSalle
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,456 | 90.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 266 | 9.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +80.5
Lincoln
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,523 | 61.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,842 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +22.8
Livingston
| John Kennedy | REP | 17,469 | 86.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,652 | 13.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +73.6
Madison
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 967 | 55.9 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 762 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +11.9
Morehouse
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,766 | 57.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,016 | 42.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +15.7
Natchitoches
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,203 | 60.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,776 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +20.4
Orleans
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 64,184 | 82.3 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 13,797 | 17.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +64.6
Ouachita
| John Kennedy | REP | 15,995 | 63.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 9,383 | 37.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +26.1
Plaquemines
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,482 | 72.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,739 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +44.1
Pointe Coupee
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,032 | 58.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,138 | 41.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +17.3
Rapides
| John Kennedy | REP | 13,965 | 65.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 7,510 | 35.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +30.1
Red River
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,145 | 52.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,049 | 47.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +4.4
Richland
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,929 | 69.3 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,297 | 30.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +38.6
Sabine
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,623 | 84.7 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 654 | 15.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +69.4
St. Bernard
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,388 | 67.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,624 | 32.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +35.2
St. Charles
| John Kennedy | REP | 6,934 | 67.7 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,303 | 32.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +35.5
St. Helena
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,613 | 56.5 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,242 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +13.0
St. James
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,951 | 52.9 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,631 | 47.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +5.7
St. John the Baptist
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 5,579 | 57.7 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,087 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +15.4
St. Landry
| John Kennedy | REP | 7,897 | 53.5 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 6,853 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +7.1
St. Martin
| John Kennedy | REP | 9,531 | 72.8 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,557 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +45.6
St. Mary
| John Kennedy | REP | 6,546 | 71.9 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,558 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +43.8
St. Tammany
| John Kennedy | REP | 42,408 | 78.9 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 11,362 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +57.7
Tangipahoa
| John Kennedy | REP | 13,075 | 69.1 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 5,855 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +38.1
Tensas
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 862 | 56.8 |
| John Kennedy | REP | 655 | 43.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Campbell +13.6
Terrebonne
| John Kennedy | REP | 12,779 | 79.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,315 | 20.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +58.8
Union
| John Kennedy | REP | 3,619 | 73.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,314 | 26.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +46.7
Vermilion
| John Kennedy | REP | 9,279 | 81.5 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 2,104 | 18.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +63.0
Vernon
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,835 | 83.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 960 | 16.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +66.9
Washington
| John Kennedy | REP | 5,096 | 72.2 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,959 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +44.5
Webster
| John Kennedy | REP | 5,220 | 62.4 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,152 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +24.7
West Baton Rouge
| John Kennedy | REP | 4,102 | 57.3 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 3,053 | 42.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +14.7
West Carroll
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,011 | 84.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 382 | 16.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +68.1
West Feliciana
| John Kennedy | REP | 2,082 | 61.6 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 1,299 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +23.2
Winn
| John Kennedy | REP | 1,952 | 73.0 |
| Foster Campbell | DEM | 722 | 27.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kennedy +46.0
Allegany
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 18,072 | 62.1 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 9,761 | 33.6 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 1,253 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +28.6
Anne Arundel
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 128,268 | 48.5 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 127,961 | 48.4 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 8,389 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +0.1
Baltimore
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 217,151 | 56.5 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 155,079 | 40.3 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 12,251 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +16.1
Calvert
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 25,431 | 55.5 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 18,534 | 40.4 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 1,855 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +15.1
Caroline
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 8,903 | 64.3 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 4,596 | 33.2 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 349 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +31.1
Carroll
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 60,195 | 66.7 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 27,649 | 30.6 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 2,370 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +36.1
Cecil
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 27,372 | 62.4 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 14,846 | 33.8 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 1,654 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +28.6
Charles
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 48,994 | 63.7 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 25,507 | 33.2 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 2,362 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +30.6
Dorchester
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 7,763 | 52.4 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 6,697 | 45.2 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 360 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +7.2
Frederick
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 60,516 | 49.4 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 57,084 | 46.6 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 4,809 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +2.8
Garrett
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 10,210 | 76.7 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 2,696 | 20.2 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 409 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +56.4
Harford
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 80,355 | 60.9 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 47,858 | 36.3 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 3,772 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +24.6
Howard
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 97,622 | 61.4 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 55,888 | 35.2 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 5,459 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +26.3
Kent
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 4,936 | 49.9 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 4,709 | 47.7 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 237 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +2.3
Montgomery
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 354,149 | 75.2 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 103,401 | 22.0 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 13,269 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +53.3
Prince George's
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 334,265 | 87.8 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 34,067 | 8.9 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 12,305 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +78.9
Queen Anne's
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 17,006 | 65.1 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 8,472 | 32.4 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 640 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +32.7
St. Mary's
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 28,207 | 58.6 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 17,980 | 37.4 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 1,937 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +21.3
Somerset
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 5,178 | 53.7 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 4,277 | 44.3 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 196 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +9.3
Talbot
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 10,861 | 53.6 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 8,967 | 44.3 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 435 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +9.3
Washington
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 37,278 | 59.0 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 23,313 | 36.9 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 2,545 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +22.1
Wicomico
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 22,027 | 52.8 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 18,382 | 44.1 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 1,305 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +8.7
Worcester
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 16,731 | 60.6 |
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 10,125 | 36.7 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 756 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Szeliga +23.9
Baltimore City
| Chris Van Hollen | DEM | 193,819 | 82.8 |
| Kathy Szeliga | REP | 29,306 | 12.5 |
| Margaret Flowers | GRE | 11,053 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Van Hollen +70.3
Adair
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,603 | 54.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,198 | 41.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +13.8
Andrew
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,610 | 61.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,122 | 34.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 213 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +27.3
Atchison
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,861 | 69.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 704 | 26.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 72 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +43.3
Audrain
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,726 | 57.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,680 | 36.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 312 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +20.5
Barry
| Roy Blunt | REP | 10,059 | 68.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,864 | 26.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 388 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.3
Barton
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,479 | 75.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,231 | 20.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +54.9
Bates
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,630 | 58.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,866 | 35.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 259 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +22.1
Benton
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,891 | 61.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,097 | 32.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 300 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +29.3
Bollinger
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,016 | 71.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,379 | 24.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +47.0
Boone
| Jason Kander | DEM | 45,100 | 54.3 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 34,171 | 41.1 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 2,167 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +13.2
Buchanan
| Roy Blunt | REP | 17,658 | 49.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 16,103 | 45.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,043 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +4.4
Butler
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,764 | 69.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,543 | 26.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 371 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.5
Caldwell
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,513 | 58.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,517 | 35.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 153 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +23.1
Callaway
| Roy Blunt | REP | 10,983 | 57.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 7,084 | 36.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 534 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +20.3
Camden
| Roy Blunt | REP | 14,434 | 64.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,995 | 31.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 580 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +33.2
Cape Girardeau
| Roy Blunt | REP | 24,173 | 65.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 11,219 | 30.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 863 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +35.2
Carroll
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,875 | 66.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,290 | 29.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 100 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +36.5
Carter
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,908 | 68.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 742 | 26.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 71 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +41.9
Cass
| Roy Blunt | REP | 27,532 | 54.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 20,628 | 40.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,542 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +13.6
Cedar
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,445 | 70.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,541 | 24.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 172 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +46.1
Chariton
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,322 | 58.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,465 | 37.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 94 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +21.6
Christian
| Roy Blunt | REP | 27,812 | 66.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 11,857 | 28.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,113 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +38.4
Clark
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,037 | 62.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,059 | 32.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 98 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +29.8
Clay
| Jason Kander | DEM | 55,322 | 50.2 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 49,173 | 44.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 3,507 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +5.6
Clinton
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,614 | 54.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,990 | 39.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 331 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +15.9
Cole
| Roy Blunt | REP | 21,940 | 58.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 14,216 | 37.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 800 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +20.6
Cooper
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,668 | 58.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,920 | 36.6 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 239 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +21.9
Crawford
| Roy Blunt | REP | 6,163 | 62.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,144 | 32.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 236 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +30.7
Dade
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,810 | 71.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 969 | 24.6 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 82 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +46.7
Dallas
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,101 | 68.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,980 | 26.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 182 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.0
Daviess
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,213 | 59.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,266 | 33.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 149 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +25.4
DeKalb
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,826 | 61.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,478 | 32.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 146 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +29.5
Dent
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,653 | 68.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,795 | 26.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 167 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.3
Douglas
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,753 | 71.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,556 | 23.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 174 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +48.0
Dunklin
| Roy Blunt | REP | 6,536 | 63.0 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,433 | 33.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +29.9
Franklin
| Roy Blunt | REP | 28,258 | 56.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 19,102 | 38.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,417 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +18.3
Gasconade
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,743 | 63.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,319 | 31.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 176 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +32.7
Gentry
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,860 | 61.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,025 | 34.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 68 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +27.7
Greene
| Roy Blunt | REP | 72,993 | 56.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 50,967 | 39.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 3,626 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +17.0
Grundy
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,898 | 65.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,325 | 29.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 91 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +35.5
Harrison
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,415 | 65.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,053 | 28.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 88 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +37.2
Henry
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,500 | 55.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,785 | 38.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 310 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +17.4
Hickory
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,959 | 62.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,490 | 31.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 135 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +31.2
Holt
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,614 | 69.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 629 | 27.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 54 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.2
Howard
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,671 | 55.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,928 | 39.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 134 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +15.4
Howell
| Roy Blunt | REP | 12,070 | 69.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,375 | 25.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 433 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +44.4
Iron
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,329 | 55.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,671 | 39.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 102 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +15.6
Jackson
| Jason Kander | DEM | 185,766 | 61.6 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 101,989 | 33.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 7,281 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +27.8
Jasper
| Roy Blunt | REP | 32,123 | 66.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 13,799 | 28.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,240 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +37.8
Jefferson
| Roy Blunt | REP | 53,218 | 50.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 46,975 | 44.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 2,941 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +5.9
Johnson
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,611 | 54.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 8,315 | 39.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 714 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +15.6
Knox
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,208 | 66.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 558 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +35.6
LaClede
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,316 | 70.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,965 | 24.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 396 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +45.8
Lafayette
| Roy Blunt | REP | 8,812 | 55.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,150 | 38.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 436 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +16.8
Lawrence
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,525 | 69.0 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,336 | 26.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 440 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +43.1
Lewis
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,732 | 61.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,472 | 33.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 98 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +28.5
Lincoln
| Roy Blunt | REP | 14,061 | 56.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 9,264 | 37.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 751 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +19.3
Linn
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,245 | 58.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,058 | 37.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 136 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +21.3
Livingston
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,834 | 60.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,208 | 34.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 158 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +25.6
McDonald
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,812 | 71.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,793 | 21.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 258 | 3.2 |
| Fred Ryman | CON | 170 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +49.2
Macon
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,894 | 64.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,323 | 30.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +34.0
Madison
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,203 | 60.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,766 | 33.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 157 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +27.2
Maries
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,978 | 66.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,339 | 29.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +36.5
Marion
| Roy Blunt | REP | 8,239 | 64.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,115 | 32.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 277 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +32.1
Mercer
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,231 | 72.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 396 | 23.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +49.1
Miller
| Roy Blunt | REP | 7,760 | 68.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,032 | 26.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 303 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +41.7
Mississippi
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,826 | 55.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,063 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +15.1
Moniteau
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,431 | 65.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,097 | 30.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 143 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +34.4
Monroe
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,584 | 62.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,330 | 32.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 105 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +30.5
Montgomery
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,405 | 62.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,722 | 31.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 128 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +31.1
Morgan
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,410 | 61.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,916 | 33.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 221 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +28.4
New Madrid
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,157 | 57.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,844 | 39.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +18.1
Newton
| Roy Blunt | REP | 18,598 | 69.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,691 | 25.1 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 573 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +44.7
Nodaway
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,516 | 58.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,466 | 36.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 208 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +21.8
Oregon
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,031 | 65.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,385 | 29.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 105 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +35.5
Osage
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,789 | 67.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,039 | 28.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +38.9
Ozark
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,085 | 69.0 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,113 | 24.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 126 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +44.1
Pemiscot
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,476 | 59.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,203 | 37.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +21.7
Perry
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,599 | 65.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,637 | 30.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 194 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +34.5
Pettis
| Roy Blunt | REP | 10,361 | 57.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,657 | 37.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 538 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +20.6
Phelps
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,063 | 59.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,576 | 35.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 533 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +24.2
Pike
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,084 | 55.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,872 | 39.1 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 192 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +16.5
Platte
| Jason Kander | DEM | 23,795 | 48.5 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 22,929 | 46.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 1,413 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +1.8
Polk
| Roy Blunt | REP | 9,693 | 69.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,605 | 26.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 327 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +43.9
Pulaski
| Roy Blunt | REP | 8,663 | 64.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,065 | 30.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 354 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +34.2
Putnam
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,708 | 74.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 486 | 21.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 46 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +53.6
Ralls
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,220 | 61.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,763 | 33.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 115 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +28.0
Randolph
| Roy Blunt | REP | 6,135 | 59.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,656 | 35.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 309 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +23.9
Ray
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,415 | 50.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,725 | 43.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 390 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +6.4
Reynolds
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,780 | 60.6 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,009 | 34.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 71 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +26.2
Ripley
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,814 | 70.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,340 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +46.0
St. Charles
| Roy Blunt | REP | 103,946 | 51.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 88,238 | 44.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 5,238 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +7.8
St. Clair
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,941 | 63.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,460 | 31.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 138 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +31.8
Ste. Genevieve
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,096 | 48.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,929 | 46.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 203 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +2.0
St. Francois
| Roy Blunt | REP | 13,110 | 53.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 10,117 | 41.1 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 661 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +12.2
St. Louis County
| Jason Kander | DEM | 308,925 | 59.9 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 189,726 | 36.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +23.1
Saline
| Roy Blunt | REP | 4,613 | 49.9 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,061 | 43.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 295 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +6.0
Schuyler
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,259 | 66.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 547 | 28.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 57 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +37.4
Scotland
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,283 | 66.1 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 570 | 29.4 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 39 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +36.8
Scott
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,040 | 64.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 5,439 | 31.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 383 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +32.7
Shannon
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,436 | 62.8 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,234 | 31.8 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 98 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +31.0
Shelby
| Roy Blunt | REP | 2,129 | 66.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 989 | 30.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +35.4
Stoddard
| Roy Blunt | REP | 9,318 | 70.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,426 | 25.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +44.5
Stone
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,620 | 70.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,162 | 25.2 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 448 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +45.1
Sullivan
| Roy Blunt | REP | 1,662 | 67.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 735 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +37.5
Taney
| Roy Blunt | REP | 16,117 | 69.0 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 6,143 | 26.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 609 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +42.7
Texas
| Roy Blunt | REP | 7,619 | 69.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,829 | 25.9 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 262 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +43.8
Vernon
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,448 | 63.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 2,700 | 31.6 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 231 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +32.1
Warren
| Roy Blunt | REP | 8,918 | 56.7 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 5,928 | 37.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 445 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +19.0
Washington
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,083 | 55.4 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 3,516 | 38.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 269 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +17.1
Wayne
| Roy Blunt | REP | 3,636 | 64.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,706 | 30.3 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 153 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +34.2
Webster
| Roy Blunt | REP | 11,450 | 68.2 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 4,612 | 27.5 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 397 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +40.7
Worth
| Roy Blunt | REP | 667 | 64.5 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 321 | 31.0 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 30 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +33.5
Wright
| Roy Blunt | REP | 5,930 | 73.3 |
| Jason Kander | DEM | 1,836 | 22.7 |
| Jonathan Dine | LIB | 176 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Blunt +50.6
St. Louis City
| Jason Kander | DEM | 107,070 | 81.8 |
| Roy Blunt | REP | 19,586 | 15.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Kander +66.8
Alamance
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 39,380 | 55.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 28,873 | 40.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,368 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +14.9
Alexander
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,271 | 73.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,895 | 21.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 929 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +51.8
Alleghany
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,720 | 70.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 1,337 | 25.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 229 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +45.1
Anson
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 5,793 | 55.6 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,383 | 42.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 250 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +13.5
Ashe
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 9,253 | 69.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,575 | 26.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 511 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +42.6
Avery
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 6,071 | 75.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 1,705 | 21.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 318 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +53.9
Beaufort
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 14,313 | 60.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,436 | 35.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 870 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +24.9
Bertie
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 5,590 | 60.9 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,446 | 37.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +23.3
Bladen
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 8,242 | 52.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,999 | 44.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 394 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +8.0
Brunswick
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 42,112 | 62.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 22,370 | 33.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,824 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +29.3
Buncombe
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 75,897 | 55.2 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 56,086 | 40.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 5,533 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +14.4
Burke
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 25,165 | 65.5 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 11,471 | 29.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,772 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +35.7
Cabarrus
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 53,723 | 58.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 34,266 | 37.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 4,382 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +21.1
Caldwell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 25,532 | 71.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,538 | 23.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,847 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +47.3
Camden
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,401 | 70.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 1,279 | 26.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 180 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +43.7
Carteret
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 26,189 | 70.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 9,668 | 25.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,531 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +44.2
Caswell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 5,991 | 54.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 4,671 | 42.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 275 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +12.1
Catawba
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 47,232 | 66.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 20,744 | 29.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,461 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +37.1
Chatham
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 20,530 | 51.7 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 18,049 | 45.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,122 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +6.2
Cherokee
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 10,116 | 73.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,210 | 23.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 489 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +50.0
Chowan
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,027 | 57.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,881 | 40.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +16.3
Clay
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,183 | 71.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 1,482 | 25.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 192 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +46.1
Cleveland
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 27,491 | 62.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 15,025 | 34.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,605 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +28.3
Columbus
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,637 | 58.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,841 | 38.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 750 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +20.6
Craven
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 27,741 | 59.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 16,955 | 36.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,778 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +23.2
Cumberland
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 69,733 | 55.4 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 51,902 | 41.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 4,266 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +14.2
Currituck
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 8,921 | 72.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,999 | 24.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 417 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +48.0
Dare
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 11,393 | 59.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 7,226 | 37.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 590 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +21.7
Davidson
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 53,535 | 72.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 17,753 | 23.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,863 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +48.3
Davie
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 15,568 | 72.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 5,117 | 23.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 929 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +48.4
Duplin
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 12,002 | 58.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,013 | 39.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 542 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +19.4
Durham
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 117,884 | 75.9 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 33,718 | 21.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,638 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +54.2
Edgecombe
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 15,847 | 64.3 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 8,353 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +30.4
Forsyth
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 89,666 | 50.6 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 82,004 | 46.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 5,543 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +4.3
Franklin
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 16,279 | 53.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 12,880 | 42.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,038 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +11.3
Gaston
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 60,298 | 63.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 30,582 | 32.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 4,388 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +31.2
Gates
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 2,821 | 53.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,316 | 44.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 129 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +9.6
Graham
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 2,935 | 73.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 872 | 21.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 174 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +51.8
Granville
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,580 | 50.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 12,758 | 47.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 825 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +3.0
Greene
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,280 | 53.5 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,518 | 44.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 202 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +9.5
Guilford
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 143,914 | 56.5 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 103,341 | 40.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 7,677 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +15.9
Halifax
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 15,601 | 62.4 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 8,983 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +26.5
Harnett
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 27,305 | 59.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 16,821 | 36.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,639 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +22.9
Haywood
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 17,873 | 59.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 10,953 | 36.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,471 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +22.8
Henderson
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 35,486 | 61.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 19,793 | 34.4 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,229 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +27.3
Hertford
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,714 | 67.5 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,116 | 31.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +36.2
Hoke
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 9,561 | 53.3 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 7,669 | 42.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 723 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +10.5
Hyde
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 1,244 | 54.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 949 | 41.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 77 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +13.0
Iredell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 53,125 | 65.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 24,187 | 29.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 4,248 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +35.5
Jackson
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 9,628 | 52.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,014 | 43.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 857 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +8.7
Johnston
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 53,977 | 63.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 28,279 | 33.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,988 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +30.1
Jones
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 2,911 | 57.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,001 | 39.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 157 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +18.0
Lee
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,535 | 54.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 10,392 | 41.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 864 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +12.7
Lenoir
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,518 | 51.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 12,297 | 46.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 640 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +4.6
Lincoln
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 27,867 | 70.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 9,798 | 24.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,915 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +45.7
McDowell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,671 | 70.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 4,901 | 25.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 960 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +44.9
Macon
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 11,357 | 65.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 5,367 | 30.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 745 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +34.3
Madison
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 6,286 | 56.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 4,271 | 38.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 505 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +18.2
Martin
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 5,825 | 49.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 5,678 | 48.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 315 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +1.2
Mecklenburg
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 277,020 | 59.2 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 173,272 | 37.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 17,255 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +22.2
Mitchell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 5,951 | 74.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 1,714 | 21.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 277 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +53.3
Montgomery
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 6,838 | 59.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 4,206 | 36.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 396 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +23.0
Moore
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 30,724 | 63.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 16,059 | 33.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,556 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +30.3
Nash
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 23,450 | 49.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 23,093 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +0.8
New Hanover
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 56,153 | 50.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 48,994 | 44.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 5,068 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +6.5
Northampton
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,065 | 62.4 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,511 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +26.3
Onslow
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 36,180 | 64.5 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 17,029 | 30.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,907 | 5.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +34.1
Orange
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 57,877 | 70.7 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 21,884 | 26.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,055 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +44.0
Pamlico
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,200 | 61.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,374 | 35.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 206 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +26.9
Pasquotank
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,579 | 50.2 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 8,083 | 47.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 443 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +2.9
Pender
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 17,180 | 62.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 9,087 | 33.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,161 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +29.5
Perquimans
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 4,153 | 63.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,281 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +28.5
Person
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 11,033 | 57.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 7,765 | 40.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 565 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +16.9
Pitt
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 40,062 | 50.3 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 37,150 | 46.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,435 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +3.7
Polk
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 6,362 | 59.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,970 | 37.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 383 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +22.3
Randolph
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 48,048 | 75.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 13,208 | 20.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 2,732 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +54.4
Richmond
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 9,732 | 51.6 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,430 | 44.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 704 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +6.9
Robeson
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 19,792 | 49.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 19,053 | 48.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 805 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +1.9
Rockingham
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 26,157 | 62.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 14,193 | 33.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,538 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +28.6
Rowan
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 41,230 | 64.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 19,227 | 30.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 3,222 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +34.6
Rutherford
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 20,366 | 68.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 8,240 | 27.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,152 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +40.7
Sampson
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 14,819 | 57.8 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 10,269 | 40.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 529 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +17.8
Scotland
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 7,161 | 52.8 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 6,113 | 45.1 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 287 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +7.7
Stanly
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 20,831 | 70.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 7,255 | 24.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,560 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +45.8
Stokes
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 16,698 | 74.4 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 4,774 | 21.3 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 975 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +53.1
Surry
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 23,143 | 72.7 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 7,509 | 23.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,162 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +49.1
Swain
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,323 | 55.5 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 2,320 | 38.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 349 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +16.7
Transylvania
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 10,221 | 57.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,749 | 38.2 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 695 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +19.7
Tyrrell
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 941 | 55.1 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 695 | 40.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 71 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +14.4
Union
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 67,893 | 65.0 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 32,116 | 30.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 4,385 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +34.3
Vance
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 12,056 | 61.0 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 7,362 | 37.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +23.8
Wake
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 290,286 | 55.3 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 217,789 | 41.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 16,534 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +13.8
Warren
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,336 | 64.8 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 3,258 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +31.5
Washington
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,392 | 55.8 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 2,534 | 41.7 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 155 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +14.1
Watauga
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 14,259 | 48.3 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 13,837 | 46.9 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,428 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +1.4
Wayne
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 27,530 | 54.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 21,286 | 42.5 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,288 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +12.5
Wilkes
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 22,852 | 73.9 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 6,749 | 21.8 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 1,317 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +52.1
Wilson
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 19,435 | 51.3 |
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 17,641 | 46.6 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 794 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ross +4.7
Yadkin
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 13,704 | 78.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,162 | 18.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 669 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +60.1
Yancey
| Richard M. Burr | REP | 5,956 | 60.2 |
| Deborah Ross | DEM | 3,566 | 36.0 |
| Sean Haugh | LIB | 371 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Burr +24.2
Adams
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,067 | 87.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 114 | 9.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +78.1
Barnes
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,302 | 80.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 835 | 15.7 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 140 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +65.0
Benson
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,340 | 66.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 574 | 28.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 68 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +37.9
Billings
| John Hoeven | REP | 543 | 89.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 43 | 7.1 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 16 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.6
Bottineau
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,998 | 85.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 383 | 10.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 80 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +74.8
Bowman
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,605 | 89.6 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 136 | 7.6 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 36 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.0
Burke
| John Hoeven | REP | 970 | 91.9 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 66 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +85.7
Burleigh
| John Hoeven | REP | 38,830 | 81.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 6,904 | 14.5 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 1,372 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +66.8
Cass
| John Hoeven | REP | 57,151 | 71.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 18,268 | 22.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 3,183 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +48.8
Cavalier
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,707 | 83.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 290 | 14.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +69.3
Dickey
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,022 | 83.2 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 335 | 13.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +69.5
Divide
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,039 | 84.5 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 140 | 11.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 36 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +73.1
Dunn
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,909 | 85.5 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 251 | 11.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 46 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +74.3
Eddy
| John Hoeven | REP | 962 | 78.5 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 219 | 17.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 35 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +60.6
Emmons
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,774 | 89.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 136 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.9
Foster
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,491 | 85.6 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 170 | 9.8 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 59 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +75.9
Golden Valley
| John Hoeven | REP | 857 | 89.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 62 | 6.5 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 28 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +83.2
Grand Forks
| John Hoeven | REP | 20,860 | 70.0 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 7,714 | 25.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 873 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +44.1
Grant
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,251 | 89.0 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 108 | 7.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +81.4
Griggs
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,046 | 81.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 194 | 15.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 28 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +66.6
Hettinger
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,160 | 89.6 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 88 | 6.8 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 30 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.8
Kidder
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,224 | 87.6 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 117 | 8.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 43 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +79.2
LaMoure
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,818 | 83.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 292 | 13.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 49 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +70.0
Logan
| John Hoeven | REP | 989 | 90.6 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 72 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +84.0
McHenry
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,433 | 85.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 296 | 10.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 75 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +74.9
McIntosh
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,327 | 90.1 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 110 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.6
McKenzie
| John Hoeven | REP | 3,903 | 84.9 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 494 | 10.7 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 140 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +74.1
McLean
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,391 | 82.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 732 | 13.7 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 116 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +68.6
Mercer
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,041 | 86.5 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 470 | 10.1 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 99 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +76.4
Morton
| John Hoeven | REP | 12,963 | 82.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 2,104 | 13.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 428 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +69.0
Mountrail
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,980 | 73.0 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 892 | 21.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 122 | 3.0 |
| James Germalic | IND | 87 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +51.2
Nelson
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,343 | 76.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 323 | 18.5 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 57 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +58.4
Oliver
| John Hoeven | REP | 915 | 89.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 74 | 7.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 25 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +82.0
Pembina
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,644 | 83.1 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 453 | 14.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +68.9
Pierce
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,816 | 86.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 225 | 10.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +76.0
Ramsey
| John Hoeven | REP | 4,291 | 80.0 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 869 | 16.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 133 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +63.8
Ransom
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,793 | 75.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 463 | 19.6 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 75 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +56.2
Renville
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,140 | 88.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 104 | 8.1 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 28 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +80.2
Richland
| John Hoeven | REP | 6,074 | 80.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 1,117 | 14.8 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 267 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +65.6
Rolette
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,801 | 48.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 1,701 | 45.7 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 137 | 3.7 |
| James Germalic | IND | 86 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +2.7
Sargent
| John Hoeven | REP | 1,513 | 74.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 423 | 20.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 67 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +53.9
Sheridan
| John Hoeven | REP | 703 | 88.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 60 | 7.6 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 17 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +81.2
Sioux
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 633 | 53.5 |
| John Hoeven | REP | 426 | 36.0 |
| James Germalic | IND | 64 | 5.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 60 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Glassheim +17.5
Slope
| John Hoeven | REP | 388 | 90.9 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 25 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +85.0
Stark
| John Hoeven | REP | 10,635 | 87.2 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 1,101 | 9.0 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 322 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +78.2
Steele
| John Hoeven | REP | 791 | 76.7 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 204 | 19.8 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 29 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +56.9
Stutsman
| John Hoeven | REP | 8,392 | 83.3 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 1,329 | 13.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 222 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +70.1
Towner
| John Hoeven | REP | 952 | 80.9 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 179 | 15.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 30 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +65.7
Traill
| John Hoeven | REP | 3,062 | 77.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 747 | 18.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 103 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +58.5
Walsh
| John Hoeven | REP | 3,788 | 80.5 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 749 | 15.9 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 116 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +64.6
Ward
| John Hoeven | REP | 22,538 | 82.9 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 3,309 | 12.2 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 938 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +70.7
Wells
| John Hoeven | REP | 2,080 | 86.8 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 239 | 10.0 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 50 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +76.8
Williams
| John Hoeven | REP | 10,750 | 85.4 |
| Eliot Glassheim | DEM | 1,180 | 9.4 |
| Robert Marquette | LIB | 466 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hoeven +76.0
Belknap
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 18,710 | 53.8 |
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 14,743 | 42.4 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 820 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ayotte +11.4
Carroll
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 14,838 | 50.6 |
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 13,431 | 45.8 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 669 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ayotte +4.8
Cheshire
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 22,809 | 55.0 |
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 16,741 | 40.4 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 1,111 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hassan +14.6
Coos
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 7,539 | 48.7 |
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 7,340 | 47.4 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 365 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ayotte +1.3
Grafton
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 28,127 | 55.4 |
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 20,679 | 40.7 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 1,120 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hassan +14.7
Hillsborough
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 105,156 | 49.4 |
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 98,727 | 46.4 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 5,210 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ayotte +3.0
Merrimack
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 41,412 | 49.9 |
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 38,540 | 46.5 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 1,737 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hassan +3.5
Rockingham
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 91,361 | 50.7 |
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 81,343 | 45.2 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 4,438 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Ayotte +5.6
Strafford
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 36,023 | 52.7 |
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 29,419 | 43.0 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 1,654 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hassan +9.7
Sullivan
| Maggie Hassan | DEM | 10,694 | 47.7 |
| Kelly Ayotte | REP | 10,649 | 47.5 |
| Aaron Day | IND | 618 | 2.8 |
| Brian Chabot | LIB | 459 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Hassan +0.2
Churchill
| Joe Heck | REP | 7,711 | 70.8 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 2,240 | 20.6 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 352 | 3.2 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 246 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +50.2
Clark
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 386,179 | 51.3 |
| Joe Heck | REP | 303,734 | 40.3 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 29,849 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Cortez Masto +10.9
Douglas
| Joe Heck | REP | 17,587 | 63.6 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 8,410 | 30.4 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 767 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +33.2
Elko
| Joe Heck | REP | 13,462 | 73.3 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 3,199 | 17.4 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 723 | 3.9 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 394 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +55.9
Esmeralda
| Joe Heck | REP | 312 | 74.3 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 66 | 15.7 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 22 | 5.2 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 13 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +58.6
Eureka
| Joe Heck | REP | 692 | 81.5 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 88 | 10.4 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 29 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +71.1
Humboldt
| Joe Heck | REP | 4,397 | 68.9 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 1,406 | 22.0 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 235 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +46.9
Lander
| Joe Heck | REP | 1,704 | 71.2 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 417 | 17.4 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 113 | 4.7 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 54 | 2.3 |
| Tom Sawyer | NO- | 49 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +53.8
Lincoln
| Joe Heck | REP | 1,609 | 75.9 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 315 | 14.9 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 91 | 4.3 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 51 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +61.0
Lyon
| Joe Heck | REP | 15,231 | 64.6 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 6,323 | 26.8 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 780 | 3.3 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 534 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +37.8
Mineral
| Joe Heck | REP | 1,141 | 57.4 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 627 | 31.5 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 89 | 4.5 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 47 | 2.4 |
| Tom Sawyer | NO- | 45 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +25.9
Nye
| Joe Heck | REP | 11,611 | 60.0 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 5,253 | 27.1 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 929 | 4.8 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 747 | 3.9 |
| Tom Sawyer | NO- | 390 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +32.8
Pershing
| Joe Heck | REP | 1,286 | 65.2 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 466 | 23.6 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 77 | 3.9 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 67 | 3.4 |
| Tom Sawyer | NO- | 45 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +41.6
Storey
| Joe Heck | REP | 1,551 | 61.0 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 791 | 31.1 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 83 | 3.3 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 58 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +29.9
Washoe
| Joe Heck | REP | 97,433 | 46.9 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 95,750 | 46.0 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 7,064 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +0.8
White Pine
| Joe Heck | REP | 2,591 | 69.1 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 723 | 19.3 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 168 | 4.5 |
| Tom Jones | IND | 107 | 2.9 |
| Tom Sawyer | NO- | 94 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +49.8
Carson City
| Joe Heck | REP | 13,027 | 52.5 |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | DEM | 9,741 | 39.2 |
| None of these candidates | NO- | 895 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Heck +13.2
Albany
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 98,291 | 72.5 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 33,754 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +47.6
Allegany
| Wendy Long | REP | 9,614 | 53.8 |
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 7,881 | 44.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Long +9.7
Bronx
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 344,113 | 91.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 25,905 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +84.7
Broome
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 51,929 | 63.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 28,156 | 34.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +28.9
Cattaraugus
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 15,297 | 52.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 13,495 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +6.1
Cayuga
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 19,796 | 61.9 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 11,536 | 36.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +25.8
Chautauqua
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 29,743 | 56.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 21,614 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +15.5
Chemung
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 18,775 | 54.5 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 14,994 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +11.0
Chenango
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 10,111 | 52.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 8,463 | 44.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +8.6
Clinton
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 18,955 | 62.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 10,802 | 35.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +26.7
Columbia
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 18,893 | 63.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 10,101 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +29.5
Cortland
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 11,857 | 61.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 7,048 | 36.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +24.7
Delaware
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 9,635 | 50.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 8,932 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +3.7
Dutchess
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 72,659 | 58.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 48,934 | 39.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +19.0
Erie
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 284,110 | 69.2 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 118,072 | 28.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +40.4
Essex
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 8,829 | 55.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 6,577 | 41.2 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 420 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +14.1
Franklin
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 9,640 | 59.5 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 6,116 | 37.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +21.7
Fulton
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 10,237 | 51.2 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 9,357 | 46.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +4.4
Genesee
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 12,343 | 49.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 12,245 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +0.4
Greene
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 10,823 | 51.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 9,863 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +4.5
Hamilton
| Wendy Long | REP | 1,572 | 51.1 |
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 1,444 | 47.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Long +4.2
Herkimer
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 13,702 | 55.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 10,376 | 42.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +13.5
Jefferson
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 20,711 | 56.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 15,245 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +14.9
Brooklyn
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 659,982 | 86.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 83,820 | 10.9 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 19,739 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +75.2
Lewis
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 5,492 | 51.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 5,106 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +3.6
Livingston
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 14,984 | 52.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 13,090 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +6.6
Madison
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 16,706 | 58.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 11,363 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +18.5
Monroe
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 226,493 | 67.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 103,400 | 30.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +36.4
Montgomery
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 10,357 | 57.2 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 7,332 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +16.7
Nassau
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 403,274 | 64.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 210,823 | 33.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +30.9
Manhattan
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 553,432 | 86.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 69,535 | 10.9 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 13,719 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +75.6
Niagara
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 52,114 | 59.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 33,662 | 38.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +21.1
Oneida
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 51,245 | 59.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 32,899 | 38.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +21.3
Onondaga
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 143,126 | 69.9 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 57,174 | 27.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +42.0
Ontario
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 29,001 | 57.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 20,344 | 40.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +17.1
Orange
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 87,368 | 59.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 55,727 | 38.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +21.7
Orleans
| Wendy Long | REP | 8,150 | 52.4 |
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 7,099 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Long +6.8
Oswego
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 26,172 | 56.9 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 18,780 | 40.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +16.1
Otsego
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 14,059 | 57.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 9,758 | 39.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +17.6
Putnam
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 24,635 | 53.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 20,588 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +8.8
Queens
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 541,334 | 82.7 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 99,252 | 15.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +67.5
Rensselaer
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 43,897 | 63.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 23,577 | 34.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +29.3
Staten Island
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 108,147 | 62.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 62,979 | 36.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +26.0
Rockland
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 82,386 | 65.3 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 41,894 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +32.1
Saint Lawrence
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 22,755 | 61.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 13,633 | 36.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +24.5
Saratoga
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 65,362 | 59.0 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 42,709 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +20.5
Schenectady
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 42,649 | 65.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 20,985 | 32.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +33.2
Schoharie
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 6,721 | 49.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 6,606 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +0.8
Schuyler
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 4,075 | 48.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 4,026 | 48.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +0.6
Seneca
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 7,746 | 57.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 5,364 | 39.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +17.7
Steuben
| Wendy Long | REP | 20,638 | 51.3 |
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 18,743 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Long +4.7
Suffolk
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 390,754 | 60.1 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 247,391 | 38.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +22.1
Sullivan
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 16,770 | 59.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 10,641 | 37.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +21.8
Tioga
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 10,661 | 49.5 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 10,345 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +1.5
Tompkins
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 30,349 | 73.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 8,815 | 21.4 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 1,611 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +52.2
Ulster
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 52,598 | 64.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 26,029 | 32.0 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 1,994 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +32.7
Warren
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 17,885 | 59.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 11,164 | 37.2 |
| Robin Wilson | GRE | 708 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +22.4
Washington
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 13,246 | 55.8 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 9,787 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +14.6
Wayne
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 19,704 | 51.2 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 17,929 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +4.6
Westchester
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 287,893 | 71.4 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 108,127 | 26.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +44.6
Wyoming
| Wendy Long | REP | 8,843 | 52.4 |
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 7,756 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Long +6.4
Yates
| Chuck Schumer | DEM | 5,205 | 53.6 |
| Wendy Long | REP | 4,297 | 44.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Schumer +9.4
Adams
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,489 | 76.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,181 | 19.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +56.7
Allen
| Rob Portman | REP | 32,085 | 71.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 10,900 | 24.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +47.0
Ashland
| Rob Portman | REP | 17,410 | 72.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 5,083 | 21.2 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 620 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +51.5
Ashtabula
| Rob Portman | REP | 23,443 | 58.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 14,097 | 34.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,113 | 2.8 |
| Joseph DeMare | GRE | 918 | 2.3 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 822 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +23.1
Athens
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 15,077 | 54.0 |
| Rob Portman | REP | 11,247 | 40.2 |
| Joseph DeMare | GRE | 797 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Strickland +13.7
Auglaize
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,414 | 83.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,044 | 13.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +70.0
Belmont
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,712 | 64.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 9,305 | 30.4 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 676 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +34.0
Brown
| Rob Portman | REP | 14,824 | 77.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,490 | 18.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +59.1
Butler
| Rob Portman | REP | 117,597 | 69.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 45,307 | 26.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.6
Carroll
| Rob Portman | REP | 9,011 | 70.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,851 | 22.4 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 360 | 2.8 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 324 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +48.3
Champaign
| Rob Portman | REP | 13,100 | 73.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,796 | 21.1 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 489 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +51.8
Clark
| Rob Portman | REP | 39,651 | 65.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 18,384 | 30.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +34.9
Clermont
| Rob Portman | REP | 74,623 | 76.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 19,062 | 19.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +56.6
Clinton
| Rob Portman | REP | 14,311 | 77.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,342 | 18.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +59.6
Columbiana
| Rob Portman | REP | 30,416 | 67.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 11,609 | 25.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,055 | 2.4 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 1,009 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.0
Coshocton
| Rob Portman | REP | 10,923 | 71.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,565 | 23.2 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 388 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +48.0
Crawford
| Rob Portman | REP | 13,741 | 72.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 4,113 | 21.7 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 490 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +50.8
Cuyahoga
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 327,680 | 56.7 |
| Rob Portman | REP | 222,125 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Strickland +18.3
Darke
| Rob Portman | REP | 20,524 | 81.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,500 | 14.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +67.9
Defiance
| Rob Portman | REP | 11,899 | 67.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 4,908 | 27.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +39.4
Delaware
| Rob Portman | REP | 69,886 | 67.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 29,801 | 29.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +39.0
Erie
| Rob Portman | REP | 21,268 | 57.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 13,610 | 36.7 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 789 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +20.7
Fairfield
| Rob Portman | REP | 47,649 | 66.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 21,073 | 29.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +37.0
Fayette
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,097 | 73.6 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,442 | 22.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +51.4
Franklin
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 292,165 | 51.4 |
| Rob Portman | REP | 252,178 | 44.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Strickland +7.0
Fulton
| Rob Portman | REP | 14,605 | 70.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 5,210 | 25.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +45.0
Gallia
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,613 | 68.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,523 | 27.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +40.2
Geauga
| Rob Portman | REP | 33,807 | 68.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 13,458 | 27.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +41.1
Greene
| Rob Portman | REP | 55,612 | 68.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 22,383 | 27.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +40.8
Guernsey
| Rob Portman | REP | 11,639 | 71.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,836 | 23.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +48.1
Hamilton
| Rob Portman | REP | 216,298 | 53.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 170,427 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +11.4
Hancock
| Rob Portman | REP | 25,928 | 73.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 7,761 | 21.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +51.3
Hardin
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,852 | 73.6 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,505 | 20.8 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 269 | 2.2 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 249 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +52.8
Harrison
| Rob Portman | REP | 4,780 | 68.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 1,823 | 26.1 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 164 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.4
Henry
| Rob Portman | REP | 9,976 | 72.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,110 | 22.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +49.9
Highland
| Rob Portman | REP | 13,866 | 76.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,521 | 19.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +56.8
Hocking
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,246 | 65.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,753 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +35.5
Holmes
| Rob Portman | REP | 8,851 | 80.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 1,575 | 14.4 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 232 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +66.5
Huron
| Rob Portman | REP | 16,493 | 67.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 6,094 | 25.1 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 714 | 2.9 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 580 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.8
Jackson
| Rob Portman | REP | 9,310 | 69.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,574 | 26.6 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 271 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.6
Jefferson
| Rob Portman | REP | 18,957 | 60.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 10,437 | 33.3 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 780 | 2.5 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 765 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +27.2
Knox
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,775 | 69.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 7,214 | 25.3 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 589 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +44.1
Lake
| Rob Portman | REP | 68,348 | 61.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 37,594 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +27.5
Lawrence
| Rob Portman | REP | 16,363 | 63.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 8,269 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +31.4
Licking
| Rob Portman | REP | 54,495 | 66.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 23,345 | 28.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +38.0
Logan
| Rob Portman | REP | 16,772 | 78.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,556 | 16.6 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 432 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +61.7
Lorain
| Rob Portman | REP | 73,531 | 53.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 56,032 | 40.8 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 3,074 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +12.7
Lucas
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 95,425 | 49.6 |
| Rob Portman | REP | 87,961 | 45.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Strickland +3.9
Madison
| Rob Portman | REP | 12,351 | 72.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,895 | 22.7 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 366 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +49.3
Mahoning
| Rob Portman | REP | 55,620 | 49.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 51,211 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +3.9
Marion
| Rob Portman | REP | 17,058 | 66.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 7,094 | 27.4 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 654 | 2.5 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 639 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +38.5
Medina
| Rob Portman | REP | 58,835 | 65.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 25,744 | 28.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,816 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +37.1
Meigs
| Rob Portman | REP | 6,415 | 67.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,756 | 28.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +38.2
Mercer
| Rob Portman | REP | 17,812 | 83.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,919 | 13.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +69.5
Miami
| Rob Portman | REP | 40,745 | 78.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 9,202 | 17.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +60.5
Monroe
| Rob Portman | REP | 3,981 | 60.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,270 | 34.3 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 150 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +25.8
Montgomery
| Rob Portman | REP | 144,700 | 57.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 98,101 | 38.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +18.4
Morgan
| Rob Portman | REP | 4,336 | 68.6 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 1,691 | 26.8 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 136 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +41.9
Morrow
| Rob Portman | REP | 11,957 | 73.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,453 | 21.1 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 427 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +52.0
Muskingum
| Rob Portman | REP | 25,944 | 71.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 8,871 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +46.8
Noble
| Rob Portman | REP | 4,259 | 74.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 1,228 | 21.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +52.6
Ottawa
| Rob Portman | REP | 14,097 | 64.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 6,608 | 30.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +34.4
Paulding
| Rob Portman | REP | 5,743 | 64.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,576 | 29.1 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 208 | 2.3 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 207 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +35.7
Perry
| Rob Portman | REP | 10,011 | 67.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 4,066 | 27.3 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 401 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +39.9
Pickaway
| Rob Portman | REP | 17,387 | 71.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 5,943 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +46.9
Pike
| Rob Portman | REP | 7,354 | 63.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,839 | 32.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +30.1
Portage
| Rob Portman | REP | 41,313 | 56.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 27,492 | 37.4 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,669 | 2.3 |
| Joseph DeMare | GRE | 1,664 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +18.8
Preble
| Rob Portman | REP | 15,900 | 78.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,424 | 16.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +61.4
Putnam
| Rob Portman | REP | 15,326 | 82.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,538 | 13.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +69.0
Richland
| Rob Portman | REP | 36,357 | 66.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 15,078 | 27.7 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,255 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +39.1
Ross
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,018 | 63.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 9,384 | 31.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +32.3
Sandusky
| Rob Portman | REP | 18,075 | 65.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 7,715 | 27.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 703 | 2.5 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 610 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +37.5
Scioto
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,336 | 63.1 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 10,271 | 33.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +29.6
Seneca
| Rob Portman | REP | 16,097 | 68.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 6,154 | 26.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.3
Shelby
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,370 | 82.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,163 | 13.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +69.0
Stark
| Rob Portman | REP | 104,011 | 60.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 58,440 | 33.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 3,976 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +26.4
Summit
| Rob Portman | REP | 123,025 | 49.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 112,591 | 45.1 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 5,291 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +4.2
Trumbull
| Rob Portman | REP | 50,252 | 53.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 38,576 | 41.1 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,879 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +12.4
Tuscarawas
| Rob Portman | REP | 27,032 | 66.7 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 11,147 | 27.5 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 973 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +39.2
Union
| Rob Portman | REP | 19,868 | 73.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 5,976 | 22.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +51.4
Van Wert
| Rob Portman | REP | 9,782 | 73.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,727 | 20.3 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 515 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +52.6
Vinton
| Rob Portman | REP | 3,478 | 65.2 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 1,546 | 29.0 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 135 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +36.2
Warren
| Rob Portman | REP | 85,848 | 74.9 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 23,827 | 20.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +54.1
Washington
| Rob Portman | REP | 18,078 | 62.3 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 9,676 | 33.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +28.9
Wayne
| Rob Portman | REP | 33,604 | 68.5 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 12,697 | 25.9 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 1,052 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +42.6
Williams
| Rob Portman | REP | 12,224 | 72.0 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 3,692 | 21.8 |
| Tom Connors | IND | 431 | 2.5 |
| Scott Rupert | IND | 359 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +50.3
Wood
| Rob Portman | REP | 37,532 | 59.4 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 22,393 | 35.4 |
| Joseph DeMare | GRE | 1,428 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +24.0
Wyandot
| Rob Portman | REP | 7,735 | 74.8 |
| Ted Strickland | DEM | 2,124 | 20.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Portman +54.3
Adair
| James Lankford | REP | 4,576 | 70.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,552 | 24.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +46.8
Alfalfa
| James Lankford | REP | 1,982 | 87.6 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 169 | 7.5 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 46 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +80.2
Atoka
| James Lankford | REP | 3,441 | 69.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,185 | 24.1 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 114 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +45.8
Beaver
| James Lankford | REP | 1,940 | 87.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 169 | 7.6 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 46 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +79.7
Beckham
| James Lankford | REP | 6,305 | 83.6 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 870 | 11.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +72.1
Blaine
| James Lankford | REP | 3,041 | 80.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 551 | 14.5 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 80 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +65.6
Bryan
| James Lankford | REP | 9,566 | 70.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,965 | 21.8 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 400 | 2.9 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 373 | 2.7 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 280 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.6
Caddo
| James Lankford | REP | 6,894 | 73.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,971 | 21.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +52.7
Canadian
| James Lankford | REP | 42,127 | 76.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 8,987 | 16.3 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 1,823 | 3.3 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 1,342 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +60.0
Carter
| James Lankford | REP | 12,935 | 70.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,030 | 21.9 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 504 | 2.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 489 | 2.7 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 420 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.5
Cherokee
| James Lankford | REP | 9,898 | 60.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 5,267 | 32.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 544 | 3.3 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 396 | 2.4 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 331 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +28.2
Choctaw
| James Lankford | REP | 3,694 | 69.5 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,279 | 24.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 124 | 2.3 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 112 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +45.4
Cimarron
| James Lankford | REP | 903 | 84.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 77 | 7.2 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 39 | 3.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 24 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +77.7
Cleveland
| James Lankford | REP | 67,796 | 61.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 29,105 | 26.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 6,597 | 6.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 3,856 | 3.5 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 2,258 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +35.3
Coal
| James Lankford | REP | 1,525 | 66.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 613 | 26.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 61 | 2.6 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 55 | 2.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 53 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.5
Comanche
| James Lankford | REP | 20,022 | 61.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 9,653 | 29.8 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 1,041 | 3.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 1,027 | 3.2 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 701 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +32.0
Cotton
| James Lankford | REP | 2,011 | 78.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 387 | 15.0 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 69 | 2.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 56 | 2.2 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 52 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.1
Craig
| James Lankford | REP | 4,195 | 73.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,226 | 21.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 122 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.9
Creek
| James Lankford | REP | 21,506 | 75.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 5,229 | 18.3 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 740 | 2.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 582 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +56.9
Custer
| James Lankford | REP | 8,317 | 78.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,628 | 15.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 279 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.4
Delaware
| James Lankford | REP | 11,382 | 73.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,301 | 21.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 333 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.9
Dewey
| James Lankford | REP | 1,979 | 88.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 185 | 8.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +80.1
Ellis
| James Lankford | REP | 1,615 | 88.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 135 | 7.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +81.0
Garfield
| James Lankford | REP | 16,776 | 77.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,401 | 15.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 581 | 2.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 549 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +61.7
Garvin
| James Lankford | REP | 8,170 | 77.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,684 | 16.0 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 227 | 2.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 226 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +61.8
Grady
| James Lankford | REP | 17,667 | 79.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,218 | 14.5 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 507 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +64.9
Grant
| James Lankford | REP | 1,863 | 85.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 205 | 9.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 47 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +75.8
Greer
| James Lankford | REP | 1,466 | 78.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 317 | 16.9 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 44 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +61.1
Harmon
| James Lankford | REP | 736 | 76.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 186 | 19.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +57.4
Harper
| James Lankford | REP | 1,354 | 89.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 97 | 6.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +83.3
Haskell
| James Lankford | REP | 3,368 | 72.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,094 | 23.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.7
Hughes
| James Lankford | REP | 3,379 | 75.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 889 | 19.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.3
Jackson
| James Lankford | REP | 6,064 | 78.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,229 | 15.8 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 215 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +62.3
Jefferson
| James Lankford | REP | 1,711 | 74.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 434 | 18.9 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 53 | 2.3 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 47 | 2.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 46 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.7
Johnston
| James Lankford | REP | 2,636 | 67.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 999 | 25.5 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 101 | 2.6 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 93 | 2.4 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 88 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +41.8
Kay
| James Lankford | REP | 12,310 | 73.6 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,145 | 18.8 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 444 | 2.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 422 | 2.5 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 398 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +54.8
Kingfisher
| James Lankford | REP | 5,323 | 86.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 524 | 8.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +78.4
Kiowa
| James Lankford | REP | 2,717 | 78.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 635 | 18.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +59.8
Latimer
| James Lankford | REP | 2,803 | 70.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 966 | 24.2 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 82 | 2.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 80 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +46.0
LeFlore
| James Lankford | REP | 11,611 | 68.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,049 | 24.0 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 449 | 2.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 382 | 2.3 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 374 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +44.8
Lincoln
| James Lankford | REP | 11,215 | 79.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,007 | 14.3 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 349 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +65.5
Logan
| James Lankford | REP | 14,234 | 74.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,319 | 17.5 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 741 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +57.5
Love
| James Lankford | REP | 2,600 | 69.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 855 | 23.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 95 | 2.6 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 85 | 2.3 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 84 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +46.9
McClain
| James Lankford | REP | 13,434 | 79.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,388 | 14.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 441 | 2.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 361 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +65.5
McCurtain
| James Lankford | REP | 7,330 | 70.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,321 | 22.4 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 326 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.3
McIntosh
| James Lankford | REP | 5,299 | 67.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,163 | 27.4 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 159 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.7
Major
| James Lankford | REP | 3,032 | 89.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 226 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +82.4
Marshall
| James Lankford | REP | 3,824 | 70.5 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,197 | 22.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 153 | 2.8 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 129 | 2.4 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 124 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.4
Mayes
| James Lankford | REP | 11,306 | 72.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,409 | 21.8 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 346 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +50.5
Murray
| James Lankford | REP | 4,162 | 75.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 999 | 18.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 146 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +57.6
Muskogee
| James Lankford | REP | 15,144 | 62.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 7,472 | 31.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 532 | 2.2 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 497 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +31.9
Noble
| James Lankford | REP | 3,819 | 78.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 759 | 15.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 117 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.1
Nowata
| James Lankford | REP | 3,115 | 74.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 845 | 20.1 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 90 | 2.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 90 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +53.9
Okfuskee
| James Lankford | REP | 2,795 | 71.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 906 | 23.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.2
Oklahoma
| James Lankford | REP | 160,491 | 58.5 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 89,222 | 32.5 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 10,105 | 3.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 9,376 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +26.0
Okmulgee
| James Lankford | REP | 8,936 | 64.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,064 | 29.3 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 317 | 2.3 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 298 | 2.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 278 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +35.1
Osage
| James Lankford | REP | 12,469 | 66.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 5,142 | 27.2 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 443 | 2.3 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 437 | 2.3 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 395 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +38.8
Ottawa
| James Lankford | REP | 6,970 | 65.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,792 | 26.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 288 | 2.7 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 265 | 2.5 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 256 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +39.5
Pawnee
| James Lankford | REP | 4,661 | 73.6 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,242 | 19.6 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 181 | 2.9 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 138 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +54.0
Payne
| James Lankford | REP | 18,275 | 65.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 6,932 | 24.9 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 1,292 | 4.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 804 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +40.8
Pittsburg
| James Lankford | REP | 11,888 | 69.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,138 | 24.1 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 414 | 2.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 365 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +45.2
Pontotoc
| James Lankford | REP | 10,173 | 68.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,549 | 24.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 414 | 2.8 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 392 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +44.9
Pottawatomie
| James Lankford | REP | 19,184 | 75.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,647 | 18.2 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 629 | 2.5 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 578 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +57.0
Pushmataha
| James Lankford | REP | 3,061 | 70.5 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 971 | 22.4 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 116 | 2.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 116 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +48.1
Roger Mills
| James Lankford | REP | 1,537 | 88.0 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 144 | 8.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +79.7
Rogers
| James Lankford | REP | 31,194 | 76.5 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 6,862 | 16.8 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 1,021 | 2.5 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 875 | 2.1 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 821 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +59.7
Seminole
| James Lankford | REP | 5,897 | 73.3 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 1,672 | 20.8 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 175 | 2.2 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 162 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +52.5
Sequoyah
| James Lankford | REP | 9,458 | 66.9 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 3,640 | 25.8 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 378 | 2.7 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 346 | 2.4 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 306 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +41.2
Stephens
| James Lankford | REP | 14,102 | 79.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 2,780 | 15.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +63.5
Texas
| James Lankford | REP | 4,526 | 78.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 769 | 13.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 224 | 3.9 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 132 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +65.3
Tillman
| James Lankford | REP | 1,941 | 72.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 577 | 21.6 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 56 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +51.1
Tulsa
| James Lankford | REP | 154,406 | 62.7 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 72,350 | 29.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 8,195 | 3.3 |
| Sean Braddy | IND | 6,439 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +33.3
Wagoner
| James Lankford | REP | 23,039 | 74.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 6,037 | 19.4 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 840 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +54.7
Washington
| James Lankford | REP | 16,445 | 74.1 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 4,223 | 19.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 621 | 2.8 |
| Mark Beard | IND | 484 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +55.1
Washita
| James Lankford | REP | 3,885 | 84.2 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 528 | 11.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +72.7
Woods
| James Lankford | REP | 3,040 | 83.4 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 404 | 11.1 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 99 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +72.3
Woodward
| James Lankford | REP | 6,401 | 84.8 |
| Mike Workman | DEM | 754 | 10.0 |
| Robert Murphy | LIB | 176 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lankford +74.8
Baker
| Mark Callahan | REP | 4,654 | 53.6 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 3,348 | 38.6 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 309 | 3.6 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 181 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +15.1
Benton
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 29,007 | 61.0 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 12,998 | 27.3 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 1,761 | 3.7 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,637 | 3.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,562 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +33.7
Clackamas
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 113,152 | 54.2 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 78,099 | 37.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 5,962 | 2.9 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 5,524 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +16.8
Clatsop
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 11,143 | 57.9 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 6,201 | 32.2 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 586 | 3.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 578 | 3.0 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 480 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +25.7
Columbia
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 13,064 | 50.1 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 10,123 | 38.8 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,059 | 4.1 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 921 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +11.3
Coos
| Mark Callahan | REP | 14,086 | 45.8 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 13,468 | 43.8 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,189 | 3.9 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 975 | 3.2 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 622 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +2.0
Crook
| Mark Callahan | REP | 6,254 | 52.2 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 4,840 | 40.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 408 | 3.4 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 249 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +11.8
Curry
| Mark Callahan | REP | 5,633 | 45.9 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 5,395 | 43.9 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 491 | 4.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 347 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +1.9
Deschutes
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 52,098 | 54.0 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 36,041 | 37.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 3,078 | 3.2 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 2,254 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +16.7
Douglas
| Mark Callahan | REP | 27,634 | 52.8 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 19,832 | 37.9 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 2,042 | 3.9 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,435 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +14.9
Gilliam
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 507 | 49.8 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 442 | 43.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 35 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +6.4
Grant
| Mark Callahan | REP | 2,277 | 53.7 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 1,631 | 38.5 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 154 | 3.6 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 96 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +15.2
Harney
| Mark Callahan | REP | 2,070 | 52.9 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 1,540 | 39.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 155 | 4.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 85 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +13.5
Hood River
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 6,967 | 65.0 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 2,646 | 24.7 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 396 | 3.7 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 322 | 3.0 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 273 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +40.3
Jackson
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 53,474 | 50.3 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 42,336 | 39.8 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 3,287 | 3.1 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 3,222 | 3.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 2,882 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +10.5
Jefferson
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 4,517 | 48.5 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 3,967 | 42.6 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 354 | 3.8 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 252 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +5.9
Josephine
| Mark Callahan | REP | 20,767 | 47.8 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 18,463 | 42.5 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,516 | 3.5 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,119 | 2.6 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 981 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +5.3
Klamath
| Mark Callahan | REP | 14,808 | 49.4 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 12,342 | 41.2 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,207 | 4.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 781 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +8.2
Lake
| Mark Callahan | REP | 2,227 | 57.7 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 1,363 | 35.3 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 119 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +22.4
Lane
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 110,836 | 59.2 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 56,716 | 30.3 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 6,013 | 3.2 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 5,670 | 3.0 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 5,540 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +28.9
Lincoln
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 14,512 | 58.3 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 7,725 | 31.0 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 872 | 3.5 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 755 | 3.0 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 714 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +27.2
Linn
| Mark Callahan | REP | 26,991 | 47.3 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 23,908 | 41.9 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 2,326 | 4.1 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,871 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +5.4
Malheur
| Mark Callahan | REP | 6,045 | 59.4 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 3,082 | 30.3 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 436 | 4.3 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 356 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +29.1
Marion
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 66,269 | 49.6 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 55,351 | 41.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 4,162 | 3.1 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 3,899 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +8.2
Morrow
| Mark Callahan | REP | 1,978 | 48.0 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 1,719 | 41.7 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 172 | 4.2 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 148 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +6.3
Multnomah
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 285,058 | 73.8 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 56,395 | 14.6 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 16,442 | 4.3 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 15,866 | 4.1 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 8,811 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +59.2
Polk
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 19,250 | 48.7 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 16,693 | 42.2 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,289 | 3.3 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,146 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +6.5
Sherman
| Mark Callahan | REP | 498 | 49.8 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 440 | 44.0 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 30 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +5.8
Tillamook
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 7,187 | 53.1 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 5,100 | 37.6 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 459 | 3.4 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 380 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +15.4
Umatilla
| Mark Callahan | REP | 12,899 | 48.0 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 11,279 | 42.0 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,085 | 4.0 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 878 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +6.0
Union
| Mark Callahan | REP | 6,372 | 50.1 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 5,302 | 41.7 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 452 | 3.6 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 302 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +8.4
Wallowa
| Mark Callahan | REP | 2,238 | 52.0 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 1,767 | 41.0 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 130 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +10.9
Wasco
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 6,512 | 55.5 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 4,124 | 35.2 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 429 | 3.7 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 335 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +20.4
Washington
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 158,685 | 60.6 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 78,184 | 29.8 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 8,215 | 3.1 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 7,701 | 2.9 |
| Eric Navickas | PAC | 5,501 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +30.7
Wheeler
| Mark Callahan | REP | 384 | 47.8 |
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 355 | 44.2 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 36 | 4.5 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 19 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Callahan +3.6
Yamhill
| Ron Wyden | DEM | 22,807 | 48.0 |
| Mark Callahan | REP | 20,150 | 42.4 |
| Steven Reynolds | IND | 1,742 | 3.7 |
| Shanti Lewallen | WOR | 1,350 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Wyden +5.6
Adams
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 30,492 | 64.2 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 14,593 | 30.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,418 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +33.5
Allegheny
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 357,450 | 55.2 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 261,316 | 40.4 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 28,260 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +14.9
Armstrong
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 20,793 | 66.2 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 8,387 | 26.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,220 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +39.5
Beaver
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 44,000 | 52.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 34,263 | 41.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 5,058 | 6.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +11.7
Bedford
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 17,739 | 75.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,356 | 18.6 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,344 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +57.1
Berks
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 95,466 | 53.2 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 77,028 | 42.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 6,919 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +10.3
Blair
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 36,533 | 66.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 15,107 | 27.6 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,150 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +39.1
Bradford
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 16,574 | 64.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 6,985 | 27.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,000 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +37.5
Bucks
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 175,898 | 51.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 157,709 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +5.4
Butler
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 62,425 | 64.6 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 28,715 | 29.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 5,465 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +34.9
Cambria
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 36,948 | 58.9 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 21,894 | 34.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,886 | 6.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +24.0
Cameron
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 1,390 | 64.5 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 593 | 27.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 171 | 7.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +37.0
Carbon
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 16,360 | 58.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 10,086 | 35.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,770 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +22.2
Centre
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 36,527 | 47.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 35,487 | 46.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 4,378 | 5.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +1.4
Chester
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 133,662 | 49.4 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 127,552 | 47.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 9,588 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +2.3
Clarion
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 11,310 | 64.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,931 | 28.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,204 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +36.6
Clearfield
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 22,128 | 65.1 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 9,454 | 27.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,429 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +37.3
Clinton
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 8,702 | 57.4 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 5,511 | 36.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 952 | 6.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +21.0
Columbia
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 16,292 | 58.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 9,819 | 34.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,991 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +23.0
Crawford
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 24,472 | 65.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 11,047 | 29.6 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,740 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +36.0
Cumberland
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 71,638 | 58.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 44,796 | 36.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 5,509 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +22.0
Dauphin
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 63,740 | 49.5 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 62,551 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +0.9
Delaware
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 163,377 | 55.6 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 126,300 | 43.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +12.6
Elk
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 8,703 | 60.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,509 | 31.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,111 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +29.3
Erie
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 60,948 | 49.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 56,846 | 46.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 4,930 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +3.3
Fayette
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 29,699 | 55.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 20,547 | 38.6 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,958 | 5.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +17.2
Forest
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 1,502 | 63.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 708 | 29.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 164 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +33.4
Franklin
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 48,658 | 69.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 17,827 | 25.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,309 | 4.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +44.2
Fulton
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 5,456 | 81.1 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 1,025 | 15.2 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 250 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +65.8
Greene
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 8,826 | 57.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 5,692 | 36.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 896 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +20.3
Huntingdon
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 13,078 | 66.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 5,105 | 26.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,406 | 7.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +40.7
Indiana
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 22,245 | 58.9 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 12,592 | 33.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,955 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +25.5
Jefferson
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 13,706 | 71.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,160 | 21.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,451 | 7.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +49.4
Juniata
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 7,657 | 73.5 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 2,153 | 20.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 612 | 5.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +52.8
Lackawanna
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 53,936 | 52.9 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 40,519 | 39.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 7,455 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +13.2
Lancaster
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 142,774 | 58.9 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 89,922 | 37.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 9,909 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +21.8
Lawrence
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 22,674 | 56.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 15,289 | 38.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,317 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +18.3
Lebanon
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 39,386 | 64.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 19,079 | 31.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,060 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +33.0
Lehigh
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 77,232 | 48.2 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 76,216 | 47.6 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 6,627 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +0.6
Luzerne
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 66,551 | 50.5 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 56,477 | 42.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 8,650 | 6.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +7.7
Lycoming
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 33,015 | 65.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 14,187 | 28.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,365 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +37.2
McKean
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 11,530 | 71.5 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 3,987 | 24.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 605 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +46.8
Mercer
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 30,567 | 59.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 19,193 | 37.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,046 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +22.0
Mifflin
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 13,089 | 71.9 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,031 | 22.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,093 | 6.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +49.7
Monroe
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 34,280 | 51.3 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 30,743 | 46.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,768 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +5.3
Montgomery
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 237,353 | 54.9 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 189,574 | 43.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +11.1
Montour
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 5,066 | 59.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 2,898 | 33.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 586 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +25.4
Northampton
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 72,172 | 51.6 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 64,151 | 45.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 3,566 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +5.7
Northumberland
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 21,826 | 61.4 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 11,117 | 31.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 2,592 | 7.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +30.1
Perry
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 14,898 | 70.6 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,962 | 23.5 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,231 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +47.1
Philadelphia
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 560,421 | 81.8 |
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 116,714 | 17.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
McGinty +64.8
Pike
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 15,192 | 59.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 9,329 | 36.4 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,113 | 4.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +22.9
Potter
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 5,990 | 77.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 1,387 | 18.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 323 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +59.8
Schuylkill
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 37,757 | 60.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 19,539 | 31.4 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 4,832 | 7.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +29.3
Snyder
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 10,867 | 66.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,299 | 26.4 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,116 | 6.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +40.3
Somerset
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 25,470 | 71.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 8,340 | 23.3 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,923 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +47.9
Sullivan
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 2,020 | 65.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 867 | 28.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 206 | 6.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +37.3
Susquehanna
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 11,996 | 62.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 5,535 | 28.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,716 | 8.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +33.6
Tioga
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 13,418 | 73.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 3,992 | 22.0 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 764 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +51.9
Union
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 10,568 | 60.4 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 6,092 | 34.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 841 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +25.6
Venango
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 14,581 | 62.8 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 6,989 | 30.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,638 | 7.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +32.7
Warren
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 12,130 | 66.6 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 5,124 | 28.1 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 958 | 5.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +38.5
Washington
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 56,952 | 56.4 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 38,133 | 37.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 5,824 | 5.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +18.6
Wayne
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 14,538 | 61.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 7,487 | 31.4 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,803 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +29.6
Westmoreland
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 107,532 | 59.7 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 62,981 | 34.9 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 9,745 | 5.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +24.7
Wyoming
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 7,844 | 60.0 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 4,154 | 31.8 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 1,068 | 8.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +28.2
York
| Patrick J. Toomey | REP | 126,350 | 61.3 |
| Katie McGinty | DEM | 69,394 | 33.7 |
| Edward Clifford | LIB | 10,271 | 5.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Toomey +27.6
Abbeville
| Tim Scott | REP | 6,669 | 63.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 3,570 | 34.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +29.6
Aiken
| Tim Scott | REP | 47,318 | 64.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 23,681 | 32.4 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 1,660 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +32.3
Allendale
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 2,544 | 75.0 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 796 | 23.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +51.5
Anderson
| Tim Scott | REP | 57,675 | 73.6 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 18,648 | 23.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +49.8
Bamberg
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 3,825 | 63.0 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 2,159 | 35.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +27.4
Barnwell
| Tim Scott | REP | 4,793 | 52.2 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,228 | 46.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +6.2
Beaufort
| Tim Scott | REP | 48,125 | 63.1 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 26,619 | 34.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +28.2
Berkeley
| Tim Scott | REP | 50,423 | 64.9 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 25,435 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +32.2
Calhoun
| Tim Scott | REP | 3,834 | 51.9 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 3,365 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +6.4
Charleston
| Tim Scott | REP | 97,219 | 56.3 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 71,631 | 41.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +14.8
Cherokee
| Tim Scott | REP | 14,565 | 69.3 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 5,901 | 28.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +41.3
Chester
| Tim Scott | REP | 6,649 | 48.9 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 6,578 | 48.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +0.5
Chesterfield
| Tim Scott | REP | 8,895 | 55.6 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 6,783 | 42.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +13.2
Clarendon
| Tim Scott | REP | 7,477 | 50.1 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 7,214 | 48.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +1.8
Colleton
| Tim Scott | REP | 9,427 | 57.2 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 6,710 | 40.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +16.5
Darlington
| Tim Scott | REP | 15,261 | 52.9 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 13,066 | 45.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +7.6
Dillon
| Tim Scott | REP | 5,743 | 52.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,969 | 45.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +7.1
Dorchester
| Tim Scott | REP | 39,918 | 65.1 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 20,009 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +32.5
Edgefield
| Tim Scott | REP | 6,662 | 59.2 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,320 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +20.8
Fairfield
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 6,342 | 58.6 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 4,265 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +19.2
Florence
| Tim Scott | REP | 31,449 | 55.5 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 24,330 | 42.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +12.6
Georgetown
| Tim Scott | REP | 18,737 | 60.4 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 11,882 | 38.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +22.1
Greenville
| Tim Scott | REP | 141,731 | 67.2 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 63,441 | 30.1 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 4,575 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +37.1
Greenwood
| Tim Scott | REP | 17,568 | 62.9 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 9,797 | 35.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +27.8
Hampton
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,831 | 58.2 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 3,265 | 39.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +18.9
Horry
| Tim Scott | REP | 90,641 | 70.6 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 35,038 | 27.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +43.3
Jasper
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 5,201 | 49.1 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 5,152 | 48.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +0.5
Kershaw
| Tim Scott | REP | 17,949 | 63.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 9,486 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +30.0
Lancaster
| Tim Scott | REP | 23,199 | 61.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 13,350 | 35.5 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 762 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +26.2
Laurens
| Tim Scott | REP | 17,051 | 66.6 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 7,793 | 30.4 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 537 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +36.2
Lee
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,998 | 63.5 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 2,727 | 34.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +28.9
Lexington
| Tim Scott | REP | 85,385 | 71.4 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 29,995 | 25.1 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 3,210 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +46.3
McCormick
| Tim Scott | REP | 2,699 | 53.8 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 2,241 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +9.1
Marion
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 7,915 | 58.3 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 5,500 | 40.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +17.8
Marlboro
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 5,717 | 57.1 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 4,132 | 41.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +15.8
Newberry
| Tim Scott | REP | 10,048 | 61.7 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 5,772 | 35.4 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 338 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +26.2
Oconee
| Tim Scott | REP | 25,248 | 77.1 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 6,722 | 20.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +56.6
Orangeburg
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 25,384 | 66.6 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 12,256 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +34.4
Pickens
| Tim Scott | REP | 37,726 | 78.6 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 8,858 | 18.5 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 1,088 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +60.2
Richland
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 95,045 | 57.5 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 66,736 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +17.1
Saluda
| Tim Scott | REP | 5,443 | 65.3 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 2,691 | 32.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +33.0
Spartanburg
| Tim Scott | REP | 79,487 | 67.4 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 35,239 | 29.9 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 2,619 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +37.5
Sumter
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 22,916 | 53.1 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 19,462 | 45.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +8.0
Union
| Tim Scott | REP | 6,727 | 58.0 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 4,514 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +19.1
Williamsburg
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 9,179 | 63.4 |
| Tim Scott | REP | 5,138 | 35.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Dixon +27.9
York
| Tim Scott | REP | 68,280 | 61.4 |
| Thomas Dixon | DEM | 39,249 | 35.3 |
| Bill Bledsoe | CON | 2,881 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Scott +26.1
Aurora
| John Thune | REP | 1,073 | 75.8 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 343 | 24.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +51.6
Beadle
| John Thune | REP | 5,049 | 73.6 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,809 | 26.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +47.2
Bennett
| John Thune | REP | 758 | 66.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 382 | 33.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +33.0
Bon Homme
| John Thune | REP | 2,253 | 74.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 770 | 25.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +49.1
Brookings
| John Thune | REP | 8,817 | 69.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 3,947 | 30.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +38.2
Brown
| John Thune | REP | 11,371 | 70.3 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 4,793 | 29.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +40.7
Brule
| John Thune | REP | 1,746 | 75.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 554 | 24.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +51.8
Buffalo
| Jay Williams | DEM | 257 | 52.6 |
| John Thune | REP | 232 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Williams +5.1
Butte
| John Thune | REP | 3,546 | 82.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 758 | 17.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +64.8
Campbell
| John Thune | REP | 740 | 89.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 87 | 10.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +79.0
Charles Mix
| John Thune | REP | 2,484 | 72.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 941 | 27.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +45.1
Clark
| John Thune | REP | 1,269 | 75.7 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 408 | 24.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +51.3
Clay
| John Thune | REP | 2,923 | 57.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 2,161 | 42.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +15.0
Codington
| John Thune | REP | 8,740 | 74.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 3,003 | 25.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +48.9
Corson
| John Thune | REP | 680 | 58.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 474 | 41.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +17.9
Custer
| John Thune | REP | 3,530 | 75.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,177 | 25.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +50.0
Davison
| John Thune | REP | 6,017 | 75.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,990 | 24.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +50.3
Day
| John Thune | REP | 1,815 | 65.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 962 | 34.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +30.7
Deuel
| John Thune | REP | 1,563 | 74.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 534 | 25.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +49.1
Dewey
| John Thune | REP | 862 | 50.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 833 | 49.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +1.7
Douglas
| John Thune | REP | 1,377 | 85.8 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 228 | 14.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +71.6
Edmunds
| John Thune | REP | 1,517 | 79.3 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 396 | 20.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +58.6
Fall River
| John Thune | REP | 2,671 | 75.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 868 | 24.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +50.9
Faulk
| John Thune | REP | 925 | 81.8 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 206 | 18.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +63.6
Grant
| John Thune | REP | 2,705 | 75.2 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 890 | 24.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +50.5
Gregory
| John Thune | REP | 1,671 | 79.7 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 426 | 20.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +59.4
Haakon
| John Thune | REP | 956 | 91.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 84 | 8.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +83.8
Hamlin
| John Thune | REP | 2,253 | 80.8 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 536 | 19.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +61.6
Hand
| John Thune | REP | 1,517 | 81.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 335 | 18.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +63.8
Hanson
| John Thune | REP | 1,512 | 77.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 451 | 23.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +54.0
Harding
| John Thune | REP | 684 | 90.2 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 74 | 9.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +80.5
Hughes
| John Thune | REP | 6,339 | 77.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,891 | 23.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +54.0
Hutchinson
| John Thune | REP | 2,779 | 82.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 609 | 18.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +64.0
Hyde
| John Thune | REP | 567 | 82.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 124 | 17.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +64.1
Jackson
| John Thune | REP | 771 | 71.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 309 | 28.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +42.8
Jerauld
| John Thune | REP | 720 | 73.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 261 | 26.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +46.8
Jones
| John Thune | REP | 494 | 88.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 67 | 11.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +76.1
Kingsbury
| John Thune | REP | 1,899 | 73.8 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 674 | 26.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +47.6
Lake
| John Thune | REP | 4,677 | 69.7 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 2,031 | 30.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +39.4
Lawrence
| John Thune | REP | 8,566 | 72.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 3,267 | 27.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +44.8
Lincoln
| John Thune | REP | 19,264 | 76.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 6,043 | 23.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +52.2
Lyman
| John Thune | REP | 1,051 | 73.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 378 | 26.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +47.1
McCook
| John Thune | REP | 2,021 | 77.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 599 | 22.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +54.3
McPherson
| John Thune | REP | 1,009 | 85.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 165 | 14.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +71.9
Marshall
| John Thune | REP | 1,341 | 68.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 629 | 31.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +36.1
Meade
| John Thune | REP | 9,198 | 79.7 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 2,348 | 20.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +59.3
Mellette
| John Thune | REP | 464 | 67.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 224 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +34.9
Miner
| John Thune | REP | 807 | 74.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 284 | 26.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +47.9
Minnehaha
| John Thune | REP | 52,494 | 67.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 25,359 | 32.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +34.9
Moody
| John Thune | REP | 1,983 | 67.2 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 970 | 32.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +34.3
Oglala Lakota
| Jay Williams | DEM | 2,217 | 77.2 |
| John Thune | REP | 655 | 22.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Williams +54.4
Pennington
| John Thune | REP | 33,967 | 72.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 13,207 | 28.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +44.0
Perkins
| John Thune | REP | 1,374 | 85.6 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 231 | 14.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +71.2
Potter
| John Thune | REP | 1,087 | 81.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 253 | 18.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +62.2
Roberts
| John Thune | REP | 2,550 | 65.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,376 | 35.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +29.9
Sanborn
| John Thune | REP | 889 | 78.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 244 | 21.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +56.9
Spink
| John Thune | REP | 2,177 | 72.7 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 816 | 27.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +45.5
Stanley
| John Thune | REP | 1,254 | 80.5 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 303 | 19.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +61.1
Sully
| John Thune | REP | 718 | 84.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 136 | 15.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +68.1
Todd
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,376 | 65.5 |
| John Thune | REP | 724 | 34.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Williams +31.0
Tripp
| John Thune | REP | 2,134 | 81.3 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 492 | 18.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +62.5
Turner
| John Thune | REP | 3,289 | 79.1 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 871 | 20.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +58.1
Union
| John Thune | REP | 6,060 | 77.2 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 1,793 | 22.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +54.3
Walworth
| John Thune | REP | 1,975 | 80.4 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 482 | 19.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +60.8
Yankton
| John Thune | REP | 6,542 | 67.9 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 3,089 | 32.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +35.9
Ziebach
| John Thune | REP | 421 | 55.0 |
| Jay Williams | DEM | 345 | 45.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Thune +9.9
Beaver
| Mike Lee | REP | 2,075 | 85.0 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 295 | 12.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +72.9
Box Elder
| Mike Lee | REP | 16,240 | 83.3 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 2,328 | 11.9 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 466 | 2.4 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 460 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +71.4
Cache
| Mike Lee | REP | 35,209 | 77.3 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 8,378 | 18.4 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 979 | 2.2 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 961 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +58.9
Carbon
| Mike Lee | REP | 5,607 | 71.6 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 1,882 | 24.0 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 210 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +47.5
Daggett
| Mike Lee | REP | 340 | 73.8 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 95 | 20.6 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 14 | 3.0 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 12 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +53.1
Davis
| Mike Lee | REP | 102,865 | 74.5 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 28,459 | 20.6 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 4,170 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +53.9
Duchesne
| Mike Lee | REP | 6,047 | 87.8 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 621 | 9.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +78.8
Emery
| Mike Lee | REP | 3,648 | 85.9 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 461 | 10.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +75.1
Garfield
| Mike Lee | REP | 1,903 | 81.5 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 361 | 15.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +66.0
Grand
| Mike Lee | REP | 2,258 | 49.6 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 2,032 | 44.7 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 172 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +5.0
Iron
| Mike Lee | REP | 14,239 | 81.5 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 2,567 | 14.7 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 462 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +66.8
Juab
| Mike Lee | REP | 3,574 | 85.9 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 448 | 10.8 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 86 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +75.1
Kane
| Mike Lee | REP | 2,568 | 74.1 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 752 | 21.7 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 81 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +52.4
Millard
| Mike Lee | REP | 4,575 | 88.2 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 469 | 9.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +79.2
Morgan
| Mike Lee | REP | 4,378 | 84.8 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 595 | 11.5 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 106 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +73.3
Piute
| Mike Lee | REP | 640 | 89.9 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 54 | 7.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +82.3
Rich
| Mike Lee | REP | 970 | 87.6 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 110 | 9.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +77.7
Salt Lake
| Mike Lee | REP | 220,652 | 53.6 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 168,403 | 40.9 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 11,699 | 2.8 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 10,584 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +12.7
San Juan
| Mike Lee | REP | 3,243 | 59.9 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 1,947 | 35.9 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 137 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +23.9
Sanpete
| Mike Lee | REP | 8,583 | 85.2 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 1,128 | 11.2 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 228 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +74.0
Sevier
| Mike Lee | REP | 7,438 | 86.9 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 836 | 9.8 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 176 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +77.1
Summit
| Misty Snow | DEM | 9,610 | 47.6 |
| Mike Lee | REP | 9,409 | 46.6 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 816 | 4.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Snow +1.0
Tooele
| Mike Lee | REP | 15,325 | 71.3 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 4,959 | 23.1 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 773 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +48.3
Uintah
| Mike Lee | REP | 10,989 | 86.5 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 1,232 | 9.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +76.8
Utah
| Mike Lee | REP | 164,401 | 82.7 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 26,246 | 13.2 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 4,205 | 2.1 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 3,980 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +69.5
Wasatch
| Mike Lee | REP | 8,464 | 71.2 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 2,898 | 24.4 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 277 | 2.3 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 241 | 2.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +46.9
Washington
| Mike Lee | REP | 48,244 | 79.3 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 10,220 | 16.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +62.5
Wayne
| Mike Lee | REP | 1,079 | 76.4 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 260 | 18.4 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 51 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +58.0
Weber
| Mike Lee | REP | 55,278 | 66.1 |
| Misty Snow | DEM | 24,214 | 28.9 |
| Stoney Fonua | IND | 2,216 | 2.6 |
| Bill Barron | IND | 1,956 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Lee +37.1
Addison
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 11,882 | 58.8 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 7,479 | 37.0 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 419 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +21.8
Bennington
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 10,246 | 61.6 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 4,956 | 29.8 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 847 | 5.1 |
| Jerry Trudell | IND | 393 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +31.8
Caledonia
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 7,348 | 53.5 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 5,580 | 40.6 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 370 | 2.7 |
| Jerry Trudell | IND | 319 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +12.9
Chittenden
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 57,338 | 83.7 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 7,436 | 10.9 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 2,053 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +72.8
Essex
| Scott Milne | REP | 6,855 | 81.7 |
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 1,324 | 15.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Milne +65.9
Franklin
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 11,948 | 55.2 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 8,716 | 40.3 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 493 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +14.9
Grand Isle
| Scott Milne | REP | 2,403 | 48.5 |
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 2,363 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Milne +0.8
Lamoille
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 7,902 | 62.5 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 4,052 | 32.0 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 404 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +30.4
Orange
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 8,073 | 56.0 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 5,611 | 38.9 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 356 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +17.1
Orleans
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 6,033 | 48.5 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 5,669 | 45.6 |
| Jerry Trudell | IND | 356 | 2.9 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 276 | 2.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +2.9
Rutland
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 15,404 | 50.7 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 13,445 | 44.2 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 874 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +6.4
Washington
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 19,628 | 63.4 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 9,694 | 31.3 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 764 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +32.1
Windham
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 14,720 | 52.5 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 11,154 | 39.8 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 974 | 3.5 |
| Pete Diamondstone | LIB | 711 | 2.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +12.7
Windsor
| Patrick J. Leahy | DEM | 18,034 | 59.1 |
| Scott Milne | REP | 10,587 | 34.7 |
| Cris Ericson | IND | 1,140 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Leahy +24.4
Adams
| Chris Vance | REP | 2,818 | 60.3 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 1,859 | 39.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +20.5
Asotin
| Chris Vance | REP | 5,497 | 56.4 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 4,248 | 43.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +12.8
Benton
| Chris Vance | REP | 46,397 | 56.5 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 35,680 | 43.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +13.1
Chelan
| Chris Vance | REP | 18,146 | 53.8 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 15,586 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +7.6
Clallam
| Patty Murray | DEM | 20,549 | 52.0 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 18,955 | 48.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +4.0
Clark
| Patty Murray | DEM | 102,922 | 51.3 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 97,637 | 48.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +2.6
Columbia
| Chris Vance | REP | 1,339 | 61.1 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 854 | 38.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +22.1
Cowlitz
| Chris Vance | REP | 23,031 | 50.2 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 22,888 | 49.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +0.3
Douglas
| Chris Vance | REP | 9,333 | 59.6 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 6,322 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +19.2
Ferry
| Chris Vance | REP | 2,099 | 58.0 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 1,520 | 42.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +16.0
Franklin
| Chris Vance | REP | 13,197 | 55.1 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 10,766 | 44.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +10.1
Garfield
| Chris Vance | REP | 771 | 61.3 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 486 | 38.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +22.7
Grant
| Chris Vance | REP | 18,404 | 64.1 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 10,329 | 35.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +28.1
Grays Harbor
| Patty Murray | DEM | 15,433 | 53.4 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 13,483 | 46.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +6.7
Island
| Patty Murray | DEM | 23,695 | 54.5 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 19,761 | 45.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +9.1
Jefferson
| Patty Murray | DEM | 14,098 | 68.8 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 6,408 | 31.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +37.5
King
| Patty Murray | DEM | 728,113 | 72.7 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 273,410 | 27.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +45.4
Kitsap
| Patty Murray | DEM | 71,784 | 56.7 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 54,746 | 43.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +13.5
Kittitas
| Chris Vance | REP | 10,292 | 53.8 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 8,830 | 46.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +7.6
Klickitat
| Chris Vance | REP | 5,692 | 52.6 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 5,121 | 47.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +5.3
Lewis
| Chris Vance | REP | 21,319 | 61.6 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 13,266 | 38.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +23.3
Lincoln
| Chris Vance | REP | 3,837 | 66.4 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 1,943 | 33.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +32.8
Mason
| Patty Murray | DEM | 14,848 | 52.1 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 13,677 | 47.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +4.1
Okanogan
| Chris Vance | REP | 9,160 | 53.1 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 8,095 | 46.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +6.2
Pacific
| Patty Murray | DEM | 5,951 | 55.3 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 4,819 | 44.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +10.5
Pend Oreille
| Chris Vance | REP | 4,093 | 59.6 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 2,775 | 40.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +19.2
Pierce
| Patty Murray | DEM | 196,171 | 55.4 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 157,644 | 44.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +10.9
San Juan
| Patty Murray | DEM | 7,789 | 71.6 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 3,091 | 28.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +43.2
Skagit
| Patty Murray | DEM | 30,572 | 53.5 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 26,600 | 46.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +6.9
Skamania
| Chris Vance | REP | 2,945 | 52.3 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 2,688 | 47.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +4.6
Snohomish
| Patty Murray | DEM | 201,915 | 57.7 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 148,325 | 42.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +15.3
Spokane
| Chris Vance | REP | 117,197 | 50.8 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 113,717 | 49.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +1.5
Stevens
| Chris Vance | REP | 14,830 | 64.5 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 8,150 | 35.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +29.1
Thurston
| Patty Murray | DEM | 78,158 | 59.8 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 52,623 | 40.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +19.5
Wahkiakum
| Chris Vance | REP | 1,217 | 51.9 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 1,129 | 48.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +3.8
Walla Walla
| Chris Vance | REP | 12,969 | 50.6 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 12,645 | 49.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +1.3
Whatcom
| Patty Murray | DEM | 65,830 | 59.4 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 44,924 | 40.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +18.9
Whitman
| Patty Murray | DEM | 9,527 | 54.2 |
| Chris Vance | REP | 8,040 | 45.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Murray +8.5
Yakima
| Chris Vance | REP | 40,612 | 51.8 |
| Patty Murray | DEM | 37,727 | 48.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Vance +3.7
Adams
| Ron Johnson | REP | 5,446 | 54.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,093 | 40.8 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 486 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +13.5
Ashland
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,452 | 56.4 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 3,214 | 40.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 232 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +15.7
Barron
| Ron Johnson | REP | 12,893 | 57.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 8,699 | 38.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 754 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +18.8
Bayfield
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 5,162 | 54.7 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,020 | 42.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 263 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +12.1
Brown
| Ron Johnson | REP | 71,760 | 56.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 51,008 | 40.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 4,616 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +16.3
Buffalo
| Ron Johnson | REP | 3,851 | 56.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 2,746 | 39.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 285 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +16.1
Burnett
| Ron Johnson | REP | 5,198 | 60.4 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,143 | 36.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 258 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +23.9
Calumet
| Ron Johnson | REP | 16,485 | 61.9 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 9,197 | 34.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 937 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +27.4
Chippewa
| Ron Johnson | REP | 17,339 | 55.4 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 12,661 | 40.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,324 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +14.9
Clark
| Ron Johnson | REP | 8,084 | 59.8 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,779 | 35.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 652 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +24.5
Columbia
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 15,057 | 51.1 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 13,557 | 46.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 838 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +5.1
Crawford
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,708 | 48.5 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 3,671 | 48.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 270 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +0.5
Dane
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 220,344 | 71.8 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 80,670 | 26.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +45.5
Dodge
| Ron Johnson | REP | 27,078 | 62.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 14,760 | 34.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,328 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +28.5
Door
| Ron Johnson | REP | 9,295 | 53.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 7,671 | 43.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 582 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +9.3
Douglas
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 11,893 | 54.0 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 9,364 | 42.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 767 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +11.5
Dunn
| Ron Johnson | REP | 11,425 | 52.4 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 9,491 | 43.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 896 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +8.9
Eau Claire
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 27,527 | 50.9 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 24,650 | 45.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,940 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +5.3
Florence
| Ron Johnson | REP | 1,770 | 67.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 759 | 29.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 85 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +38.7
Fond du Lac
| Ron Johnson | REP | 32,464 | 63.2 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 17,131 | 33.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,734 | 3.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +29.9
Forest
| Ron Johnson | REP | 2,589 | 58.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 1,651 | 37.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 199 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +21.1
Grant
| Ron Johnson | REP | 12,197 | 51.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 10,926 | 45.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 801 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +5.3
Green
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 10,207 | 54.2 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 8,106 | 43.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 528 | 2.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +11.2
Green Lake
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,215 | 66.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 2,774 | 29.8 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 329 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +36.9
Iowa
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 7,226 | 59.2 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,679 | 38.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 294 | 2.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +20.9
Iron
| Ron Johnson | REP | 1,949 | 57.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 1,361 | 40.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 90 | 2.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +17.3
Jackson
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,615 | 50.4 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,096 | 44.8 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 442 | 4.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +5.7
Jefferson
| Ron Johnson | REP | 23,902 | 56.5 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 17,149 | 40.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,258 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +16.0
Juneau
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,441 | 55.8 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,697 | 40.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 408 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +15.1
Kenosha
| Ron Johnson | REP | 37,540 | 49.5 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 35,670 | 47.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 2,621 | 3.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +2.5
Kewaunee
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,678 | 62.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,697 | 34.3 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 388 | 3.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +27.7
La Crosse
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 32,903 | 52.5 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 27,694 | 44.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 2,100 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +8.3
Lafayette
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,757 | 49.5 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 3,659 | 48.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 178 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +1.3
Langlade
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,007 | 60.8 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,465 | 35.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 415 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +25.7
Lincoln
| Ron Johnson | REP | 8,031 | 55.2 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 5,785 | 39.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 743 | 5.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +15.4
Manitowoc
| Ron Johnson | REP | 23,769 | 59.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 14,299 | 35.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,785 | 4.5 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +23.8
Marathon
| Ron Johnson | REP | 38,570 | 56.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 27,812 | 40.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 2,518 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +15.6
Marinette
| Ron Johnson | REP | 12,597 | 63.4 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 6,502 | 32.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 773 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +30.7
Marquette
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,357 | 55.9 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,190 | 40.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 253 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +15.0
Menominee
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 844 | 68.6 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 303 | 24.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 84 | 6.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +43.9
Milwaukee
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 276,556 | 63.7 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 147,922 | 34.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 9,879 | 2.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +29.6
Monroe
| Ron Johnson | REP | 10,797 | 55.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 7,673 | 39.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 944 | 4.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +16.1
Oconto
| Ron Johnson | REP | 13,004 | 65.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 6,061 | 30.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 745 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +35.0
Oneida
| Ron Johnson | REP | 12,047 | 56.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 8,293 | 39.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 926 | 4.4 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +17.7
Outagamie
| Ron Johnson | REP | 53,252 | 56.8 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 37,067 | 39.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 3,448 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +17.3
Ozaukee
| Ron Johnson | REP | 35,456 | 64.9 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 18,159 | 33.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +31.7
Pepin
| Ron Johnson | REP | 2,097 | 56.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 1,491 | 40.3 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 111 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +16.4
Pierce
| Ron Johnson | REP | 11,418 | 54.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 8,646 | 41.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 806 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +13.3
Polk
| Ron Johnson | REP | 13,535 | 60.5 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 8,094 | 36.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 747 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +24.3
Portage
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 18,985 | 50.1 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 17,547 | 46.3 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,397 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +3.8
Price
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,282 | 56.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 2,955 | 39.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 314 | 4.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +17.6
Racine
| Ron Johnson | REP | 49,682 | 53.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 41,606 | 44.4 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 2,485 | 2.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +8.6
Richland
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,905 | 48.9 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 3,837 | 48.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 236 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +0.9
Rock
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 42,437 | 56.3 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 30,487 | 40.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 2,388 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +15.9
Rusk
| Ron Johnson | REP | 4,229 | 60.5 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 2,443 | 34.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 320 | 4.6 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +25.5
St. Croix
| Ron Johnson | REP | 27,406 | 58.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 17,713 | 37.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,563 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +20.8
Sauk
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 16,323 | 52.0 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 14,127 | 45.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 937 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +7.0
Sawyer
| Ron Johnson | REP | 5,154 | 57.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,507 | 39.3 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 264 | 3.0 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +18.5
Shawano
| Ron Johnson | REP | 12,794 | 65.1 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 6,114 | 31.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 758 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +34.0
Sheboygan
| Ron Johnson | REP | 35,146 | 59.1 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 22,441 | 37.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,884 | 3.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +21.4
Taylor
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,177 | 65.8 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 2,828 | 30.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 384 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +35.7
Trempealeau
| Ron Johnson | REP | 7,081 | 52.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 5,963 | 44.0 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 500 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +8.3
Vernon
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 6,887 | 48.8 |
| Ron Johnson | REP | 6,712 | 47.5 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 522 | 3.7 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Feingold +1.2
Vilas
| Ron Johnson | REP | 8,247 | 61.1 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 4,820 | 35.7 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 420 | 3.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +25.4
Walworth
| Ron Johnson | REP | 30,786 | 60.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 18,358 | 36.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,672 | 3.3 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +24.5
Washburn
| Ron Johnson | REP | 5,250 | 58.2 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,508 | 38.9 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 263 | 2.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +19.3
Washington
| Ron Johnson | REP | 55,961 | 72.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 19,831 | 25.6 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,619 | 2.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +46.7
Waukesha
| Ron Johnson | REP | 161,351 | 67.9 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 71,779 | 30.2 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +37.7
Waupaca
| Ron Johnson | REP | 16,208 | 63.0 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 8,514 | 33.1 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 995 | 3.9 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +29.9
Waushara
| Ron Johnson | REP | 7,579 | 63.7 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 3,834 | 32.2 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 491 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +31.5
Winnebago
| Ron Johnson | REP | 46,843 | 54.3 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 36,077 | 41.8 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 3,288 | 3.8 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +12.5
Wood
| Ron Johnson | REP | 20,925 | 55.6 |
| Russ Feingold | DEM | 15,175 | 40.3 |
| Phil Anderson | LIB | 1,542 | 4.1 |
100.0% of precincts reporting
Lead:
Johnson +15.3